Databinding is about making two properties in sync. The target property could be a JPA entity, but also another widget property. From a Databinding framework perspective, a JPA entity object of any RPC interface should not be tied to the framework.
Google Groups - 0 views
Event Collaboration - 0 views
ValueStoreAndRequestFactory - google-web-toolkit - Discussion of ValueStore and Request... - 1 views
-
-
The intent is that ValueBox? would also be useful for data binding of plain old client side JavaBeans?, without any need for the Id and Property classes. I can define a ValueBox? interface tied to a set of bean classes and have it move their fields to and from HasValue? instances, enforcing validations in the process. I can set up this binding myself via calls like valueBox.setSubcription(bean, fieldNameString). Or I can GWT.create an EditorSupport? object to make those calls for me (which is why they didn't appear in the sketch).
-
Re: why re-invent a wheel, we want our new data backed widgets to play very nice in an asynchronous world — I'll tell you what values I want, you push them into me when they show up, and as they get updated. My impression of the existing frameworks is that they don't play naturally in that world.
- ...1 more annotation...
Codiform: Blog - 2 views
Codiform: Blog - 1 views
« First
‹ Previous
181 - 198 of 198
Showing 20▼ items per page