Skip to main content

Home/ Diigo In Education/ Group items tagged advisory

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
anonymous

Horizon Report 2013 - 3 views

www.nmc.org/...013-horizonk12-interim-results

horizon nmc

shared by anonymous on 24 Mar 13 - No Cached
  • anonymous on 24 Mar 13
     
    The NMC is pleased to announce the interim results of the 2013 Horizon.K12 Project, as presented at the 2013 CoSN Conference in San Diego. The Horizon Project Advisory Board voted for the top 12 emerging technologies as well as the top ten trends and challenges that they believe will have a significant impact on teaching, learning, and creative inquiry in global K-12 education over the next five years. These initial results will be compiled into an interim report, known as the "Short List," and described in further detail. The "Time-to-Adoption Horizon" indicates how long the Advisory Board feels it will be until a significant number of schools are providing or using each of these technologies or approaches broadly. Near-Term Horizon: One Year or Less * BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) * Cloud Computing * Mobile Learning * Online Learning Mid-Term Horizon: Two to Three Years * Adaptive Learning and Personal Learning Networks * Electronic Publishing * Learning Analytics * Open Content Long-Term Horizon: Four to Five Years * 3D Printing * Augmented Reality * Virtual and Remote Laboratories * Wearable Technology
Marc Patton

The New Media Consortium | Sparking innovation, learning and creativity. - 26 views

www.nmc.org

Teacher_Resources Planning

shared by Marc Patton on 24 Jan 13 - Cached
  • Marc Patton on 24 Jan 13
     
    The NMC (New Media Consortium) is an international community of experts in educational technology - from the practitioners who work with new technologies on campuses every day; to the visionaries who are shaping the future of learning at think tanks, labs, and research centers; to its staff and board of directors; to the advisory boards and others helping the NMC conduct cutting edge research.
Pat Hundelt

Slideshow: Florida oil spill update two counties close beaches, health advisories issue... - 9 views

www.examiner.com/alth-advisories-issued--photos

oil spill slideshow florida

shared by Pat Hundelt on 25 Jun 10 - Cached
  • Pat Hundelt on 25 Jun 10
     
    slide show of spill and beach closures
Pat Hundelt

Gulf Oil Spill Affects Asthma, Causes Nausea - Advisory for Alabama, Louisiana & Missis... - 5 views

www.examiner.com/Alabama-Louisiana--Mississippi

spill gulf oil nausea

shared by Pat Hundelt on 21 Jun 10 - Cached
  • Pat Hundelt on 21 Jun 10
     
    nausea,
Peter Beens

Teachers warned away from Facebook, Twitter - The Sault Star - Ontario, CA - 64 views

www.saultstar.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx

social-networking education OSSTF OTF issues communication Facebook twitter web2.0

shared by Peter Beens on 05 May 11 - No Cached
  • Peter Beens on 05 May 11
     
    Keep that status update to yourself. That's the advice teachers are being given as the education system grapples with the expanding use of social media by students. Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation has been conducting workshops with high school teachers in Algoma in recent months after the Ontario College of Teachers issued an advisory that teachers should keep their distance from students when it comes to Facebook, Twitter and other electronic communication.
Martin Burrett

Teachers as Advisors and Mentors by @RTBCoaching - 3 views

ukedchat.com/...teachers-advisors-mentors

teachers advisors mentors

shared by Martin Burrett on 05 Nov 18 - No Cached
  • Martin Burrett on 05 Nov 18
     
    "During the last 18 months, I have served as the mathematics teacher for an alternative high school in Nederland, CO. Our school operates with three full-time instructors and several support staff who teach various electives. One unique feature of our school is the advisory program. New students, within the first week of attendance, must interview each staff member. This provides an opportunity to meet every adult in the school and assists in the advisor-advisee matching process. The students provide three choices of adults to serve as their advisor until graduation."
Megan N-B

Dietary Guidelines - health.gov - 9 views

health.gov/dietaryguidelines

nutrition guidelines dietary

shared by Megan N-B on 21 Sep 16 - No Cached
  • Dietary Guidelines
    • Megan N-B
      Megan N-B on 21 Sep 16
       
      NEW dietary guidelines! Just released. Textbook refers to the 2010 guidelines. How are they the same/different?
    • Megan N-B
      Megan N-B on 21 Sep 16
       
      Look here for the previous guidelines for comparing!
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI)
  • As of June 2016, you can also download the Dietary Guidelines [PDF - 10.8 MB].
    • Megan N-B
      Megan N-B on 21 Sep 16
       
      This website is an excellent resource for finding dietary and physical guideline information. The new Dietary Guidelines were just relesed a few months ago.
    • Megan N-B
      Megan N-B on 21 Sep 16
       
      Did you know Texas State has a School Health Advisory Committee (SHAC) you can join?
  • 2015 Advisory Committee
  • Megan N-B on 21 Sep 16
     
    New for 2015-2020
  • Megan N-B on 21 Sep 16
     
    New for 2015-2020
Martin Burrett

The intervention programme that claims to lessen the achievement gap - 4 views

ukedchat.com/...intervention-achievement

research

shared by Martin Burrett on 02 Sep 19 - No Cached
  • Martin Burrett on 02 Sep 19
     
    "A multi-national European study, looking at over 5,500 students, has found that a novel school intervention programme can not only improve the mathematics scores of primary school children from disadvantaged areas, but can also lessen the achievement gap caused by socioeconomic status. Known as the Dynamic Approach to School Improvement (DASI), the programme is based on the latest findings in educational research. Rather than a one-size-fits-all, top-down approach, DASI works by first assessing a school to identify the specific teaching areas that could be improved and then implementing targeted measures to improve them. This process involves all members of the school community, including teachers, pupils and parents, with support from a specialized Advisory and Research Team."
Josh Flores

SREB Advisory: 4,700 Teachers Focus on College, Career Readiness in Charlotte This Week - 7 views

us4.campaign-archive2.com/?u=c67c5841e2df804cf1c9ea093&id=1e18bb5623&e=436e20ce10

shared by Josh Flores on 17 Jul 13 - No Cached
    • Josh Flores
      Josh Flores on 17 Jul 13
       
      What test determines this?
  • Literacy Design Collaborative
  • strategies
Silas St. James

Welcome to Career Cruising... - 26 views

www.careercruising.com/...Index.aspx

career match cruising

shared by Silas St. James on 14 Sep 10 - No Cached
  • Silas St. James on 14 Sep 10
     
    career matchmaker etc.
  • Silas St. James on 14 Sep 10
     
    Great site for Advisory or guidance - helps students find out about careers to pursue. Pretty cheap, too.
Gareth Jones

Looking in the Wrong Places | Edge.org - 5 views

www.edge.org/...er-looking-in-the-wrong-places

NaturalScience senseperception paradigm

shared by Gareth Jones on 19 May 18 - No Cached
  • We should be very careful in thinking about whether we’re working on the right problems. If we don’t, that ties into the problem that we don’t have experimental evidence that could move us forward. We're trying to develop theories that we use to find out which are good experiments to make, and these are the experiments that we build.   We build particle detectors and try to find dark matter; we build larger colliders in the hope of producing new particles; we shoot satellites into orbit and try to look back into the early universe, and we do that because we hope there’s something new to find there. We think there is because we have some idea from the theories that we’ve been working on that this would be something good to probe. If we are working with the wrong theories, we are making the wrong extrapolations, we have the wrong expectations, we make the wrong experiments, and then we don’t get any new data. We have no guidance to develop these theories. So, it’s a chicken and egg problem. We have to break the cycle. I don’t have a miracle cure to these problems. These are hard problems. It’s not clear what a good theory is to develop. I’m not any wiser than all the other 20,000 people in the field.
  • I’m still asking myself the same question that I asked myself ten years ago: "What is going on in my community?" I work in the foundations of physics, and I see a lot of strange things happening there. When I look at the papers that are being published, many of them seem to be produced simply because papers have to be produced. They don’t move us forward in any significant way. I get the impression that people are working on them not so much because it’s what they’re interested in but because they have to produce outcomes in a short amount of time. They sit on short-term positions and have short-term contracts, and papers must be produced.
  • The field that I mostly work in is the foundations of physics, which is, roughly speaking, composed of cosmology, the foundations of quantum mechanics, high-energy particle physics, and quantum gravity. It’s a peculiar field because there hasn’t been new data for almost four decades, since we established the Standard Model of particle physics. There has been, of course, the Higgs particle that was discovered at the LHC in 2012, and there have been some additions to the Standard Model, but there has not been a great new paradigm change, as Kuhn would have put it. We’re still using the same techniques, and we’re still working with the same theories as we did in the 1970s.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • That makes this field of science rather peculiar and probably explains why there hasn’t been much progress. But it’s not like we don’t have any questions that need to be answered. There are a lot of questions that have been around for decades. For example, what is dark energy? What is dark matter? What are the masses of the Standard Model particles? And what’s up with the foundation of quantum mechanics? Is a theory that's fundamentally not deterministic, where we cannot predict outcomes, the last word that we have, or is there something more to it? Is there maybe another underlying structure to reality?
  • but we haven't reached the fundamental level. Maybe we will never reach it. Certainly, the theories that we have right now are not all there is. The question is, of course, if we don’t have any guidance by experiment, how do we make progress? And are we doing the right thing?
  • We’ve reached this point where we have to carefully rethink if the criteria that we’re using to select our theories are promising at all. If one looks at the history of this field in the foundations of physics, progress has usually been made by looking at questions that, at least in hindsight, were well posed, where there was an actual mathematical contradiction. For example, special relativity is incompatible with Newtonian gravity. If you try to resolve this incompatibility, you get general relativity.
  • There are various similar examples where such breakthroughs have happened because there was a real problem. There was an inconsistency and people had to resolve it. It had nothing to do with beauty. Maybe beauty was, in some cases, the personal motivation of the people to work on it. There’s certainly some truth to this, but I don’t think it’s good to turn this story around and say that if we only pay attention to this motivation that comes from ideals of beauty it will lead to progress.
  • If we are working with the wrong theories, we are making the wrong extrapolations, we have the wrong expectations, we make the wrong experiments, and then we don’t get any new data. We have no guidance to develop these theories. So, it’s a chicken and egg problem. We have to break the cycle. I don’t have a miracle cure to these problems. These are hard problems. It’s not clear what a good theory is to develop. I’m not any wiser than all the other 20,000 people in the field.
  • The way that research is funded in foundations of physics and in many other fields just puts a lot of things at a disadvantage that are not pursued anymore. Typically, everything that takes longer than three years to complete, no one will start it because they can’t afford it. They can literally not afford it.
  • Who makes the decisions about the funding? Superficially, people say that it's a funding agency, so it’s the university who get to hire people. But that puts the blame on the wrong party. In the end it’s the community itself who makes the decisions. What do the funding agencies do if they get a proposal? They send it to reviewers. And who are the reviewers? They're people from the same community. If you look at how hiring decisions are being made, there’s some committee and they are people from the same community. They have some advisory boards or something, which contains people from the same community.
  • Even if that wasn’t so, what the people in these committees would be doing is looking at easy measures for scientific success. Presently, the most popular of these measures are the number of publications and the number of citations. And maybe also whether the person has published in high-impact journals. So, these are the typical measures that are presently being used. But what do they measure? They primarily measure popularity. They indicate whether somebody’s research is well received by a lot of people in the same community. And that’s why once a research area grows beyond a certain critical mass, you have sufficiently many people who tell each other that what they’re doing is the good thing to do. They review each other’s papers and say that that’s great and it's what we should continue to do. It’s a problem in all communities that grow beyond a certain size.
  • I later came to the United States and then Canada, and that gave me the opportunity to learn a lot about quantum gravity. I also figured out that much of what goes on in quantum gravity is very detached from reality. It’s pretty much only mathematics. Yes, the mathematics is there, but I still don’t know if it’s the mathematics that describes reality.
  • That’s the very reason why we don’t normally think of gravity as a weak force. It’s the only force that is left over on long distances, and the reason for this is that it adds up. It gets stronger the more mass you pile up. More precisely, we should say that the reason we find it so hard to measure quantum gravitational effects is that we either have a particle that has very pronounced quantum properties, like, say, a single electron or something like that, but then it’s so light that we cannot measure the gravitational field. Or we have some object that is so heavy that we can measure the gravitational field, but then it doesn’t have quantum properties. Okay, so that’s the actual problem.
1 - 13 of 13
Showing 20▼ items per page