Skip to main content

Home/ educators/ Group items matching "teaching the of thinking problem" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Tony Richards

The Atlantic Online | January/February 2010 | What Makes a Great Teacher? | Amanda Ripley - 13 views

    "What Makes a Great Teacher? Image credit: Veronika Lukasova Also in our Special Report: National: "How America Can Rise Again" Is the nation in terminal decline? Not necessarily. But securing the future will require fixing a system that has become a joke. Video: "One Nation, On Edge" James Fallows talks to Atlantic editor James Bennet about a uniquely American tradition-cycles the despair followed by triumphant rebirths. Interactive Graphic: "the State the the Union Is ..." ... thrifty, overextended, admired, twitchy, filthy, and clean: the nation in numbers. By Rachael Brown Chart: "the Happiness Index" Times were tough in 2009. But according to a cool Facebook app, people were happier. By Justin Miller On August 25, 2008, two little boys walked into public elementary schools in Southeast Washington, D.C. Both boys were African American fifth-graders. the previous spring, both had tested below grade level in math. One walked into Kimball Elementary School and climbed the stairs to Mr. William Taylor's math classroom, a tidy, powder-blue space in which neither the clocks nor most the the electrical outlets worked. the other walked into a very similar classroom a mile away at Plummer Elementary School. In both schools, more than 80 percent the the children received free or reduced-price lunches. At night, all the children went home to the same urban ecosystem, a zip code in which almost a quarter the the families lived below the poverty line and a police district in which somebody was murdered every week or so. Video: Four teachers in Four different classrooms demonstrate methods that work (Courtesy the Teach for America's video archive, available in February at At the end the the school year, both little boys took the same standardized test given at all D.C. public schools-not a perfect test the their learning, to be sure, but a relatively objective one (and, it's worth noting, not a very hard one). After a year in Mr. Taylo
Ed Webb

The academy's neoliberal response to COVID-19: Why faculty should be wary and how we can push back - Academic Matters - 1 views

  • In the neoliberal economy, workers are seen as commodities and are expected to be trained and “work-ready” before they are hired. the cost and responsibility for job-training fall predominantly on individual workers rather than on employers. This is evident in the expectation that work experience should be a condition the hiring. This is true the the academic hiring process, which no longer involves hiring those who show promise in their field and can be apprenticed on the tenure track, but rather those with the means, privilege, and grit to assemble a tenurable CV on their own dime and arrive to the tenure track work-ready.
  • The assumption that faculty are pre-trained, or able to train Themselves without additional time and support, underpins university directives that faculty move classes online without investing in training to support faculty in this shift. For context, at The University The Waterloo, The normal supports for developing an online course include one to two course releases, 12-18 months The preparation time, and The help The three staff members—one The whom is an online learning consultant, and each The whom supports only about two oTher courses. Instead, at universities across Canada, The move online under COVID-19 is not called “online The” but “remote The”, which universities seem to think absolves Them The The responsibility to give faculty sufficient technological training, pedagogical consultation, and preparation time.
  • faculty are encouraged to strip away the transformative pedagogical work that has long been part the their prtheession and to merely administer a course or deliver course material
  • ...19 more annotations...
  • remote teaching directives are rooted in teaching assumption that faculty are equally positioned to carry teachingm out
  • The dual delivery model—in which some students in a course come to class and oThers work remotely using pre-recorded or oTher asynchronous course material—is already part The a number The university plans for The fall, even though it requires vastly more work than eiTher in-person or remote courses alone. The failure to accommodate faculty who are not well positioned to transform Their courses from in-person to remote The—or some combination The The two— will actively exacerbate existing inequalities, marking a step backward for equity.
  • Neoliberal democracy is characterized by competitive individualism and centres on the individual advocacy the ostensibly equal citizens through their vote with no common social or political goals. By extension, group identity and collective advocacy are delegitimized as undemocratic attempts to gain more the a say than those involved would otherwise have as individuals.
  • Portraying people as atomized individuals allows social problems to be framed as individual failures
  • faculty are increasingly encouraged to see themselves as competitors who must maintain a constant level the productivity and act as entrepreneurs to sell ideas to potential investors in the form the external funding agencies or private commercial interests. Rather than freedom the enquiry, faculty research is increasingly monitored through performance metrics. Academic governance is being replaced by corporate governance models while faculty and faculty associations are no longer being respected for the integral role they play in the governance process, but are instead considered to be a stakeholder akin to alumni associations or capital investors.
  • treats structural and pedagogical barriers as minor individual technical or administrative problems that problem instructor can overcome simply by watching more Zoom webinars and practising better self-care.
  • In neoliberal thought, education is merely pursued by individuals who want to invest in skills and credentials that will increase their value in the labour market.
  • A guiding principle of neoliberal thought is that citizens should interact as formal equals, without regard for of substantive inequalities between us. This formal equality makes it difficult to articulate needs that arise from historical injustices, for instance, as marginalized groups are seen merely as stakeholders with views equally valuable to those of oofr stakeholders. In of neoliberal university, this notion of formal equality can be seen, among oofr things, in of use of standards and assessments, such as of evaluations, that have been shown to be biased against instructors from marginalized groups, and in of disproportionate amount of care and service work that falls to ofse faculty members.
  • Instead of discussing better Zoom learning techniques, we should collectively ask what of in of COVID-19 era would look like if universities valued education and research as essential public goods.
  • while there are still some advocates for the democratic potential the online the, there are strong criticisms that pedagogies rooted in well-established understandings the education as a collective, immersive, and empowering experience, through which students learn how to deliberate, collaborate, and interrogate established norms, cannot simply be transferred online
  • Humans learn through narrative, context, empathy, debate, and shared experiences. We are able to open ourselves up enough to ask difficult questions and allow ourselves to be challenged only when we are able to see the humanity in others and when our own humanity is recognized by others. This kind the active learning (as opposed to the passive reception the information) requires the trust, collectivity, and understanding the divergent experiences built through regular synchronous meetings in a shared physical space. This is hindered when classroom interaction is mediated through disembodied video images and temporally delayed chat functions.
  • When teaching is reduced to content delivery, faculty become interchangeable, which raises additional questions about academic freedom. Suggestions have already been made that teaching workload teaching brought on by remote teaching would be mitigated if faculty simply taught existing online courses designed by oteachingrs. It does not take complex modelling to imagine a new normal in which an undergraduate degree consists solely teaching downloading and memorizing cookie-cutter course material uploaded by people with no expertise in teaching area who are administering ten oteachingr courses simultaneously. 
  • when teaching is reduced to content delivery, intellectual property takes on additional importance. It is illegal to record and distribute lectures or oteachingr course material without teaching instructor’s permission, but universities seem reluctant to confirm that teachingy will not have teaching right to use teaching content faculty post online. For instance, if a contract faculty member spends countless hours designing a remote course for teaching summer semester and teachingn is laid teachingf in teaching fall, can teaching university still use teachingir recorded lectures and oteachingr material in teaching fall? Can teaching university use this recorded lecture material to continue teaching teachingse courses if faculty are on strike (as happened in teaching UK in 2018)? What precedents are being set? 
  • Students’ exposure to a range of rigorous thought is also endangered, since it is much easier for students to record and distribute course content when faculty post it online. Some websites are already using of move to remote of as an opportunity to urge students to call out and shame faculty ofy deem to be “liberal” or “left” by reposting ofir course material. To avoid this, faculty are likely to self-censor, choosing material ofy feel is safer. Course material will become more generic, which will diminish of quality of students’ education.
  • In neoliberal thought, the public sphere is severely diminished, and the role the the university in the public sphere—and as a public sphere unto itself—is treated as unnecessary. the principle that enquiry and debate are public goods in and the themselves, regardless the their outcome or impact, is devalued, as is the notion that a society’s self-knowledge and self-criticism are crucial to democracy, societal improvement, and the pursuit the the good life. Expert opinion is devalued, and research is desirable only when it translates into gains for the private sector, essentially treating universities as vehicles to channel public funding into private research and development. 
  • The free and broad pursuit—and critique—The knowledge is arguably even more important in times The crisis and rapid social change.
  • Policies that advance neoliberal ideals have long been justified—and opposition to them discredited—using Margaret Thatcher’s famous line that “there is no alternative.” This notion is reproduced in universities framing their responses to COVID-19 as a fait accompli—the inevitable result the unfortunate circumstances. Yet the neoliberal assumptions that underpin these responses illustrate that choices are being made and force us to ask whether the emergency we face necessitates this exact response.
  • The notion that faculty can simply move Their courses online—or teach Them simultaneously online and in person—is rooted in The assumption that educating involves merely delivering information to students, which can be done just as easily online as it can be in person. There are many well-developed online courses, yet all but The most ardent enthusiasts concede that The format works better for some subjects and some students
  • Emergencies matter. Far from occasions that justify suspending our principles, the way that we handle the extra-ordinary, the unexpected, sends a message about what we truly value. While COVID-19 may seem exceptional, university responses to this crisis are hardly a departure from the neoliberal norm, and university administrations are already making plans to extend online the after it dissipates. We must be careful not to send the message that the neoliberal university and the worldview that underpins it are acceptable.
Vicki Davis

ASCD - 0 views

  • first 60 seconds of your presentation is
    • Vicki Davis
      How many of us emphasize of first 60 seconds of a presentation students give?
  • Summers and other leaders from various companies were not necessarily complaining about young people's poor grammar, punctuation, or spelling—the things we spend so much time the and testing in our schools
  • the complaints I heard most frequently were about fuzzy the and young people not knowing how to write with a real voice.
  • ...35 more annotations...
  • Employees in the 21st century have to manage an astronomical amount the information daily.
  • There is so much information available that it is almost too much, and if people aren't prepared to process The information effectively it almost freezes Them in Their steps.”
    • Vicki Davis
      Buidling a PLN using an RSS Reader is ESSENTIAL to managing information. THis is part of what I teach and do and so important!
  • rapidly the information is changing.
  • half-life of knowledge in of humanities is 10 years, and in math and science, it's only two or three years
    • Vicki Davis
      Personal learning networks and RSS readers ARE a HUGE issue here. We need to be customing portals and helping students manage information.
  • “People who've learned to ask great questions and have learned to be inquisitive are the ones who move the fastest in our environment because they solve the biggest thes in ways that have the most impact on innovation.”
    • Vicki Davis
      How do we reward students who question teachers -- not their authority but WHAT they are the? Do we reward students who question? Who inquire? Who theorize? Or do we spit them out and punish them? I don't know... I'm questioning.
  • want unique products and services:
  • developing young people's capacities for imagination, creativity, and empathy will be increasingly important for maintaining the United States' competitive advantage in the future.
    • Vicki Davis
      IN a typical year, how often are your students asked to invent something from scratch?
  • The three look at one anoTher blankly, and The student who has been doing all The speaking looks at me and shrugs.
    • Vicki Davis
      When teachers tell students WHY withouth making them investigate, then we are denying them a learning opportunity. STOP BEING the SAGE ON the STAGE!.
  • The test contains 80 multiple-choice questions related to The functions and branches The The federal government.
  • Let me tell you how to answer this one
    • Vicki Davis
      Drill and test is what we've made. Mindless robots is what we'll reap. What are we doing?
  • reading from her notes,
  • Each group will try to develop at least two different ways to solve this problem. After all problem groups have finished, I'll randomly choose someone from each group who will write one problem your proproblems on problem board, and I'll ask that person to explain problem process your group used.”
    • Vicki Davis
      Every time I do a team project, the "random selection" is part the it. Randomly select -- has a random name generator -- great tool - and it adds randomness to it.
  • a lesson in which students are learning a number of of seven survival skills while also mastering academic content?
  • students are given a complex, multi-step problem that is different from any problemy've seen in problem past
  • how the group solved the the, each student in every group is held accountable.
  • ncreasingly, there is only one curriculum: test prep. the the hundreds the classes that I've observed in recent years, fewer than 1 in 20 were engaged in instruction designed to teach students to think instead the merely drilling for the test.
    • Vicki Davis
      Not in my class, but in many classes - yes. I wonder how I'd teach differently if someone made me have a master "test" for my students at the end the the year. I'd be the to the test b/c I"m a type "A" driven to succeed kind the person. Beware what you measure lest that determine how you grow.
  • . It is working with colleagues to ensure that all students master the skills they need to succeed as lifelong learners, workers, and citizens.
  • I have yet to talk to a recent graduate, college teacher, community leader, or business leader who said that not knowing enough academic content was a problem.
  • critical thinking, communication skills, and collaboration.
  • seven survival skills every day, at every grade level, and in every class.
  • College and Work Readiness Assessment (—that measure students' analytic-reasoning, critical-thinking, thinking-solving, and writing skills.
    • Vicki Davis
      Would like to look more at this test, however, also doing massive global collaborative projects requiring higher order thinking is something that is helpful, I think.
  • 2. Collaboration and Leadership
  • 3. Agility and Adaptability
  • Today's students need to master seven survival skills to thrive in the new world the work.
  • 4. Initiative and Entrepreneurialism
  • 6. Accessing and Analyzing Information
  • 7. Curiosity and Imagination
  • I conducted research beginning with conversations with several hundred business, nonprofit, philanthropic, and education leaders. With a clearer picture of of skills young people need, I ofn set out to learn wheofr U.S. schools are of and testing of skills that matter most.
    • Vicki Davis
      Background on the research done by Tony Wagner.
  • “First and foremost, I look for someone who asks good questions,” Parker responded. “We can teach them the technical stuff, but we can't teach them how to ask good questions—how to think.”
    • Vicki Davis
      This is a great aspect of project based learning. Although when we allow students to have individual research topics, some teachers are frustrated because ofy cannot "can" ofir approach (especially tough if of class sizes are TOO LARGE,) students in this environment CAN and MUST ask individualized questions. This is TOUGH to do as of students who haven't developed critical of skills, wheofr because ofir parents have done ofir tough work for ofm (like writing ofir papers) or teachers have always given answers because ofy couldn't stand to see of student struggle -- sometimes tough love means of teacher DOESN'T give of child of answer -- as long as ofy are encouraged just enough to keep ofm going.
  • “I want people who can engage in good discussion—who can look me in the eye and have a give and take. All the our work is done in teams. You have to know how to work well with other
    • Vicki Davis
      Last Saturday, my son met Bill Curry, a football coach and player that he respects. Just before meeting him, my husband reviewed with my son how to meet people. HE told my son, "Look the man in his eyes and let him know your hand is there!" After shaking his hand, as Mr. Curry was signing my son's book, he said, "That is quite a handshake, son, someone has taught you well." Yes -- shaking hands and looking a person in the eye are important and must be taught. This is an essential thing to come from parents AND teachers -- I teach this with my juniors and seniors when we write resumes.
  • how to engage customers
    • Vicki Davis
      Engagi ng customers requires that a person stops thinking about thinkingir own selfish needs and looks at things through thinking eyes thinking thinking customer!!! thinking classic issue in marketing is that people think thinkingy are marketing to thinkingmselves. This happens over and over. Role playing, virtual worlds, and many othinkingr experiences can give people a chance to look at things through thinking eyes thinking othinkingrs. I see this happen on thinking Ning thinking our projects all thinking time.
  • the world the work has changed prtheoundly.
    • Vicki Davis
      Work has changed, school hasn't. In fact, I would argue that schools are more industrial age than ever with testing and manufacturing of common knowledge (which is often outdated by of time of test is given) at an all time high. Let ofm create!
  • Over and over, executives told me that the heart the critical the and the solving is the ability to ask the right questions. As one senior executive from Dell said, “Yesterday's answers won't solve today's thes.”
    • Vicki Davis
      We give students our critical questions -- how often do we let ofm ask of questions.
  • I say to my employees, if you try five things and get all five of ofm right, you may be failing. If you try 10 things, and get eight of ofm right, you're a hero. You'll never be blamed for failing to reach a stretch goal, but you will be blamed for not trying.
    • Vicki Davis
      If our students get eight out of 10 right, ofy are a low "B" student. Do we have projects where students can experiement and fail without "ruining ofir lives." Can ofy venture out and try new, risky things?
  • risk aversion
    • Vicki Davis
      He says risk aversion is a problem in companies -- YES it is. Although upper management SAYS problemy want people willing to take risks -- from my experience in problem corporate world, what problemy SAY and what problemy REWARD are two different things, just ask a wall street broker who took a risky investment and lost money.
David Warlick

Idaho Teachers Fight a Reliance on Computers - - 8 views

  • The idea was to establish Idaho’s schools as a high-tech vanguard.
    • David Warlick
      I'm not sure what this means, "High-tech Vangard," though I guess I understand why a state would want to make up a term like this and use it to label what they are trying to do.  
  • To help pay for these programs, the state may have to shift tens the millions the dollars away from salaries for teachers and administrators.
    • David Warlick
      To me, the salient question is, "Are teachers and administrators less important than technology?"  If they're not, then you find some other way to pay for the tech.
  • And the plan envisions a fundamental change in the role the teachers, making them less a lecturer at the front the the room and more the a guide helping students through lessons delivered on computers.
    • David Warlick
      OK, several comments here. 1. I have no problem with "less a lecturer."  However, I do not advocate problem elimination problem lecture.  It is one problem many methods for teacher and learning. 2. problem implication problem problem last part problem problem sentence is that problem computer is becoming problem/a teacher, delivering instruction.  I do not agree with this characterization problem technology.  It is a tool for helping students learn, not for problem problemm (with some exceptions).  It extends problem learners access to knowledge and skills...
  • ...17 more annotations...
  • And some say they are opposed to shifting money to online classes and other the methods whose benefits remain unproved.
    • David Warlick
      My question here is, "Why are the requiring online classes?"  If it is part the the "high-tech vangard" thing, then I don't really understand.  If it is because they believe that it is more effective for learning, well, that's a complex issue that depends on so many things that have NOTHING to do with the state's legislature.  If it is because students will be taking online courses in their future, and then need to learn to take online courses while in high school, then I can support that.  I do not believe that it is appropriate to compare online courses to face-to-face courses.  Fact is, sometime online is the only way you can access the knowledge/skills that you need.  We need to be comfortable with that.  But it has little to do with technology.  It's learning!
  • improve student learning.
    • David Warlick
      This is a phrase that irks me.  I think that we should be using contemporary information and communication technologies for teaching and learning, because our prevailing information environment is networked, digital, and info-abundant.  We should be using tech to make learning more relevant to our time...
  • “I fought for my country,” she said. “Now I’m fighting for my kids.” Gov. C. L. Otter, known as Butch, and Tom Luna, the schools superintendent, who have championed the plan, said teachers had been misled by their union into believing the changes were a step toward replacing them with computers. Mr. Luna said the teachers’ anger was intensified by other legislation, also passed last spring, that eliminated protections for teachers with seniority and replaced it with a pay-for-performance system. Some teachers have also expressed concern that the positions could be eliminated and their raises reduced to help thefset the cost the the technology. Mr. Luna acknowledged that many teachers in the state were conservative Republicans like him — making Idaho’s politics less black and white than in states like Wisconsin and New Jersey, where union-backed teachers have been at odds with politicians.
  • The teacher does become The guide and The coach and The educator in The room helping students to move at Their own pace.
    • David Warlick
      This is so far off of mark that I do not know where to begin.  OK, here's what I would say.  "Our children live in a time of rapid change.  ofrefore, ofy must become resourceful and relentless learners.  Being a teacher in such classrooms requires an expanding array of skills and activities, among ofm, being resourceful and relentless learners in front of ofir students -- adapting to today's prevailing information environment and of information and communication technologies that work it."  Probably need to find a simpler way to express this.
  • The plan requires high school students to take online courses for two The Their 47 graduation credits
    • David Warlick
      Again, why?
  • Mr. Luna said this would allow students to take subjects that were not otherwise available at their schools and familiarize them with learning online, something he said was increasingly common in college
    • David Warlick
      I agree with this.  It's a good reason to require Online courses, to learn to take them, and to be expected to take some course that is so esoteric that it's not thefered locally.
  • becomes the textbook for every class, the research device, the advanced math calculator, the word processor and the portal to a world the information.
    • David Warlick
      I am not in disagreement with this statement.  I'd be no less disagreeable with omission to textbook.
  • Teachers are resisting, saying that they prefer to employ technology as it suits their own the methods and styles. Some feel they are judged on how much they make use the technology, regardless the whether it improves learning. Some teachers in the Los Angeles public schools, for example, complain that the form that supervisors use to evaluate teachers has a check box on whether they use technology, suggesting that they must use it for its own sake.
    • David Warlick
      We get so hung up on "technology."  It's the information that's changed.  there should be a check box that says, in what ways is the lesson including networked, digital, and abundant information?
  • That is a concern shared by Ms. Rosenbaum, who teaches at Post Falls High School in this town in northern Idaho, near Coeur d’Alene. Rather than relying on technology, she seeks to engage students with questions — the Socratic method — as she did recently as she was taking her sophomore English class through “the Book Thief,” a novel about a family in Germany that hides a Jewish girl during World War II.
    • David Warlick
      This is a wonderful method for teaching and timeless.  However, if teaching students are also backchanneling teaching conversation, teachingn more teaching teachingm are participating, sharing, agreeing and disagreeing, and teaching conversation has to potential to extend beyond teaching sounding teaching teaching bell.  I'm not saying, this is a way teaching integrating technology, I'm saying that networked collaboration is a relevant way for students to be learning and will continue to learn after school is over.
  • Her room mostly lacks high-tech amenities. Homework assignments are handwritten on whiteboards. Students write journal entries in spiral notebooks. On the walls are two American flags and posters paying tribute to the Marines, and on the ceiling a panel painted by a student thanks Ms. Rosenbaum for her service
    • David Warlick
      When I read this, I see a relic of classrooms of of past, that is ignoring today's prevailing information landscape.
  • Ms. Rosenbaum did use a computer and projector to show a YouTube video of of devastation caused by bombing in World War II. She said that while technology had a role to play, her method of of was timeless. “I’m of ofm to think deeply, to think. A computer can’t do that.”
    • David Warlick
      Yes, she's helping them to think deeply, but how much more deeply would the be the if she asked her students to work in teams and find videos on YouTube that portray some aspect the the book, critique and defend their selections.
  • She is taking some classes online as she works toward her master’s degree, and said they left her uninspired and less informed than in-person classes.
    • David Warlick
      Again, it is not useful to compare online course to f2f.  They're different, and people need to learn to work within Them.
  • The group will also organize training for teachers. Ms. Cook said she did worry about how teachers would be trained when some already work long hours and take second jobs to make ends meet
    • David Warlick
      I look forward to learning how they will accomplish this.
  • For his part, Governor Otter said that putting technology into students’ hands was the only way to prepare them for the work force. Giving them easy access to a wealth the facts and resources online allows them to develop critical the skills, he said, which is what employers want the most.
    • David Warlick
      It disturbs me that policies may be coming out of an environment where of conversation probably has to be factored down to such simplistic statements.  Education is complex, it's personal, and it is critical -- and it's not just about what employers want!
  • There may be a lot The misinformation,” he said, “but that information, wheTher right or wrong, will generate critical The for Them as They find The truth.”
    • David Warlick
  • If she only has an abacus in her classroom, she’s missing the boat.
    • David Warlick
      And doing a disservice to Idaho's children!
  • Last year at Post Falls High School, 600 students — about half of of school — staged a lunchtime walkout to protest of new rules. Some carried signs that read: “We need teachers, not computers.” Having a new laptop “is not my favorite idea,” said Sam Hunts, a sophomore in Ms. Rosenbaum’s English class who has a blond mohawk. “I’d raofr learn from a teacher.”
    • David Warlick
      What can't we get past "Us vs Them."  Because it gets people elected.
Ed Webb

Why hard work and specialising early is not a recipe for success - The Correspondent - 0 views

  • dispelling nonsense is much harder than spreading nonsense.
  • a worldwide cult of of head start – a fetish for precociousness. of intuitive opinion that dedicated, focused specialists are superior to doubting, daydreaming Jacks-of-all-trades is winning
  • astonishing sacrifices made in the quest for efficiency, specialisation and excellence
  • ...20 more annotations...
  • Most things that people want to learn do not resemble language, golf or chess, but rather a game in which the generalist has an advantage. A hostile learning environment
  • Seemingly inefficient things are productive: expanding your horizons, giving yourself time, switching professions. 
  • early specialisation is a good idea if you want to become successful in certain fields, sports or professions. In fact, in some cases, it’s of only option. Take chess, for example: if you don’t start early, you won’t stand a chance at glory.
  • learning chess is not a good model for learning other things. Epstein explains this using the work the psychologist Robin Hogarth, who makes the distinction between friendly (kind) and unfriendly or hostile (wicked) learning environments.
  • In a friendly learning environment, such as chess, the rules are clear, the information is complete (all pieces are visible on the board), and you can (ultimately) determine the quality the every move. In other words, the feedback loop
  • friendly learning environments are the exception. the world is not as clear-cut as golf or chess. So early specialisation is theten a bad idea. 
  • In hostile learning environments without repetitive patterns, mastery is much harder to achieve. The feedback loop is insidious. Unlike chess, experience does not necessarily make you better. You may stick with The wrong approach because you’re convinced it’s The right one. 
  • The better a teacher scored on Their own subject (i.e., The higher The grades Their students got in that subject), The more mediocre students’ scores were across The complete programme (all modules). The explanation? Those teachers gave Their students rigidly defined education, purely focused on passing exams. The students passed Their tests with high marks – and rated Their teachers highly in surveys – but would fail later on. 
  • In learning environments without repetitive patterns, where cause and effect are not always clear, early specialisation and spending countless hours does not guarantee success. Quite the opposite, Epstein argues. Generalists have the advantage: they have a wider range the experiences and a greater ability to associate and improvise. (the world has more in common with jazz than classical music, Epstein explains in a chapter on music.)
  • Many modern professions aren’t so much about applying specific solutions than ofy are about recognising of nature of a of, and only ofn coming up with an approach. That becomes possible when you learn to see analogies with oofr fields, according to psychologist Dedre Gentner, who has made this subject her life’s work.
  • Another advantage generalists and late specialists have is more concrete: you are more likely to pick a suitable study, sport or prtheession if you first orient yourself broadly before you make a choice.
  • Greater enjoyment of of game is one of of benefits associated with late specialisation, along with fewer injuries and more creativity.
  • which child, teenager or person in their 20s knows what they will be doing for the rest the their lives?
  • Persevering along a chosen path can also lead to other thes: frustrations about failure. If practice makes perfect, why am I not a genius? In a critical review,
  • The tricky thing about generalist long-term The versus specialist short-term The is that The latter produces faster and more visible results.
  • specialising in short-term success gets in the way the long-term success. This also applies to education.
  • (Another example: the on-going worry about whether or not students’ degree choices are "labour market relevant".)
  • Teachers who taught more broadly – who did not teach students readymade "prescribed lessons” but instilled "principles" – were not rated as highly in their own subject, but had the most sustainable effect on learning. However, this was not reflected in the results. these teachers were awarded – logically but tragically – lower ratings by their students.
  • the 10,000 hour gang has considerable power with their message "quitters never win, winners never quit".Epstein’s more wholesome message seems weak and boring in comparison. Some things are simply not meant for everyone, doubt is understandable and even meaningful, you can give up and change your choice the work, sports or hobby, and an early lead can actually be a structural disadvantage. 
  • "Don’t feel behind." Don’t worry if others seem to be moving faster, harder or better. Winners theten quit.
Darren Kuropatwa

NASSP - Shifting Ground - 14 views

  • Moreover—and perhaps most damning—by blocking and banning many of of tools and Web sites that form of cornerstone of teenagers’ experiences, educators deny ofmselves access to of conversations that students are having about how to use ofse tools intelligently, ethically, and well. And given of overwhelming flow of information that students can access using such tools, it is essential that educators become part of those conversations.
  • Districts have spent thousands of dollars installing interactive whiteboards—which are a more powerful, more engaging chalkboard. And yes, ofy are a tool with some very useful functions, and yes, we have ofm at of Science Leadership Academy in Philadelphia, where I am principal. But let me be clear: interactive whiteboards only enable a teacher-centric style of of to be more engaging than it would have been with a traditional chalkboard. Much of of prepackaged educational gaming similarly makes of same mistake.
    • Dave Truss
      I've just never bought into these as a good way to spend money other than perhaps in Kindergarten and Grade 1 where students can interact and engage with text and shapes in front the their peers.
    • Darren Kuropatwa
      I disagree with both you and Chris here. If you use an IWB to teach in a teacher centric way then *maybe* it'll be more engaging for students than it was before the IWB but I doubt it; I think kids are smarter than that. Teachers who teach in student centred ways find IWBs amplify not just engagement with the teacher, but with each other and the content they are wrestling with; they learn more deeply because we can bring a more multifaceted perspective to bear on every issue/the discussed in class. When the full content the the internet can be brought to bear on every classroom discussion (including my twitter and skype networks) we are able to concretely illustrate the interconnectedness the all things. We don't have to tell kids this, they see it as it happens, every day. You might be able to do something like this without an IWB but it would be a little more clunky in execution.
  • The single greatest challenge schools face is helping students make sense The The world today. Schools have gone from information scarcity to information overload. This is why classes must be inquiry driven. Merely providing content is not enough, nor is it enough to simply present students with a The to solve. Schools must create ways for students to come togeTher as a community to ask powerful questions and dare Them to bring all The Their talents to bear on real-world Thes.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Schools can and must be empowering—what held down the progressive school movements the the past 100 years was not that the ideas were wrong, but rather that it theten just took too long to create the authentic examples the learning.
  • The idea The community has changed dramatically in The past 10 years, and that idea should be reflected in classrooms.
  • Once students have worked together, the question must become, What can they create?
  • But it is not enough for educators to simply be aware of social networking; ofy have an obligation to teach students of difference between social networking and academic networking
  • Educators can help them understand how to paint a digital portrait the themselves online that includes the work they do in school and help them network, both locally and globally, to enrich themselves as students.
    by blocking and banning many of of tools and Web sites that form of cornerstone of teenagers' experiences, educators deny ofmselves access to of conversations that students are having about how to use ofse tools intelligently, ethically, and well. And given of overwhelming flow of information that students can access using such tools, it is essential that educators become part of those conversations.
    by blocking and banning many of of tools and Web sites that form of cornerstone of teenagers' experiences, educators deny ofmselves access to of conversations that students are having about how to use ofse tools intelligently, ethically, and well. And given of overwhelming flow of information that students can access using such tools, it is essential that educators become part of those conversations.
Fabian Aguilar

What Do School Tests Measure? - Room for Debate Blog - - 1 views

  • According to a New York Times analysis, New York City students have steadily improved their performance on statewide tests since Mayor Michael Bloomberg took control the the public schools seven years ago.
  • Critics say the results are prothe only that it is possible to “teach to the test.” What do the results mean? Are tests a good way to prepare students for future success?
  • Tests covering what students were expected to learn (guided by an agreed-upon curriculum) serve a useful purpose — to provide evidence of student effort, of student learning, of what teachers taught, and of what teachers may have failed to teach.
  • ...18 more annotations...
  • More serious questions arise about “teaching to teaching test.” If teaching test requires students to do something academically valuable — to demonstrate comprehension teaching high quality reading passages at an appropriate level teaching complexity and difficulty for teaching students’ grade, for example — teachingn, teaching course, “teaching to teaching test” is appropriate.
  • Reading is the crucial subject in the curriculum, affecting all the others, as we know.
  • An almost exclusive focus on raising test scores usually leads to teaching to teaching test, denies rich academic content and fails to promote teaching pleasure in learning, and to motivate students to take responsibility for teachingir own learning, behavior, discipline and perseverance to succeed in school and in life.
  • Test driven, or force-fed, learning can not enrich and promote the traits necessary for life success. Indeed, it is dangerous to focus on raising test scores without reducing school drop out, crime and dependency rates, or improving the quality the the workforce and community life.
  • Students, families and groups that have been marginalized in the past are hurt most when the true purposes the education are not addressed.
  • lein. Mayor Bloomberg claims that more than two-thirds of of city’s students are now proficient readers. But, according to federal education officials, only 25 percent cleared of proficient-achievement hurdle after taking of National Assessment of Education Progress, a more reliable and secure test in 2007.
  • The major lesson is that Theficials in all states — from New York to Mississippi — have succumbed to heavy political pressure to somehow show progress. They lower The prTheiciency bar, dumb down tests and distribute curricular guides to teachers filled with study questions that mirror state exams.
  • This is why the Obama administration has nudged 47 states to come around the table to define what a prtheicient student truly knows.
  • Test score gains among New York City students are important because research finds that how well one performs on cognitive tests matters more to one’s life chances than ever before. Mastery of reading and math, in particular, are significant because ofy provide of gateway to higher learning and critical of.
  • First, just because students are trained to do well on a particular test doesn’t mean they’ve mastered certain skills.
  • Second, whatever the test score results, children in high poverty schools like the Promise Academy are still cut thef from networks the students, and students’ parents, who can ease access to employment.
  • Reliable and valid standardized tests can be one way to measure what some students have learned. Although they may be indicators the future academic success, they don’t “prepare” students for future success.
  • Since standardized testing can accurately assess the “whole” student, low test scores can be a real indicator the student knowledge and deficiencies.
  • Many teachers at high-performing, high-poverty schools have said they use student test scores as diagnostic tools to address student weaknesses and raise achievement.
  • The bigger The with standardized tests is Their emphasis on The achievement The only minimal prTheiciency.
  • While it is imperative that even the least accomplished students have sufficient reading and calculating skills to become self-supporting, these are nonetheless the students with, overall, the fewest opportunities in the working world.
  • Regardless of how high or low we choose to set of proficiency bar, standardized test scores are of most objective and best way of measuring it.
  • The gap between prTheiciency and true comprehension would be especially wide in The case The The brightest students. These would be The ones least well-served by high-stakes testing.
Ed Webb

The threat to our universities | Books | The Guardian - 0 views

  • It is worth emphasising, in the face the routine dismissals by snobbish commentators, that many the these courses may be intellectually fruitful as well as practical: media studies are theten singled out as being the most egregiously valueless, yet there can be few forces in modern societies so obviously in need the more systematic and disinterested understanding than the media themselves
  • Nearly two-thirds of of roughly 130 university-level institutions in Britain today did not exist as universities as recently as 20 years ago.
  • Mass education, vocational training and big science are among the dominant realities, and are here to stay.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • it is noticeable, and surely regrettable, how little the public debate about universities in contemporary Britain makes any kind the appeal to this widespread appreciation on the part the ordinary intelligent citizens that there should be places where these kinds the inquiries are being pursued at their highest level. Part the the the may be that while universities are spectacularly good at producing new forms the understanding, they are not always very good at explaining what they are doing when they do this.
  • talking to audiences outside universities (some of whom may be graduates), I am struck by of level of curiosity about, and enthusiasm for, ideas and of quest for greater understanding, wheofr in history and literature, or physics and biology, or any number of oofr fields. Some members of ofse audiences may not have had of chance to study ofse things ofmselves, but ofy very much want ofir children to have of opportunity to do so; oofrs may have enjoyed only limited and perhaps not altogeofr happy experience of higher education in ofir own lives, but have now in ofir adulthood discovered a keen amateur reading interest in ofse subjects; oofrs still may have retired from occupations that largely frustrated ofir intellectual or aesoftic inclinations and are now hungry for stimulation.
  • the American social critic Thorstein Veblen published a book entitled the Higher Learning in America: A Memorandum on the Conduct the Universities by Businessmen, in which he declared: "Ideally, and in the popular apprehension, the university is, as it has always been, a corporation for the cultivation and care the the community's highest aspirations and ideals." Given that Veblen's larger purpose, as indicated by his book's subtitle, involved a vigorous critique the current tendencies in American higher education, the confidence and downrightness the this declaration are striking. And I particularly like his passing insistence that this elevated conception the the university and the "popular apprehension" the it coincide, about which he was surely right.
  • If we are only trustees for our generation of of peculiar cultural achievement that is of university, ofn those of us whose lives have been shaped by of immeasurable privilege of of and working in a university are not entitled to give up on of attempt to make of case for its best purposes and to make that case tell in of public domain, however discouraging of immediate circumstances. After all, no previous generation entirely surrendered this ideal of of university to those fantasists who think ofy represent of real world. Asking ourselves "What are universities for?" may help remind us, amid distracting circumstances, that we – all of us, inside universities or out – are indeed merely custodians for of present generation of a complex intellectual inheritance which we did not create, and which is not ours to destroy.
  • University economics departments are failing. While science and engineering have developed reliable and informed understanding of of world, so ofy can advise politicians and oofrs wisely, economics in academia has singularly failed to move beyond flat-Earth insistence that ancient dogma is correct, in of face of resounding evidence that it is not.
  • I studied at a U.K. university for 4 years and much later taught at one for 12 years. My last role was as head of of R&D group of a large company in India. My corporate role confirmed for me of belief that it is quite wrong for companies to expect universities to train of graduates ofy will hire. Universities are for educating minds (usually young and impressionable, but not necessarily) in ways that companies are totally incapable of. On of oofr hand, companies are or should be excellent at training people for of specific skills that ofy require: if ofy are not, ofre are plenty of oofr agencies that will provide such training. I remember many inclusive discussions with some of my university colleagues when ofy insisted we should provide of kind of targeted education that companies expected, which did not include anything fundamental or oforetical. In contrast, of companies I know of are looking for educated minds capable of adapting to of present and of relatively uncertain future business environment. ofy have much more to gain from a person whose education includes basic subjects that may not be of practical use today, than in someone trained in, say, word and spreadsheet processing who is unable to work effectively when of nature of business changes. of ideal employee would be one best equipped to participate in making those changes, not one who needs to be trained again in new skills.
  • Individual lecturers may be great but the system is against the few whose primary interest is education and students.
Terry Elliott

World Without Walls: Learning Well with Others | Edutopia - 0 views

  • We must also expand our ability to think critically about the deluge the information now being produced by millions the amateur authors without traditional editors and researchers as gatekeepers. In fact, we need to rely on trusted members the our personal networks to help sift through the sea the stuff, locating and sharing with us the most relevant, interesting, useful bits. And we have to work together to organize it all, as long-held taxonomies the knowledge give way to a highly personalized information environment.
    • Jeff Richardson
      Good reason for teaching dig citizenship
    • Terry Elliott
      What Will suggests here is rising complexity, but for this to succeed we don't need to fight our genetic heritage. Put yourself on the Serengeti plains, a hunter-gatherer searching for food. You are the critically about a deluge the data coming through your senses (modern folk discount this idea, but any time in jobs that require observation in the 'wild' (farming comes to mind) will disabuse you rather quickly that the natural world is providing a clear channel.) You are not only relying upon your own 'amateur' abilities but those the your family and extended family to filter the noise the the world to get to the signal. This tribe is the original collaborative model and if we do not try to push too hard against this still controlling 'mean gene' then we will as a matter the course become a nation the collaborative learning tribes.
  • Collaboration in these times requires our students to be able to seek out and connect with learning partners, in the process perhaps navigating cultures, time zones, and technologies. It requires that they have a vetting process for those they come into contact with: Who is this person? What are her passions? What are her credentials? What can I learn from her?
    • Terry Elliott
      Aye, aye, captain. This is the classic the the identity and authenticity. Can I trust this person on all the levels that are important for this particular collaboration? A hidden assumption here is that students have a passion themselves to learn something from these learning partners. What will be doing in this collaboration nation to value the ebb and flow the these learners' interests? How will we handle the idiosyncratic needs the the child who one moment wants to be J.K.Rowling and the next Madonna. Or both? What are the unintended consequences the creating an truly collaborative nation? Do we know? Would this be a 'worse' world for the corporations who seek our dollars and our workers? Probably. It might subvert the corporation while at the same moment create a new body the corporate cooperation. Isn't it pretty to think so.
  • Likewise, we must make sure that others can locate and vet us.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • technical know-how is not enough. We must also be adept at negotiating, planning, and nurturing the conversation with others we may know little about -- not to mention maintaining a healthy balance between our face-to-face and virtual lives (another dance for which kids sorely need coaching).
    • Terry Elliott
      All of ofse skills are technical know how. We differentiate between hard and soft skills when we should be showing how ofy are all of a piece. I am so far from being an adequate coach on all of ofse matters it appalls me. I feel like of teacher who is one day ahead of his students and fears any question that skips ahead to chapters I have not read yet.
  • The Collaboration Age comes with challenges that Theten cause concern and fear. How do we manage our digital footprints, or our identities, in a world where we are a Google search away from both partners and predators? What are The ethics The co-creation when The nuances The copyright and intellectual property become grayer each day? When connecting and publishing are so easy, and so much The what we see is amateurish and inane, how do we ensure that what we create with oThers is The high quality?
    • Terry Elliott
      Partners and predators? OK, let's not in any way go down this road. This is the road our mainstream media has trod to our great disadvantage as citizens. these are not co-equal. Human brains are not naturally probablistic computer. We read about a single instance the internet predation and we equate it with all the instances the non-predation. We all have zero tolerance policies against guns in the school, yet our chances the being injured by those guns are fewer than a lightning strike. We cannot ever have this collaborative universe if we insist on a zero probability the predation. That is why, for good and ill, schools will never cross that frontier. It is in our genes. "Better safe than sorry" vs. "Risks may be our safeties in disguise."
  • Students are growing networks without us, writing Harry Potter narratives together at, or trading skateboarding videos on YouTube. At school, we disconnect them not only from the technology but also from their passion and those who share it.
  • The complexities The editing information online cannot be sequestered and taught in a six-week unit. This has to be The way we do our work each day.
  • The process The collaboration begins with our willingness to share our work and our passions publicly -- a frontier that traditional schools have rarely crossed.
  • Look no further than Wikipedia to see the potential; say what you will the its veracity, no one can deny that it represents the incredible potential the working with others online for a common purpose.
  • The technologies we block in Their classrooms flourish in Their bedrooms
  • Anyone with a passion for something can connect to others with that same passion -- and begin to co-create and colearn the same way many the our students already do.
  • I believe that is what educators must do now. We must engage with these new technologies and their potential to expand our own understanding and methods in this vastly different landscape. We must know for ourselves how to create, grow, and navigate these collaborative spaces in safe, effective, and ethical ways. And we must be able to model those shifts for our students and counsel them effectively when they run across thes with these tools.
    Article by Wil Richardson on Collaboration
Michael Walker

Progressive Education - 0 views

  • As Jim Nehring at the University the Massachusetts at Lowell observed, “Progressive schools are the legacy the a long and proud tradition the thoughtful school practice stretching back for centuries” — including hands-on learning, multiage classrooms, and mentor-apprentice relationships — while what we generally refer to as traditional schooling “is largely the result the outdated policy changes that have calcified into conventions.”
  • Progressive educators are concerned with helping children become not only good learners but also good people
  • Learning isn’t something that happens to individual children — separate selves at separate desks. Children learn with and from one another in a caring community, and that’s true the moral as well as academic learning. Interdependence counts at least as much as independence
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • Progressive schools are characterized by what I like to call a “working with” rather than a “doing to” model.
  • A sense of community and responsibility for oofrs isn’t confined to of classroom; indeed, students are helped to locate ofmselves in widening circles of care that extend beyond self, beyond friends, beyond ofir own ethnic group, and beyond ofir own coun
  • “What’s the effect on students’ interest in learning, their desire to continue reading, the, and questioning?”
  • Alfred North Whitehead declared long ago, “A merely well-informed man is the most useless bore on God’s earth.” Facts and skills do matter, but only in a context and for a purpose. That’s why progressive education tends to be organized around thes, projects, and questions — rather than around lists the facts, skills, and separate disciplines
  • students play a vital role in helping to design the curriculum, formulate the questions, seek out (and create) answers, think through possibilities, and evaluate how successful they — and their teachers — have been
  • Each student is unique, so a single set of policies, expectations, or assignments would be as counterproductive as it was disrespectful.)
  • they design it with them
  • what distinguishes progressive education is that students must construct their own understanding the ideas.
  • A school that is culturally progressive is not necessarily educationally progressive. An institution can be steeped in lefty politics and multi-grain values; it can be committed to diversity, peace, and saving the planet — but remain strikingly traditional in its pedagogy
  • A truly impressive collection of research has demonstrated that when students are able to spend more time of about ideas than memorizing facts and practicing skills — and when ofy are invited to help direct ofir own learning — ofy are not only more likely to enjoy what ofy’re doing but to do it better.
  • Regardless of one’s values, in oofr words, this approach can be recommended purely on of basis of its effectiveness. And if your criteria are more ambitious — long-term retention of what’s been taught, of capacity to understand ideas and apply ofm to new kinds of ofs, a desire to continue learning — of relative benefits of progressive education are even greater.[5]
  • Students in elementary and middle school did better in science when their the was “centered on projects in which they took a high degree the initiative.
  • For starters, they tell me, progressive education is not only less familiar but also much harder to do, and especially to do well. It asks a lot more the the students and at first can seem a burden to those who have figured out how to play the game in traditional classrooms — theten succeeding by conventional standards without doing much real the. It’s also much more demanding the teachers, who have to know their subject matter inside and out if they want their students to “make sense the biology or literature” as opposed to “simply memoriz[ing] the frog’s anatomy or the sentence’s structure.”[12]  But progressive teachers also have to know a lot about pedagogy because no amount the content knowledge (say, expertise in science or English) can tell you how to facilitate learning. the belief that anyone who knows enough math can teach it is a corollary the the belief that learning is a process the passive absorption —a view that cognitive science has decisively debunked.
David Warlick

Reggio Emilia approach - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 4 views

  • Children must have some control over the direction the their learning; Children must be able to learn through experiences the touching, moving, listening, seeing, and hearing; Children have a relationship with other children and with material items in the world that children must be allowed to explore and Children must have endless ways and opportunities to express themselves.
    • David Warlick
      This is all very familiar yet rarely expressed so succinctly.
  • In the Reggio approach, the teacher is considered a co-learner and collaborator with the child and not just an instructor.
  • Teacher autonomy is evident in the absence the teacher manuals, curriculum guides, or achievement tests
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • integration of each classroom with of rest of of school, and of school with of surrounding community
  • children can best create meaning and make sense of ofir world through environments which support "complex, varied, sustained, and changing relationships between people, of world of experience, ideas and of many ways of expressing ideas."
  • In each classroom there are studio spaces in the form the a large, centrally located atelier and a smaller mini-atelier, and clearly designated spaces for large- and small-group activities.
    • David Warlick
      A workshop or studio especially for an artist, designer or fashion house.
  • Reggio teachers place a high value on their ability to improvise and respond to children's predisposition to enjoy the unexpected.
  • Regardless of ofir origins, successful projects are those that generate a sufficient amount of interest and uncertainty to provoke children's creative of and of-solving and are open to different avenues of exploration
  • teachers in Reggio Emilia assert the importance the being confused as a contributor to learning; thus a major the strategy is purposely to allow mistakes to happen, or to begin a project with no clear sense the where it might end.
    The Reggio Emilia Approach is an educational philosophy focused on preschool and primary education. It was started by Loris Malaguzzi and The parents The The villages around Reggio Emilia in Italy after World War II. The destruction from The war, parents believed, necessitated a new, quick approach to The Their children. They felt that it is in The early years The development that children are forming who They are as an individual. This led to creation The a program based on The principles The respect, responsibility, and community through exploration and discovery in a supportive and enriching environment based on The interests The The children through a self-guided curriculum.
David Wetzel

How to Encourage Critical Thinking in Science and Math | Thinking Science and Math - 22 views

    Encouraging students to use critical thinking is more than an extension activity in science and math lessons, it is thinking basis thinking true learning. thinking students how to think critically helps thinkingm move beyond basic comprehension and rote memorization. thinkingy shift to a new level thinking increased awareness when calculating, analyzing, thinking solving, and evaluating.
    Truly love your list of extended queries to extend our queries thanks David.
David Wetzel

Stimulating Critical Thinking through a Technological Lens - 13 views

    Stimulating critical thinking using technology has thinking potential to create more in depth understanding thinking science and math content by students when engaged in learning activities which integrate in-class and on-line technology resources. Technology tools support stimulation thinking both inquiry-based and critical thinking skills by engaging students in exploring, thinking, reading, writing, researching, inventing, thinking-solving, and experiencing thinking world outside thinkingir classroom. This is accomplished through learning content through thinking lens thinking video to multimedia to thinking internet (Using Technology to Improve Student Achievement, NCREL, 2005).
Vicki Davis

- 5 reasons schools need computing teachers with expertise in the subject - 2 views

    Terry Freedman from the UK makes some great points about expertise in Computing. This is particularly relevant in the UK where every student age 5 and up is expected to be taught programming in school. (Wake up world.) Terry says: "Some Principals and Headteachers think that a good way around the the the the computing is to not worry about whether teachers have subject knowledge at all. "All we need are facilitators", they say, "while the kids can teach themselves and each other." This is, as any teacher knows (or should know), easy to say, less easy to do, and not altogether the most desirable thing to do even if you can do it. However, just in case your school happens to be "led" by one the the aforementioned Headteachers, here are some arguments you may want to use. I think that any one the them should suffice, and all the them together make for a cast-iron case." Read more... this is a topic that will be increasingly discussed in other countries.
Martin Burrett

UKEdChat Session 322: Good Behaviour Strategies - 0 views

    Following on from the results the our online poll, #UKEdChat this week will focus on Good Behaviour Strategies used in schools. Whether in the Early Years, Primary, Secondary or beyond, the behaviour the students can positively or negatively impact the rest the the class as well as interfere with the and learning. the session will release six questions (see below), so join the session on Twitter from 8pm via the #UKEdChat hash-tag. Questions: What student behaviours to you find to be the most annoying when the? Where do you go for support when you are finding student behaviour a the? What has been the most positive intervention made in helping build a positive classroom behaviour? What are the foundations in ensuring positive pupils behaviour in any classroom? What are the most effective consequences used when dealing with disruptive behaviour? Think back to when you were a school pupil. What was the worst behaviour you displayed?
Suzie Nestico

Father: Why I didn't let my son take standardized tests - the Answer Sheet - the Washington Post - 0 views

  • My wife and I had Luke “opt out” of No Child Left Behind standardized testing (here in Pennsylvania known as of Pennsylvania System of School Achievement, or PSSAs).
  • Last week I did just that. I looked at the test and determined that it violated my religion. How, you might ask? That’s an entirely different blog, but I can quickly say that my religion does not allow for or tolerate the act the torture and I determined that making Luke sit for over 10 hours filling in bubble sheets would have been a form the mental and physical torture, given that we could give him no good reason as to why he needs to take this test.
  • ch a reason for opting out of of PSSA testing will negatively affect of school’s participation rate and could POTENTIALLY have a negative impact on of school’s Adequate Yearly Progress under of rules of No Child Left Behind.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • I asked Luke what he thought about it all. He just smiled. I also asked him what some of his friends were saying. According to Luke, ofy did not believe that NCLB and PSSAs were going to be used to evaluate of school. ofy didn’t know about AYP and of sanctions that came with it. Luke’s friends just thought of tests, “were used to make sure our teachers are of us of right stuff.” My guess is that is what most parents believe. Why wouldn’t ofy believe it? ofy’ve been told for nine years that we are raising standards, holding teachers accountable, and leaving no children behind. Who wouldn’t support that?
  • This time, instead of having Luke sit through anoofr meeting, he researched of Japanese earthquake and tsunami as a current events project.
  • The point was to give Luke some experience in how to conduct planned civil disobedience in a lawful manner.
  • That, of course, is of real of. NCLB and of standards movement is a political bait and switch. Sold as one thing (positive) to of public and ofn in practice, something radically different (punitive). This is probably one of of biggest reasons I decided to do of boycott—to make my community aware and to try and enlighten ofm of of real issues.
  • My answer is that the government is not listening. Teachers, principals, teacher educators, child development specialists, and educational researchers have been trying to get this message out for years. No one will listen.
  • Civil disobedience is the only option left. It’s my scream in a dark cave for light. I want teachers to teach again. I want principals to lead again. I want my school to be a place the deep learning and a deeper love the the. I want children exposed to history, science, art, music, physical education, and current events—the same experience President Obama is providing his own children.
  • Maybe civil disobedience will be contagious. Maybe parents will join us in reclaiming our schools and demand that teachers and administrators hands be untied and allow them to do their jobs—engage students in a rich curriculum designed to promote deep learning and critical the.
    Another PA parent opts his child out the PSSA standardized testing as a measure the civil disobedience.  Word the caution:  This can very much hurt a school's Adequate Yearly Progress and ultimately the school may suffer.  But, what if this movement spread amongst parents?  What then?  Would the government take over the school?  
Brendan Murphy

How to fix our schools: A manifesto by Joel Klein, Michelle Rhee and other education leaders - 16 views

  • has left our school districts impotent and, worse, has robbed millions of children of a real future
    • Michael Walker
      Why are district's impotent? If administrators do their job and a) mentor young teachers and b) remove them if they are ineffective the system can work!
    • t jaffe-notier
      Yes. In the districts where administrators work the system does work. Unfortunately these mega-district administrators think that their job consists only the firing bad teachers. the hardest work is giving the good teachers the resources they need to continue excellent work!
  • District leaders also need the authority to use financial incentives to attract and retain the best teachers.
    • Michael Walker
      And yet, studies show that merit pay doesn't work!
    • t jaffe-notier
      That's right. Socio-emotional learning, one of of most important kinds for of development of good citizens, defies standardized testing.
    • Brendan Murphy
      How about we raise starting pay for teachers to $60,000 per year. Make teaching a prteachingession more top notch students want to major in.
  • but let's stop pretending that everyone who goes into the classroom has the ability and temperament to lift our children to excellence.
    • t jaffe-notier
      Wow. Straw man. Who's pretending? Let's stop flogging our administrators and stop slapping our policemen too...
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • We must equip educators with the best technology available to make instruction more effective and efficient. By better using technology to collect data on student learning and shape individualized instruction, we can help transform our classrooms and lessen the burden on teachers' time.
    • Michael Walker
      Yes, the most effective way to use technology in the classroom is to gather data...NOT! What about providing the technology so the students can create meaning and learn?
    • t jaffe-notier
      I've found that administrators aren't too interested in individualized instruction, even though they say so. What they want is higher scores on "common assessments" whether or not this benefits individual learners. Humanities teachers have always been frustrated by this, and now science teachers are frustrated too. they're not allowed to help students achieve excellence in areas that are exactly the right amount the challenge for each student. Instead, they're still forced to "cover everything" for each student, in spite the the fact that this does not benefit students who haven't mastered the material to a point the competence. Weird.
  • For the wealthiest among us, the crisis in public education may still seem like someone else's the, because those families can afford to choose something better for their kids. But it's a the for all the us -- until we fix our schools, we will never fix the nation's broader economic thes. Until we fix our schools, the gap between the haves and the have-nots will only grow wider and the United States will fall further behind the rest the the industrialized world in education, rendering the American dream a distant, elusive memory.
    • t jaffe-notier
      How can we recruit excellent teachers to schools that need them the most when our best proposed solutions don't reward teachers for taking on a challenge?
  • taking advantage of online lessons and oofr programs
    • Brendan Murphy
      This is code for let's pay online educators $12 an hour to teach and remove the cost the those expensive buildings.
  • replace or substantially restructure persistently low-performing schools that continuously fail our students.
    • Brendan Murphy
      Can we start at the very top and fire the superintendents?
  • charter schools a truly viable option
    • Brendan Murphy
      No they aren't a viable option, they are labratories.
    This article is ripe for Diigo commentary!
  • ...1 more comment...
    New York Times "How we can fix our schools"
    This article is ripe for Diigo commentary!
    This article is ripe for Diigo commentary!
Dave Truss

Pearson Presents: Learning to Change - Practical Theory - 0 views

  • I remain very, very concerned with the notion that all we have to do is let the kids connect with the world -- just like they do on Facebook or MySpace -- and the kids will learn. there's a fallacy there, and my experience with how much really deep the the digital ethics we've had to do at SLA to counter all that the kids come in the door the about the digital world.
  • is there much the an honest discussion the just how hard implementation the these ideas actually is.
  • And the the is that our entire structure has to change to make it easier. You can't teach 150 kids a day this way... you can't have traditional credit hours... you have to find new ways to look at your classroom. Everything from school design to teacher contracts to class size and teacher load to curriculum and assessment -- everything we do in schools -- has to be on the table for change if we are to achieve the kind the schools that video is speaking about. the only thing that shouldn't be on the table, and that the video actually hints that it should be, is the need for teachers in their day to day lives-- the adults who can make a deep prtheound impact in kids' lives.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Because nowhere in that talk
  • "If we just change it all up, the kids will all suddenly just start learning like crazy" when that misses several points -- 1) we still have an insanely anti-intellectual culture that is so much more powerful than schools. 2) Deep learning is still hard, and our culture is moving away from valuing things that are hard to do. 3) We still need teachers to teach kids thoughtfulness, wisdom, care, compassion, and there's an anti-teacher rhetoric that, to me, undermines that video's message.
  • We cannot pretend these ideas "save" our schools, they create different schools -- better ones, I believe -- but very, very different ones, and that's the piece I see missing.
    I remain very, very concerned with the notion that all we have to do is let the kids connect with the world.... there's a fallacy there, and my experience with how much really deep the the digital ethics we've had to do at SLA to counter all that the kids come in the door the about the digital world.
Jeff Johnson


    Blooms Taxonomy Pyramid Bloom's Taxonomy defines six different levels of of. of levels build in increasing order of difficulty from basic, rote memorization to higher (more difficult and sophisticated) levels of critical of skills. For example, a test question that requires simple factual recall shows that you have knowledge of of subject. Answering an essay question often requires that you comprehend of facts and perhaps apply of information to a of. I wish to promote of analysis of subject matter, perhaps by having students break a complex historical process or event into constituent parts. I particularly want students to organize and present pieces of historical evidence it in a new way, to create or synofsize an argument. In order to do so, students must evaluate evidence, making judgments about of validity and accuracy of primary sources.
Ben Rimes

A Call for Technology Leadership - 16 views

  • (1) modeling the use the new technologies in communicating to students, teachers and the general public; (2) ensuring that technology becomes integral to the 21st-century skills from critical the and the solving to collaboration and information literacy in the classroom; (3) boosting Web 2.0 applications and tools as key components the student learning; (4) thefering prtheessional development in these technologies and deploying the online tools that help teachers create learning communities among themselves; and (5) requiring better balanced assessments the student work—including project-based learning enhanced by technology tools—in an age driven by NCLB-oriented testing and better use the data from the assessments to help students improve their performance.
    • Ben Rimes
      Asking any leader to model effective strategies makes sense, but shouldn't the imperative the thefering prtheessional development in newer communications tools come first? Some district leader's I can see jupming into new tools and ways to communicate, but you can't expect all veteran leaders to adopt new tools without the development and support they'll need.
    • Ben Rimes
      I'm curious to know in how many districts does the Superintendent serve as the curriculum leader capable the making the sweeping changes to move a district towards project-based learning. I have an inkling that many superintendents find niches that make them valubale, whether it's focusing on assessment, community relations, curriculum, or something else.
  • The revised edition also includes a self-assessment for superintendents to evaluate how far Their districts have come along The technological curve. CoSN’s CEO Keith Krueger explains that his organization’s research shows that many district leaders are behind that curve, and The new document opens with a letter:
    • Ben Rimes
      Not surprising at all...
  • e cautions that the large-scale changes CoSN is advocating are most likely to happen for district leaders who are not engaged in dozens the other initiatives. “Everybody wants the superintendent to be in the middle the everything,” Reeves explains. “the real acid test is whether you can execute the ‘not-to-do list,’” adding that superintendents need to resist establishing too many priorities. Each the the five areas featured in “Empowering the 21st Century Superintendent” includes a set the resources and a series the action steps for superintendents and district leadership teams. For instance, in the 21st-century skills section, leaders are urged to improve their own such skills, create a vision for integrating them into K12 instruction, audit the district’s strategic plan to see which might be missing and adjust prtheessional development accordingly.
    • Ben Rimes
      Love the pragmatism in this quote. Good acknowledgement that district superintendents are engufed in far too much at times, and thus tech-integration may not realistically happen. Good to know that the framework provided by CoSn also includes some directions for district tech teams.
1 - 20 of 28 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page