Why are people occupying Wall Street?
Contents contributed and discussions participated by Tiberius Brastaviceanu
44More
Swarm Wall Street: why an anti-political movement is the most important force on the pl... - 0 views
- ...41 more annotations...
-
Political leaders must be wondering what is going on. (‘Who are these kids? Would they vote for me?’)
-
Last week, the movement crossed a threshold. A localized set of swarm events evolved into a distributed swarm network.
-
the movement is political, but this is a different kind of politics, which seeks to circumnavigate the tactics and fora of established political action.
-
To understand the true potential of the Occupy movement, we need to reflect on how the collective voice of the protesters is giving shape to a new vision of political culture, reigniting the hopes and dreams of those who are paying attention to it, in the US and elsewhere.
-
OccupyWallStreet is not a political movement in the traditional sense. It is a countercultural swarm. We need to see it as a swarm to understand why people are drawn to it, and what makes it the most important political force on the planet today.
-
these movements have political limits, set by the system that they chose to work within. We see the limits of these movements when we compare and contrast the way that they shape the identities of their members with swarm movements.
-
we can say that traditional movements shape and transform their member’s identities in the following way: first, by orienting thought in relation to a
-
and finally, by activating the movement by steering its energies towards contesting established political and legal structures.
-
A second point of difference between traditional and swarm movements concerns what these movements seek to achieve.
-
Traditional movements focus on challenging and changing institutions. The goals of these movements are thus extrinsic to the movements themselves: they are achieved as a result of movement activity. Swarms can (and usually do) set extrinsic goals. Their primary goal, however, is to sustain the critical mass that holds the network together. As a result, movement activity is focused more on the intrinsic goal of empowering the swarm than any extrinsic goal the movement might hope to achieve. This can make swarms look unfocused from an external point of view. But within the movement, conditions tend to be highly conducive for participation. Swarm movements are intrinsically empowering and thus intrinsically rewarding for participants. Ultimately, participants do not need to look beyond the act of participation for a reason to join the swarm. Swarming is its own reward; the payoff is the empowerment that comes from swarming.
-
the more we look for extrinsic goals, the further get from understanding what really inspires swarm activity. Swarms are based in a common sense of potential. What catalyzes a swarm movement is the sense that here, today, a new way of working and living together is possible.
-
Swarms are transformative movements. Insofar as members acknowledge a common sense of identity, it is a transformative identity, a sense of being part of a movement that is changing the world.
-
First, a mass of people acquire a new cognitive map, representing an original conception of what they can achieve together as a network. The cognitive maps that inspire OccupyWallStreet and Occupy Together resonate with innovations in the online world. OccupyWallStreet is an ‘open space’ movement. The camp structure is an open API that anyone is free to hack into and explore using MeetUp as a Directory. The second step in the process comes when the mass of people who apply these cognitive maps start reflecting on how working together expands their common potential. This insight gives rise to the swarm. A swarm movement comes into being as a swarm when a mass collective grasps what it is capable of achieving en masse.
-
No government or political institution can hold its ground when confronted with a new collective sense of what human beings are capable of doing and achieving en masse.
-
Swarm movements do not expend their energies by contesting the status quo. They reinvent it. Norms slide in all directions and political institutions are forced to keep up.
-
The protesters in Liberty Square and across the US are engaged in a more serious business than contesting dominant institutions.
-
The human microphone system is a physical expression of the appreciative process that happens on the internet all the time.
-
OccupyWallStreet applies the same modus operandi to transformative political action. I see it as a living expression of the intuition behind ‘Coalition of the Willing’:
Unified Field Bank - 0 views
Geoffrey Vickers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views
Imagine the Future of Money : DYNDY - 1 views
Dmitry Orlov - Definancialisation, Deglobalisation, Relocalisation on Vimeo - 1 views
Network Weaving - 0 views
Network Weaver || Weaving Smart Networks - 0 views
We give Your Community a Place to Thrive | CommunityForge.net - 1 views
61More
Gift economy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views
-
- ...56 more annotations...
-
the potlatch ritual, where leaders give away large amounts of goods to their followers, strengthening group relations. By sacrificing accumulated wealth, a leader gained a position of honor.
-
a currency-less gift economy where goods and services are produced by workers and distributed in community stores where everyone
-
is essentially entitled to consume whatever they want or need as "payment" for their production of goods and services.
-
-
open-source software developers have created "a 'gift culture' in which participants compete for prestige by giving time, energy, and creativity away"
-
a traditional gift economy is based on "the obligation to give, the obligation to accept, and the obligation to reciprocate,"
-
a difference between a "true" gift given out of gratitude and a "false" gift given only out of obligation
-
the "true" gift binds us in a way beyond any commodity transaction, but "we cannot really become bound to those who give us false gifts.
-
Hyde argues that when a primarily gift-based economy is turned into a commodity-based economy, "the social fabric of the group is invariably destroyed."[
-
commercial goods can generally become gifts, but when gifts become commodities, the gift "...either stops being a gift or else abolishes the boundary...
-
it is easy to romanticize a gift economy, humans do not always wish to be enmeshed in a web of obligation
-
practice that bears out different roles for the parts that undertake an action in it, installing in this act of donating the Hegelian dipole of master and slave
-
anarcho-primitivists and anarcho-communists, believe that variations on a gift economy may be the key to breaking the cycle of poverty.
-
mutual benefit is a stronger incentive than mutual strife and is eventually more effective collectively in the long run to drive individuals to produce.
-
a gift economy stresses the concept of increasing the other's abilities and means of production, which would then (theoretically) increase the ability of the community to reciprocate to the giving individual.
-
collective shunning where collective groups keep track of other individuals' productivity, rather than leaving each individual having to keep track of the rest of society by him or herself.