The first question was could (or even should) Wolfram Alpha be built using the Semantic Web in some manner, rather than (or as well as) the Mathematica engine it is currently built on. Is anything missed by not building it with Semantic Web's languages (RDF, OWL, Sparql, etc.)?
The answer is that there is no reason that one MUST use the Semantic Web stack to build something like Wolfram Alpha. In fact, in my opinion it would be far too difficult to try to explicitly represent everything Wolfram Alpha knows and can compute using OWL ontologies. It is too wide a range of human knowledge and giant OWL ontologies are just too difficult to build and curate.
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url
2More
EU files antitrust charges against Amazon over use of data | The Seattle Times - 1 views
3More
Sony Sued For Not Protecting Leaked Movie From Pirates - TorrentFreak [# ! Note] - 0 views
1More
Fedora 24 shows off new visions of the Linux desktop, cloud, and containers | ZDNet - 0 views
1More
How to Run Kali Linux 2.0 In Docker Container | LinuxPitstop - 0 views
3More
Conservative Party Pirated Labour Leader Supporter's Video - TorrentFreak [# ! Note] - 0 views
3More
Flex/Flash: About Singleton, Threads and Flex | Blogging about Software Development - 0 views
2More
How microservices and containers are changing applications | Opensource.com - 0 views
2More
Highly critical "Ghost" allowing code execution affects most Linux systems | Ars Technica - 1 views
2More
On net neutrality, Internet providers are betrayed by one of their own | Ars Technica - 2 views
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 149
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page