I think this is a great analogy for environmental problems in general. There are usually more than just one root cause for the problem. It's often multiple causes working in conjunction that create the issue. Thoughts?
It is precisely because our population is so large and growing so fast that we must care, ever more with each generation, how much we as individuals are out of sync with environmental sustainability.
Fresh water is now shared so thinly that the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) projects that in just 14 years two thirds of the world’s population will be living in countries facing water scarcity or stress. Half of the world’s original forests have been cleared for human land use, and UNEP warns that the world’s fisheries will be effectively depleted by mid-century. The world’s area of cultivated land has expanded by about 13 percent since its measurement began in 1961, but the doubling of world population since then means that each of us can count on just half as much land as in 1961 to produce the food we eat.
These figures suggest that we haven't been living sustainably on this planet for some time. Why is the Industrial Revolution often blamed for this nonsustainable lifestyle? Could the Agricultural Revolution be more at fault?
We can elevate the autonomy of women to make life-changing decisions for themselves. We can lower birth rates by assuring that women become pregnant only when they themselves decide to bear a child.
Is this easy to do? Are there countries/people groups whose culture will have to change in order for this to take place? How easy is it to change culture and whose culture is actually right?
Simultaneously, we need a swift transformation of energy, water, and materials consumption through conservation, efficiency, and green technologies.