Today's teens are still more interested in their friends than their lessons. They're still resistant to power and authority at variable levels. They still gossip, bully, flirt, joke around, and hang out. The underlying dynamics are fairly consistent. That said, technology is inflecting these practices in unique ways. And my goal here today is to talk about these inflection points.
They use these sites to connect to people that they already know from school, church, activities, summer camp, etc.
One of the most problematic mistakes adults make when trying to make sense of social network sites is to presume that kids interact on these sites just like they do
Teens are using this space as a social hangout with their pre-existing network.
Profiles
Think of the profile as a digital body
This is about showing off to known individuals
self-expression for friends
Friends
it's socially rude not to
Friends is as intended audience
Comments
process of social grooming
Teens know how to have deeper conversations - this just isn't where those necessarily happen.
New Feed
according to Pew, the median age of the Twitterverse is 31
social pressure to be where your friends are
How are these environments similar or different to other public spaces?
Persistence
What you say sticks around
Replicability
crux of rumor-spreading
bullying
Searchability
when trying to avoid those who hold power over you, it may be less than ideal
Scalability
spiral out of control
(de)locatability
simultaneously more and less connected to physical space
implications have to do with the ways in which they alter social dynamics
Invisible Audiences
lurkers
we are having to present ourselves and communicate without fully understanding the potential or actual audience
Collapsed Contexts
Social media brings all of these contexts crashing into one another and it's often difficult to figure out what's appropriate, let alone what can be understood.
Blurring of Public and Private.
youth see privacy in terms of control - control of space, control of information, control of trust
reproduction of socio-economic status and class divisions in digital worlds.
Teens who use MySpace can't communicate with those on Facebook and vice-versa. So if you don't participate, you're written out of the story. This means that divisions are re-inforced. Forget all of the rhetoric about how the Internet is the great equalizer - it's the great reproducer of inequality.
For all of the attention paid to "digital natives" it's important to realize that most teens are engaging with social media without any deep understanding of the underlying dynamics or structure. Just because they understand how to use the technology doesn't mean that they understand the information ecology that surrounds it. Most teens don't have the scaffolding for thinking about their information practices.
Researchers at Northwestern University found no connection between time spent on social-networking sites and academic performance. The study, the results of which appear in the latest issue of Information, Communication & Society, included responses from approximately 1,000 first-year students at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
These kids could be my students. For a group that didn't even know what Twitter was last year, this year many flat out resent it and refuse to open themselves to the idea that we can build class community or share resources by using it.
He's also troubled because he says educators are shortchanging kids by not warning them about the potential dangers, including Facebook addiction
I analyzed my (Twitter) followers and was amazed at what you can find out about me and who my networks are with. You can't escape your past. That's a real danger of social networking sites," he says.
Writing for Nonreaders in the Postprint Era focuses on the creation of short-form prose that is not intended to be reproduced on pulp fibers.
Instant messaging. Twittering. Facebook updates. These 21st-century literary genres are defining a new "Lost Generation" of minimalists
Throughout the course, a further paring down of the Hemingway/Stein school of minimalism will be emphasized, limiting the superfluous use of nouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, conjunctions, gerunds, and other literary pitfalls.
Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students' Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation1
Sebastián Valenzuela 1 Namsu Park 1 Kerk F. Kee 1
1 University of Texas at Austin
1 Earlier versions of this study were presented at the 2008 International Symposium on Online Journalism and the 2008 APSA Preconference on Political Communication. For intellectual and financial support on this research, we thank Sharon Strover. Helpful comments at various stages were provided by Jeff Gulati and Talia Stroud. Corresponding author: Sebastián Valenzuela [sebastianvalenzuela@mail.utexas.edu]
ABSTRACT
This study examines if Facebook, one of the most popular social network sites among college students in the U.S., is related to attitudes and behaviors that enhance individuals' social capital. Using data from a random web survey of college students across Texas (n = 2,603), we find positive relationships between intensity of Facebook use and students' life satisfaction, social trust, civic engagement, and political participation. While these findings should ease the concerns of those who fear that Facebook has mostly negative effects on young adults, the positive and significant associations between Facebook variables and social capital were small, suggesting that online social networks are not the most effective solution for youth disengagement from civic duty and democracy.