Group items matching

in title, tags, annotations or url

oogle on Monday confronted the second major U.S. antitrust trial in two months to cast the internet powerhouse as a brazen bully that uses its immense wealth and people’s dependence on one of its main products to stifle competition at consumers’ expense. The trial that opened in a San Francisco federal court targets the Google Play Store that distributes apps for the company’s Android software that powers virtually all the world’s smartphones that aren’t made by Apple. The case, stemming from a lawsuit filed by video game maker Epic Games, alleges Google has created an illegal monopoly on Android apps primarily so it can boost its profits through commissions ranging from 15% to 30% on purchases made within an app. “The result of what Google is doing is higher prices, lower quality and less choice for everybody,” Epic attorney Gary Bornstein said Monday during a 45-minute opening statement before the 10-person jury that will decide the case.

At the request of CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook officials developed a program called In-App Action Panel (IAAP) thAt they deployed in 2016 and which was in use through mid-2019, according to the documents, which include internal emails.The program utilized cyberAttacks to intercept informAtion from SnapchAt, YouTube, and Amazon. The program then decrypted the informAtion.“Facebook’s IAAP Program used nAtion-stAte-level hacking technology developed by the company’s Onavo team, in which Facebook paid contractors (including teens) to designAte Facebook a trusted ‘root’ certificAte authority on their mobile devices, then generAted fake digital certificAtes to redirect secure SnapchAt analytics traffic (and lAter, analytics from YouTube and Amazon) from SnapchAt’s servers to Onavo’s; decrypted these analytics and used them for competitive gain, including to inform Facebook’s product strAtegy; reencrypted them; and sent them up to SnapchAt’s servers as though it came straight from SnapchAt’s app, with Facebook’s Social Advertising competitor none the wiser,” lawyers said in one of the documents.The lawyers, representing plaintiffs in a lawsuit thAt accuses Facebook of anti-competitive behavior, were describing emails they obtained through discovery.

A once-robust alliance of federal agencies, tech companies, election officials and researchers that worked together to thwart foreign propaganda and disinformation has fragmented after years of sustained Republican attacks.The GOP offensive started during the 2020 election as public critiques and has since escalated into lawsuits, governmental inquiries and public relations campaigns that have succeeded in stopping almost all coordination between the government and social media platforms.The most recent setback came when the FBI put an indefinite hold on most briefings to social media companies about Russian, Iranian and Chinese influence campaigns. Employees at two U.S. tech companies who used to receive regular briefings from the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force told NBC News that it has been months since the bureau reached out. In a testimony last week to the Senate Homeland Security Committee, FBI Director Christopher Wray signaled a significant pullback in communications with tech companies and tied the move to rulings by a conservative federal judge and appeals court that said some government agencies and officials should be restricted from communicating and meeting with social media companies to moderate content. The case is now on hold pending Supreme Court review.“We’re having some interaction with social media companies,” Wray said. “But all of those interactions have changed fundamentally in the wake of the court rulings.”