Contents contributed and discussions participated by arnie Grossblatt
Is Drupal Moral? - 0 views
China tries to control free speech through Internet - 0 views
-
is happy state of affairs could be close to an end.
-
his will make the Web more accessible to non-English-speakers but also will lead to tricky issues, such as whether dissidents in China or Iran will be permitted to have their own dot-addresses. How would Beijing respond to a Chinese-language domain that translates into .democracy or .limitedgovernment, perhaps hosted by computers in Taipei or Vancouver?
-
he U.N. model of Internet governance is highly unsatisfactory from a human-rights and free-expression point of view for obvious reasons,” she told me. “The Chinese and the Iranians and various other authoritarian countries will insist on standards and rules that make dissent more difficult, destroy the possibility of anonymity, and facilitate surveillance.”
- ...1 more annotation...
Iran's Web Spying Aided By Western Technology - WSJ.com - 0 views
-
The Iranian regime has developed, with the assistance of European telecommunications companies, one of the world's most sophisticated mechanisms for controlling and censoring the Internet, allowing it to examine the content of individual online communications on a massive scale
-
Human-rights groups have criticized the selling of such equipment to Iran and other regimes considered repressive, because it can be used to crack down on dissent, as evidenced in the Iran crisis. Asked about selling such equipment to a government like Iran's, Mr. Roome of Nokia Siemens Networks said the company "does have a choice about whether to do business in any country. We believe providing people, wherever they are, with the ability to communicate is preferable to leaving them without the choice to be heard."
High Tech's Great Leap Backward - 0 views
Legally Speaking: The Dead Souls of the Google Booksearch Settlement - O'Reilly Radar - 0 views
-
In the short run, the Google Book Search settlement will unquestionably bring about greater access to books collected by major research libraries over the years. But it is very worrisome that this agreement, which was negotiated in secret by Google and a few lawyers working for the Authors Guild and AAP (who will, by the way, get up to $45.5 million in fees for their work on the settlement—more than all of the authors combined!), will create two complementary monopolies with exclusive rights over a research corpus of this magnitude. Monopolies are prone to engage in many abuses. The Book Search agreement is not really a settlement of a dispute over whether scanning books to index them is fair use. It is a major restructuring of the book industry’s future without meaningful government oversight. The market for digitized orphan books could be competitive, but will not be if this settlement is approved as is.
Google Book Settlement Links - 0 views
Stanford Copyright & Fair Use Center - 0 views
Teaching Copyright - 0 views
Lessig on Free Culture - 0 views
Global Internet Freedom Consortium - 0 views
Google Public Policy Blog: Opening access to books means opportunities for everyone -- ... - 0 views
-
We still strongly believe that copying for the sake of indexing is a fair use that is encouraged by existing copyright law precedents. Fair use is critical to the way web search and book search work and is already well established.
Google's Gatekeepers - NYTimes.com - 0 views
Open Access Publisher Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars - 0 views
Make Textbooks Affordable - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
101 - 120 of 156
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page