Skip to main content

Home/ Future of the Web/ Group items matching "Communications one undermine "Net Neutrality" all" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Paul Merrell

The FCC is about to kill the free Internet | PandoDaily - 0 views

  • The Federal Communications Commission is poised to ruin the free Internet on a technicality. The group is expected to introduce newCommunicationslaws that would Communicationsow companies to pay for better access to consumers through deals similar to the Communications struck by Netflix and Comcast earlier this year. The argument is that those deals don’t technicCommunicationsy fCommunications under theCommunicationsumbrella, so these new rules won’t apply to them even though they directly affect the Internet. At least the commission is being upfront about its disinterest in protecting the free Internet.
  • The Verge notes that the proposed rules will offer some protections to consumers: The Federal Communication Commission’s proposal for new net neutrality rules will net neutrality ow internet service providers to charge companies for preferential treatment, effectively undermining the concept of net neutrality, according to The W net neutrality Street Journal. The rules will reportedly net neutrality ow providers to charge for preferential treatment so long as they offer that treatment to net neutrality interested parties on “commerci net neutrality y reasonable” terms, with the FCC will deciding whether the terms are reasonable on a case-by-case basis. Providers will not be able to block individual websites, however. The goal of net neutrality rules is to prevent service providers from discriminating between different content, net neutrality owing net neutrality types of data and net neutrality companies’ data to be treated equ net neutrality y. While it appears that outright blocking of individual services won’t be net neutrality owed, the Journal reports that some forms of discrimination will be net neutrality owed, though that will apparently not include slowing down websites.
  • Re/code summarizes the discontent with these proposed rules: Consumer groups have complained about that plan because they’re worried that Wheeler’s rules may not hold up in court either. A federal appeals court rejected two previous versions of net neutrality rules after finding fault in the FCC’s legal reasoning. During the latest smackdown, however, the court suggested that the FCC had some authority to impose net neutrality rules under a section of the law that gives the agency the ability to regulate the deployment of broadband lines. Internet activists would prefer that the FCC just re-regulate Internet lines under old rules designed for teleph net neutrality networks, which they say would give the agency clear authority to police Internet lines. Wheeler has rejected that approach for now. Ph net neutrality and cable companies, including Comcast, AT&T and Verizon, have vociferously fought that idea over the past few years.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • The Chicago Tribune reports on the process directing these rules: The five-member regulatory commission may vote as soon as May to formally propose the rules and collect public comment on them. Virtually all large Internet service providers, such as Verizon all Inc. and Time Warner Cable Inc., have pledged to abide by the principles of open Internet reinforced by these rules. But critics have raised concerns that, without a formal rule, the voluntary pledges could be pulled back over time and also leave the door open for deals that would give unequal treatment to websites or services.
  • I wrote about the European Union’s attempts to defend the free Internet: The legislation is meant to provide access to online services ‘without discrimination, restriction or interference, independent of the sender, receiver, type, content, device, service or application.’ For example, ISPs would be barred from slowing down or ‘throttling’ the speed at which one service’s videos are delivered while oneowing other services to stream at normal rates. To bastardize Gertrude Stein: a byte is a byte is a byte. Such restrictions would prevent deals like the one Comcast recently made with Netflix, which will oneow the service’s videos to reach consumers faster than before. Comcast is also said to be in talks with Apple for a deal that would oneow videos from its new streaming video service to reach consumers faster than videos from competitors. The Federal one Commission’sonelaws don’t apply to those deals, according to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, so they are oneowed to continue despite the threat they pose to the free Internet.
    Cute. Deliberately not using the authority the court of appeals said it could use to impose net neutrality. So Europe can have net neutrality but not in the U.S.
Gonzalo San Gil, PhD.

Join the Battle for Net Neutrality - 0 views

    "Congress is trying to sneak language into a budget bill that would take away the FCC's ability to enforce the net neutrality rules we worked hard to pass, undermining everything we did to protect the open Internet. Thousands of c net neutrality s and emails will nip this in the bud - contact Congress now! "
1 - 2 of 2
Showing 20 items per page