The history of ECMAScript since its beginnings in November 1996 shows that when Microsoft was behind in the market (against Netscape in 1996-1997), it moved aggressively in the standards body to evolve standards starting with ES1 through ES3. Once Microsoft dominated the market, the last edition of the standard was left to rot -- ES3 was finished in 1999 -- and even easy-to-fix standards conformance bugs in IE JScript went unfixed for eight years (so three years to go from Edition 1 to 3, then over eight to approach Edition 4). Now that the proposed 4th edition looks like a competitive threat, the world suddenly hears in detail about all those bugs, spun as differences afflicting "JavaScript" that should inform a new standard.
1More
Google's Fallacious Piracy Self-Study (Part 1) | MUSIC * TECHNOLOGY * POLICY - 1 views
3More
Brendan's Roadmap Updates: Open letter to Microsoft's Chris Wilson and their fight to s... - 0 views
2More
California Supreme Court Shows How Pharma 'Pay For Delay' Can Violate Antitrust Laws | ... - 0 views
2More
Get involved with the Open Source Hardware Association | Opensource.com - 0 views
2More
The ratings: Most net neutrality groups get poor grades for funding transparency | Netw... - 1 views
2More
Becoming a trusted member of an open source community | Opensource.com - 0 views
2More
Hey UK: Jailing File-Sharers for Years is Shameful | TorrentFreak - 1 views
2More
What's your vision for the FSF? Fill out our survey - Free Software Foundation - workin... - 1 views
3More
Copyright Troll Partner Threatens to Report Blogger to the Police - TorrentFreak [# ! '... - 0 views
1More