Skip to main content

Home/ Future of the Web/ Group items tagged vigor

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Gonzalo San Gil, PhD.

Entró en vigor la nueva Ley de Propiedad Intelectual que intenta censurar a l... - 0 views

  •  
    "La reforma de la ley de propiedad intelectual entró en vigor el 1º de enero, precedida de protestas de numerosos sectores, que han llevado incluso al cierre de Google News en el Estado español. La norma contempla que todo el que reproduzca un texto publicado en la red deberá pagar un canon a la empresa editora. De no hacerlo podrá ser sancionado con multas que llegan hasta los 600.000 euros."
Gonzalo San Gil, PhD.

¿Qué significa la Ley Mordaza para los internautas? - 0 views

  •  
    "Desde el "caso Isabel Carrasco" (la presidenta de la Diputación de León), al "caso Zapata" (edil de Ahora Madrid), hemos visto cómo el legislador se ha vuelto loco con las consecuencias de ejercer la "libertad de expresión" en Internet, y ahora sufriremos cómo lo ha resuelto, porque hoy entra en vigor la normativa conocida como Ley Mordaza. "
Gonzalo San Gil, PhD.

¿Qué significa la Ley Mordaza para los internautas? - 0 views

  •  
    "Desde el "caso Isabel Carrasco" (la presidenta de la Diputación de León), al "caso Zapata" (edil de Ahora Madrid), hemos visto cómo el legislador se ha vuelto loco con las consecuencias de ejercer la "libertad de expresión" en Internet, y ahora sufriremos cómo lo ha resuelto, porque hoy entra en vigor la normativa conocida como Ley Mordaza. "
Gonzalo San Gil, PhD.

Victor Domingo: "La 'tasa Google' ha puesto a España al pie de los caballos e... - 0 views

  •  
    Después de todo el revuelo que generó el cierre de Google News en España el pasado 16 de diciembre, motivado por la aprobación de la reforma de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, ésta entró en vigor casi sin hacer ruido el pasado 1 de enero. Lo hizo casi en su totalidad, pues algunos puntos, como el incremento del importe de las multas para luchar contra la piratería, estarán vigentes a partir de mañana.
Gonzalo San Gil, PhD.

Coalición ProInternet pide que se suspenda la entrada en vigor de la LPI y el... - 0 views

  •  
    "- La Coalición Prointernet ha mantenido encuentros con todos los grupos parlamentarios, incluyendo al PP, pero no ha sido escuchada por el Gobierno. - Una Ley que nace muerta. - Finalmente todos los grupos de la oposición han votado en contra en Congreso y Senado. - Cerca de 100.000 firmas de ciudadanos contra la Ley y una importante alarma social - La Coalición denuncia el intento de AEDE de llevar el pago del futuro Canon a los Presupuestos Generales para que sea pagado por los ciudadanos - Si se aplicara provocaría el cierre y salida de España de agregadores y medios digitales - Provocará un "Precipicio Digital" único en el mundo. "
Gonzalo San Gil, PhD.

Así reaccionó la prensa internacional tras aprobarse la tasa Google - 0 views

  •  
    "Fuera de España, expertos y medios coinciden en que la aprobación de la tasa Google puede suponer una restricción clara a la libertad de internet en nuestro país. Se incide en la incertidumbre que plantea el texto ratificado el pasado 22 de julio y que está a la espera de la aprobación definitiva y su entrada en vigor."
Gonzalo San Gil, PhD.

Cómo te afecta la nueva (y vergonzosa) Ley de Propiedad Intelectual - 0 views

  •  
    "No hay vuelta atrás. La reforma de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual (LPI) española acaba de aprobarse en el Pleno del Congreso de los Diputados por 172 votos a favor (solo los del Partido Popular), 144 en contra y 3 abstenciones. Era el último paso que necesitaba para entrar en vigor el próximo 1 de enero de 2015. La nueva Ley ha levantado una fuerte polémica porque, básicamente, intenta regular y controlar Internet en beneficio de unos pocos"
Gonzalo San Gil, PhD.

Moncloa no sabe qué hacer con el canon AEDE: sin Google evalúan 'congelar' la... - 0 views

  •  
    "El discutido canon AEDE' o 'Tasa Goole' [# ! sic.] sigue estancado a pesar de que en teoría está en vigor desde el pasado 1 de enero."
Gonzalo San Gil, PhD.

Por qué la #LPI #no #puede (ni podrá) #frenar la #piratería - 0 views

  •  
    "A principios de este mes entraba en vigor la última reforma sobre la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual que impide a las páginas web ofrecer enlaces a contenido audiovisual protegido por los derechos de autor." [# ! Vía, Gracias, Francisco Manuel Hernández Sosa's FB]
Paul Merrell

Rapid - Press Releases - EUROPA - 0 views

  • The Commission has found that Intel excluded its competitor in two ways: through illegal loyalty rebates by paying manufacturers and retailers to restrict the commercialisation of competitors' products.These illegal actions were designed to preserve Intel's market share at a time when their only significant rival - AMD - was a growing threat to Intel's position. This threat was widely recognised by both computer manufacturers and in Intel's own internal documents seen by the Commission. The computer manufacturers involved are Acer, Dell, HP, Lenovo and NEC. The retailer involved is Media Saturn Holdings, the parent company of Media Markt.
  • Naturally, the Commission favours strong, vigorous price competition, including by dominant firms. However, Intel went beyond normal price competition by giving rebates to computer manufacturers on the condition that they bought all, or almost all, of their CPUs from Intel. Intel also made direct payments to a major retailer – Media Markt - on the condition that it stocked only computers with Intel CPUs.
  • Just to give you one example: in one case, a computer manufacturer took up only a small part of an offer by AMD of free CPUs because acceptance of all the free CPUs offered would have led that computer manufacturer to breach the conditions of its agreement with Intel and to lose rebates on all its much more numerous Intel purchases.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Intel made direct payments to computer manufacturers to halt or delay the launch of products using their rival's chips, and to limit their distribution once available. The Commission has specific, documented examples, of Intel paying other manufacturers to, for example, delay the launch of an AMD-based PC by six months, and to restrict the sales of AMD-based products to certain customers.
  • The Commission Decision contains evidence that Intel went to great lengths to cover-up many of its anti-competitive actions. Many of the conditions mentioned above were not to be found in Intel’s official contracts. However, the Commission was able to gather a broad range of evidence demonstrating Intel's illegal conduct through statements from companies, on-site inspections, and formal requests for information.
  • Finally, I would like to draw your attention to Intel's latest global advertising campaign which proposes Intel as the "Sponsors of Tomorrow." Their website invites visitors to add their 'vision of tomorrow'. Well, I can give my vision of tomorrow for Intel here and now: "obey the law".
Paul Merrell

Keller Lenkner & Quinn Emanuel File Antitrust Class-Action Lawsuit Against Facebook - 1 views

  • National plaintiffs’ law firm Keller Lenkner LLC and global business litigation firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP filed a class-action lawsuit against Facebook, Inc. alleging violations of federal antitrust laws and California law on behalf of Facebook users.ADVERTISEMENTFiled in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, the complaint alleges that Facebook obtained and maintained a social network and social media monopoly by consistently deceiving consumers about the data-privacy protections it provided to users, and by exploiting the data it extracted from users to target smaller startup companies for destruction or acquisition.The lawsuit seeks to put an end to Facebook’s misrepresentations about its privacy practices and its anticompetitive acquisition conduct; to require Facebook to engage in third-party auditing of its conduct; and to require Facebook to divest assets, such as Instagram and WhatsApp, that entrench its market power.
  • According to the complaint, which was filed on behalf of named plaintiffs Sarah Grabert and Maximilian Klein, Facebook did not achieve its Big Tech monopoly through innovation or vigorous competition. Despite its public pledge to protect user privacy, Facebook lied to users and violated their trust in a scheme to build a technology empire. Facebook also acquired technology from smaller firms that it used to track consumer activity across the internet so that it could identify and target competitors.ADVERTISEMENTThe complaint further alleges that in a strategic, intentional ploy for market domination, Facebook engaged in its scheme to destroy all competition without a care for the ultimate harm it would inflict on consumers. By the time Facebook’s deception about its lackluster privacy protections became public knowledge, Facebook had already achieved dominance, making it difficult for any firm to challenge its social media and social network monopoly.
  • The complaint notes that Facebook derives enormous economic value from the data it harvests from consumers on its platform. In fact, Facebook itself has described how it generates massive earnings per user from the data it collects. The complaint details how Facebook’s destruction of competition has caused consumers substantial economic injury. Consumers who sign up for Facebook agree to give up their valuable data and attention in exchange for using Facebook’s platform. That information and attention is then sold in measurable units to advertisers in exchange for money. The complaint alleges that consumers were harmed by Facebook’s anticompetitive conduct, as they did not receive the benefit of their bargain with Facebook.The lawsuit includes claims for violations of federal antitrust laws and California common law. It also seeks an order enjoining Facebook from continuing to engage in the alleged wrongful acts, requiring Facebook to engage third-party auditors to evaluate and correct problems with Facebook’s conduct, and requiring Facebook to divest assets like Instagram and WhatsApp. The lawsuit also seeks monetary damages, restitution and/or disgorgement of Facebook’s wrongful gains, attorneys’ fees, and costs.
1 - 11 of 11
Showing 20 items per page