Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged case study

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Govind Rao

'We have the evidence ... Why aren't we providing evidence-based care?'; Mental illness... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Sat May 23 2015
  • It's 4:30 on a Friday afternoon at her Sherbrooke, Que., clinic and Marie Hayes takes a deep breath before opening the door to her final patient of the day, who has arrived without an appointment. The 32-year-old mother immediately lists her complaints: She feels dizzy. She has abdominal pain. "It is always physical and always catastrophic," Dr. Hayes will later tell me. In the exam room, she runs through the standard checkup, pressing on the patient's abdomen, recording her symptoms, just as she has done almost every week for months. "There's something wrong with me," the patient says, with a look of panic. Dr. Hayes tries to reassure her, to no avail. In any case, the doctor has already reached her diagnosis: severe anxiety. Dr. Hayes prescribed medication during a previous visit, but the woman stopped taking it after two days because it made her nauseated and dizzy. She needs structured psychotherapy - a licensed therapist trained to bring her anxiety under control. But the wait list for public care is about a year, says Dr. Hayes, and the patient can't afford the cost of private sessions.
  • Meanwhile, the woman is paying a steep personal price: At home, she says, she spends most days in bed. She is managing to care for her two young children - for now - but her husband also suffers from anxiety, and the situation is far from ideal. Dr. Hayes does her best, spending a full hour trying to calm her down, and the woman is less agitated when she leaves. But the doctor knows she will be back next week. And that their meeting will go much the same as it did today. In its broad strokes, this is a scene that repeats itself in thousands of doctors' offices every day, right across the country. It is part and parcel of a system that denies patients the best scientific-based care, and comes with a massive price tag, to the economy, families and the health care system. Canadian physicians bill provincial governments $1-billion a year for "counselling and psychotherapy" - one third of which goes to family doctors - a service many of them acknowledge they are not best suited to provide, and that doesn't come close to covering patient need. Meanwhile, psychologists and social workers are largely left out of the publicly funded health-care system, their expertise available only to Canadians with the resources to pay for them.
  • ...42 more annotations...
  • Imagine if a Canadian diagnosed with cancer were told she could receive chemotherapy paid for by the health-care system, but would have to cough up the cash herself if she needed radiation. Or that she could have a few weeks of treatment, and then be sent home even if she needed more. That would never fly. If doctors, say, find a tumour in a patient's colon, the government kicks in and offers the mainstream treatment that is most effective. But for many Canadians diagnosed with a mental illness, the prescription is very different. The treatment they receive, and how much of it they get, will largely be decided not on evidence-based best practices but on their employment benefits and income level: Those who can afford it pay for it privately. Those who cannot are stuck on long wait lists, or have to fall back on prescription medications. Or get no help at all. But according to a large and growing body of research, psychotherapy is not simply a nice-to-have option; it should be a front-line treatment, particularly for the two most costly mental illnesses in Canada: anxiety and depression - which also constitute more than 80 per cent of all psychiatric diagnoses.
  • Why aren't we providing evidence-based care?" .. The case for psychotherapy Research has found that psychotherapy is as effective as medication - and in some cases works better. It also often does a better job of preventing or forestalling relapse, reducing doctor's appointments and emergency-room visits, and making it more cost-effective in the long run.
  • Therapy works, researchers say, because it engages the mind of the patient, requires active participation in treatment, and specifically targets the social and stress-related factors that contribute to poor mental health. There are a variety of therapies, but the evidence is strongest for cognitive behavioural therapy - an approach that focuses on changing negative thinking - in large part because CBT, which is timelimited and very structured, lends itself to clinical trials. (Similar support exists for interpersonal therapy, and it is emerging for mindfulness, with researchers trying to find out what works best for which disorders.) Research into the efficacy of therapy is increasing, but there is less of it overall than for drugs - as therapy doesn't have the advantage of well-heeled Big Pharma benefactors. In 2013, a team of European researchers collated the results of 67 studies comparing drugs to therapy; after adjusting for dropouts, there was no significant difference between the most often-used drugs - selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) - and psychotherapy.
  • The issue is not one against the other," says Montreal psychiatrist Alain Lesage, director of research at the Douglas Mental Health University Institute. "I am a physician; whatever works, I am good. We know that when patients prefer one to another, they do better if they have choice." Several studies have backed up that notion. Many patients are reluctant to take medication for fear of side effects and the possibility of difficult withdrawal; research shows that more than half of patients receiving medication stop taking it after six months. A small collection of recent studies has found that therapy can cause changes in the brain similar to those brought about by medication. In people with depression, for instance, the amygdala (located deep within the brain, it processes basic memories and controls our instinctive fight-or-flight reaction) works in overdrive, while the prefrontal cortex (which regulates rational thought) is sluggish. Research shows that antidepressants calm the amygdala; therapy does the same, though to a lesser extent.
  • But psychotherapy also appears to tune up the prefrontal cortex more than does medication. This is why, researchers believe, therapy works especially well in preventing relapse - an important benefit, since extending the time between acute episodes of illnesses prevents them from becoming chronic and more debilitating. The theory, then, is that psychotherapy does a better job of helping patients consciously cope with their unconscious responses to stress.
  • According to treatment guidelines by leading international professional and scientific organizations - including Canada's own expert panel, the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments - psychotherapy should be considered as a first option in treatment, alone or in combination with medication. And it is "highly recommended" in maintaining recovery in the long term. Britain's independent, research-guided scientific body, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, has concluded that therapy should be tried before drugs in mild to moderate cases of depression and anxiety - a finding that led to the creation of a $760million public system, which now handles therapy referrals for nearly one million people a year.
  • In 2012, Canada's Mental Health Commission estimated that only about one in three adults and one in four children are receiving support and treatment when they need it. Ironically, anti-stigma campaigns designed to help people understand mental illness may only make those statistics worse. In Toronto, for instance, putting up posters in subway stations in 2010 had the unexpected effect of spiking the volume of walk-ins at nearby emergency rooms by as much as 45 per cent in 12 months. Dr. Kurdyak treated many of them at CAMH. The system, he says, "has been conveniently ignoring this unmet need. It functions as if two-thirds of the people suffering won't get help." What would happen if the healthcare system outright "ignored" two-third of tumour diagnoses?
  • Essentially, argues Dr. Lesage, adding therapy into the health-care system is like putting a new, highly effective drug on the table for doctors. "Think about it," he says. "We have a new antidepressant. It works as well as many others, and it may even have some advantages - it works better for remission - with fewer side effects. The patients may prefer it. And [in the long run] it doesn't cost more than what we have. How can it not be covered?" ..
  • A heavy price This isn't just a medical issue; it's an economic one. Mental illness accounts for roughly 50 per cent of family doctors' time, and more hospital-bed days than cancer. Nearly four million Canadians have a mood disorder: more than all cases of diabetes (2.2 million) and heart disease (1.4 million) combined.
  • Mental illness - and depression, in particular - is the leading cause of disability, accounting for 30 per cent of workplace-insurance claims, and 70 per cent of total compensation costs. In 2012, an Ontario study calculated that the burden of mental illness and addiction was 1.5 times that of all cancers, and more than seven times the cost of all infectious diseases. Mental illness is so debilitating because, unlike physical ailments, it often takes root in adolescence and peaks among Canadians in their 20s and 30s, just as they are heading into higher education, or building careers and families. Untreated, symptoms reverberate through all aspects of life, routinely trapping people in poverty and homelessness. More than one-third of Ontario residents receiving social assistance have a mental illness. The cost to society is clearly immense.
  • Yet, when family doctors were asked why they didn't refer more patients to therapy in a 2008 Canadian survey, the main reason they gave was cost. For many Canadians, private therapy is a luxury, especially if families are already wrestling with the economic fallout from mental illness. Costs vary across provinces, but psychologists in private practice may charge more than $200 an hour in major centres. And it's not just the uninsured who are affected.
  • Although about 60 per cent of Canadians have some form of private insurance, the amount available for therapy may cover only a handful of sessions. Those with the best benefits are more likely to be higherincome workers with stable employment. Federal public servants, notably, have one of the best plans in the country - their benefits were doubled in 2014 to $2,000 annually for psychotherapy. Many of those who can pay for therapy are doing so: A 2013 consultant's study commissioned by the Canadian Psychological Association found that $950-million is spent annually on private-practice psychologists by Canadians, insurance companies and workers compensation boards. The CPA estimates t
  • These are the patients that family doctors juggle, the ones who eat up appointment time, and never seem to get better, the ones caught on waiting lists. Sometimes, they have already been bounced in and out of the system, received little help, and have become wary of trying again. A 40-something mother recovering from breast cancer, suffering from chronic depression post-treatment, debilitated by fear her cancer will return. A university student, struggling with anxiety, who hasn't been to class for three weeks and may soon be kicked out of school. A teenager with bulimia removed from an eatingdisorder program because she couldn't follow the rules. They are the ones dangling on waiting lists in the public system for what often amounts to a handful of talk-therapy sessions, who don't have the money to pay for private therapy, or have too little coverage to get the full course of appointments they need.
  • Canada's investment does not match that burden. Only about 7 per cent of health-care spending goes to mental health. Even recent increases pale when compared to other countries: According to a study by the Canadian Mental Health Association, Canada increased per-capita funding by $5.22 in 2011. The British government, meanwhile, kicked in an extra 12 times that amount per citizen, and Australia added nearly 20 times as much as we did. Falling off a cliff, again and again
  • In Winnipeg, Dr. Stanley Szajkowski watched for months as his patient, a woman in her 80s, slowly declined. Her husband had died and she was spiralling into a severe depression. At every appointment, she looked thinner, more dishevelled. She wasn't sleeping, she admitted, often through tears. Sometimes she thought of suicide. She lived alone, with no family nearby, and no resources of her own to pay for therapy. "You do what you can," says Dr. Szajkowksi. "You provide some support and encouragement." He did his best, but he always had other patients waiting.
  • hat 30 per cent of private patients pay out-ofpocket themselves. When the afflicted don't seek help, the cost isn't restricted to their own pocketbook. People with mental-health problems are significantly more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol, and to become physically sick, further increasing health-care costs. A 2014 study by Oxford University researchers found that having a mental illness reduced life expectancy by 10 to 20 years, roughly the same as did smoking and obesity. A 2008 Statistics Canada study linked depression to new-onset heart disease in the general population. A 2014 U.S. study found that women under the age of 55 are twice as likely to suffer or die from a heart attack, or require heart surgery, if they have moderate to severe depression. The result: clogged-up doctors' offices, ERs, and operating rooms. And an inexorable burden for the patients' families forced to fill the gaps in caregiving - or carry on when they lose a loved one.
  • Patients refer to it as falling repeatedly off a cliff. And they can only manage the climb back up so many times. Family doctors interviewed for this story admitted that they are often "handholding" patients with nowhere else to go. "I am making them feel cared for, I am providing a supportive ear that they may not get anywhere else," says Dr. Batya Grundland, a physician who has been in family practice at Toronto's Women's College Hospital for almost a decade. "But do I think I am moving them forward with regard to their illness, and helping them cope better? I am going to say rarely." More senior doctors have told her that once in a while "a light bulb goes off" for the patients, but often only after many years. That's not an efficient use of health dollars, she points out - not when there are trained therapists who could do the job better. However, she says, "in some cases, I may be the only person they have."
  • Family doctors aren't the only ones struggling to find therapy for their patients. "I do a hundred consultations a year," says clinical psychiatrist Joel Paris, a professor at McGill University and research associate at the Montreal Jewish General, "and one of the most common situations is that the patient has tried a few anti-depressants, they have not responded very well, and from their story it is obvious they would benefit from psychotherapy. But where do they go? We have community clinics here in Montreal with six-to-12-month waiting lists even for brief therapy." A fractured, inefficient system
  • "You fall into the role that is handed to you," says Antoine Gagnon, a family doctor in Osgoode, on the outskirts of Ottawa. He tries to set aside 20-minute appointments before lunch or at the end of the day to provide "active listening" to his patients with anxiety and depression. Many of them are farmers or self-employed, without any private coverage for therapy. "Five of those minutes are spent talking about the weather," he says, "and then maybe you get into the meat of the problem, but the reality is we don't have the appropriate amount of time to give to therapy, even to listen, really." Often, he watches his patients' symptoms worsen over several months, until they meet the threshold of a clinical diagnosis. "The whole system could save on productivity and money if people were actually able to get the treatment they needed."
  • But these issues aren't insurmountable, as other countries have demonstrated. Britain, for instance, has trained thousands of university graduates to become therapists in its new public program, following research showing that, as long they have the proper skills, people don't need PhDs to be effective therapists. Australia, which has created a pay-for-service system, also makes wide use of online support to cost-effectively reach remote communities.
  • Except for a small fraction of GPs who specialize in psychotherapy, few family doctors have the training - or the time - to provide structured therapy. Saadia Hameed, a GP in a family-health team in London, Ont., has been researching access to psychotherapy for an advanced degree. Many of the doctors she has interviewed had trouble even producing a clear definition of therapy. One told her, "If a patient cries, than it's psychotherapy." Another described it as "listening to their woes." A 2007 survey of 163 family doctors in Ontario found that almost four out of five had not received training in cognitive behavioural therapy, and knew little about it. "Do family doctors really need to do that much psychotherapy," Dr. Hameed asks, "when there are other people trained - and better trained - to do it?"
  • What further frustrates treatment for physicians and patients is lack of access to specialists within the system. Across the country, family doctors describe the difficulty of reaching a psychiatrist to consult on a diagnosis or followup with their patients. In a telling 2011 study, published in the Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, researchers conducted a real-world experiment to see how easily a GP could locate a psychiatrist willing to see a patient with depression. Researchers called 297 psychiatrists in Vancouver, and reached 230. Of the 70 who said they would consider taking referrals, 64 required extensive written documentation, and could not give a wait-time estimate. Only six were willing to take the patient "immediately," but even then, their wait times ranged from four to 55 days. Psychiatrists are in increasingly short supply in Canada, and there's strong evidence that we're not making the best use of these highly trained specialists. They can - and often do - provide fee-for-service psychotherapy in a private setting, which limits their ability to meet the huge demand to consult with family doctors and treat the most severe cases.
  • A recent Ontario study by a team at CAMH found that while waiting lists exist in both urban and rural centres, the practices of psychiatrists in those locations tend to look very different. Among full-time psychiatrists in Toronto, 10 per cent saw fewer than 40 patients, and 40 per cent saw fewer than 100 - on average, their practices were half the size of psychiatrists in smaller centres. The patients for those urban psychiatrists with the smallest practices were also more likely to fall in the highest income bracket, and less likely to have been previously hospitalized for a mental illness than those in the smaller centres.
  • And those therapy sessions are being billed with no monitoring from a health-care system already scrimping on dollars, yet spending a lot on this care: On average, psychiatrists earn $216,000 a year. There is nothing to stop psychiatrists from seeing the same patients for years, and no system to ensure the patients with the greatest need get priority. In Australia, Britain and the United States, by contrast, billing for psychiatrists has been adjusted to encourage them to reduce psychotherapy sessions and serve more as consultants, particularly for the most severe cases, as other specialists do.
  • As the Canadian system exists now, says Benoit Mulsant, the physician-in-chief at CAMH and also a psychiatrist, the doctors in his specialty "can do whatever they please. If I wanted, I could have a roster of actor patients who tell me entertaining stories, and I would be paid the same as someone who is treating homeless people. ... By treating the rich and famous, there is zero risk of being punched in the face by a patient." Left out in all this, by and large, are other professionals who can provide therapy. It doesn't help that the rules are often murky around who can call themselves psychotherapists. While psychologists and social workers are licensed under their professional associations, in some provinces a person can call himself a marriage counsellor or music therapist with no one demanding they be certified. In 2007, Ontario passed a law to regulate psychotherapists, requiring them to register with a provincial college that would set standards and handle complaints. Currently, however, the law is in limbo, although the government has said it will finally bring it into force by December. The brain keeps many secrets
  • Science, however, has yet to find depression's equivalent of insulin. Despite being scanned, poked and stimulated over and over and over again, the brain keeps its secrets. The "chemical imbalance" theory is now viewed as simplistic at best. It may not do much for patients, either: A 2014 study published in the journal Behaviour Research and Therapy suggested that, rather than reassuring them, focusing on the biological explanation for depression actually made patients feel more pessimistic and lacking in control. SSRIs work by increasing the amount of serotonin, a chemical that helps deliver messages within the brain and is known to influence mood. But researchers aren't sure why the drugs help some patients and fail with others. "Basically, it's like we have a bucket of water and we pour it over the patient's head," says Dr. Georg Northoff, the University of Ottawa's Michael Smith chair of Neurosciences and Mental Health. "But you want a drug that injects the water in a very specific brain regions or brain system, which we don't have."
  • Critics of therapy have argued that it's basically "good listening" - comparable to having a sympathetic friend across the kitchen table - and that in the real world of mercurial patients and practitioners of varying abilities, a pill just works better. That's true in many cases, especially when the symptoms are severe and the patients is suicidal: a fast-acting medication is safer, and may even be necessary before starting talk therapy. The staunchest advocates of therapy do not suggest it should be the first course of treatment for psychosis, or debilitating chronic depression, or mania - although, in those cases, there is evidence that psychotherapy and medication work well in tandem. (A 2011 meta-analysis found that patients with severe depression who received a combination approach had higher recovery rates and were less likely to drop out of treatment.) But drugs also don't work as well as the manufacturers would like us to think. Roughly one-third of patients given a drug will see no benefit (although they often respond to a second or third medication). In randomly controlled trials, drugs often perform only marginally better than sugar pills.
  • Yet it's talk therapy that the public often views most skeptically. "Until you go to a therapist, or a member of your family has a serious psychological problem, people are unsympathetic [about therapy]," says Dr. Paris, the Montreal psychiatrist. "They are very skeptical, and they don't believe the research. It's amazing, because pharmaceutical trials will get approval for a drug on the basis of two clinical trials that they paid for. And we have 100 clinical trials and no one believes us."
  • Dr. Ajantha Jayabarathan, an assistant professor at Dalhousie University's medical school, spent her early years as a family doctor in Spryfield, N.S., trying to manage an overload of mental-health cases. Most of her patients had little insurance; there was one reduced-cost counselling service in town, but the waiting lists were long. In 2000, her group practice became a test site for a shared-care project, which gave the doctors access to a mental-health team, including weekly in-person consultations with a psychiatrist. "It was transformative," she says. "We looked after everything in-house.
  • Over time, Dr. Jayabarathan says, she learned how to properly assess mental illness in patients, and how to use medication more effectively. "I just made it my business to teach myself what to do." It's the kind of workaround GPs are increasingly experimenting with, waiting for the system to catch up. Who would pay - and how?
  • The case for expanding publicly funded access to therapy is gaining traction in Canada. In 2012, the health commissioner of Quebec recommended therapy be covered by the province; it is now being studied by Quebec's science-based health body (INESSS), which is expected to report back next year. A new Quebec-based organization of doctors, researchers and mental-health advocates called the Coalition for Access to Psychotherapy (CAP) is lobbying the government.
  • In Manitoba, the Liberal Party - albeit well behind in the polls - has made the public funding of psychologists one of its campaign platforms for the province's spring 2016 election. In Saskatchewan, the government commissioned, and has since endorsed, a mental-health action plan that includes providing online therapy - though politicians have given themselves 10 years to accomplish it. Michael Kirby, the former head of the Canadian Mental Health Commission, has been advocating for eight annual sessions of therapy to be covered for children and youth in need.
  • There are significant hurdles: Which practitioners would provide therapy, and how would they be paid? What therapies would be covered, and for how long? Complicating every aspect of major mentalhealth change in Canada is the question of who should shoulder the cost: the provinces or Ottawa. In a written statement in response to questions from The Globe and Mail, federal Health Minister Rona Ambrose lobbed the issue back at her provincial counterparts, pointing out that the Canada Health Act does not "preclude provinces and territories from extending public coverage to other services or providers such as psychologists."
  • One result can be overloaded family doctors minimizing mental-health problems. "If you have nothing to offer someone," asks Dr. Anderson, "how much are you going to dig around to find out what is going on?" Some doctors also admit that the lack of resources can lead to physicians cherry-picking patients who don't have mental illness. And yet family physicians alone bill about $361million a year for counselling or psychotherapy in Canada - 5.6 million visits of roughly 30 minutes each. This is a broad category, and not always specifically related to mental health (some of it includes drug counselling, and a certain amount of coaching is a necessary part of the patient-doctor relationship). When it is psychotherapy, however, doctors admit it's often more supportive listening than actual therapy.
  • So how would Canada pay for access to such therapy? It wouldn't be cheap, in the short term. The savings would come from what Canadians would not have to spend in the long term: in additional medical and drug costs, emergency-room visits and hospital stays, and in unnecessary disability payments, to say nothing of better long-term health outcomes for patients given good care earlier. Some of the figures being tossed around sound staggering. Rolling out a version of Britain's centre-based program across Canada would cost $950-million. Michael Kirby's plan would amount to $1,000 annually per patient. A 2013 report commissioned by the Canadian Psychological Association calculated that, based on predicted need, and assuming no coverage from private health-care plans, providing an average of six sessions of therapy a year would cost an estimated $2.8-billion annually.
  • But any of those figures would still be a fraction of the roughly $210-billion that Canada spends annually on health care. Figuring out how to make the system most costeffective is, according to sources, currently delaying the INESSS report to the Quebec government. "You need to facilitate the government," says Helen- Maria Vasiliadis, a professor of community health at the University of Sherbrooke. "You can't be going to policymakers and showing them billions and billions of dollars. People start having heart attacks. With evidence in hand, we have to present possible solutions."
  • An insurance-based plan is the proposal that has emerged from the Quebec-based CAP group, which sent its proposal to Quebec's health minister last month. In its design, the system would work much like Quebec's public drug plan - Quebeckers not covered through work plans would contribute to a provincial insurance program for therapy. That would be similar to the system that Germany has used for decades. One step forward, one step back
  • Last year, the Sherbrooke clinic where Marie Hayes works received provincial funding for a part-time psychologist and a full-time social worker. With a roster of 25,000 patients, the clinic team laid out clear guidelines for the psychologist, who would consult on cases and screen patients, and be limited to a mere four sessions of actual counselling with any one patient. "We wanted to be careful she didn't become a waiting list - like everything in the system," says Dr. Hayes. The social worker helps guide patients into services such as housing and addiction counselling. They have also offered group sessions for depression management at the clinic. As stretched as those new professionals are in such a large practice, Dr. Hayes says the addition of that mental-health team is improving the care she can provide patients. Recently, for instance, the 32- year-old mother with anxiety attended sessions with the psychologist. "She is making progress," says Dr. Hayes, "slowly."
  • At Women's College Hospital in Toronto, Dr. Grundland is not so lucky. Asked to describe a difficult case, the family-practice physician mentions a patient suffering from depression after a lifechanging accident. Every month, doctor and patient would repeat the same conversation they'd already had more than a dozen times - and make little real headway. Her patient, says Dr. Grundland, needs a trained therapist: someone she can see regularly, to help her move past her frustration, counsel her about addiction, and ease the burden on her family.
  • But there's no extra money in the patient's budget for a psychologist. "I do my best," Dr. Grundland says, "but it's not my area of expertise." Meanwhile, the patient isn't getting better, and in the time that it takes to make it through one appointment with her, Dr. Grundland could see three other people with problems she was actually trained to treat. "But," says Dr. Grundland, "she has nowhere else to go." Erin Anderssen is a feature writer at The Globe and Mail. OPEN MINDS How to build a better mental health care system
  • The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health has purchased advertisements to accompany this series. While CAMH professionals are quoted in this story, the organization had no involvement in the creation or production of this, or any other story in the series. $20.7-billion The cost, according to a 2012 Conference Board of Canada report, of lost productivity each year due to mental illness. What else does $20-billion represent?
  • $20B: Canadian spending on national defence, 2012-13 $20B: Market valuation of Airbnb, 2015 $21B: Kitchener-CambridgeWaterloo region's GDP, 2009 $21B: Amount food manufacturing contributed to the economy, 2012
Govind Rao

Your smartphone will see you now; Apps that can track symptoms are among new ways of br... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Tue Jul 28 2015
  • Jody Kearns doesn't like to spend time obsessing about her Parkinson's disease. The 56-year-old dietitian from Syracuse, N.Y., had to give up bicycling because the disorder affected her balance. But she still works, drives and tries to live a normal life. Yet since she enrolled in a clinical study that uses her iPhone to gather information about her condition, Kearns has been diligently taking a series of tests three times a day. She taps the phone's screen in a certain pattern, records a spoken phrase and walks a short distance while the phone's motion sensors measure her gait. "The thing with Parkinson's disease is there's not much you can do about it," she said of the nervous-system disorder, which can be managed but has no cure. "So when I heard about this, I thought, 'I can do this.'"
  • Smartphone apps are the latest tools to emerge from the intersection of health care and Silicon Valley, where tech companies are also working on new ways of bringing patients and doctors together online, applying massive computing power to analyze DNA and even developing ingestible "smart" pills for detecting cancer. More than 75,000 people have enrolled in health studies that use specialized iPhone apps, built with software Apple Inc. developed to help turn the popular smartphone into a research tool. Once enrolled, iPhone owners use the apps to submit data on a daily basis, by answering a few survey questions or using the iPhone's built-in sensors to measure their symptoms.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • Scientists overseeing the studies say the apps could transform medical research by helping them collect information more frequently and from more people, across larger and more diverse regions, than they're able to reach with traditional health studies. A smartphone "is a great platform for research," said Dr. Michael McConnell, a Stanford University cardiologist, who's using an app to study heart disease. "It's one thing that people have with them every day." While the studies are in early stages, researchers also say a smartphone's microphone, motion sensors and touchscreen can take precise readings that, in some cases, may be more reliable than a doctor's observations. These can be correlated with other health or fitness data and even environmental conditions, such as smog levels, based on the phone's GPS locator.
  • "Participating in clinical studies is often a burden," he explained. "You have to live near where the study's being conducted. You have to be able to take time off work and go in for frequent assessments." Smartphones also offer the ability to collect precise readings, Dorsey added. One test in the Parkinson's study measures the speed at which participants tap their fingers in a particular sequence on the iPhone's touchscreen. Dorsey said that's more objective than a process still used in clinics, where doctors watch patients tap their fingers and assign them a numerical score.
  • The most important is safeguarding privacy and the data that's collected, according to ethics experts. In addition, researchers say apps must be designed to ask questions that produce useful information, without overloading participants or making them lose interest after a few weeks. Study organizers also acknowledge that iPhone owners tend to be more affluent and not necessarily an accurate mirror of the world's population. Apple had previously created software called HealthKit for apps that track iPhone owners' health statistics and exercise habits. Senior vice-president Jeff Williams said the company wants to help scientists by creating additional software for more specialized apps, using the iPhone's capabilities and vast user base - estimated at 70 million or more in North America alone. "This is advancing research and helping to democratize medicine," Williams said in an interview.
  • Apple launched its ResearchKit program in March with five apps to investigate Parkinson's, asthma, heart disease, diabetes and breast cancer. A sixth app was released last month to collect information for a long-term health study of gays and lesbians by the University of California, San Francisco. Williams said more are being developed. For scientists, a smartphone app is a relatively inexpensive way to reach thousands of people living in different settings and geographic areas. Traditional studies may only draw a few hundred participants, said Dr. Ray Dorsey, a University of Rochester neurologist who's leading the Parkinson's app study, called mPower.
  • Others have had similar ideas. Google Inc. says it's developing a health-tracking wristband specifically designed for medical studies. Researchers also have tried limited studies that gather data from apps on Android phones. But if smartphones hold great promise for medical research, experts say there are issues to consider when turning vast numbers of people into walking test subjects.
  • Some apps rely on participants to provide data. Elizabeth Ortiz, a 48-year-old New York nurse with asthma, measures her lung power each day by breathing into an inexpensive plastic device. She types the results into the Asthma Health app, which also asks if she's had difficulty breathing or sleeping, or taken medication that day. "I'm a Latina woman and there's a high rate of asthma in my community," said Ortiz, who said she already used her iPhone "constantly" for things such as banking and email. "I figured that participating would help my family and friends, and anyone else who suffers from asthma."
  • None of the apps test experimental drugs or surgeries. Instead, they're designed to explore such questions as how diseases develop or how sufferers respond to stress, exercise or standard treatment regimens. Stanford's McConnell said he also wants to study the effect of giving participants feedback on their progress, or reminders about exercise and medication. In the future, researchers might be able to incorporate data from participants' hospital records, said McConnell. But first, he added, they must build a track record of safeguarding data they collect. "We need to get to the stage where we've passed the privacy test and made sure that people feel comfortable with this."
  • Toward that end, the enrolment process for each app requires participants to read an explanation of how their information will be used, before giving formal consent. The studies all promise to meet federal health confidentiality rules and remove identifying information from other data that's collected. Apple says it won't have access to any data or use it for commercial purposes.
  • Elizabeth Ortiz uses the Asthma Health smartphone app to track her condition. • Richard Drew/the associated press
Irene Jansen

Gone Without a Case: Suspicious Elder Deaths Rarely Investigated - ProPublica - 0 views

  • Dec. 21, 2011
  • When investigators reviewed Shepter's medical records, they determined that he had actually died of a combination of ailments often related to poor care, including an infected ulcer, pneumonia, dehydration and sepsis.
  • Prosecutors in 2009 charged Pormir and two former colleagues with killing Shepter and two other elderly residents. They've pleaded not guilty. The criminal case is ongoing. Health-care regulators have already taken action, severely restricting the doctor's medical license. The federal government has fined the home nearly $150,000.
  • ...31 more annotations...
  • Shepter's story illustrates a problem that extends far beyond a single California nursing home. ProPublica and PBS "Frontline" have identified more than three-dozen cases in which the alleged neglect, abuse or even murder of seniors eluded authorities.
  • For more than a year, ProPublica, in concert with other news organizations, has scrutinized the nation's coroner and medical examiner offices [1], which are responsible for probing sudden and unusual fatalities. We found that these agencies -- hampered by chronic underfunding, a shortage of trained doctors and a lack of national standards -- have sometimes helped to send innocent people to prison and allowed killers to walk free.
  • If a senior like Shepter dies under suspicious circumstances, there's no guarantee anyone will ever investigate.
  • "a hidden national scandal."
  • Because of gaps in government data, it's impossible to say how many suspicious cases have been written off as natural fatalities.
  • In one 2008 study, nearly half the doctors surveyed failed to identify the correct cause of death for an elderly patient with a brain injury caused by a fall.
  • Autopsies of seniors have become increasingly rare even as the population age 65 or older has grown. Between 1972 and 2007, a government analysis [2] found, the share of U.S. autopsies performed on seniors dropped from 37 percent to 17 percent.
  • "father was lying in a hospital bed essentially dying of thirst, unable to express himself -- so people could have a nice, quiet cup of tea."
    • Irene Jansen
       
      Staff were more likely caring for dozens of other patients, run off their feet. See pp. 38-40 of CUPE's Our Vision for Better Seniors Care http://cupe.ca/privatization-watch-february-2010/our-vision-research-paper
  • "We're where child abuse was 30 years ago," said Dr. Kathryn Locatell, a geriatrician who specializes in diagnosing elder abuse. "I think it's ageism -- I think it boils down to that one word. We don't value old people. We don't want to think about ourselves getting old."
  • A study published last year in The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology found that nearly half of 371 Florida death certificates surveyed had errors in them.
  • Doctors without training in forensics often have trouble determining which cases should be referred to a coroner or medical examiner.
  • State officials in Washington and Maryland routinely check the veracity of death certificates, but most states rarely do so
  • there has to be a professional, independent review process
  • a public, 74-bed facility
  • As the chief medical examiner for King County, Harruff launched a program in 2008 to double-check fatalities listed as natural on county death certificates. By 2010, the program had caught 347 serious misdiagnoses.
  • Of the 1.8 million seniors who died in 2008, post-mortem exams were performed on just 2 percent. The rate is even lower -- less than 1 percent -- for elders who passed away in nursing homes or care facilities.
  • Some counties have formed elder death review teams that bring special expertise to cases of possible abuse or neglect. In Arkansas, thanks to one crusading coroner, state law requires the review of all nursing-home fatalities, including those blamed on natural causes.
  • Thogmartin said "95 percent" of the elder abuse allegations he comes across "are completely false," and that many of the claims originate with personal injury attorneys.
  • Decubitus ulcers, better known as pressure sores or bed sores, are a possible indication of abuse or neglect. If a person remains in one position for too long, pressure on the skin can cause it to break down. Left untreated, the sores will expand, causing surrounding flesh to die and spreading infection throughout the body.
  • Federal data show that more than 7 percent of long-term nursing-home residents have pressure ulcers.
  • "Very often, that is the way these folks die," he said. "It is a preventable mechanism of death that we're missing."
  • "Occasionally, there are elderly people who are being assaulted. But this issue of pressure ulcers is a far, far bigger issue, and really nationwide."
  • a new state law requiring nursing homes to report all deaths, including those believed to be natural, to the local coroner. The law, enacted in 1999, authorizes coroners to probe all nursing-home deaths, and requires them to alert law enforcement and state regulators if they think maltreatment may have contributed to a death.
  • "It was a horrible place,"
    • Irene Jansen
       
      This facility was for-profit, owned by Riley's Corporation. See CUPE Our Vision pp. 52-55 for evidence on the link between for-profit ownership and lower quality of care.
  • investigations led state regulators to shut down the facility, in part because of the home's failure to prevent and treat pressure sores
  • prompted Medicare inspectors to start citing nursing homes for care-related deaths and to undergo additional elder-abuse training.
  • Still, nursing homes inspections are not designed to identify problem deaths. The federal government relies on state death-reporting laws and local coroners and medical examiners to root out suspicious cases
  • They found such problems repeatedly at Riley's Oak Hill Manor North in North Little Rock.
  • A 2004 review of Malcolm's efforts by the U.S. Government Accountability Office concluded that the "serious, undetected care problems identified by the Pulaski County coroner are likely a national problem not limited to Arkansas."
  • staffing in homes is a constant challenge. Being a caregiver is a low-paying, thankless kind of job. (at one time you could make more money flipping burgers than caring for our elderly- priorities anyone??) With all the new Medicare cuts, pharmacy companies who continue to overcharge facilities for services, insurance companies who won’t be regulated, our long-term facilities are in for a world of hurt- which will affect the loved ones we care for. Medicare cuts mean staffing cuts- there are no nurse/patient ratios here- meaning you may have one nurse for up to 50 residents. Scary? You bet it is!!  Better staffing, better care, everyone wins.
  • Lets not just blame the caregivers. Healthcare and business do not mix. When a business is trying to make money, they will not put the needs of patients and people first. To provide actual staffing (good-competant care with proper patient to caregiver ratios) the facilities would not make money.
Irene Jansen

Healthcare Policy, 7(1) 2011: 68-79 Population Aging and the Determinants of Healthcar... - 0 views

    • Irene Jansen
       
      Rising hospital expenses, use of specialists threaten system; Aging population accounts for one third of increase, says UBC study Vancouver Sun Tue Aug 30 2011 Page: A4 Section: Westcoast News Byline: Matthew Robinson 
  • We found that population aging contributed less than 1% per year to spending on medical, hospital and pharmaceutical care. Moreover, changes in age-specific mortality rates actually reduced hospital expenditure by –0.3% per year. Based on forecasts through 2036, we found that the future effects of population aging on healthcare spending will continue to be small. We therefore conclude that population aging has exerted, and will continue to exert, only modest pressures on medical, hospital and pharmaceutical costs in Canada. As indicated by the specific non-demographic cost drivers computed in our study, the critical determinants of expenditure on healthcare stem from non-demographic factors over which practitioners, policy makers and patients have discretion.
  • research dating back 30 years illustrates that population aging exerts modest pressure on health system costs in Canada (Denton and Spencer 1983; Barer et al. 1987, 1995; Roos et al. 1987; Marzouk 1991; Evans et al. 2001; McGrail et al. 2001; Denton et al. 2009)
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • To shed new empirical light on this old debate, we quantified the impacts of demographic and non-demographic determinants of healthcare expenditure using data for British Columbia (BC) over the period 1996 to 2006. Using linked administrative healthcare data, we quantified the trends in and the determinants of expenditures on hospital care, physician services and pharmaceuticals. To our knowledge, this is the first time that all three of these major components of healthcare costs have been analyzed in a single Canadian study.
  • our study cohort included 3,159,900 residents in 1996 and 3,662,148 residents in 2006
  • We found that population aging in British Columbia contributed less than 1% per year to total growth of expenditures on hospital, medical and pharmaceutical care from 1996 to 2006. We also found that changes in age-specific mortality rates reduced (albeit modestly) per capita healthcare costs over time, confirming what other researchers have suggested (Fries 1980; Breyer and Felder 2006). With rigorous analysis of recent healthcare data, we can therefore confirm what studies spanning earlier decades for British Columbia, elsewhere in Canada and other comparable health systems have found: the net impact of demographic factors on major components of the healthcare system is moderate (Denton and Spencer 1983; Fuchs 1984; Barer et al. 1987, 1995; Gerdtham 1993; Evans et al. 2001; McGrail et al. 2001). Moreover, when we forecasted the effects of expected demographic changes in British Columbia through 2036, we found that the future effects of population aging on healthcare spending will continue to be modest (1% or less per year).
  • Our findings also indicated that average payment per unit of hospital care increased over the period. The increase in hospital unit costs may have been an appropriate policy response to increases in age-adjusted clinical complexity per patient remaining in care following reductions in the average length of stay
  • After taking into account population aging, the average number of days of prescription drug therapy received by British Columbia residents grew more than 5% per year during the first half of our study period and plateaued in the latter half of the period (data not shown)
  • Despite popular claims about population aging and the sustainability of healthcare in Canada, demographic changes exert steady, predictable and modest forces on the cost of major components of our healthcare system. This is likely to remain true for the foreseeable future.
  •  
    Despite popular claims about population aging and the sustainability of healthcare in Canada, demographic changes exert steady, predictable and modest forces on the cost of major components of our healthcare system. This is likely to remain true for the foreseeable future. Changes in the age-specific profile of healthcare costs, by contrast, can exert and have exerted significant pressures on health system costs. Clinicians, policy makers and patients have some discretion over the non-demographic sources of healthcare cost increases - unlike population aging. Though these results are largely confirmations of studies from past decades, it is nevertheless important to update the scientific basis for policy debates. Moreover, close attention to recent trends and cost drivers - such as the price of prescription drugs that drove pharmaceutical expenditures in the past decade - also helps to illuminate the non-demographic forces that seem most amenable to policy intervention. Ultimately, then, research of this nature is a reminder that the healthcare system is as sustainable as we want it to be.
Govind Rao

Nursing home ills tied to heavy antibiotic use - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Thu Jul 2 2015
  • Antibiotics are likely being overused in some nursing homes in Ontario - and that misuse is putting all residents of these facilities at risk, a study suggests. With most drugs, inappropriate use only threatens the health of the person who takes the medication. But with misuse of antibiotics, the problems that arise - drug-resistant bacteria, C. difficile infections - are not restricted to the people who have been taking the drugs. "[Nursing] homes with higher use put patients at hig
  • her risk," said Dr. Nick Daneman, first author of the study. "Unlike other medication classes, which can harm the individual recipient of that medication, antibiotics have the capacity to do harm even beyond the individual that gets the medication." Daneman is an adjunct scientist at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and an internal medicine physician at Toronto's Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. The study appeared in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine, a publication of the American Medical Association.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • It has been known for some time that long-term care facilities use a lot of antibiotics. Earlier studies have suggested there is a significant amount of overuse in this sector of the healthcare system, with potentially between one-third and half of all use being inappropriate or unnecessary. Residents of these facilities are typically frail, elderly people with a variety of health concerns. They are at the point in life where their immune systems cannot fight off invaders easily.
  • These people often live in close quarters and are cared for by staff who move from resident to resident. It's a situation that makes for efficient spread of bacteria and other pathogens that cause infections. For this study, Daneman and his co-authors looked at antibiotic use in 110,656 residents of 607 nursing homes in Ontario in 2010 and 2011. The nursing homes studied were divided into low, medium and high antibiotic-use categories. The differences were stark: antibiotic prescribing in high-use facilities was 10 times that of low-use homes. If high-use homes had residents who were significantly sicker and more frail, that might explain their heavy reliance on antibiotics. But the authors also did a comparison of the residents of the various facilities and found there were not major health differences among them. That suggests the increased use of antibiotics in the high-use homes likely is a result of the doctors who are prescribing at those facilities, said infectious diseases expert Dr. Andrew Simor, who was not involved in this study. Simor is head of microbiology at Sunnybrook.
  • He suggested this information could help change prescribing behaviours; facilities where antibiotic use is higher than the norm could be targeted with programs aimed at minimizing misuse of these critical drugs. The article, which Simor praised, also drew a line between high antibiotic use and higher rates of negative consequences of antibiotic use. Those side-effects included allergic reactions to antibiotics, developing antibiotic-related diarrhea, contracting C. difficile infection, or becoming infected with a drug-resistant bacteria. Daneman said the adverse events were generally serious enough to send these people to hospital. "If you live in a high antibiotic-use home versus a low antibiotic-use home, you had 25 per cent increased risk of one of these serious antibiotic-related adverse events," he said. Because of the way the study was designed, the authors could not tell if the antibiotics used were needed in each setting. So they cannot say that the low-use homes had hit the sweet spot for antibiotic use - not too much, but enough.
  • Still, Simor observed that when hospitals started to develop programs to cut back on unneeded use of antibiotics - it's called antibiotic stewardship - concerns were raised that some people who needed the drugs might not get them. That hasn't proven to be the case, he said. "So if you feel comfortable translating those findings into a nursing home setting, I think you'll find the same situation is true - that stewardship will not place patients at increased risk for not getting an antibiotic when they need it."
Govind Rao

Typhoid 'superbug' may break out in Africa; Journal says illness has been quietly shape... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Wed May 13 2015
  • A "superbug" strain of the bacterium that causes typhoid fever has spread globally in just three decades and is currently seeding a silent epidemic in Africa, according to a study in the journal Nature Genetics. An international team of researchers on Monday reported that typhoid fever - a centuries-old disease that still afflicts millions of people in the developing world - has been quietly shape-shifting into a deadlier threat, thanks to the rapid emergence of a drug-resistant strain called H58.
  • The strain refers to a family of Salmonella enterica Typhi (the bacterium that causes typhoid fever) that has developed resistance to antibiotics commonly used to treat the disease. In recent years, public health officials have seen H58 popping up in countries such as Vietnam and Malawi, but this latest study is the first to provide a snapshot of the superbug's global spread. In a major international collaboration, more than 70 researchers analyzed 1,832 samples of S. Typhi collected from 63 countries. Twenty-one of those countries had H58, which has "expanded dramatically" across Asia and Africa since first emerging three decades ago, the study found. The superbug is also now moving across Africa, where it is causing an "ongoing, unrecognized multi-drug resistant epidemic."
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • "One of the surprising findings was that when we sequenced all these ... almost half of them fell into the H58 lineage," said first author Dr. Vanessa Wong, an infectious disease specialist with the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and University of Cambridge. "That (covered) 21 countries. So we were like, oh no. This is actually kind of everywhere." Typhoid fever is a disease that can be spread by only humans who carry the S. Typhi bacterium in their bloodstreams and intestinal tracts.
  • The disease is now rare in industrialized countries like Canada - which had 144 reported cases in 2012, probably mostly in travellers - but it is still relatively common in the developing world, especially where hygiene and sanitation are poor. While a typhoid vaccine is available, its efficacy wears off after a few years and many people also can't afford the vaccine in the developing world, where the disease is estimated to cause 21 million cases every year and about 200,000 deaths. Typhoid fever can be treated with antibiotics but the overuse of these drugs has fuelled resistance, as bacteria capable of defeating these drugs survive and proliferate. In a 2013 report, the Public Health Agency of Canada found that S. Typhi infections resistant to the antibiotic ciprofloxacin had increased to 18 per cent from 10 per cent the previous year. When asked if H58 has ever been reported in Canada, the agency said it doesn't routinely analyze the strains of S. Typhi cases since typhoid fever is not endemic here.
  • In countries where H58 has emerged, the superbug is now crowding out weaker strains, thus dramatically "changing the architecture of the disease," Wong said. She said treating multidrug-resistant strains like H58 also requires intravenous antibiotics - an expensive luxury that many people in the developing world cannot access or afford. Resistance against last-line antibiotics will probably also eventually emerge, she added. "If we carry on and the bug continues to evolve, we'll run out of options pretty quickly." She noted that her study also found H58 in Nepal, where devastating earthquakes have now left the country highly vulnerable to outbreaks of diseases like typhoid fever.
  • For Virginia Pitzer, a professor of epidemiology with the Yale School of Public Health who was not involved with this study, this "important and interesting" new paper underscores the need to tackle typhoid fever.
Govind Rao

Canada can afford universal pharmacare - no more excuses - 0 views

  • Matthew B. Stanbrook, MD PhD, Deputy Editor
  • Correspondence to: CMAJ editor, pubs@cmaj.ca See also page 491 and www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.141564 Canadians embrace universal public health care as a core national value. We are proud to say that we live in a country that ensures access to health care for all, regardless of means — the problem is, that statement isn’t true. A gaping hole in our supposedly universal system is the lack of public coverage for prescription drugs for most Canadians. Many Canadians face drug costs they can’t afford, forcing them to either take their medicines less often than prescribed or do without them entirely, with predictable adverse health consequences.1
  • Universal pharmacare has been recommended by virtually every national study and Royal Commission from the time medicare was first introduced in Canada to the 2002 Romanow Report, yet we still don’t have it. Governments past and present have defended their inaction on this issue by arguing that pharmacare would cost too much. Although it’s not clear that there was ever good reason to assume that would be true, providing scientific evidence to refute such a claim requires a study with access to comprehensive data about the sources and magnitude of drug costs, prescribing patterns and the effects of introducing universal drug coverage from the experience of other national and international jurisdictions.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • In their recent CMAJ article, Morgan and colleagues present just such a study.2 Using recently available national data on drug use and costs, they report an economic model that estimates the cost of implementing national public drug coverage. The model anticipates several key evidence-based consequences of universal pharmacare. Patients who were previously unable to access drugs would now receive them, which would drive up costs. However, the greatly enhanced purchasing power of a single national third-party payer would be expected to confer an ability to negotiate substantial reductions in the prices of many drugs, as other countries have experienced and as Canadian provinces are already trying to achieve through collaboration. The model also assumes that patients would incur modest copayments, as is the case in other countries with universal pharmacare.
  • The bottom line? The best estimate would require the federal government to spend an extra $1 billion per year. That’s a lot of money, but considering that federal transfers for health care to the provinces and territories amount to $35 billion — not to mention everything the federal government spends directly on health — relatively speaking, it’s not that much of an increase. As with all modelling studies, these estimates rely on assumptions, and the associated uncertainties mean that costs could be higher — as much as $5.4 billion per year in the worst imaginable case. Equally, though, national pharmacare could well result in net savings for government — perhaps as much as $2.9 billion per year.
  • Morgan SG, Law M, Daw JR, et al. Estimated cost of universal public coverage of prescription drugs in Canada. CMAJ 2015;187:491–7. Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • A small number of drug classes are key drivers of overall costs and would continue to be so with or without pharmacare. Some (e.g., biologic agents) represent classes in which many emerging new therapies are expected to arise. Thus, the $1 billion estimate might not be stable going forward. But knowing this information may now enable policy-makers to develop specific interventions focused on reducing the impact of these key cost drivers even further.
  • Although the Canada Health Act has long enshrined the value of equitable, public health care coverage for all Canadians, its enactment by governments to date has been hypocritical in the absence of pharmacare. Canada has the dubious distinction of being the only country with universal health care coverage, but not universal pharmacare. As we have said before,3 the time to end this hypocrisy is long overdue; all of our peer nations have already done so. The moral case for universal pharmacare has always been apparent. With a strong economic case for pharmacare also evident, there can be no more excuses for delay. In this election year, it is especially timely for Canadians to demand that their next government enact national pharmacare.
  • Tang KL, Ghali WA, Manns BJ. Addressing cost-related barriers to prescription drug use in Canada. CMAJ 2014;186:276–80. FREE Full Text
  • Even more striking are the potential benefits to the private sector: no matter what, it would save a lot of money from pharmacare. Currently, nearly half of all drug expenditures in Canada are incurred by the private sector, divided almost evenly between individuals, whose costs would drop by more than half under pharmacare, and private drug plans, whose current costs for nearly all prescription drugs would disappear completely. Of note, a big chunk of public savings would arise from what governments presently spend on private drug coverage, such as for civil servants. With projected savings like these, one would expect that private companies, governments and individuals alike should be clamouring for pharmacare.
  • tanbrook MB, Hébert PC, Coutts J, et al. Can Canada get on with national pharmacare already? CMAJ 2011;183:E1275. FREE Full Text
Govind Rao

Privatization in health care will leave poor out in the cold - Infomart - 0 views

  • Windsor Star Mon May 4 2015
  • A long-running dispute between Dr. Brian Day, the co-owner of Cambie Surgeries Corp., and the British Columbia government may finally be resolved in the BC Supreme Court this year - and the ruling could transform the Canadian health system from coast to coast. The case emerged in response to an audit of Cambie Surgeries, a private for-profit corporation, by the BC Medical Services Commission. The audit found from a sample of Cambie's billing that it (and another private clinic) had charged patients hundreds of thousands of dollars more for health services covered by medicare than is permitted by law. Day and Cambie Surgeries claim the law preventing a doctor charging patients more is unconstitutional.
  • Day's challenge builds on the legacy of a 2005 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada overturning a Quebec ban on private health insurance for medically necessary care. But this case goes much further, not only challenging the ban on private health insurance to cover medically necessary care, but also the limits on extra-billing and the prohibition against doctors working for both the public and private health systems at the same time. A trial date was set to begin in 2012, but was adjourned until March 2015 so that the parties could resolve their dispute out of court and reach a settlement. It now appears such a resolution has not been reached and the court proceedings may resume in November. Here's why this case matters.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Legal precedent: Whatever way the case is decided at trial, it is likely to be appealed and eventually reviewed by the Supreme Court of Canada. A decision from this level will mean all provincial and territorial governments will have to revisit equivalent laws. The foundational pillars of Canadian medicare - equitable access and preventing twotier care - could well be vanquished in the process. Wait times: Day will likely argue that Canada performs poorly on wait times compared to other countries, and that other countries allow two-tier care; thus, if Canada is allowed two-tier care, our wait times would improve. But this approach is too simplistic. Comparisons to the British health system, fail to recall that, despite having two-tiers, it has in the past suffered horrendously long-wait times. Recent efforts to tackle wait times have come from within the public system, with initiatives like wait time guarantees and tying payment for public officials to wait times targets.
  • By looking to Britain, we are comparing apples to oranges. British doctors are generally full-time salaried employees while most Canadian physicians bill medicare on a fee-forservice basis. Consequently, the repercussions of permitting extra billing in Canada could eviscerate our publiclyfunded system, whereas this is not the case in Britain. Imagine if most doctors in Canada could bill, as those at the Cambie clinic have done, whatever they want in addition to what they are paid by governments?
  • Conflict-of-interest incentives: Evidence suggests there is a danger in providing a perverse incentive for physicians who are permitted to work in both public and private health systems at the same time. Wait times may grow for patients left in the public system as specialists drive traffic to their more lucrative private practice. Sound improbable? Academic studies have noted this trend in specific clinics that permit simultaneous private-public practice. And recent U.K. news reports have profiled a case where a surgeon bumped a public patient in need of a transplant for his private-pay patient.
  • Competition: Proponents of privatized health services often claim it would add a healthy dose of competition, jolting the "monopoly" of public health care from its apathy. But free markets don't work well in health care. Why? Because public providers and private providers won't truly compete if the laws Day challenges are struck down. Instead, those with means and/or private insurance will buy their way to the front of queues. Public coverage for the poor will likely suffer, as is clearly evident in the U.S., with doctors refusing to provide care to low-income patients in preference for those covered by higher-paying private insurance.
  • Of course, this is all based on an outcome that is not yet known. It may be that the charter challenge in B.C. will be unsuccessful, but clearly the stakes for ordinary Canadians are high. Sadly Dr. Day is not bringing a challenge for all Canadians. Isn't it past time our governments and doctors work to ensure all Canadians - and not just those who can afford to pay - receive timely care? Colleen Flood is Professor and University Research Chair in Health Law Policy at the University of Ottawa. Kathleen O'Grady is a Research Associate at the Simone de Beauvoir Institute, Concordia University and Managing Editor of EvidenceNetwork. ca
Doug Allan

Scarborough's two hospital systems to study merger - Infomart - 0 views

  • Scarborough's two hospitals have agreed to start studying a full merger.
  • The Central East Local Health Integration Network, a regional overseer expected to approve the study on Monday, ordered the hospitals in March to create an "integration plan" between TSH General and Birchmount campuses and RVHS Centenary.
  • "Right away it was like silos fell down between the two hospitals," said Lyn McDonell, a TSH board member on the committee.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • "Everything's on the table," said TSH CEO Robert Biron, who argued Scarborough's hospitals have suffered a lack of operating and capital funds because they are split, an arrangement he called "to some degree dysfunctional."
  • The TSH board expected to hear the report of an expert panel on two proposals the LHIN said required more study, the elimination of the birthing centre at the General and a division of programs turning the Birchmount into a centre for day surgery and the General into the facility for operations requiring overnight stays.
  • "We felt strongly that merger seemed to be the (option) that had the most potential."
  • As the province forces hospitals into "a more competitive model," those in Scarborough need a way to "obtain our fair share," he said.
  • We're much better positioned if we do that together."
  • "The days of hospitals doing everything for everybody" are changing, said Dr. Robert Ting, the group's president. "We have to decide what our community needs and focus on certain areas."
  • So much enthusiasm for a merger was expressed, Warren Law, a TSH board member who is not on the ILC, cautioned colleagues the appropriate time to make the case was "down the road."
  • Biron insisted the ILC is "starting from a blank slate" and no decision to merge had been made.
  • In 2011, Dr. John Wright, the former TSH CEO, initiated study of a merger between TSH and Toronto East General Hospital in East York, but the work was shelved last year after objections from medical staffs of both hospitals, residents and the LHIN, which noted the East General was outside its jurisdiction.
  •  
    As the province forces hospitals into "a more competitive model," those in Scarborough need a way to "obtain our fair share," he said. "We're much better positioned if we do that together."
Doug Allan

Elevators carrying bacteria: study; Hospital elevator buttons coated with more germs th... - 0 views

  • You might want to use an elbow to push the elevator button the next time you are in a hospital.
  • A new study suggests that elevator buttons in hospitals have more bacteria on them than surfaces in public bathrooms in hospitals.
  • "It's a theoretic risk. But the main point here is that it's also an avoidable risk through hand hygiene."
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • Analysis of the swabs taken in the study found most of the bugs were benign. But that might not always be the case, said senior author Dr. Donald Redelmeier.
  • While elevator buttons are certainly among the surfaces hospital cleaners target, they are touched so often, by so many people, that it's a bit of a losing battle.
  • "They can't be cleaned again and again and again, every second of the day," Redelmeier said. "Once they're clean, they don't stay clean very long."
  • Studies have found bacterial contamination on neckties worn by male doctors, lab coats, stethoscopes, curtains separating beds in multiple-bed rooms, computer keyboards as well as smart phones and digital tablets health-care workers use to enter and check patient data.
  • For the study, swabs were taken from 120 different elevator buttons and 96 toilet surfaces in three different hospitals in Toronto. Swabbing was done on weekdays and weekends, and a variety of elevator buttons were tested. As well, the public washrooms closest to the elevators were also tested, with swabs taken of the door handles on the inside and outside of the main door, the latch used to close cubicle doors and the toilet flush handle or button.
  • Redelmeier said people should consider using an elbow, a pen or some other item to push elevator buttons in hospitals, or make sure they use hand sanitizer after exiting an elevator. He suggested hospitals should put sanitizer dispensers in elevators.
  • "Often when people use a hand cleanser, they're very good at washing their palms, but not their fingertips. And yet most of the transmission does not occur in the middle of the hand, it occurs at the periphery of the hand."
Govind Rao

Study sparks renewed interest in universal pharmacare plan | canada.com - 0 views

  • The study, published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, found that universal drug coverage would save Canada $7.3 billion every year, with a 32 per cent reduction in overall spending on prescription drugs. At the same time, the annual cost of having such a system would be just $1 billion. With this study, health care experts and industry leaders are once again pointing to the need for a single, coherent and effective national pharmacare strategy. The case for it, as the latest study suggests, may in fact be strong. But the likelihood of any such proposal soon being implemented as policy remains unclear. A surprising void in Canadian medicare
  •  
    March 23 2015
  •  
    March 23 2015
Irene Jansen

The Oprah effect and why not all scientific evidence is valuable - Science-ish - Maclea... - 0 views

  • On the question of type, it’s important to differentiate between primary research (such as control studies and clinical trials) and secondary research (meta-analyses and systematic reviews). In the media, you often read about primary research, like this jewel from earlier this week: “Study touts new way to spot babies at risk for obesity.” Greenhalgh points to a useful “evidence hierarchy” that ranks the relative weight of research from highest to lowest: 1. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses 2. Randomised controlled trials with definitive results (confidence intervals that do not overlap the threshold clinically significant effect) 3. Randomised controlled trials with non-definitive results (a point estimate that suggests a clinically significant effect but with confidence intervals overlapping the threshold for this effect) 4. Cohort studies 5. Case-control studies 6. Cross sectional surveys 7. Case reports
Doug Allan

Customize local food for hospitals - Infomart - 0 views

  • Setting out to find ways to incorporate local food into hospitals and long-term care facilities was a noble pursuit for University of Guelph researcher Paulette Padanyi and her team.
  • the team's vision for a 20 per cent increase in local food in institutional care facilities
  • But while all this sounds great, when it comes to hospitals and institutions, a new level of business propriety must take hold. There's no end-of-the-lane sales. No late deliveries allowed. No excuses - even reasonable ones - such as the truck broke down, or we had a crop failure. A deal with a hospital entails people having to eat local food, rather than making it some personal choice.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • So in their study, Report on Food Provision in Ontario Hospitals and Long-Term Care Services: The Challenges and Opportunities of Incorporating Local Food, it follows that Padanyi and her team found substantial barriers to requiring that all public health-care facilities in Ontario incorporate local food into their patient and visitor food service.
  • Simply put, we're not there yet. We have a hard enough time agreeing on the definition of local food, let alone providing it en masse to sick and elderly people.
  • Having looked at some institutional case studies in our area, they say local food can be offered to patients and residents very successfully, on a facility-by-facility basis.
  • Realistically, though, not much will change on the hospital-food frontier as long as the province gives hospitals peanuts for food care. True, no one checks into the hospital for its food. But it's sure one more reason to check out.
  • Report on Food Provision in Ontario Hospitals and Long-Term Care Services: The Challenges and Opportunities of Incorporating Local Food
  •  
    Local food study for institutions is out/
Govind Rao

Medicare study: House calls tailored to frailest patients cut costs by avoiding hospita... - 0 views

  • Canadian Press Fri Jun 19 2015
  • WASHINGTON - An X-ray in the living room. A rapid blood test. A peek into pill bottles and refrigerators. The humble house call can accomplish a lot - and now research suggests that tailoring it to some of Medicare's frailest patients can improve their care while cutting costs. Medicare announced Thursday that it saved more than $25 million in the first year of a three-year study to determine the value of home-based primary care for frail seniors with multiple chronic illnesses, by avoiding pricier hospital or emergency room care.
  • Dr. Patrick Conway, Medicare's chief medical officer, says the house call delivers "high-touch" co-ordinated care that allows doctors and nurses to spot brewing problems in a patient's everyday environment before he or she worsens. "If we can keep people as healthy as possible and at home, so they only go to the hospital or emergency room when they really need to, that both improves quality and lowers cost," he said.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • House calls are starting to make a comeback amid a rapidly greying population, although they're still rare. The idea: A doctor or nurse-practitioner, sometimes bringing along a social worker, makes regular visits to frail or homebound patients whose needs are too complex for a typical 15-minute office visit - and who have a hard time even getting to a physician's office. "It helps you avoid the emergency situations," said Naomi Rasmussen, whose 83-year-old father in Portland, Oregon, is part of Medicare's Independence at Home study.
  • On Thursday, Medicare released its long-awaited analysis of the study's first year and said the project saved an average of $3,070 per participating beneficiary; Conway said all but five practices generated savings. Medicare will divide $11.7 million in incentive payments among the nine practices that met enough of the quality requirements for that financial bonus, including Portland's Housecall Providers. "We need to shift costs to this kind of intervention," said Dr. Pamela Miner of Housecall Providers.
  • It took extra primary care visits, but "he went from bouncing in and out of the hospital to one hospitalization in an entire year," said Housecall Providers nurse Mary Sayre. But this kind of care is hard to find, in part because of reimbursement. Medicare did pay for more than 2.6 million house call visits in 2013. But add in the travel time, and doctors can see - and get paid for - many more patients in a day in the office than they can see on the road. Enter Medicare's Independent at Home demonstration project, now in its third year of testing how well a house call approach really works and how to pay for it. About 8,400 frail seniors with multiple chronic conditions - Medicare's most expensive type of patient - are receiving customized home-based primary care from 17 programs around the country. The incentive for doctors: They could share in any government savings if they also meet enough quality-care goals.
  • Her father, stroke survivor Teodor Mal, is prone to frequent infections and unable to tell his wife or daughter whenever he starts to feel ill. Visits to multiple doctors left him so agitated that a good exam was difficult, and just getting him and his wheelchair there took several hours and a special van. Then Mal began getting his primary care from Portland-based Housecall Providers Inc. When family members see any worrisome changes in his behaviour or appearance, providers can make a quick visit to see if another urinary tract infection or case of pneumonia is beginning, in time to give at-home antibiotics a chance.
  • The Affordable Care Act created the Medicare study, and legislation is pending in Congress to extend the project another two years. The program is "bringing the house calls of yesteryear into the 21st century," said Sen. Edward J. Markey, D-Mass. He said Thursday's pilot results are promising enough to make the project permanent so that many more Medicare patients eventually could seek this kind of care.
Govind Rao

It's true - putting in too much overtime can kill you. Here's the proof - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Thu Jul 9 2015
  • Whether it's to help boost their paycheques, complete a project or satisfy their workaholic spirit, some employees think little of logging extra hours on the job. But experts say significant stretches of overtime without adequate time for recovery could not only result in diminished work performance, but it could also pose potentially serious health risks. A University of Massachusetts study published by the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine in 2005 explored the impact of overtime and long work hours on occupational injuries and illness.
  • Researchers cited studies associating overtime and extended work schedules with heightened risk of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, fatigue, stress, depression, chronic infections, diabetes and death. They also noted some studies found evidence of links between long working hours and an increased risk of occupational injuries, including among construction workers, nurses, miners, bus drivers and firefighters. "While some occupations have restrictions on length of work shift, most don't," said Dr. Cameron Mustard, president and senior scientist at the Institute for Work & Health in Toronto.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • "Whether you're in a healthcare facility, a manufacturing facility, driving a vehicle - if you're tired, the risks of mistakes are going to go up." Two studies comparing eightand 12-hour schedules during day and night shifts found that 12hour night shifts were associated with more physical fatigue, smoking or alcohol use, according to a 2004 report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "It's the law of diminishing returns," said Liane Davey, vicepresident of team solutions with Lee Hecht Harrison Knightsbridge, which specializes in talent recruitment and development.
  • "We think that we're staying and doing more and being more productive; but the negative outcome of doing that actually means our core quality suffers." Irregular schedules - such as switching from a block of night shifts to day shifts - can result in sleep disturbance which can become chronic, Mustard noted. "If you build up a period of disturbed sleep ... this is somewhat different from fatigue, although in a sense the consequence is kind of the same. "If we can't rest, we're not renewing our cognitive and physical capacities."
  • German-born Moritz Erhardt was a week from completing a work placement at Bank of America Merrill Lynch in London when he died in 2013. A British coroner said the 21-year-old intern died of an epileptic seizure that may have been triggered by fatigue. Erhardt's case sparked widespread speculation that the notorious long working hours and competitive environment at top investment banks were to blame for his death. Matt Ferguson said his 22-yearold brother, Andy, died in a headon collision in 2011 after logging excessive hours as an unpaid intern at an Edmonton radio station.
  • When Jeff and Andrea Archibald launched their design agency, the couple initially worked from home and logged significant extra time to establish their business. "We definitely hit 60-hour work weeks mainly because when there's two of you, you have to do all the billable work," recalled Jeff Archibald. "When you're starting out, your rate's a little lower, and then you have to balance out with all the business side of things, like invoicing. You don't have anybody on staff that can do those kinds of things, so you're basically wearing all of the hats," he said. "What ends up happening is you have all your meetings and your phone calls ... during the day and you do your production work at night - and that's not just us. A lot of our friends are in similar situations."
  • The Archibalds are now part of a team of seven at their Edmonton custom Web and branding firm, Paper Leaf. Weekly meetings help assess key tasks to accomplish within a given day and week - and avoid overbooking. "One of the singularly biggest concerns I think we all have is balancing the amount of workload so that we can have a profitable company - but also not overwork people," Jeff Archibald said.
  • "When you overwork, you're staring down the barrel of burnout. It's a real short-term gain." Mustard said employees logging overtime should be aware of the pace of their work and ensure they are taking breaks. "Being thoughtful about nutrition, making sure that you're not missing meals is very important. And then rest. Not shortening your chance to have sleep."
Irene Jansen

Canada News: Fire chiefs want sprinkler systems for seniors' homes, not body bags - the... - 1 views

  • Residents of many seniors homes in Ontario would die if a fire broke out because their buildings are short-staffed and lack sprinkler systems, according to a preliminary study by top provincial fire chiefs.
  • Roughly 24 retirement and nursing homes in 10 cities — including London, Kitchener, Niagara Falls and Huntsville — have been tested in mock evacuations and most failed
  • Toronto Fire Services is first conducting a survey of each care home in the city to learn the cognitive abilities of residents before conducting the mock tests.
  • ...18 more annotations...
  • Ontario seniors homes have the worst fire fatality record in North America with 45 deaths since 1980.
  • Four private members’ bills and three inquests have all recommended sprinklers.
  • Residences built after 1998 must have sprinklers but the devices are still not required in 4,000 older “care occupancies,” which house more than 200,000 seniors and other vulnerable people across Ontario including the intellectually challenged. The frail, elderly are more likely to die in fires than any other age group, experts say.
  • Madeleine Meilleur, Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services
  • “Sprinklers are not the only answer. They are important, but nothing will replace the staffing levels and how they are trained in case of fire,”
  • There are never fire deaths in homes with sprinklers except in the rare case where a person who caused the fire is overcome by injuries, said Sean Tracey, of the U.S.-based National Fire Protection Association.
  • Ontario fire chiefs are frustrated with the province’s refusal to force homes to install sprinklers that would protect the elderly. The fire chiefs say their study is the latest effort in a long campaign to convince Queen’s Park.
  • an early draft said most respondents (more than 230 comments came from firefighters, retirement homes, municipalities and advocates) agreed that sprinklers should be mandatory in all care homes.
  • Oak Terrace long-term care home, a government-licensed nursing home operated by the Revera chain, failed a test in October 2010.
  • After fire officials sent a letter to each member of Revera’s board of directors, the home decided to install sprinklers
  • Revera has installed sprinklers in 85 per cent of its 200 retirement and nursing homes across Canada
  • Homes that fail mock evacuation tests are hit with legal orders under the Fire Prevention and Protection Act, telling them to hire enough staff to be able to safely evacuate 24 hours a day — or install sprinklers.
  • Sprinkler installation costs roughly $3 a square foot. That translates to $40,000 for a 30-person home or about $110,000 for a 155-person home.
  • Fragile residents, combined with inadequate staffing and the fiery nature of materials in modern furniture, like the foam padding in couches, are a recipe for disaster.
  • In 2010, a year after the Orillia fire killed four residents (and left two brain dead), the government began a consultation on fire safety. Meilleur said she expects the report will be released in June.
  • Here is how the chiefs did the study: Firefighters visited a retirement or nursing home — sometimes without advance notice — and performed a mock evacuation based on the number of overnight staff when few employees are on shift. Firefighters ordered staff to conduct a fire drill. Using a stopwatch, they tested staff’s ability to move residents out of the building or behind a firewall
  • “If 45 children had died in fires would we still be waiting for the government to take action?”
  • residents, some drugged for a night’s sleep
Doug Allan

Stubbornly high rates of health care worker injury - Healthy Debate - 0 views

  • In Ontario, the hazards of health care work were dramatically highlighted during the SARS crisis. Overall, 375 people contracted SARS in the spring of 2003. Over  three quarters were  infected in a health care setting, of whom 45% were health care workers.
  • Justice Archie Campbell led a commission to learn from SARS, and highlighted the danger for staff working in health care settings – and in this case, hospitals. The report opens by stating “hospitals are dangerous workplaces, like mines and factories, yet they lack the basic safety culture and workplace safety systems that have become expected and accepted for many years in Ontario mines and factories.”
  • Workplace injuries have been steadily declining over the past two decades.  In 1987, 48.9 of 1,000 working Canadians received some form of workers’ compensation for injury on the job, and this has declined continuously to 14.7 per 1,000 in 2010. While injury rates for health care workers have declined slightly over that same time period, they remain stubbornly difficult to change.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • One challenge in understanding the extent to which people in health care are injured at work is that injuries tend to be underreported. Generally the data used to measure health care worker injury is through workers’ compensation claims. A study of Canadian health care workers found that of 2,500 health care workers who experienced an injury, less than half filed a workers’ compensation claim.
  • Recent data from Alberta shows that about 3% of health care workers are at risk of a disabling injury in 2012, compared with 1.45% of workers in the mining and petroleum industry.
  • A study of health care worker injuries in three British Columbia health regions from 2004 to 2005 found that injury rates are particularly high for those providing direct patient care – and highest among nursing or care aides (known as health care aides in Alberta, and personal support workers in Ontario).
  • 83% of health care worker injuries were musculoskeletal in nature.
  • However, there have been efforts to mechanize some of the dangerous aspects of health care. Musculoskeletal injuries are the leading category of occupational injury for health care workers.
  • Evidence suggests that this is the case – a 2009 British study of over 40,000 workplace injury claims found that 89% were made by women, and 11% by men.
  • Gert Erasmus, senior provincial director of workplace health and safety for Alberta Health Services says that “health care is a people intensive business – combine that with physically demanding jobs and an aging workforce.”
  • The Canadian Federation of Nurses’ Unions notes nurses retire around the age of 56 – compared to the average Canadian worker at 62.
  • Experts also point to the changing work environments for many health care workers. There is a worldwide trend towards moving health care services out of hospitals into patients’ homes. Thease are uncharted waters for workplace safety and prevention of injury. Little is known about how often workers in peoples’ homes are injured and the kinds of injuries they are sustaining.
  • Gert Erasmus notes the tremendous insecurity of providing health care inside patients’ homes. “They [health care workers in homes] work in an environment that is not controlled at all, which is fundamentally different than most industries and workplaces.” In this environment, workers are more likely to be alone, lacking back up from colleagues, and the help of aids such as mechanical lifts.
  • Miranda Ferrier, President of the Ontario Personal Support Worker Association says that each time a personal support worker enters a new patient’s home – they enter into the unknown. “You are lucky if you know anything about a client when you go into the home” she says.
Heather Farrow

Feds gear up for battle against private health care - Infomart - 0 views

  • Feds gear up for battle against private health care THE NATIONAL Mon Aug 29 2016, 9:00pm ET Byline: CATHERINE CULLEN; DR. BRIAN DAY; JANE PHILPOTT WENDY MESLEY (HOST): - WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Good evening, I'm Wendy Mesley and this is "The National." DR. BRIAN DAY (CAMBIE SURGERY CENTRE):
  • Our goal is actually to fix Medicare. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): A B.C. clinic' fights to expand private health care. Catherine Cullen finds out how the federal government plans to fight back. - Justin Trudeau's Liberal government is gearing up for a fight, the outcome of which will affect all Canadians. It's a battle between public and private health care in a B.C. Court and CBC News has learned that the feds are entering the fray, armed with some powerful evidence against for-profit care. The CBC's Catherine Cullen has the details. DR. BRIAN DAY (CAMBIE SURGERY CENTRE): You have a lot of arthritis but this is not normal.
  • CATHERINE CULLEN (REPORTER): For nearly two decades the Cambie Surgery Centre has offered private healthcare. Some patients come from other countries, some are covered by workplace compensation and some are just willing to pay out of pocket for faster treatment. DR. BRIAN DAY (CAMBIE SURGERY CENTRE): What is morally wrong with Canadians spending their own money on their own health care? CATHERINE CULLEN (REPORTER): Today Dr. Brian Day is getting ready to go to court to defend that argument. DR. BRIAN DAY (CAMBIE SURGERY CENTRE): Our goal is actually to fix Medicare and that's what I think we will achieve with this lawsuit.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • CATHERINE CULLEN (REPORTER): The Cambie Surgery Centre is taking on the province of British Columbia in court next week, trying to overturn two provincial regulations. One bans private health insurance from medically-necessary surgeries. Advocates of private healthcare says it's too expensive for most people if there's no insurance. The other regulation forces doctors to choose between working in the public or private system rather than letting them to split their schedule. And now Justin Trudeau's government has been accepted as an intervener in the case. CBC News has obtained the expert report federal lawyers will use. It cites numerous studies to paint a bleak picture of a Canada with more private health care, arguing "society as a whole would be worse off." Resources like highly- skilled doctors would be siphoned from the public system. Even bankruptcies if people buy health insurance they can't afford as sometimes happens in the United States. Day says that he wants to see a European-style system with a public/private mix. DR. BRIAN DAY (CAMBIE SURGERY CENTRE):
  • To me it's a very simple question and that is: if the government promises health care, fails to deliver it, do they have the right under the constitution to stop you or your loved ones from extricating yourself from the pain and suffering that then ensues? CATHERINE CULLEN (REPORTER): The federal government says it's concerned about anything that would create a barrier to quality healthcare. JANE PHILPOTT (MINISTER OF HEALTH): It goes completely against the principles of the Canada Health Act which include accessibility and universality and we're committed to upholding those. CATHERINE CULLEN (REPORTER):
  • Now, the Supreme Court has already ruled on a similar case about private insurance, specifically in Québec, and in that case private healthcare won. People on both sides of the debate say that this new case could have some very important consequences for the whole country and that it could also wind up in front of the Supreme Court. Catherine Cullen, CBC News, Ottawa. © 2016 CBC. All Rights Reserved.
Irene Jansen

Four common meds send thousands of seniors to hospital - USATODAY.com - Jack's posterous - 0 views

  • Nearly half (48 percent) of the 100,000 hospitalizations occurred among adults 80 and up, according to the study, published in the Nov. 24 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. Nearly two-thirds (66 percent) were the result of unintentional overdoses.The four medications, used alone or together, most often cited:The blood thinning medication warfarin (Coumadin, Jantoven), which is used to treat blood clots, was involved in 33 percent of emergency hospitalizations.Insulin, used to control blood sugar in diabetes patients, was involved in 14 percent of cases.Antiplatelet drugs such as aspirin and clopidogrel (Plavix), which are used to prevent blood clots, were involved in 13 percent of cases.Oral hypoglycemic agents -- diabetes medications taken by mouth -- were involved in 11 percent of cases.With antiplatelet or blood thinning drugs, bleeding was the main problem. For insulin and other diabetes medications, about two-thirds of cases involved changes in mental status such as confusion, loss of consciousness or seizures.
Govind Rao

On pharmacare, we're running out of excuses - Infomart - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Thu Apr 9 2015
  • A new study in the Canadian Medical Association Journal with health economist Steve Morgan as lead author argues a national universal care drug program would not result in substantial tax increases. Indeed, such a plan reduces public and private spending on prescription drugs by $7.3 billion annually - or by 32 per cent. According to Morgan et al., the private sector would save $8.2 billion (worst-case scenario $6.6 billion, best-case scenario $9.6 billion), whereas costs to government would increase by about $1 billion (worst-case scenario $5.4-billion net increase, best-case scenario $2.9-billion net savings). The authors suggest that any perceived barriers to implementation of a national universal care drug plan appear to be unjustified. Given that a national drug program is the forgotten child of Canadian public health care and was also advanced in the 2002 Romanow Report, the time may finally be ripe for such a plan.
1 - 20 of 100 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page