Skip to main content

Home/ CULF 3331: "Middle Eastern Revolutions"/ Group items matching "fault" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
pvaldez2

15 years later, divorce laws remain unfair to Egyptian women - 0 views

venturesafrica.com/...men-still-suffer-in-the-courts

divorce laws egyptian women

shared by pvaldez2 on 22 Mar 16 - No Cached
  • pvaldez2 on 22 Mar 16
     
    This article was written during International Women's day, and describes what has been achieved to help equality. Before March 2000, no Egyptian women could file for a divorce expect if she could convince the courts that she has suffered physically or psychologically abuse from the husband. Now, women in Egypt have the advent of 'Khul' (no-fault divorce), though it did not truly help the women of Egypt.
cguybar

Fault Lines in Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood | The Nation - 0 views

www.thenation.com/...ines-egypts-muslim-brotherhood

muslim Egypt brotherhood fault lines

shared by cguybar on 02 Mar 16 - No Cached
  • cguybar on 02 Mar 16
     
    This article gives a historical evidence of the many fractures in the Muslim Brotherhood. It also walks those internal issues all the way down to 2011 which is when the article was written.
allieggg

What Happened to the Humanitarians Who Wanted to Save Libyans With Bombs and Drones? - The Intercept - 0 views

firstlook.org/...nted-save-libyans-bombs-drones

humanitarian libya civil war politics US Intervention NATO revolution

shared by allieggg on 23 Nov 14 - No Cached
  • “Libya is a reminder that sometimes it is possible to use military tools to advance humanitarian causes.”
  • intervention was a matter of upholding “universal values,” which itself advanced America’s strategic goals. In justifying the war to Americans (more than a week after it started), President Obama decreed: “Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different.”
  • But “turning a blind eye” to the ongoing – and now far worse – atrocities in Libya is exactly what the U.S., its war allies, and most of the humanitarian war advocates are now doing.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • “this was a rare military intervention for humanitarian reasons, and it has succeeded” and that “on rare occasions military force can advance human rights. Libya has so far been a model of such an intervention.”
  • What’s most notable here isn’t how everything in Libya has gone so terribly and tragically wrong. That was painfully predictable: anyone paying even casual attention now knows that killing the Bad Dictator of the Moment (usually one the U.S. spent years supporting) achieves nothing good for the people of that country unless it’s backed by years of sustained support for rebuilding its civil institutions.
  • As the country spun into chaos, violence, militia rule and anarchy as a direct result of the NATO intervention, they exhibited no interest whatsoever in doing anything to arrest or reverse that collapse. What happened to their deeply felt humanitarianism? Where did it go?
  • But the most compelling reason to oppose such wars is that – even if it all could work perfectly in an ideal world and as tempting as it is to believe – humanitarianism is not what motivates the U.S. or most other governments to deploy its military in other nations.
  • If there were any authenticity to the claimed humanitarianism, wouldn’t there be movements to spend large amounts of money not just to bomb Libya but also to stabilize and rebuild it? Wouldn’t there be just as much horror over the plight of Libyans now: when the needed solution is large-scale economic aid and assistance programs rather than drone deployments, blowing up buildings, and playful, sociopathic chuckling over how we came, conquered, and made The Villain die?
  • The way most war advocates instantly forgot Libya existed once that fun part was over is the strongest argument imaginable about what really motivates these actions. In the victory parade he threw for himself, Kristof said the question of “humanitarian intervention” will “arise again” and “the next time it does, let’s remember a lesson of Libya.”
  • allieggg on 23 Nov 14
     
    This article basically lays out the faults in US intervention in Libya during the fall of Gaddafi and condemns the US officials for their lack of hindsight in their agenda. The US claimed that they could not "turn a blind eye" to atrocities and human right violations in other countries and to intervene in Libya was a matter of upholding "universal values." After the successful ousting of Gaddafi, the US hypocritically turned their back on the country as a whole, leaving them to pick up the pieces and re-build themselves in the midst of socio-political and economic chaos. The US claims that military intervention is sometimes necessary to address human right violations, but in the case of Libya more violations have occurred as a result of a fallen regime rather than because of its reign. The author basically says that the US should have predicted that short-term intervention strategies achieves nothing without years of sustained support for rebuilding the civil institutions. 
hkerby2

Saving Syria: International law is not the answer - Al Jazeera English - 0 views

www.aljazeera.com/...2013827123244943321.html

syria international law Geneva Convention legal rights chemical weapons

shared by hkerby2 on 02 Mar 15 - No Cached
  • hkerby2 on 02 Mar 15
     
    The article looks into why it is not illegal for Syria to use chemical warfare against its people. It covers several international treaties including the Geneva Convention and explains why Syria is not legally at fault for the treatment of their civilians.
hkerby2

Syria Intervention: Geneva Conventions | The New Republic - 0 views

www.newrepublic.com/...ntervention-geneva-conventions

syria intervention geneva convention chemical weapons

shared by hkerby2 on 02 Mar 15 - No Cached
  • hkerby2 on 02 Mar 15
     
    This article states that if Bashar al Assad's use of chemical weapons in a suburb is true then why isn't the United States acting to protect the Syrian civilians. This article, contrary to the one I posted earlier, says that Syria is legally at fault in regards to chemical warfare because they signed the Geneva Convention.
cguybar

The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood's Failures - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace - 0 views

carnegieendowment.org/...n-muslim-brotherhood-s-failure

failures muslim brotherhood Egyptian

shared by cguybar on 17 Feb 16 - No Cached
  • cguybar on 17 Feb 16
     
    Great detail is provided on the major failures of the group, with specific instances as examples. The three primary faults mentioned are; misreading the political situation, shallow and opportunistic regarding ideologies, and incapable of adapting.
jordanbrown16

G.O.P. Senators' Letter to Iran About Nuclear Deal Angers White House - 1 views

www.nytimes.com/...s-letter-to-irans-leaders.html

Republican Party Iran nuclear deal WhiteHouse

shared by jordanbrown16 on 12 Apr 15 - No Cached
  • jordanbrown16 on 12 Apr 15
     
    Open letter sent from Republican members of congress to Islamic Republic of Iran about nuclear deal said to be "an unprecedented violation of the tradition of leaving politics at the water's edge." Republicans said that by styling it as an "open letter," it was related to a statement, not an overt intervention in the talks.
1 - 7 of 7
Showing 20▼ items per page