W.E.B. DuBois Critiques Booker T. Washington - 25 views
-
-
tthomasuscu on 29 Sep 14It is interesting that DuBois summarizes for this audience/
-
-
To gain the sympathy and cooperation of the various elements comprising the white South was Mr. Washington’s first task
-
Next to this achievement comes Mr. Washington’s work in gaining place and consideration in the North
-
-
I like how DuBois pointed out the flaws of Washington and showed expressions towards it.
-
DuBois pointed out that black men have a duty in this world and says that we must follow in Washington's footsteps.
-
He notices that Washington has imposed movements in the South and he doesn't know that it is hurting the Negro's. I like how he lets the readers know that technically Washington knew what he was doing but being smart and using common sense didn't really click.
-
- ...50 more annotations...
-
-
In all things purely social we can be as separate as the five fingers, and yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress.”
-
And yet the time is come when one may speak in all sincerity and utter courtesy of the mistakes and shortcomings of Mr. Washington’s career, as well as of his triumphs, without being thought captious or envious, and without forgetting that it is easier to do ill than well in the world.
-
-
The criticism that has hitherto met Mr. Washington has not always been of this broad character. In the South especially has he had to walk warily to avoid the harshest judgments,—and naturally so, for he is dealing with the one subject of deepest sensitiveness to that section.
-
-
-
And yet ten years later it was done in the word spoken at Atlanta
-
Walker’s wild appeal against
-
It startled the nation to hear a Negro advocating such a programme after many decades of bitter complaint; it startled and won the applause of the South, it interested and won the admiration of the North; and after a confused murmur of protest, it silenced if it did not convert the Negroes themselves.
-
and perfect faith into this programme, and changed it from a by-path into a veritable Way of Life. And the tale of the methods by which
-
but as Mr. Washington knew the heart of the South from birth and training, so by singular insight he intuitively grasped the spirit of the age which was dominating the North. And so thoroughly did he learn the speech and thought of triumphant commercialism, and the ideals of material prosperity that the picture of a lone black boy poring over a French grammar amid the weeds and dirt of a neglected home soon seemed to him the acme of absurdities. One wonders what Socrates and St. Francis of Assisi would say to this.
-
Some of this opposition is, of course, mere envy; the disappointment of displaced demagogues and the spite of narrow minds. But aside from this, there is among educated and thoughtful colored men in all parts of the land a feeling of deep regret, sorrow, and apprehension at the wide currency and ascendancy which some of Mr. Washington’s theories have gained. These same men admire his sincerity of purpose, and are willing to forgive much to honest endeavor which is doing something worth the doing. They cooperate with Mr. Washington as far as they conscientiously can; and, indeed, it is no ordinary tribute to this man’s tact and power that, steering as he must between so many diverse interests and opinions, he so largely retains the respect of all.
-
Honest and earnest criticism from those whose interests are most nearly touched,—criticism of writers by readers, of government by those governed, of leaders by those led, — this is the soul of democracy and the safeguard of modern society. If the best of the Ame
-
I do think we should have be somewhat critical about the ideas and values people promote.I think the lack of criticism was the cause of cycles like the similarities between how Tom and Rufus treated their slaves.If society would have questioned more it is possible things like slavery would have not lasted as long as it did.
-
-
But when to earth and brute is added an environment of men and ideas, then the attitude of the imprisoned group may take three main forms, — a feeling of revolt and revenge; an attempt to adjust all thought and action to the will of the greater group; or, finally, a determined effort at self-realization and self-development despite environing opinion. The influence of all of these attitudes at various times can be traced in the history of the American Negro, and in the evolution of his successive leaders.
-
Before 1750, while the fire of African freedom still burned in the veins of the slaves, there was in all leadership or attempted leadership but the one motive of revolt and revenge,—typified in the terrible Maroons, the Danish blacks, and Cato of Stono, and veiling all the Americas in fear of insurrection.
-
First, political power,Second, insistence on civil rights,Third, higher education of Negro youth
-
i think this is the major reason why other African Americans disagreed with Washington.They probably saw things like voting or educating their children as hopes for the future and didn't want to support Washington if he didn't view these as important.Some slaves realized the power behind being able to read,write and vote in an election and they too wanted that power.
-
-
and concentrate all their energies on industrial education, the accumulation of wealth, and the conciliation of the South
-
-
3. He advocates common-school and industrial training, and depreciates institutions of higher learning; but neither the Negro common-schools, nor Tuskegee itself, could remain open a day were it not for teachers trained in Negro colleges, or trained by their graduates.
-
The black men of America have a duty to perform, a duty stern and delicate,—a forward movement to oppose a part of the work of their greatest leader. So far as Mr. Washington preaches Thrift, Patience, and Industrial Training for the masses, we must hold up his hands and strive with him, rejoicing in his honors and glorying in the strength of this Joshua called of God and of man to lead the headless host. But so far as Mr. Washington apologizes for injustice, North or South, does not rightly value the privilege and duty of voting, belittles the emasculating effects of caste distinctions, and opposes the higher training and ambition of our brighter minds,—so far as he, the South, or the Nation, does this,—we must unceasingly and firmly oppose them.
-
If history and reason give any distinct answer to these questions, it is an emphatic No. And Mr. Washington thus faces the triple paradox of his career
-
This“Atlanta Compromise” is by all odds the most notable thing in Mr. Washington’s career.
-
It is as though Nature must needs make men narrow in order to give them force.
-
"We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creater with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nearly all the former ones had become leaders by the silent suffrage of their fellows, had sought to lead their own people alone, and were usually, save Douglass, little known outside their race.
-
or a time Price arose as a new leader, destined, it seemed, not to give up, but to re-state the old ideals in a form less repugnant to the white South.
-