Week 5 Slides on Mark Deuze - 0 views
Profile of the Digital Magazine Reader - 0 views
Why Do Teens Shun Twitter? - PC World - 0 views
With Software, The A.P. Takes on Digital Piracy of Articles - Media Decoder Blog - NYTi... - 0 views
Study Finds That Online Education Beats the Classroom - Bits Blog - NYTimes.com - 0 views
Virgin Australia using Creative Commons content - 0 views
Whitworth - 0 views
-
While current computing practice abounds with innovations like online auctions, blogs, wikis, twitter, social networks and online social games, few if any genuinely new theories have taken root in the corresponding "top" academic journals. Those creating computing progress increasingly see these journals as unreadable, outdated and irrelevant. Yet as technology practice creates, technology theory is if anything becoming even more conforming and less relevant. We attribute this to the erroneous assumption that research rigor is excellence, a myth contradicted by the scientific method itself. Excess rigor supports the demands of appointment, grant and promotion committees, but is drying up the wells of academic inspiration. Part I of this paper chronicles the inevitable limits of what can only be called a feudal academic knowledge exchange system, with trends like exclusivity, slowness, narrowness, conservatism, self-involvement and inaccessibility. We predict an upcoming social upheaval in academic publishing as it shifts from a feudal to democratic form, from knowledge managed by the few to knowledge managed by the many. The technology trigger is socio-technical advances. The drive will be that only democratic knowledge exchange can scale up to support the breadth, speed and flexibility modern cross-disciplinary research needs. Part II suggests the sort of socio-technical design needed to bring this transformation about.
Multitasking Muddles Brains, Even When the Computer Is Off | Wired Science | Wired.com - 0 views
-
"We wanted to ask a different question," said Clifford Nass, a Stanford University cognitive scientist. "What happens to people who multitasking all the time?" In a study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nass and Stanford psychologists Anthony Wagner and Eyal Ophir surveyed 262 students on their media consumption habits. The 19 students who multitasked the most and 22 who multitasked least then took two computer-based tests, each completed while concentrating only on the task at hand.
-
Interesting that. And scary. Hail the era of scatterbrains. I'm definetely one of them.
QUT ePrints - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
161 - 180
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page