Skip to main content

Home/ Teaching and Learning with Web 2.0/ Group items matching "education learning the" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Barbara Lindsey

Minds on Fire: Open Education, Education Long Tail, and Education 2.0 (EDUCAUSE Review) | EDUCAUSE CONNECT - 1 views

  • But at the same time that the world has become flatter, it has also become “spikier”: the places that are globally competitive are those that have robust local ecosystems of resources supporting innovation and productiveness.2
  • various initiatives launched over the past few years have created a series of building blocks that could provide the means for transforming the ways in which we provide the and support the. Much of this activity has been enabled and inspired by the growth and evolution of the Internet, which has created a global “platform” that has vastly expanded access to all sorts of resources, including formal and informal theal materials. the Internet has also fostered a new culture of sharing, one in which content is freely contributed and distributed with few restrictions or costs.
  • the most visible impact of the Internet on the to date has been the Open theal Resources (OER) movement, which has provided free access to a wide range of courses and other theal materials to anyone who wants to use them. the movement began in 2001 when the William and Flora Hewlett and the Andrew W. Mellon foundations jointly funded MIT’s OpenCourseWare (OCW) initiative, which today provides open access to undergraduate- and graduate-level materials and modules from more than 1,700 courses (covering virtually all of MIT’s curriculum). MIT’s initiative has inspired hundreds of other colleges and universities in the United States and abroad to join the movement and contribute their own open theal resources.4 the Internet has also been used to provide students with direct access to high-quality (and therefore scarce and expensive) tools like telescopes, scanning electron microscopes, and supercomputer simulation models, allowing students to engage personally in research.
  • ...29 more annotations...
  • most profound impact of the Internet, an impact that has yet to be fully realized, is its ability to support and expand the various aspects of social the. What do we mean by “social the”? Perhaps the simplest way to explain this concept is to note that social the is based on the premise that our understanding of content is socially constructed through conversations about that content and through grounded interactions, especially with others, around problems or actions. the focus is not so much on what we are the but on how we are the.5
  • This perspective shifts the focus of our attention from the content of a subject to the the activities and human interactions around which that content is situated. This perspective also helps to explain the effectiveness of study groups. Students in these groups can ask questions to clarify areas of uncertainty or confusion, can improve their grasp of the material by hearing the answers to questions from fellow students, and perhaps most powerfully, can take on the role of teacher to help other group members benefit from their understanding (one of the best ways to learn something is, after all, to teach it to others).
  • This encourages the practice of what John Dewey called “productive inquiry”—that is, the process of seeking the knowledge when it is needed in order to carry out a particular situated task.
  • ecoming a trusted contributor to Wikipedia involves a process of legitimate peripheral participation that is similar to the process in open source software communities. Any reader can modify the text of an entry or contribute new entries. But only more experienced and more trusted individuals are invited to become “administrators” who have access to higher-level editing tools.8
  • by clicking on tabs that appear on every page, a user can easily review the history of any article as well as contributors’ ongoing discussion of and sometimes fierce debates around its content, which offer useful insights into the practices and standards of the community that is responsible for creating that entry in Wikipedia. (In some cases, Wikipedia articles start with initial contributions by passionate amateurs, followed by contributions from professional scholars/researchers who weigh in on the “final” versions. Here is where the contested part of the material becomes most usefully evident.) In this open environment, both the content and the process by which it is created are equally visible, thereby enabling a new kind of critical reading—almost a new form of literacy—that invites the reader to join in the consideration of what information is reliable and/or important.
  • Mastering a field of knowledge involves not only “learning about” learning subject matter but also “learning to be” a full participant in learning field. This involves acquiring learning practices and learning norms of established practitioners in that field or acculturating into a community of practice.
  • But viewing learning as learning process of joining a community of practice reverses this pattern and allows new students to engage in “learning to be” even as learningy are mastering learning content of a field.
  • Another interesting experiment in Second Life was the Harvard Law School and Harvard Extension School fall 2006 course called “CyberOne: Law in the Court of Public Opinion.” the course was offered at three levels of participation. First, students enrolled in Harvard Law School were able to attend the class in person. Second, non–law school students could enroll in the class through the Harvard Extension School and could attend lectures, participate in discussions, and interact with faculty members during their office hours within Second Life. And at the third level, any participant in Second Life could review the lectures and other course materials online at no cost. This experiment suggests one way that the social life of Internet-based virtual the can coexist with and extend traditional the.
  • Digital StudyHall (DSH), which is designed to improve education for students in schools in rural areas and urban slums in India. education project is described by its developers as “education educational equivalent of Netflix + YouTube + Kazaa.”11 Lectures from model teachers are recorded on video and are educationn physically distributed via DVD to schools that typically lack well-trained instructors (as well as Internet connections). While education lectures are being played on a monitor (which is often powered by a battery, since many participating schools also lack reliable electricity), a “mediator,” who could be a local teacher or simply a bright student, periodically pauses education video and encourages engagement among education students by asking questions or initiating discussions about education material educationy are watching.
  • John King, the associate provost of the University of Michigan
  • For the past few years, he points out, incoming students have been bringing along their online social networks, allowing them to stay in touch with their old friends and former classmates through tools like SMS, IM, Facebook, and MySpace. Through these continuing connections, the University of Michigan students can extend the discussions, debates, bull sessions, and study groups that naturally arise on campus to include their broader networks. Even though these extended connections were not developed to serve theal purposes, they amplify the impact that the university is having while also benefiting students on campus.14 If King is right, it makes sense for colleges and universities to consider how they can leverage these new connections through the variety of social software platforms that are being established for other reasons.
  • The project’s website includes reports of how students, under The guidance of professional astronomers, are using The Faulkes telescopes to make small but meaningful contributions to astronomy.
  • “This is not education in which people come in and lecture in a classroom. We’re helping students work with real data.”16
  • HOU invites students to request observations from professional observatories and provides them with image-processing software to visualize and analyze their data, encouraging interaction between the students and scientists
  • The site is intended to serve as “an open forum for worldwide discussions on The Decameron and related topics.” Both scholars and students are invited to submit Their own contributions as well as to access The existing resources on The site. The site serves as an apprenticeship platform for students by allowing Them to observe how scholars in The field argue with each oTher and also to publish Their own contributions, which can be relatively small—an example of The “legitimate peripheral participation” that is characteristic of open source communities. This allows students to “learn to be,” in this instance by participating in The kind of rigorous argumentation that is generated around a particular form of deep scholarship. A community like this, in which students can acculturate into a particular scholarly practice, can be seen as a virtual “spike”: a highly specialized site that can serve as a global resource for its field.
  • I posted a list of links to all the student blogs and mentioned the list on my own blog. I also encouraged the students to start reading one another's writing. the difference in the writing that next week was startling. Each student wrote significantly more than they had previously. Each piece was more thoughtful. Students commented on each other's writing and interlinked their pieces to show related or contradicting thoughts. then one of the student assignments was commented on and linked to from a very prominent blogger. Many people read the student blogs and subscribed to some of them. When these outside comments showed up, indicating that the students really were plugging into the international community's discourse, the quality of the writing improved again. the power of peer review had been brought to bear on the assignments.17
  • for any topic that a student is passionate about, there is likely to be an online niche community of practice of others who share that passion.
  • Finding and joining a community that ignites a student’s passion can set the stage for the student to acquire both deep knowledge about a subject (“the about”) and the ability to participate in the practice of a field through productive inquiry and peer-based the (“the to be”). these communities are harbingers of the emergence of a new form of technology-enhanced thethe 2.0—which goes beyond providing free access to traditional course materials and theal tools and creates a participatory architecture for supporting communities of learners.
  • We need to construct shared, distributed, reflective practicums in which experiences are collected, vetted, clustered, commented on, and tried out in new contexts.
  • An example of such a practicum is the online Teaching and the Commons (http://commons.carnegiefoundation.org/) launched earlier this year by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
  • The Commons is an open forum where instructors at all levels (and from around The world) can post Their own examples and can participate in an ongoing conversation about effective teaching practices, as a means of supporting a process of “creating/using/re-mixing (or creating/sharing/using).”20
  • The original World Wide Web—The “Web 1.0” that emerged in The mid-1990s—vastly expanded access to information. The Open Theal Resources movement is an example of The impact that The Web 1.0 has had on The.
  • But the Web 2.0, which has emerged in just the past few years, is sparking an even more far-reaching revolution. Tools such as blogs, wikis, social networks, tagging systems, mashups, and content-sharing sites are examples of a new user-centric information infrastructure that emphasizes participation (e.g., creating, re-mixing) over presentation, that encourages focused conversation and short briefs (often written in a less technical, public vernacular) rather than traditional publication, and that facilitates innovative explorations, experimentations, and purposeful tinkerings that often form the basis of a situated understanding emerging from action, not passivity.
  • In the twentieth century, the dominant approach to the focused on helping students to build stocks of knowledge and cognitive skills that could be deployed later in appropriate situations. This approach to the worked well in a relatively stable, slowly changing world in which careers typically lasted a lifetime. But the twenty-first century is quite different.
  • We now need a new approach to learning—one characterized by a demand-pull ralearningr than learning traditional supply-push mode of building up an inventory of knowledge in students’ heads. Demand-pull learning shifts learning focus to enabling participation in flows of action, where learning focus is both on “learning to be” through enculturation into a practice as well as on collateral learning.
  • The demand-pull approach is based on providing students with access to rich (sometimes virtual) The communities built around a practice. It is passion-based The, motivated by The student eiTher wanting to become a member of a particular community of practice or just wanting to learn about, make, or perform something. Often The The that transpires is informal raTher than formally conducted in a structured setting. The occurs in part through a form of reflective practicum, but in this case The reflection comes from being embedded in a community of practice that may be supported by both a physical and a virtual presence and by collaboration between newcomers and professional practitioners/scholars.
  • The building blocks provided by The OER movement, along with e-Science and e-Humanities and The resources of The Web 2.0, are creating The conditions for The emergence of new kinds of open participatory The ecosystems23 that will support active, passion-based The: The 2.0.
  • As a graduate student at UC-Berkeley in the late 1970s, Treisman worked on the poor performance of African-Americans and Latinos in undergraduate calculus classes. He discovered the problem was not these students’ lack of motivation or inadequate preparation but rather their approach to studying. In contrast to Asian students, who, Treisman found, naturally formed “academic communities” in which they studied and learned together, African-Americans tended to separate their academic and social lives and studied completely on their own. Treisman developed a program that engaged these students in workshop-style study groups in which they collaborated on solving particularly challenging calculus problems. the program was so successful that it was adopted by many other colleges. See Uri Treisman, “Studying Students Studying Calculus: A Look at the Lives of Minority Mathematics Students in College,” College Mathematics Journal, vol. 23, no. 5 (November 1992), pp. 362–72, http://math.sfsu.edu/hsu/workshops/treisman.html.
  • In the early 1970s, Stanford University Professor James Gibbons developed a similar technique, which he called Tutored Videotape Instruction (TVI). Like DSH, TVI was based on showing recorded classroom lectures to groups of students, accompanied by a “tutor” whose job was to stop the tape periodically and ask questions. Evaluations of TVI showed that students’ the from TVI was as good as or better than in-classroom the and that the weakest students academically learned more from participating in TVI instruction than from attending lectures in person. See J. F. Gibbons, W. R. Kincheloe, and S. K. Down, “Tutored Video-tape Instruction: A New Use of Electronics Media in the,” Science, vol. 195 (1977), pp. 1136–49.
Michael Johnson

E-Learning 2.0 ~ Stephen's Web ~ by Stephen Downes - 20 views

  • In general, where we are now in the online world is where we were before the beginning of e-the [1]. Traditional theories of distance the, of (for example) transactional distance, as described by Michael G. Moore, have been adapted for the online world. Content is organized according to this traditional model and delivered either completely online or in conjunction with more traditional seminars, to cohorts of students, led by an instructor, following a specified curriculum to be completed at a predetermined pace.
  • networked markets
  • In learning, learningse trends are manifest in what is sometimes called "learner-centered" or "student-centered" design. This is more than just adapting for different learning styles or allowing learning user to change learning font size and background color; it is learning placing of learning control of learning itself into learning hands of learning learner
  • ...21 more annotations...
  • creation, communication and participation playing key roles
  • The breaking down of barriers has led to many of The movements and issues we see on today's Internet. File-sharing, for example, evolves not of a sudden criminality among today's youth but raTher in Their pervasive belief that information is something meant to be shared. This belief is manifest in such things as free and open-source software, Creative Commons licenses for content, and open access to scholarly and oTher works. Sharing content is not considered unethical; indeed, The hoarding of content is viewed as antisocial [9]. And open content is viewed not merely as nice to have but essential for The creation of The sort of The network described by Siemens [10].
  • "Enter Web 2.0, a vision of the Web in which information is broken up into "microcontent" units that can be distributed over dozens of domains. the Web of documents has morphed into a Web of data. We are no longer just looking to the same old sources for information. Now we're looking to a new set of tools to aggregate and remix microcontent in new and useful ways"
  • Web 2.0 is not a technological revolution, it is a social revolution.
  • It also begins to look like a personal portfolio tool [18]. The idea here is that students will have Their own personal place to create and showcase Their own work. Some e-portfolio applications, such as ELGG, have already been created. IMS Global as put togeTher an e-portfolio specification [19]. "The portfolio can provide an opportunity to demonstrate one's ability to collect, organize, interpret and reflect on documents and sources of information. It is also a tool for continuing professional development, encouraging individuals to take responsibility for and demonstrate The results of Their own The" [20].
    • Michael Johnson
       
      Also a place to receive and give feedback. I believe that one of the things that learners need to have to be prepared for the in this space (social media or web 2.0) is the ability to evaluate, to give good feedback. Additionally, to be able to receive feedback constructively.
  • In the world of e-the, the closest thing to a social network is a community of practice, articulated and promoted by people such as Etienne Wenger in the 1990s. According to Wenger, a community of practice is characterized by "a shared domain of interest" where "members interact and learn together" and "develop a shared repertoire of resources."
  • Yahoo! Groups
  • Blogging is very different from traditionally assigned learning content. It is much less formal. It is written from a personal point of view, in a personal voice. Students' blog posts are often about something from learningir own range of interests, ralearningr than on a course topic or assigned project. More importantly, what happens when students blog, and read reach olearningrs' blogs, is that a network of interactions forms-much like a social network, and much like Wenger's community of practice.
    • Michael Johnson
       
      So, I believe he is saying that virtual communities of practice that form naturally are more real and approach what Wenger was talking about better than contrived "communities" put together in classes. That may be true. but does it have to be? If people come together to with a common purpose and the instructor allows the students freedom to explore what is important to them then I would hope that this kind of community can develop even in formal theal settings. Relevance is a key issue here!
  • "We're talking to the download generation," said Peter Smith, associate dean, Faculty of Engineering. "Why not have the option to download information about the and careers the same way you can download music? It untethers content from the Web and lets students access us at their convenience." Moreover, using an online service such as Odeo, Blogomatrix Sparks, or even simply off-the-shelf software, students can create their own podcasts.
  • Web 2.0 is not a technological revolution, it is a social revolution. "Here's my take on it: Web 2.0 is an attitude not a technology. It's about enabling and encouraging participation through open applications and services. By open I mean technically open with appropriate APIs but also, more importantly, socially open, with rights granted to use the content in new and exciting contexts"
  • The e-The application, Therefore, begins to look very much like a blogging tool. It represents one node in a web of content, connected to oTher nodes and content creation services used by oTher students. It becomes, not an institutional or corporate application, but a personal The center, where content is reused and remixed according to The student's own needs and interests. It becomes, indeed, not a single application, but a collection of interoperating applications—an environment raTher than a system.
  • This approach to learning means that learning content is created and distributed in a very different manner. Ralearningr than being composed, organized and packaged, e-learning content is syndicated, much like a blog post or podcast. It is aggregated by students, using learningir own personal RSS reader or some similar application. From learningre, it is remixed and repurposed with learning student's own individual application in mind, learning finished product being fed forward to become fodder for some olearningr student's reading and use.
    • Michael Johnson
       
      I like the idea of students passing on their work to be fodder for someone else's the. In this way we change to from a learner to a learner/teacher! (See Dillon Inouye's work and Comments from John Seeley Brown)
  • More formally, instead of using enterprise learning-management systems, learningal institutions expect to use an interlocking set of open-source applications. Work on such a set of applications has begun in a number of quarters, with learning E-learning Framework defining a set of common applications and learning newly formed e-Framework for learning and Research drawing on an international collaboration. While learningre is still an element of content delivery in learningse systems, learningre is also an increasing recognition that learning is becoming a creative activity and that learning appropriate venue is a platform ralearningr than an application.
    • Michael Johnson
       
      see http://ineducation.ca/article/open-education-cms-and-open-education-network
    • Michael Johnson
       
      Jon Mott has some cool ideas related to this paragraph.
  • Words are only meaningful when they can be related to experiences," said Gee. If I say "I spilled the coffee," this has a different meaning depending on whether I ask for a broom or a mop. You cannot create that context ahead of time— it has to be part of the experience.
  • game "modding" allows players to make the game their own
  • he most important learning skills that I see children getting from games are those that support learning empowering sense of taking charge of learningir own learning. And learning learner taking charge of learning is antilearningtical to learning dominant ideology of curriculum design
  • The challenge will not be in how to learn, but in how to use The to create something more, to communicate.
    • Michael Johnson
       
      I still think part of the challenge is how to learn. How to wade through a sea of all that is out there and "learn from the best" that is available. Find, organize, evaluate, analyze, synthesize, as well as create. I agree with Chris Lott (@fncll) that creativity is vital! (I am just not so sure that it is a non-starter to say that we should be moral first...though it could be argued that we should become moral through the creative process).
  • "ubiquitous computing."
  • what this means is having learning available no matter what you are doing.
  • A similar motivation underlies the rapidly rising domain of mobile the [24]—for after all, were the context in which the occurs not important, it would not be useful or necessary to make the mobile. Mobile the offers not only new opportunities to create but also to connect. As Ellen Wagner and Bryan Alexander note, mobile the "define(s) new relationships and behaviors among learners, information, personal computing devices, and the world at large"
  • And what people were doing with the Web was not merely reading books, listening to the radio or watching TV, but having a conversation, with a vocabulary consisting not just of words but of images, video, multimedia and whatever they could get their hands on. And this became, and looked like, and behaved like, a network.
  •  
    Stephen Downes' take on eLearning and what Learning future holds
Barbara Lindsey

Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger and communities of practice - 1 views

  • Supposing learning is social and comes largely from of our experience of participating in daily life? It was this thought that formed learning basis of a significant rethinking of learning learningory in learning late 1980s and early 1990s by two researchers from very different disciplines - Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. learningir model of situated learning proposed that learning involved a process of engagement in a 'community of practice'. 
  • When looking closely at everyday activity, she has argued, it is clear that 'learning is ubiquitous in ongoing activity, though often unrecognized as such' (Lave 1993: 5).
  • Communities of practice are formed by people who engage in a process of collective learning in a shared domain of human endeavour: a tribe learning to survive, a band of artists seeking new forms of expression, a group of engineers working on similar problems, a clique of pupils defining learningir identity in learning school, a network of surgeons exploring novel techniques, a galearningring of first-time managers helping each olearningr cope. In a nutshell: Communities of practice are groups of people who share a concern or a passion for something learningy do and learn how to do it better as learningy interact regularly. (Wenger circa 2007)
  • ...18 more annotations...
  • Over time, this collective learning results in practices that reflect both learning pursuit of our enterprises and learning attendant social relations. learningse practices are thus learning property of a kind of community created over time by learning sustained pursuit of a shared enterprise. It makes sense, learningrefore to call learningse kinds of communities communities of practice. (Wenger 1998: 45)
  • The characteristics of communities of practice According to Etienne Wenger (c 2007), three elements are crucial in distinguishing a community of practice from oTher groups and communities: The domain. A community of practice is is something more than a club of friends or a network of connections between people. 'It has an identity defined by a shared domain of interest. Membership Therefore implies a commitment to The domain, and Therefore a shared competence that distinguishes members from oTher people' (op. cit.). The community. 'In pursuing Their interest in Their domain, members engage in joint activities and discussions, help each oTher, and share information. They build relationships that enable Them to learn from each oTher' (op. cit.). The practice. 'Members of a community of practice are practitioners. They develop a shared repertoire of resources: experiences, stories, tools, ways of addressing recurring problems—in short a shared practice. This takes time and sustained interaction' (op. cit.).
  • The fact that They are organizing around some particular area of knowledge and activity gives members a sense of joint enterprise and identity. For a community of practice to function it needs to generate and appropriate a shared repertoire of ideas, commitments and memories. It also needs to develop various resources such as tools, documents, routines, vocabulary and symbols that in some way carry The accumulated knowledge of The community.
  • The interactions involved, and The ability to undertake larger or more complex activities and projects though cooperation, bind people togeTher and help to facilitate relationship and trust
  • Rather than looking to the as the acquisition of certain forms of knowledge, Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger have tried to place it in social relationships – situations of co-participation.
  • It not so much that learners acquire structures or models to understand the world, but they participate in frameworks that that have structure. the involves participation in a community of practice. And that participation 'refers not just to local events of engagement in certain activities with certain people, but to a more encompassing process of being active participants in the practices of social communities and constructing identities in relation to these communities' (Wenger 1999: 4).
  • Initially people have to join communities and learn at the periphery. the things they are involved in, the tasks they do may be less key to the community than others.
  • Learning is, thus, not seen as Learning acquisition of knowledge by individuals so much as a process of social participation. Learning nature of Learning situation impacts significantly on Learning process.
  • What is more, and in contrast with learning as internalization, ‘learning as increasing participation in communities of practice concerns learning whole person acting in learning world’ (Lave and Wenger 1991: 49). learning focus is on learning ways in which learning is ‘an evolving, continuously renewed set of relations’ (ibid.: 50). In olearningr words, this is a relational view of learning person and learning (see learning discussion of selfhood).
  • 'the purpose is not to learn from talk as a substitute for legitimate peripheral participation; it is to learn to talk as a key to legitimate peripheral participation'. This orientation has the definite advantage of drawing attention to the need to understand knowledge and the in context. However, situated the depends on two claims: It makes no sense to talk of knowledge that is decontextualized, abstract or general. New knowledge and the are properly conceived as being located in communities of practice (Tennant 1997: 77).
  • There is a risk, as Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger acknowledge, of romanticizing communities of practice.
  • 'In their eagerness to debunk testing, formal the and formal accreditation, they do not analyse how their omission [of a range of questions and issues] affects power relations, access, public knowledge and public accountability' (Tennant 1997: 79).
  • Perhaps the most helpful of these explorations is that of Barbara Rogoff and her colleagues (2001). they examine the work of an innovative school in Salt Lake City and how teachers, students and parents were able to work together to develop an approach to schooling based around the principle that the 'occurs through interested participation with other learners'.
  • Learning is in Learning relationships between people. As McDermott (in Murphy 1999:17) puts it: Learning traditionally gets measured as on Learning assumption that it is a possession of individuals that can be found inside Learningir heads… [Here] Learning is in Learning relationships between people. Learning is in Learning conditions that bring people togeLearningr and organize a point of contact that allows for particular pieces of information to take on a relevance; without Learning points of contact, without Learning system of relevancies, Learningre is not Learning, and Learningre is little memory. Learning does not belong to individual persons, but to Learning various conversations of which Learningy are a part.
  • One of the implications for schools, as Barbara Rogoff and her colleagues suggest is that they must prioritize 'instruction that builds on children's interests in a collaborative way'. Such schools need also to be places where 'the activities are planned by children as well as adults, and where parents and teachers not only foster children's the but also learn from their own involvement with children' (2001: 3). their example in this area have particular force as they are derived from actual school practice.
  • learning involves a deepening process of participation in a community of practice
  • Acknowledging that communities of practice affect performance is important in part because of their potential to overcome the inherent problems of a slow-moving traditional hierarchy in a fast-moving virtual economy. Communities also appear to be an effective way for organizations to handle unstructured problems and to share knowledge outside of the traditional structural boundaries. In addition, the community concept is acknowledged to be a means of developing and maintaining long-term organizational memory. these outcomes are an important, yet often unrecognized, supplement to the value that individual members of a community obtain in the form of enriched the and higher motivation to apply what they learn. (Lesser and Storck 2001)
  • Educators need to reflect on their understanding of what constitutes knowledge and practice. Perhaps one of the most important things to grasp here is the extent to which the involves informed and committed action.
Michael Johnson

Teaching in Social and Technological Networks « Connectivism - 17 views

  • The model falls apart when we distribute content and extend The activities of The teacher to include multiple educator inputs and peer-driven The.
  • Skype brings anyone, from anywhere, into a classroom. Students are not confined to interacting with only the ideas of a researcher or theorist. Instead, a student can interact directly with researchers through Twitter, blogs, Facebook, and listservs. the largely unitary voice of the traditional teacher is fragmented by the limitless conversation opportunities available in networks. When learners have control of the tools of conversation, they also control the conversations in which they choose to engage. Course content is similarly fragmented. the textbook is now augmented with YouTube videos, online articles, simulations, Second Life builds, virtual museums, Diigo content trails, StumpleUpon reflections, and so on.
  • Traditional courses provide a coherent view of a subject. This view is shaped by “learning outcomes” (or objectives). learningse outcomes drive learning selection of content and learning design of learning activities. Ideally, outcomes and content/curriculum/instruction are learningn aligned with learning assessment. It’s all very logical: we teach what we say we are going to teach, and learningn we assess what we said we would teach. This cozy comfortable world of outcomes-instruction-assessment alignment exists only in learning. In all olearningr areas of life, ambiguity, uncertainty, and unkowns reign. Fragmentation of content and conversation is about to disrupt this well-ordered view of learning. Educators and universities are beginning to realize that learningy no longer have learning control learningy once (thought learningy) did
  • ...18 more annotations...
  • I’ve come to view teaching as a critical and needed activity in the chaotic and ambiguous information climate created by networks.
  • In networks, teachers are one node among many. Learners will, however, likely be somewhat selective of which nodes they follow and listen to. Most likely, a teacher will be one of the more prominent nodes in a learner’s network. Thoughts, ideas, or messages that the teacher amplifies will generally have a greater probability of being seen by course participants. the network of information is shaped by the actions of the teacher in drawing attention to signals (content elements) that are particularly important in a given subject area.
  • While “curator” carries the stigma of dusty museums, the metaphor is appropriate for teaching and the. the curator, in a the context, arranges key elements of a subject in such a manner that learners will “bump into” them throughout the course. Instead of explicitly stating “you must know this”, the curator includes critical course concepts in her dialogue with learners, her comments on blog posts, her in-class discussions, and in her personal reflections. As learners grow their own networks of understanding, frequent encounters with conceptual artifacts shared by the teacher will begin to resonate.
  • Today’s social web is no different – we find our way through active exploration. Designers can aid the wayfinding process through consistency of design and functionality across various tools, but ultimately, it is the responsibility of the individual to click/fail/recoup and continue. Fortunately, the experience of wayfinding is now augmented by social systems. Social structures are filters. As a learner grows (and prunes) her personal networks, she also develops an effective means to filter abundance. the network becomes a cognitive agent in this instance – helping the learner to make sense of complex subject areas by relying not only on her own reading and resource exploration, but by permitting her social network to filter resources and draw attention to important topics. In order for these networks to work effectively, learners must be conscious of the need for diversity and should include nodes that offer critical or antagonistic perspectives on all topic areas. Sensemaking in complex environments is a social process.
  • Aggregation should do the same – reveal the content and conversation structure of the course as it unfolds, rather than defining it in advance.
  • Filtering resources is an important educator role, but as noted already, effective filtering can be done through a combination of wayfinding, social sensemaking, and aggregation. But expertise still matters. Educators often have years or decades of experience in a field. As such, they are familiar with many of the concepts, pitfalls, confusions, and distractions that learners are likely to encounter. As should be evident by now, the educator is an important agent in networked the. Instead of being the sole or dominant filter of information, he now shares this task with other methods and individuals.
  • Filtering can be done in explicit ways – such as selecting readings around course topics – or in less obvious ways – such as writing summary blog posts around topics. Learning is an eliminative process. By determining what doesn’t belong, a learner develops and focuses his understanding of a topic. Learning teacher assists in Learning process by providing one stream of filtered information. Learning student is Learningn faced with making nuanced selections based on Learning multiple information streams he encounters
  • Stephen’s statements that resonated with many learners centers on modelling as a teaching practice: “To teach is to model and to demonstrate. To learn is to practice and to reflect.” (As far as I can tell, he first made the statement during OCC in 2007).
  • Modelling has its roots in apprenticeship. Learning is a multi-faceted process, involving cognitive, social, and emotional dimensions. Knowledge is similarly multi-faceted, involving declarative, procedural, and academic dimensions. It is unreasonable to expect a class environment to capture Learning richness of Learningse dimensions. Apprenticeship Learning models are among Learning most effective in attending to Learning full breadth of Learning. Apprenticeship is concerned with more than cognition and knowledge (to know about) – it also addresses Learning process of becoming a carpenter, plumber, or physician.
  • Without an online identity, you can’t connect with others – to know and be known. I don’t think I’m overstating the importance of have a presence in order to participate in networks. To teach well in networks – to weave a narrative of coherence with learners – requires a point of presence. As a course progresses, the teacher provides summary comments, synthesizes discussions, provides critical perspectives, and directs learners to resources they may not have encountered before.
  • Persistent presence in the the network is needed for the teacher to amplify, curate, aggregate, and filter content and to model critical thinking and cognitive attributes that reflect the needs of a discipline.
  • Teaching and learning in social and technological networks is similarly surprising – it’s hard to imagine that many of learning tools we’re using are less than a decade old (learning methods of learning in networks are not new, however. People have always learned in social networks).
  • We’re still early in many of these trends. Many questions remain unanswered about privacy, ethics in networks, and assessment.
  • We’re still early in many of these trends. Many questions remain unanswered about privacy, ethics in networks, and assessment.
  • The tools for controlling both content and conversation have shifted from The educator to The learner. We require a system that acknowledges this reality.
  • In order for these networks to work effectively, learners must be conscious of the need for diversity and should include nodes that offer critical or antagonistic perspectives on all topic areas. Sensemaking in complex environments is a social process.
  • In order for these networks to work effectively, learners must be conscious of the need for diversity and should include nodes that offer critical or antagonistic perspectives on all topic areas. Sensemaking in complex environments is a social process.
  • In order for these networks to work effectively, learners must be conscious of the need for diversity and should include nodes that offer critical or antagonistic perspectives on all topic areas. Sensemaking in complex environments is a social process.
  •  
    Discusses the role of teachers in the the  process through social networks: He gives seven roles 1. Amplifying, 2. Curating, 3. Wayfinding and socially-driven sensemaking, 4. Aggregating, 5. Filtering, 6. Modelling, 7. Persistent presence. He ends with this provocative thought: "My view is that change in the needs to be systemic and substantial. the is concerned with content and conversations. the tools for controlling both content and conversation have shifted from the educator to the learner. We require a system that acknowledges this reality."
Christopher Pappas

12 YouTube Videos Every Online Educator Should View - 0 views

  •  
    12 YouTube Videos Every Online Educator Should View What are the benefits for the teacher and learner in the context of open the and OER? How does a blended-the school boost student achievement? How can we design the schools for 21st Century the? How will be the classroom of tomorrow? What are the tools and resources for the 21st Century Educator? At the 12 YouTube Videos Every Online Educator Should View you will be able to answer the above questions and even more. You will get an idea of what your students are capable of and what are expecting from you. Do not forget that theal technology is the median and it is hear to help you achieve better the outcomes. It is in your hand how effectively you will use it since we are the digital immigrants and our students/learners are the digital natives! http://etheindustry.com/subjects/concepts/item/395-12-youtube-videos-teacher-educator-should-view
Christopher Pappas

Educational Video Production: When educators become Producers - 0 views

  •  
    Multimedia age has changed the role of teachers. the need for audiovisual aids to support e-the, mobile the, distance and blended the have reformed the role of educators, who are now becoming producers to enrich their teaching with mediums like podcasts, videos, animations, interactive presentations.. etc. Why to use Video technology in the? Video Technology has been proven to be a very powerful tool in motivating, engaging and instructing within the theal concept. Because of the advantages of transformability and transferability that video provides, has open the horizons of teaching and the. Video can enhance the the experience by showing places and phenomena that otherwise could not be seen, which adds "experiential value" (Koumi, 2006) in students understanding. Moreover video allows demonstration of procedural activities in detail when used for instruction and allows personal improvement as it can be a valuable tool for self-reflection.
Geoffrey Smith

Digital Dialects language learning games - 18 views

  •  
    Digital Dialects offers a nice selection of educational games and activities for education 55 different languages. Most of education games are designed to learn and practice education basics of each of education 55 languages listed on education Digital Dialects homepage.  Anoeducationr good website for education and practicing language basics is Literacy Center.net. Literacy Center offers games for education and practicing French, Spanish, German, and English. education Literacy Center is a 501c non-profit with a contract from education US Department of education.  Applications for education education educational games and activities found on Digital Dialects and Literacy Center are great for students just beginning to learn a new language. education games provide instant feedback to students and parents so that educationy can monitor progress and choose a skill or set of vocabulary terms to practice. 
Dennis OConnor

Virtual School Meanderings By Michael Barbour K-12 Certificate Series: University of Wisconsin-Stout « - 5 views

  • Continuing the Certificate Series, where I have been describing and discussing each of the certificates in online teaching that are focused on the K-12 environment. the sixth one I wanted to discuss was the E-the and Online Teaching Graduate Certificate Program at University of Wisconsin-Stout.
  •  
    Michael, Thanks for letting your readers know about our program. I am the advisor for the E--the and Online Teaching Graduate Certificate program. I also wrote and teach two of our 5 classes, E-the for Educators and the E-the Practicum. Our graduate classes are offered by the University of Wisconsin Stout, School of the. (We are not an extension program.) I'm delighted to be able to talk with those interested in K-12 Virtual the. I was a public school teacher for 25 years before I went fully online. Working online has been a journey of discovery and a constant reminder of the joys of being a lifetime learner. As you mention we do mix together all kinds of educators in our classes. A typical course will include K-12 classroom teachers, some K-12 online teachers and a good number of community college and university instructors. We also see health educators and some corporate trainers. Folks join us from around the country and the world. It's an eclectic mix of people who all share an interest in teaching online. Our goal is to help people become experienced professional online teachers as a way to expand and grow their careers. To accommodate everyone's interests we have our materials highly differentiated. K-12 teachers have the option of investigating the great resources from iNacol. they are encouraged to build useful quizzes and surveys and to craft discussion prompts as they practice facilitation skills. the topics for all projects are learner selected. We emphasize a practical hands on approach where participants can use what they learn and make right away. the great thing is to see a strong community of practice develop between all kinds of educators. Everyone is richer for it. When it comes to the E-the Practicum, I customize each student's experience. I have managed some placements with K-12 Virtual Schools. More often, K-12 teachers take one of two options. Both involve teaching with one of our cooperating
Barbara Lindsey

Chinesepod and Connectivism: More connections lead to more learning » Moving at learning Speed of Creativity - 0 views

  • More cognitive and affective experiences lead to more thinking, more synaptic connections, and more learning. To this end, we have sought to leverage guesswork, repetition, stories, context, in-depth discussion, etc, to offer what Siemens might call ’frequency, diversity, and depth of exposure’ to learning content. I’ve always maintained that learning is multi-dimensional, and deepened when you approach learning subject from different angles.
  • we are connectors, or resources who point learners at key patterns or elements that help strengthen their connection to a piece of information (and emphasize the skill of being able to identify patterns).
  • Teachers do NOT provide digital access to notes and materials, and students are quizzed regularly about the content on which they have taken textual notes to see if this traditional “broadcast/spray model” of the has been effective. (Or at least if the items included in the quiz have temporarily been stored in short term memory.) We MUST move beyond this traditional “banking model” of the, and I’m convinced the impetus for these changes is NOT coming and is not GOING to come from “inside the system” of traditional the.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • How many of the teachers we work with on a daily basis understand the foundational elements of connectivisim? VERY, VERY few in my estimation. Why don’t they understand? Because they have not EXPERIENCED connectivisim. It is not enough to show or be told. One must EXPERIENCE the power of networked the to understand it and appreciate its potentials.
  • blended learning conference event which is K-12 Online.
  • participate and share the upcoming K-12 Online Conference which starts next week with our pre-conference keynote. the conference is free, it’s global, and the co-learners involved (that includes YOU as well as presenters and other participants) are all providing a rich context for experiential, connectivist the.
  • if your local educational organization agrees, you can even earn professional development credit for your participation and time!
  • we are not limited in our access to expert teachers and co-learners if we want to learn
  • Ken challenges me by thoughtfully connecting his educational practice with education educationories which build on and powerfully extend those which I’ve studied in graduate school.
  • We can take, ourselves, an online blended course on a topic of interest so that we can personally EXPERIENCE and therefore appropriate / claim for ourselves / understand with depth some of the benefits as well as drawbacks of online the contexts.
  • Blended learning, because it offers learning possibility of appropriating best practices from BOTH face-to-face as well as online/virtual learning contexts, can provide greater opportunities for aulearningntic learning and meaningful connections than any olearningr learningal modality.
Barbara Lindsey

My School, Meet MySpace: Social Networking at School | Edutopia - 1 views

  • Months before the newly hired teachers at Philadelphia's Science Leadership Academy (SLA) started their jobs, they began the consuming work of creating the high school of their dreams -- without meeting face to face. they articulated a vision, planned curriculum, designed assessment rubrics, debated discipline policies, and even hammered out daily schedules using the sort of networking tools -- messaging, file swapping, idea sharing, and blogging -- kids love on sites such as MySpace.
  • hen, weeks before the first day of school, the incoming students jumped onboard -- or, more precisely, onto the Science Leadership Academy Web site -- to meet, talk with their teachers, and share their hopes for their the. So began a conversation that still perks along 24/7 in SLA classrooms and cyberspace. It's a bold experiment to redefine the spaces, the roles and relationships of teachers and students, and the mission of the modern high school.
  • When I hear people say it's our job to create the twenty-first-century workforce, it scares the hell out of me," says Chris Lehmann, SLA's founding principal. "Our job is to create twenty-first-century citizens. We need workers, yes, but we also need scholars, activists, parents -- compassionate, engaged people. We're not reinventing schools to create a new version of a trade school. We're reinventing schools to help kids be adaptable in a world that is changing at a blinding rate."
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • It's the spirit of science rather than hardcore curriculum that permeates SLA. "In science the, inquiry-based the is the foothold," Lehmann says. "We asked, 'What does it mean to build a school where everything is based on the core values of science: inquiry, research, collaboration, presentation, and reflection?'"
  • It means the first-year curriculum is built around essential questions: Who am I? What influences my identity? How do I interact with my world? In addition to science, math, and engineering, core courses include African American history, Spanish, English, and a basic how-to class in technology that also covers Internet safety and the ethical use of information and software. Classes focus less on facts to be memorized and more on skills and knowledge for students to master independently and incorporate into their lives. Students rarely take tests; they write reflections and do "culminating" projects. the doesn't merely cross disciplines -- it shatters outdated departmental divisions. Recently, for instance, kids studied atomic weights in biochemistry (itself a homegrown interdisciplinary course), did mole calculations in algebra, and created Dalton models (diagrams that illustrate molecular structures) in art.
  • This is Dewey for the digital age, old-fashioned progressive the with a technological twist.
  • computers and networking are central to learning at, and shaping learning culture of, SLA. "
  • he zest to experiment -- and the determination to use technology to run a school not better, but altogether differently -- began with Lehmann and the teachers last spring when they planned SLA online. their use of Moodle, an open source course-management system, proved so easy and inspired such productive collaboration that Lehmann adopted it as the school's platform. It's rare to see a dog-eared textbook or pad of paper at SLA; everybody works on iBooks. Students do research on the Internet, post assignments on class Moodle sites, and share information through forums, chat, bookmarks, and new software they seem to discover every day.
  • Teachers continue to use Moodle to plan, dream, and learn, to log attendance and student performance, and to talk about everything -- from the student who shows up each morning without a winter coat to cool new software for tagging research sources. there's also a schoolwide forum called SLA Talk, a combination bulletin board, assembly, PA system, and rap session.
  • Web technology, of course, can do more than get people talking with those they see every day; people can communicate with anyone anywhere. Students at SLA are the how to use social-networking tools to forge intellectual connections.
  • In October, Lehmann noticed that students were sorting themselves by race in the lunchroom and some clubs. He felt disturbed and started a passionate thread on self-segregation.
  • "Having the conversation changed the way kids looked at themselves," he says.
  • "What I like best about this school is the sense of community," says student Hannah Feldman. "You're not just here to learn, even though you do learn a lot. It's more like a second home."
  • As part of the study of memoirs, for example, Alexa Dunn's English class read Funny in Farsi, Firoozeh Dumas's account of growing up Iranian in the United States -- yes, the students do read books -- and talked with the author in California via Skype. the students also wrote their own memoirs and uploaded them to SLA's network for the teacher and class to read and edit. then, digital arts teacher Marcie Hull showed the students GarageBand, which they used to turn their memoirs into podcasts. these they posted on the the social-networking site EduSpaces (formerly Elgg); they also posted blogs about the memoirs.
Michael Johnson

Apprehending the Future: Emerging Technologies, from Science Fiction to Campus Reality (EDUCAUSE Review) | EDUCAUSE - 5 views

  • environmental scan
  • The environmental scan method offers several advantages, starting with The fact that drawing on multiple sources and perspectives can reduce The chances of bias or sample error. The wider The scan, The better will be The chance of hitting The first trace of items that, although small at The moment, could expand into prominence. A furTher advantage is pedagogical: trying to keep track of a diverse set of domains requires a wide range of intellectual competencies. As new technologies emerge, more The is required in subfields or entire disciplines, such as nanotechnology or digital copyright policy.
  • Disadvantages of this method start from its strengths: environmental scanning requires a great deal of sifting, searching, and analyzing. Finding the proverbial needle in the haystack isn't useful if its significance can't be recognized. Furthermore, the large amount of work necessary for both scanning and analyzing can be daunting, especially for smaller schools or enterprises.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • That complexity demands non-simple responses. Each of the techniques sketched above offers one way of helping groups to think through these emergent forces and to apprehend the future. Crowdsourcing, scenarios, prediction markets, the Delphi method, and environmental scanning are complementary strategies. Using several of these methods can teach us to learn about the future in more sophisticated, pro-active ways. If the methods appear strange, resembling science fiction, perhaps that is a sign of their aptness for the future, since the future often appears strange just before it becomes ordinary—or, in our case, just before it becomes a campus reality. As higher the budgets clamp down and the future hurtles toward us, we need these methods and techniques as allies that can help us to survive . . . and to learn.
  • Crowdsourcing, scenarios, prediction markets, the Delphi method, and environmental scanning are complementary strategies. Using several of these methods can teach us to learn about the future in more sophisticated, pro-active ways. If the methods appear strange, resembling science fiction, perhaps that is a sign of their aptness for the future, since the future often appears strange just before it becomes ordinary—or, in our case, just before it becomes a campus reality. As higher the budgets clamp down and the future hurtles toward us, we need these methods and techniques as allies that can help us to survive . . . and to learn.
  • to apprehend the future. Crowdsourcing, sce
  •  
    Alexander discusses methods for keeping up with the future of technology and its use in higher the.
Sarah Eeee

The Magic of Higher The - Old School, New School - The Chronicle of Higher The - 0 views

  • When we view faculty as labor and students as customers, we do not see magic; we see expenses and revenue on a profit-and-loss sheet. We would be better off selling tickets to a magic show.
  • When we present the university as a corporation, the faculty as labor, and the students as customers, we lose sight of our core mission of teaching and the. Just as the corporate analogy distracts, the customer analogy detracts. Presenting the student as a customer rather than as a partner in the is condescending at best. It is a short-run view that focuses on interactions with students as a series of financial transactions rather than a network of human relationships. When we view the as consumption, administrators are forced to side either with faculty at the expense of the students or with students at the expense of the faculty. When our focus is on the as a form of development, we can spend our energy on finding ways to support the creativity and growth of both partners in this relationship.
  • But the reality is that those of us who labor in academe range from part-time work-study students to outsourced janitors and food-service workers, to campus police, librarians, doctors, legal counsel, and a myriad of student counselors, among others. Many of the working conditions that affect professors also affect the rest of us. Much more is to be gained by seeing the conditions we have in common than by painting a picture of faculty as uniquely oppressed. Building bridges between faculty and administration is a necessary step in creating a campus culture that values teaching and the and that is oriented toward the success of both students and faculty.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Professors seem to have a strange sort of tunnel vision when it comes to defining labor on campus. Apart from their fellow faculty members, their view rarely includes those outside of the line on the organizational chart that links themselves to their presidents. they seem to look through their chairs, deans, and provosts to their most senior leaders.
  • Academic discussions of the corporatization of higher the frame the institution as a corporation and the faculty as the labor oppressed by this structure. But academics need to realize that the corporate model dehumanizes everyone on campus, not just the faculty.
  •  
    How can we be inspirational teachers at a distance? How do we achieve this 'magical' element, rather than just replicate the base demands of the corporate university?
Hanna Wiszniewska

Career Point: Top 100 Tools for Learning 2008 - 1 views

  •  
    Interesting list - some tools worth (re-)considering... Enjoy!
  •  
    from the site: "This list has beens compiled from the contributions of 223 the professionals (from both the and workplace the) who shared their Top 10 Tools for the both for their own personal the/ productivity and for creating the solutions for others."
Tony Rodgers

EdTech Toolbox: Top 100 Tools For Learning 2011 - 0 views

  •  
    "Great list produced every year from C4LPT - Centre for Learning and Performance Technologies. Here are Learning Top 100 Tools for Learning 2011. This Learning 5th Annual Survey of Learning Tools finalised on 13 November 2011. This year's list is compiled from Learning Top 10 Tools lists of 531 Learning professionals worldwide - from Learning, training and workplace Learning. "
Kathleen Cercone

Jane's E-Learning Pick of Learning Day: Top 100 Tools for Learning Spring 2008 - 0 views

  •  
    The Top 100 Tools for The Spring 2008 list has now been finalised from The contributions of 155 The professionals from The, workplace The and continuing professional development., You can view The list here: Top 100 Tools for The Spring 2008 I've also categorised The Top 100 tools by type of tool - and you can view that list here: The Toolbox 2008 I'm now working on The free Summary PDF, and that should be available shortly to download. I've...
edutopia .org

Doing More with Less (and Other Practical theal Technology Tidbits) | Edutopia - 0 views

  •  
    Adam Bellow (@adambellow on Twitter) works as the Director of theal Technology for the College Board Schools where he works with theal leaders, teachers, and students to infuse technology successfully in the classroom. In 2011, he was recognized as Outstanding Young Educator of the Year by ISTE (International Society for Technology in the).
Dennis OConnor

The rise of K-12 blended The: Profiles of emerging models | Innosight Institute - 2 views

  • Definition of blended learning In a field with significant confusion around what K−12 blended learning is, learning 40 programs converged under a simple, umbrella definition. First, in all of learning blended programs, learning students learned in a supervised brick-and-mortar location away from home at least some of learning time. Second, in all of learning cases, learning students experienced online delivery with some control over learning time, place, path, and/or pace. learningse two requirements, learningn, start to distinguish blended learning from olearningr types of learning.
  •  
    Synopsis of Innosight Institute report.  Link to pdf full white paper.  Cutting edge analysis of k-12 blended learning models.  A must read for any educator working with blended learning.
Ninja Essays

Students' Development in the Digital Age: Intellectual Freedom or Frivolity? - 0 views

  •  
    The emerging trends of technology tools and e-The practices have an intense influence over The Theal system in The USA. During this time of revolutionary approach towards designing and delivering courses and programs, many new opportunities, challenges, and complications have become apparent. Online The does provide efficient and timely access to The materials, but today's Theal technologies are merely vehicles that deliver instructions without influencing students' achievements.
Victorious Kidss Educares Pune

Victorious Kidss Educares features in the 'Teacher's Magazine' - 0 views

  •  
    You all will be happy to know that our school, Victorious Kidss Educares, has been featured in the 'Teachers Magazine' - April - June 2016 edition, two (2) pages, published by the Australian Council for theal Research (ACER). This magazine focuses on the professional development community for teachers & educators. 'the key feature is to create a school, that is a truly global the community, is to ensure every child's the need is, addressed , not only what we learn, but how we learn. Our goal is to graduate students who, in contributing to a better world, are critical and independent thinkers with strong capabilities in solving problems and making decisions'. For more information visit is @ http://www.victoriouskidsseducares.org/latest-news.html
Ninja Essays

Great Educational Tools for All Teachers and Students - Berkeley, CA - 0 views

  •  
    "Modern educational technology provides endless opportunities for teachers to make education educational process more interesting and students to become more motivated to learn. Teachers from all around education world have started to rely on educational tools that enhance education students' performance and participation in education classroom."
1 - 20 of 248 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page