If you google it, you got too many results, as above link provides you but this will also take of your time with step by step guidance so follow link to recover your forgotten Yahoo password.
Blocking is greate feature who allow a user to block a particular person, so you'll never receive any mail from him, here you will find help to block sender in Yahoo mail.
See somebody doing something creative with her blog on Stumbleupon. Do you find yourself wanting to slow down and take the time to really read, not just this blog, but the pages it links to, because you're having a good time?
You get a real feeling of the presence of the other person on the other side of that screen, don't you?
The article points us toward a reason why the business model alluded to in links above (paid for stumbles) is ultimately unsustainable - those visiting bounce through without doing much more than briefly glancing at the pages they visit, very often.
This is plausible. People get enthusiastic about their new toy, they get a rhythm going, and they don't want to stop.
WARNING: Mild profanity appears once at the other end of this link. (Word for excrement used to indicate that something is objectionably nonsensical)
News about Zaibatsu, who was Digg's top user at the time of his banning. Message of the story: anybody who submits a link to Digg is at the mercy of the owner of the site at the other end of the link, because Digg will not listen to any explanations, no matter how reasonable, and no matter how innocent the action taken on the part of the user.
Something for any SU user who likes GigaOm's suggestion of a Digg acquisition of Stumbleupon to think about (see previous link), because that very activity is at the core of what almost all SU users do.
Whether you want to increase your net worth, lose weight, or start a great career, there's a web tool out there for you. Read on to find 100 tools for your career, personal life and beyond.
WARNING: Mild profanity at the other end of this link, too. Unavoidable, as it is found in the quoted material.
Brief report of the incident, along with a much longer taped interview with the banned user, marred by prejudgement from the interviewer, who can't seem to let go of a fixation on the idea both sides in this absurd incident must have a point, or that at least Digg must.
Quoting the post: "We get the feeling that there is more to this story than we have managed to unearth ... Clearly Digg feels that Zaibatsu has violated their terms multiple times and it appears they've simply had enough." In other words, corporate spin should be taken naively, at face value.
Zaibatsu does himself no favors in his response, by choosing to be conciliatory in his response. In a civilized society, there's nothing wrong with that, but we're not living in one of those. We're living in one that still bears imprint of the same fun loving culture that brought us the concept of "trial by combat" and it shows.
When you are wronged and you are speaking, keep it short, keep it sweet, and let your anger show. Do not offer to turn the other cheek, and do not express concern for those who have wronged you, for these civilized acts will never be understood by the uncivilized men with whom you deal to be anything other than a confession of guilt.
A blog that Zaibatsu (of former Digg user fame) contributes to, as one of the "hosts". No signs of multilevel marketing were present, as far as I could see.
A fact that you can confirm for yourself, and I hope you will remember, as you read some of the remarks below.
A list of article burials on Digg, along with the users who buried them. One does note that one is seeing a very few users doing a lot of burying. See link above, on my list of bookmarks.
Points to a disproportionately large number of posts about the political candidate Ron Paul that were buried on Digg, in support of the premise of that so-called "bury brigades" exist on Digg, groups of users who vote against articles en masse when they don't like them, "philosophically".
This should surprise absolutely nobody who is familiar with Digg's basic operating principles and has been online for more than ten minutes in his life, but sometimes people need evidence in support of the obvious.
Putting the feeedom to be heard on a topic to a vote - how do people expect that to work out?