March 12, 2014Heineken N.V. (ADR)Tweede Weteringplantsoen 21 AMSTERDAM 1017 ZD Netherlands
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url
6More
LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views
-
-
1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Incredibly so. It not only had links to the web article but also links and information on the entire company. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Not directly but through links to the company's press releases. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. The time stamp on the article is March 12, 2014. It doesn't appear to be revised after that date. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Not really. This one is pretty good because it covers not only basic information about the company but also links to the content I was looking for directly. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. No but it does have the page it is from. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. Not for the person who wrote the article but the financial institution that it came from. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes from Reuters Knowledge Direct. 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. This site is often updated. In this case mostly in a timely fashion. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. It still isn't real time but it is pretty close. This article was uploaded just a couple days ago. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes. At least as it relates to the discussion of gay rights. This article has more information on the whole company. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. This article is factual instead of guiding towards a particular view. Because it focuses on the company as a whole and not the current debate it maintains its neutrality. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not within the scope of this article. Because this article just dic
-
-
var myVar; function googleTranslateElementInit() { new google.translate.TranslateElement({ pageLanguage: 'auto' }, 'google_translate_element'); myVar=setInterval(function(){chkGoogle()},1000); } //Start: 4734642: SEC content seach causes screen to freeze: Nikhil function chkGoogle(){ var obj = $('.goog-te-combo')[0].value; if(obj!=null && obj!=""){ clearInterval(myVar); showHideOriginal(); obj.onchange = function(){showHideOriginal();} } } function showHideOriginal(){ var googleTranslateLang = $('.goog-te-combo')[0].value; if(googleTranslateLang!=null && googleTranslateLang!=""){ document.getElementById("showOrigBut").style.display = 'block'; } else{ document.getElementById("showOrigBut").style.display = 'none'; } } //End: 4734642: SEC content seach causes screen to freeze: Nikhil Copyright 2014 Thomson Financial, All Rights Reserved Reuters Knowledge Direct
- ...3 more annotations...
-
TELEPHONE: Main Phone: 31-20-5239239, Contact Phone: 31-312-5239590 FAX: 31-20-6622640 URL: Home Page: http://www.theheinekencompany.com E-MAIL: investors@heineken.com OTHER URL:News Releases: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/media/media-releasesInvestor Relations: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/investorsFinancial Information: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/investors/reports-and-presentations?tab=financialsCorporate History/Profile: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/about-us/company-strategyExecutives: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/investors/governance/executive-boardProducts/Services: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/brandsEmployment Opportunities: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/careers
1More
LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views
-
-
1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. It seems to be both accurate and thorough. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. No. It covered more information about the church and protests and counter protest. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. This article was published on March 3 2014 and does not show if it has been revised. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Not in the context of this article. It is pretty much a recording of events that happened in the past. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes. Brittany Woolsey b. Can we see their job title or description? i. Yes Staff Writer for the Orange County Register c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Orange County Register 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. The internet site for LexisNexis is continuously updated but not kept in real time. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? Not up-to-date but close. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes. It also has external links for more information 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. The article just lays out the facts instead of painting the church in a negative light. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Yes, this article was good if you were looking for just the activities and description of the Westborough Baptist Church. But it does not contain anything about Rev. Fred Phelps Sr.'s medical condition.
-
8More
LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views
-
-
1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Yes, very much so. It paints a positive image on the tragedy. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Yes, it focuses on information about the plane and the information surrounding its disappearance. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. This Article was updated 03/16/2014. There is no record of it being altered or revised since upload. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. No. Because this article was uploaded and published today the information is current. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes, Larry McShane b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. But it is assumed that he is a reporter for the New York Daily News c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. New York Daily News, Page 5 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. Yes. This site is updated often to maintain the most accurate information. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. Yes. It may not be bleeding edge down to the second up to date, but it is at best only a few hours old. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. No. Not in the article itself. It does provide options to search for additional articles and provides a way to narrow your search 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. Yes, but not in a bad way. It was about how hope hasn't been lost in the search for the plane. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not currently. Because of how new the article is there isn't really any more information on it. If it included all the information available it would be come hard to read.
-
- ...5 more annotations...
-
LOAD-DATE: March 16, 2014LANGUAGE: ENGLISHGRAPHIC: A man cries (top) at prayer ceremony for passengers' family members Saturday in Subang Jaya, Malaysia. Messages of hope outside temple (c.). A family member gets emotional before prime minister's announcement Saturday.PUBLICATION-TYPE: NewspaperCopyright 2014 Daily News, L.P.
2More
LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views
-
-
1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. This article seems to be accurate and thorough. It's well written. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. This article answered basic questions on my topic but to the exact information I was looking for. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. September 26th, 2013 b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Yes there was, this article focused on more on Russian oil running low and how the Kremlin was looking towards Siberian shale to replenish it and not at all about the interactions of the US in that regard. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes. His name is Guy Chazan. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. It originated in the Financial Times (London, England) 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. For the most part yes. It seems that it is often update but not current. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. No. It does update but not often enough to provide up-to-date information. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes it does at least about the value of Russian oil. It doesn't contain anything about how people are reacting to the current foreign policy from President Obama. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. It seems unbiased and direct in its point of view. It doesn't take either side, but still relates all the information properly. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. It didn't have any information on the actions or reaction of the US or the world.
-
-
-
1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. This article seems to be accurate and thorough. It's well written. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. This article answered basic questions on my topic but to the exact information I was looking for. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. September 26th, 2013 b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Yes there was, this article focused on more on Russian oil running low and how the Kremlin was looking towards Siberian shale to replenish it and not at all about the interactions of the US in that regard. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes. His name is Guy Chazan. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. It originated in the Financial Times (London, England) 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. For the most part yes. It seems that it is often update but not current. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. No. It does update but not often enough to provide up-to-date information. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes it does at least about the value of Russian oil. It doesn't contain anything about how people are reacting to the current foreign policy from President Obama. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. It seems unbiased and direct in its point of view. It doesn't take either side, but still relates all the information properly. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. It didn't have any information on the actions or reaction of the US or the world.
-
9More
LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views
-
-
1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Yes. This article covers all the same information that I found in previous searches. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic? i. Yes. This article covers all the pertinent information. The problem is that they make light of the situation and put jokes in the article. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. March 12, 2014 was when this article was published. It does not look like it has been revised since then. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. It doesn't include the fact that he plead guilty and was fined $79 for it. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes. Tony Hicks b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No, but it is assumed that he is a reporter for the Constra Costa Times. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. It the San Jose Mercury News (California) 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. Yes this site is maintained and updated regularly. Just not in real time. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. Yes. It is only a couple days old so other than a couple details it is still accurate. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. It does mostly. The comparable article I found was a little newer and covered his trail, plea, and fine. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. Yes. The author tries to make jokes throughout the article ruining his credibility as a source. In a serious article jokes and whit are negatives. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. There is a few pieces of information that could have been covered that was found in the comparable article. Such as his plea and the fine. However this has the name of
-
- ...6 more annotations...
-
Chris Pine arrested for alleged DUI in New ZealandBYLINE: Compiled by Tony Hicks Contra Costa TimesSECTION: BREAKING; News; Entertainment; GossipLENGTH: 203 words
5More
LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views
- ...2 more annotations...
-
GRAPHIC: In this Dec. 4, 2012 file photo, actor Chris Pine attends a press conference for his latest film "Star Trek Into Darkness" in Tokyo.
LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views
www.lexisnexis.com.oclc.fullsail.edu/...docview.do
academic document research Digital Literacy reference
![](/images/link.gif)
LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views
www.lexisnexis.com.oclc.fullsail.edu/...docview.do
academic document research Digital Literacy reference
![](/images/link.gif)
LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views
www.lexisnexis.com.oclc.fullsail.edu/...checkbrowser.do
research academic document Digital Literacy reference
![](/images/link.gif)
LexisNexis® Academic: Tv Overload - 0 views
30More
Shibboleth Authentication Request - 5 views
-
-
-
10 Currency-Not current, no updates, can be used in classroom setting 7 Content is credible. the story can be useful to students to educate. The information is valid. 8 Authority- Authors' names are at the top of article, no links to contact author, Authors' Occupation is visible 7 Navigation-No links relevant to topic. everything clear and readable, 10 Experience-Fulfills it's intended purpose. very engaging to me. 0 Multimedia-no multimedia 7 Treatment- Bias toward Democrats, 6 Access-Easy to access page, no relevant links to help further investigate, 7 Miscellaneous-no per-use cost, no inquiring of private info, can be printed with no issues
-
-
-
WiTricity is also developing technology for wireless charging of electric vehicles and, later, for use in implanted medical devices like heart pumps, said Katie Hall, its chief technology officer.
- ...6 more annotations...
-
The technology is based on magnetic induction -- the process used to recharge electric toothbrushes. In the toothbrush, the base has a magnetic coil that generates a magnetic field. A second coil in the toothbrush captures some of that field, inducing an electric current.But electric toothbrushes transfer power only from the primary coil to the secondary one at very close range. Move the brush a short distance from the base, and it won't charge.
-
WiTricity has signed a technology transfer and licensing agreement with MediaTek, a semiconductor company in Taiwan, to collaborate on systems for wireless charging of mobile handsets, tablet computers, game controllers and other devices, Mr. Giler said.
-
-
-
1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Yes, very much so. It paints a positive image on the tragedy. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Yes, it focuses on information about the plane and the information surrounding its disappearance. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. This Article was updated 03/16/2014. There is no record of it being altered or revised since upload. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. No. Because this article was uploaded and published today the information is current. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes, Larry McShane b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. But it is assumed that he is a reporter for the New York Daily News c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. New York Daily News, Page 5 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. Yes. This site is updated often to maintain the most accurate information. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. Yes. It may not be bleeding edge down to the second up to date, but it is at best only a few hours old. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. No. Not in the article itself. It does provide options to search for additional articles and provides a way to narrow your search 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. Yes, but not in a bad way. It was about how hope hasn't been lost in the search for the plane. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not currently. Because of how new the article is there isn't really any more information on it. If it included all the information available it would be come hard to read.
-
-
-
1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. This article seems to be accurate and thorough. It's well written. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. This article answered basic questions on my topic but to the exact information I was looking for. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. September 26th, 2013 b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Yes there was, this article focused on more on Russian oil running low and how the Kremlin was looking towards Siberian shale to replenish it and not at all about the interactions of the US in that regard. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes. His name is Guy Chazan. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. It originated in the Financial Times (London, England) 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. For the most part yes. It seems that it is often update but not current. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. No. It does update but not often enough to provide up-to-date information. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes it does at least about the value of Russian oil. It doesn't contain anything about how people are reacting to the current foreign policy from President Obama. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. It seems unbiased and direct in its point of view. It doesn't take either side, but still relates all the information properly. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. It didn't have any information on the actions or reaction of the US or the world.
-
-
-
1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Yes, very much so. It paints a positive image on the tragedy. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Yes, it focuses on information about the plane and the information surrounding its disappearance. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. This Article was updated 03/16/2014. There is no record of it being altered or revised since upload. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. No. Because this article was uploaded and published today the information is current. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes, Larry McShane b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. But it is assumed that he is a reporter for the New York Daily News c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. New York Daily News, Page 5 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. Yes. This site is updated often to maintain the most accurate information. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. Yes. It may not be bleeding edge down to the second up to date, but it is at best only a few hours old. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. No. Not in the article itself. It does provide options to search for additional articles and provides a way to narrow your search 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. Yes, but not in a bad way. It was about how hope hasn't been lost in the search for the plane. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not currently. Because of how new the article is there isn't really any more information on it. If it included all the information available it would be come hard to read.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
AFP - RELAXNEWS (English International Version) Two film stars, Michael Douglas and Paul Rudd, are to share the title role in the next film from "The World's End" director Edgar Wright, due 2015. After Robert Redford's stint in "Captain America: The Winter Soldier," Marvel has recruited another legendary actor for an upcoming blockbuster in Michael Douglas. The 69-year-old will become the face of Henry Pym and hand over the Ant-Man moniker to Scott Lang, the new hero played by Paul Rudd. Ant-Man first appeared in print in 1962 and has become the alter ego for a number of Marvel characters; the film sees Lang succeed Pym as the electronics whizz in charge of wearing the Ant-Man mantle, able to shrink, grow, and communicate with insects. Dated for July 31, 2015, "Ant-Man" should also result in the character's addition to the supporting cast of the next Avengers film, set for mid-2018.
-
Adknowledge is a leading digital marketing company working with some of the worldâs top brands. Adknowledge designs, manages and measures campaigns for companies including Audi, Starbucks, LG, Disney and LâOréal to unlock digital audiences using multiple channels: social media, mobile, apps, email, display ads and audience engagement. A proprietary database of more than 600 million internet and mobile users steers Adknowledgeâs targeting; user preferences, online behavior and unsurpassed optimization ensure surgical message precision. In addition, Adknowledge helps publishers monetize their sites and lists effectively, with great attention to contextual relevance. Since it was founded 2004, Adknowledge has grown organically and through acquisitions. This includes a 2011 purchase of Toronto-based AdParlor, one of the first Facebook Strategic Preferred Marketing Developers (sPMD). Adknowledge is based in Kansas City, Missouri; it also has North American offices in San Francisco, New York Fort Myers and Toronto. It has overseas locations in London, Paris, Munich and Shanghai with sales presence in Australia and Brazil. Today, there are approximately 300 Adknowledge employees located around the world.
5More
shared by Corey Gyger on 15 Mar 14
- No Cached
Mike D'Antoni calls Knicks' hiring of Phil Jackson 'a good move' - latimes.com - 0 views
www.latimes.com/...s-fyi-20140315,0,5554552.story
mike knicks hiring phil jackson team com latimes calls
![](/images/link.gif)
9More
shared by Corey Gyger on 15 Mar 14
- No Cached
Knicks Turn to Jackson to Resuscitate the Team - NYTimes.com - 0 views
www.nytimes.com/...-head-knicks-front-office.html
knicks jackson team nytimes com nytimes com LexisNexis research
![](/images/link.gif)
4More
shared by Corey Gyger on 16 Mar 14
- No Cached
Linda Stein slay trial begins: Lawyers for Natavia Lowery say she's no killer - NY Dail... - 0 views
www.nydailynews.com/...lowery-killer-article-1.459495
linda trial begins lawyers killer daily news LexisNexis
![](/images/link.gif)