his report, from Missouri, describes the repeated failure of the State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (SBRHA) in distinguishing safe and effective coronary artery stenting from unnecessary stenting.
state medical boards (SMBs
d to ensure that only competent physicians are practicing medicine and that those physicians act in a professional manner
According to Chaudhry et al., physicians are given due process by SMBs [1,9]. However, this report of fraudulent or fraud-like regulation by the SBRHA demonstrates that licensees are not always afforded the “luxury” of due process.
This report describes the numerous efforts to discipline interventional cardiologist, Antoine Adem, MD, by the Missouri (MO) State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (SBRHA)
The SBRHA cited no peer-reviewed literature or scholarly work in support of their claims of negligent patient care.
legislatively establish
filed blatantly dishonest
ried to conceal the exculpatory deposition of Dr. Tobis
The SBRHA
scientifically unmeritorious claims alleging unsafe patient care in court
ntentionally mischaracterized the medical records reviewed by Dr. Kern
“to punish or penalize in order to train and control
definition of discipline
is it concerning that none of the eight doctors on the SBRHA demonstrated sufficient medical knowledge to either know that Dr. Adem’s provision of care was appropriate or to learn that it was appropriate
The physicians of the MO SBRHA have repeatedly demonstrated
misrepresentation
ignoranc
attempted concealme
regulatory miscondu
fraud
ineffective communication
gross negligence
Further investigation and study of regulatory misconduct by SMBs is critical to determine its extent and impact.
This article provides novel insight into the quality of medical regulation by the Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts. This article raises critical questions about the efficacy and integrity of a state medical board and suggests that further study is needed to evaluate the extend of regulatory misconduct.
According to Leonard et al. “effective communication and teamwork is essential for the delivery of high quality, safe patient care.
Legislators and health care reform activists may be interested in encouraging policies and laws that ensure the SMBs are composed of those that can communicate and work in teams effectively.
MEDICAL BOARD COMMITTED FRAUD
THE DISRUPTIVE REGULATOR
The quality and accuracy of medical regulation is an understudied topic
those interested in health care policy, quality, and regulation might identify this largely unstudied area as an untapped resource with rich potential for future discovery
QUESTIONS ABOUT THE EXTENT OF MEDICAL BOARD MISCONDUCT
Future studies are needed to evaluate the quality of medical regulation
THE MEDICAL BOARD LACKED KNOWLEDGE
Are State Medical Boards in Need of Reform?
There may be conflicts of interest involving the SMB attorneys who are paid hourly and rewarded instead of punished for filing false claims in court
The findings on State Medical Board misconduct are concerning. Effective communication within these boards is crucial for patient safety. I think legislators and healthcare advocates should push for reforms to ensure boards comprise professionals capable of teamwork. Also, it is worth exploring various technology-driven solutions that transform the patient experience and financial performance of healthcare providers. I suggest addressing r1 rcm customer service https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/r1-rcm/customer-service.html for this purpose.
Rationale for Professional Regulation
From a public policy perspective, the rationale for professional regulation of medicine is patient protection [1]. Patients generally lack the knowledge, skills, or judgment to diagnose or treat disease and, thus, have strong incentives to rely on caregivers with specialized expertise
a longtime military contractor, acting after a string of Army medical students testified that Dr. John Hagmann had subjected them to dangerous experiments and sexual exploitation.
it demonstrates that for those reported to medical boards, the peer review process disciplines those with less training or the inability to qualify for or pass certification requirements.
Almost all of these cases are completely archived except for one file - that file is usually the ruling by the judge. In this case, someone archived the ruling that rebuked the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts on every one of their 137 charges. However, the claim can still be found at https://archive.org/details/Medical-Board-vs-Paskon. #Healthcare
Case No.: #02-1491 HA
Title: State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts vs. Paskon, M.D., Seth
The UMKC Pathology Department permitted a prolonged ishemic time from January to June 2011 and this occured in spite of being informed about the unsafe care.
1. We always have an ischemic time of less than 30 minutes.
2. The Pathology Department "often[sic]" documents the ischemic time.