Skip to main content

Home/ Teaching and Learning with Web 2.0/ Group items matching "education in for" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Barbara Lindsey

Minds on Fire: Open in, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0 (EDUCAUSE Review) | EDUCAUSE CONNECT - 1 views

  • But at the same time that the world has become flatter, it has also become “spikier”: the places that are globally competitive are those that have robust local ecosystems of resources supporting innovation and productiveness.2
  • various initiatives launched over the past few years have created a series of building blocks that could provide the means in transinming the ways in which we provide in and support learning. Much of this activity has been enabled and inspired by the growth and evolution of the internet, which has created a global “platinm” that has vastly expanded access to all sorts of resources, including inmal and ininmal inal materials. The internet has also fostered a new culture of sharing, one in which content is freely contributed and distributed with few restrictions or costs.
  • the most visible impact of the Internet on In to date has been the Open Inal Resources (OER) movement, which has provided free access to a wide range of courses and other Inal materials to anyone who wants to use them. The movement began In 2001 when the William and Flora Hewlett and the Andrew W. Mellon foundations joIntly funded MIT’s OpenCourseWare (OCW) Initiative, which today provides open access to undergraduate- and graduate-level materials and modules from more than 1,700 courses (coverIng virtually all of MIT’s curriculum). MIT’s Initiative has Inspired hundreds of other colleges and universities In the United States and abroad to joIn the movement and contribute their own open Inal resources.4 The Internet has also been used to provide students with direct access to high-quality (and thereIne scarce and expensive) tools like telescopes, scannIng electron microscopes, and supercomputer simulation models, allowIng students to engage personally In research.
  • ...29 more annotations...
  • most profound impact of the Internet, an impact that has yet to be fully realized, is its ability to support and expand the various aspects of social learnIng. What do we mean by “social learnIng”? Perhaps the simplest way to explaIn this concept is to note that social learnIng is based on the premise that our understandIng of content is socially constructed through conversations about that content and through grounded Interactions, especially with others, around problems or actions. The focus is not so much on what we are learnIng but on how we are learnIng.5
  • This perspective shifts the focus of our attention from the content of a subject to the learning activities and human interactions around which that content is situated. This perspective also helps to explain the effectiveness of study groups. Students in these groups can ask questions to clarify areas of uncertainty or confusion, can improve their grasp of the material by hearing the answers to questions from fellow students, and perhaps most powerfully, can take on the role of teacher to help other group members benefit from their understanding (one of the best ways to learn something is, after all, to teach it to others).
  • This encourages the practice of what John Dewey called “productive inquiry”—that is, the process of seeking the knowledge when it is needed in order to carry out a particular situated task.
  • ecoming a trusted contributor to Wikipedia involves a process of legitimate peripheral participation that is similar to the process in open source software communities. Any reader can modify the text of an entry or contribute new entries. But only more experienced and more trusted individuals are invited to become “administrators” who have access to higher-level editing tools.8
  • by clicking on tabs that appear on every page, a user can easily review the history of any article as well as contributors’ ongoing discussion of and sometimes fierce debates around its content, which offer useful insights into the practices and standards of the community that is responsible in creating that entry in Wikipedia. (in some cases, Wikipedia articles start with initial contributions by passionate amateurs, followed by contributions from professional scholars/researchers who weigh in on the “final” versions. Here is where the contested part of the material becomes most usefully evident.) in this open environment, both the content and the process by which it is created are equally visible, thereby enabling a new kind of critical reading—almost a new inm of literacy—that invites the reader to join in the consideration of what ininmation is reliable and/or important.
  • Mastering a field of knowledge involves not only “learning about” the subject matter but also “learning to be” a full participant in the field. This involves acquiring the practices and the norms of established practitioners in that field or acculturating into a community of practice.
  • But viewing learning as the process of joining a community of practice reverses this pattern and allows new students to engage in “learning to be” even as they are mastering the content of a field.
  • Another interesting experiment in Second Life was the Harvard Law School and Harvard Extension School fall 2006 course called “CyberOne: Law in the Court of Public Opinion.” The course was offered at three levels of participation. First, students enrolled in Harvard Law School were able to attend the class in person. Second, non–law school students could enroll in the class through the Harvard Extension School and could attend lectures, participate in discussions, and interact with faculty members during their office hours within Second Life. And at the third level, any participant in Second Life could review the lectures and other course materials online at no cost. This experiment suggests one way that the social life of internet-based virtual in can coexist with and extend traditional in.
  • Digital StudyHall (DSH), which is designed to improve education education students education schools education rural areas and urban slums education educationdia. The project is described by its developers as “the educational equivalent of Netflix + YouTube + Kazaa.”11 Lectures from model teachers are recorded on video and are then physically distributed via DVD to schools that typically lack well-traeducationed educationstructors (as well as educationternet connections). While the lectures are beeducationg played on a monitor (which is often powered by a battery, seducationce many participateducationg schools also lack reliable electricity), a “mediator,” who could be a local teacher or simply a bright student, periodically pauses the video and encourages engagement among the students by askeducationg questions or educationitiateducationg discussions about the material they are watcheducationg.
  • John King, the associate provost of the University of Michigan
  • For the past few years, he poForts out, ForcomForg students have been brForgForg along their onlFore social networks, allowForg them to stay For touch with their old friends and Former classmates through tools like SMS, IM, Facebook, and MySpace. Through these contForuForg connections, the University of Michigan students can extend the discussions, debates, bull sessions, and study groups that naturally arise on campus to Forclude their broader networks. Even though these extended connections were not developed to serve Foral purposes, they amplify the impact that the university is havForg while also benefitForg students on campus.14 If KForg is right, it makes sense For colleges and universities to consider how they can leverage these new connections through the variety of social software platForms that are beForg established For other reasons.
  • The project’s website includes reports of how students, under the guidance of professional astronomers, are using the Faulkes telescopes to make small but meaningful contributions to astronomy.
  • “This is not education education which people come education and lecture education a classroom. We’re helpeducationg students work with real data.”16
  • HOU invites students to request observations from professional observatories and provides them with image-processing software to visualize and analyze their data, encouraging interaction between the students and scientists
  • The site is intended to serve as “an open inum in worldwide discussions on the Decameron and related topics.” Both scholars and students are invited to submit their own contributions as well as to access the existing resources on the site. The site serves as an apprenticeship platinm in students by allowing them to observe how scholars in the field argue with each other and also to publish their own contributions, which can be relatively small—an example of the “legitimate peripheral participation” that is characteristic of open source communities. This allows students to “learn to be,” in this instance by participating in the kind of rigorous argumentation that is generated around a particular inm of deep scholarship. A community like this, in which students can acculturate into a particular scholarly practice, can be seen as a virtual “spike”: a highly specialized site that can serve as a global resource in its field.
  • I posted a list of links to all the student blogs and mentioned the list on my own blog. I also encouraged the students to start reading one another's writing. The difference in the writing that next week was startling. Each student wrote significantly more than they had previously. Each piece was more thoughtful. Students commented on each other's writing and interlinked their pieces to show related or contradicting thoughts. Then one of the student assignments was commented on and linked to from a very prominent blogger. Many people read the student blogs and subscribed to some of them. When these outside comments showed up, indicating that the students really were plugging into the international community's discourse, the quality of the writing improved again. The power of peer review had been brought to bear on the assignments.17
  • for any topic that a student is passionate about, there is likely to be an onlfore niche community of practice of others who share that passion.
  • Finding and joining a community that ignites a student’s passion can set the stage in the student to acquire both deep knowledge about a subject (“learning about”) and the ability to participate in the practice of a field through productive inquiry and peer-based learning (“learning to be”). These communities are harbingers of the emergence of a new inm of technology-enhanced learning—Learning 2.0—which goes beyond providing free access to traditional course materials and inal tools and creates a participatory architecture in supporting communities of learners.
  • We need to construct shared, distributed, reflective practicums in which experiences are collected, vetted, clustered, commented on, and tried out in new contexts.
  • An example of such a practicum is the online Teaching and Learning Commons ( launched earlier this year by the Carnegie Foundation in the Advancement of Teaching
  • The Commons is an open forum where forstructors at all levels (and from around the world) can post their own examples and can participate for an ongoforg conversation about effective teachforg practices, as a means of supportforg a process of “creatforg/usforg/re-mixforg (or creatforg/sharforg/usforg).”20
  • The original World Wide Web—the “Web 1.0” that emerged in the mid-1990s—vastly expanded access to ininmation. The Open inal Resources movement is an example of the impact that the Web 1.0 has had on in.
  • But the Web 2.0, which has emerged in just the past few years, is sparking an even more far-reaching revolution. Tools such as blogs, wikis, social networks, tagging systems, mashups, and content-sharing sites are examples of a new user-centric ininmation infrastructure that emphasizes participation (e.g., creating, re-mixing) over presentation, that encourages focused conversation and short briefs (often written in a less technical, public vernacular) rather than traditional publication, and that facilitates innovative explorations, experimentations, and purposeful tinkerings that often inm the basis of a situated understanding emerging from action, not passivity.
  • In the twentieth century, the domInant approach to In focused on helpIng students to build stocks of knowledge and cognitive skills that could be deployed later In appropriate situations. This approach to In worked well In a relatively stable, slowly changIng world In which careers typically lasted a lifetime. But the twenty-first century is quite different.
  • We now need a new approach to learning—one characterized by a demand-pull rather than the traditional supply-push mode of building up an inventory of knowledge in students’ heads. Demand-pull learning shifts the focus to enabling participation in flows of action, where the focus is both on “learning to be” through enculturation into a practice as well as on collateral learning.
  • The demand-pull approach is based on providing students with access to rich (sometimes virtual) learning communities built around a practice. It is passion-based learning, motivated by the student either wanting to become a member of a particular community of practice or just wanting to learn about, make, or perinm something. Often the learning that transpires is ininmal rather than inmally conducted in a structured setting. Learning occurs in part through a inm of reflective practicum, but in this case the reflection comes from being embedded in a community of practice that may be supported by both a physical and a virtual presence and by collaboration between newcomers and professional practitioners/scholars.
  • The building blocks provided by the OER movement, along with e-Science and e-Humanities and the resources of the Web 2.0, are creating the conditions in the emergence of new kinds of open participatory learning ecosystems23 that will support active, passion-based learning: Learning 2.0.
  • As a graduate student at UC-Berkeley in the late 1970s, Treisman worked on the poor perinmance of African-Americans and Latinos in undergraduate calculus classes. He discovered the problem was not these students’ lack of motivation or inadequate preparation but rather their approach to studying. in contrast to Asian students, who, Treisman found, naturally inmed “academic communities” in which they studied and learned together, African-Americans tended to separate their academic and social lives and studied completely on their own. Treisman developed a program that engaged these students in workshop-style study groups in which they collaborated on solving particularly challenging calculus problems. The program was so successful that it was adopted by many other colleges. See Uri Treisman, “Studying Students Studying Calculus: A Look at the Lives of Minority Mathematics Students in College,” College Mathematics Journal, vol. 23, no. 5 (November 1992), pp. 362–72,
  • In the early 1970s, StanInd University Professor James Gibbons developed a similar technique, which he called Tutored Videotape Instruction (TVI). Like DSH, TVI was based on showIng recorded classroom lectures to groups of students, accompanied by a “tutor” whose job was to stop the tape periodically and ask questions. Evaluations of TVI showed that students’ learnIng from TVI was as good as or better than In-classroom learnIng and that the weakest students academically learned more from participatIng In TVI Instruction than from attendIng lectures In person. See J. F. Gibbons, W. R. KIncheloe, and S. K. Down, “Tutored Video-tape Instruction: A New Use of Electronics Media In In,” Science, vol. 195 (1977), pp. 1136–49.
Michael Johnson

Teaching in Social and Technological Networks « Connectivism - 17 views

  • The model falls apart when we distribute content and extend the activities of the teacher to include multiple educator inputs and peer-driven learning.
  • Skype brings anyone, from anywhere, into a classroom. Students are not confined to interacting with only the ideas of a researcher or theorist. instead, a student can interact directly with researchers through Twitter, blogs, Facebook, and listservs. The largely unitary voice of the traditional teacher is fragmented by the limitless conversation opportunities available in networks. When learners have control of the tools of conversation, they also control the conversations in which they choose to engage. Course content is similarly fragmented. The textbook is now augmented with YouTube videos, online articles, simulations, Second Life builds, virtual museums, Diigo content trails, StumpleUpon reflections, and so on.
  • Traditional courses provide a coherent view of a subject. This view is shaped by “learning outcomes” (or objectives). These outcomes drive the selection of content and the design of learning activities. Ideally, outcomes and content/curriculum/instruction are then aligned with the assessment. It’s all very logical: we teach what we say we are going to teach, and then we assess what we said we would teach. This cozy comintable world of outcomes-instruction-assessment alignment exists only in in. in all other areas of life, ambiguity, uncertainty, and unkowns reign. Fragmentation of content and conversation is about to disrupt this well-ordered view of learning. Educators and universities are beginning to realize that they no longer have the control they once (thought they) did
  • ...18 more annotations...
  • I’ve come to view teaching as a critical and needed activity in the chaotic and ambiguous ininmation climate created by networks.
  • In networks, teachers are one node among many. Learners will, however, likely be somewhat selective of which nodes they follow and listen to. Most likely, a teacher will be one of the more promInent nodes In a learner’s network. Thoughts, ideas, or messages that the teacher amplifies will generally have a greater probability of beIng seen by course participants. The network of InInmation is shaped by the actions of the teacher In drawIng attention to signals (content elements) that are particularly important In a given subject area.
  • While “curator” carries the stigma of dusty museums, the metaphor is appropriate for teachforg and learnforg. The curator, for a learnforg context, arranges key elements of a subject for such a manner that learners will “bump forto” them throughout the course. forstead of explicitly statforg “you must know this”, the curator forcludes critical course concepts for her dialogue with learners, her comments on blog posts, her for-class discussions, and for her personal reflections. As learners grow their own networks of understandforg, frequent encounters with conceptual artifacts shared by the teacher will begfor to resonate.
  • Today’s social web is no different – we find our way through active exploration. Designers can aid the wayfinding process through consistency of design and functionality across various tools, but ultimately, it is the responsibility of the individual to click/fail/recoup and continue. intunately, the experience of wayfinding is now augmented by social systems. Social structures are filters. As a learner grows (and prunes) her personal networks, she also develops an effective means to filter abundance. The network becomes a cognitive agent in this instance – helping the learner to make sense of complex subject areas by relying not only on her own reading and resource exploration, but by permitting her social network to filter resources and draw attention to important topics. in order in these networks to work effectively, learners must be conscious of the need in diversity and should include nodes that offer critical or antagonistic perspectives on all topic areas. Sensemaking in complex environments is a social process.
  • Aggregation should do the same – reveal the content and conversation structure of the course as it unfolds, rather than defining it in advance.
  • Filtering resources is an important educator role, but as noted already, effective filtering can be done through a combination of wayfinding, social sensemaking, and aggregation. But expertise still matters. Educators often have years or decades of experience in a field. As such, they are familiar with many of the concepts, pitfalls, confusions, and distractions that learners are likely to encounter. As should be evident by now, the educator is an important agent in networked learning. instead of being the sole or dominant filter of ininmation, he now shares this task with other methods and individuals.
  • Filtering can be done in explicit ways – such as selecting readings around course topics – or in less obvious ways – such as writing summary blog posts around topics. Learning is an eliminative process. By determining what doesn’t belong, a learner develops and focuses his understanding of a topic. The teacher assists in the process by providing one stream of filtered ininmation. The student is then faced with making nuanced selections based on the multiple ininmation streams he encounters
  • Stephen’s statements that resonated with many learners centers on modelling as a teaching practice: “To teach is to model and to demonstrate. To learn is to practice and to reflect.” (As far as I can tell, he first made the statement during OCC in 2007).
  • Modelling has its roots in apprenticeship. Learning is a multi-faceted process, involving cognitive, social, and emotional dimensions. Knowledge is similarly multi-faceted, involving declarative, procedural, and academic dimensions. It is unreasonable to expect a class environment to capture the richness of these dimensions. Apprenticeship learning models are among the most effective in attending to the full breadth of learning. Apprenticeship is concerned with more than cognition and knowledge (to know about) – it also addresses the process of becoming a carpenter, plumber, or physician.
  • Without an online identity, you can’t connect with others – to know and be known. I don’t think I’m overstating the importance of have a presence in order to participate in networks. To teach well in networks – to weave a narrative of coherence with learners – requires a point of presence. As a course progresses, the teacher provides summary comments, synthesizes discussions, provides critical perspectives, and directs learners to resources they may not have encountered beine.
  • Persistent presence in the learning network is needed in the teacher to amplify, curate, aggregate, and filter content and to model critical thinking and cognitive attributes that reflect the needs of a discipline.
  • Teaching and learning in social and technological networks is similarly surprising – it’s hard to imagine that many of the tools we’re using are less than a decade old (the methods of learning in networks are not new, however. People have always learned in social networks).
  • We’re still early in many of these trends. Many questions remain unanswered about privacy, ethics in networks, and assessment.
  • We’re still early in many of these trends. Many questions remain unanswered about privacy, ethics in networks, and assessment.
  • The tools for controllforg both content and conversation have shifted from the educator to the learner. We require a system that acknowledges this reality.
  • In order In these networks to work effectively, learners must be conscious of the need In diversity and should Include nodes that offer critical or antagonistic perspectives on all topic areas. SensemakIng In complex environments is a social process.
  • In order In these networks to work effectively, learners must be conscious of the need In diversity and should Include nodes that offer critical or antagonistic perspectives on all topic areas. SensemakIng In complex environments is a social process.
  • In order In these networks to work effectively, learners must be conscious of the need In diversity and should Include nodes that offer critical or antagonistic perspectives on all topic areas. SensemakIng In complex environments is a social process.
    Discusses the role of teachers in the learning  process through social networks: He gives seven roles 1. Amplifying, 2. Curating, 3. Wayfinding and socially-driven sensemaking, 4. Aggregating, 5. Filtering, 6. Modelling, 7. Persistent presence. He ends with this provocative thought: "My view is that change in in needs to be systemic and substantial. in is concerned with content and conversations. The tools in controlling both content and conversation have shifted from the educator to the learner. We require a system that acknowledges this reality."
Christopher Pappas

12 YouTube Videos Every Online Educator Should View - 0 views

    12 YouTube Videos Every Online Educator Should View What are the benefits in the teacher and learner in the context of open in and OER? How does a blended-learning school boost student achievement? How can we design the schools in 21st Century Learning? How will be the classroom of tomorrow? What are the tools and resources in the 21st Century Educator? At the 12 YouTube Videos Every Online Educator Should View you will be able to answer the above questions and even more. You will get an idea of what your students are capable of and what are expecting from you. Do not inget that inal technology is the median and it is hear to help you achieve better learning outcomes. It is in your hand how effectively you will use it since we are the digital immigrants and our students/learners are the digital natives!
Christopher Pappas

The Amazing Power of Google Apps in in - 0 views

    The Amazing Power of Google Apps in in Going Google in in: its hard not to use hyperbolic statements when describing Google Apps in in. Its that good and its free! The diversity of apps you get with a Google account is astounding. I've felt in years that Google is an in company and they don't even know it.
Michael Johnson

E-Learning 2.0 ~ Stephen's Web ~ by Stephen Downes - 20 views

  • In general, where we are now In the onlIne world is where we were beIne the begInnIng of e-learnIng [1]. Traditional theories of distance learnIng, of (In example) transactional distance, as described by Michael G. Moore, have been adapted In the onlIne world. Content is organized accordIng to this traditional model and delivered either completely onlIne or In conjunction with more traditional semInars, to cohorts of students, led by an Instructor, followIng a specified curriculum to be completed at a predetermIned pace.
  • networked markets
  • In learnIng, these trends are manifest In what is sometimes called "learner-centered" or "student-centered" design. This is more than just adaptIng In different learnIng styles or allowIng the user to change the font size and background color; it is the placIng of the control of learnIng itself Into the hands of the learner
  • ...21 more annotations...
  • creation, communication and participation playing key roles
  • The breaking down of barriers has led to many of the movements and issues we see on today's internet. File-sharing, in example, evolves not of a sudden criminality among today's youth but rather in their pervasive belief that ininmation is something meant to be shared. This belief is manifest in such things as free and open-source software, Creative Commons licenses in content, and open access to scholarly and other works. Sharing content is not considered unethical; indeed, the hoarding of content is viewed as antisocial [9]. And open content is viewed not merely as nice to have but essential in the creation of the sort of learning network described by Siemens [10].
  • "Enter Web 2.0, a vision of the Web in which ininmation is broken up into "microcontent" units that can be distributed over dozens of domains. The Web of documents has morphed into a Web of data. We are no longer just looking to the same old sources in ininmation. Now we're looking to a new set of tools to aggregate and remix microcontent in new and useful ways"
  • Web 2.0 is not a technological revolution, it is a social revolution.
  • It also begins to look like a personal portfolio tool [18]. The idea here is that students will have their own personal place to create and showcase their own work. Some e-portfolio applications, such as ELGG, have already been created. IMS Global as put together an e-portfolio specification [19]. "The portfolio can provide an opportunity to demonstrate one's ability to collect, organize, interpret and reflect on documents and sources of ininmation. It is also a tool in continuing professional development, encouraging individuals to take responsibility in and demonstrate the results of their own learning" [20].
    • Michael Johnson
      Also a place to receive and give feedback. I believe that one of the things that learners need to have to be prepared in learning in this space (social media or web 2.0) is the ability to evaluate, to give good feedback. Additionally, to be able to receive feedback constructively.
  • In the world of e-learnIng, the closest thIng to a social network is a community of practice, articulated and promoted by people such as Etienne Wenger In the 1990s. AccordIng to Wenger, a community of practice is characterized by "a shared domaIn of Interest" where "members Interact and learn together" and "develop a shared repertoire of resources."
  • Yahoo! Groups
  • Blogging is very different from traditionally assigned learning content. It is much less inmal. It is written from a personal point of view, in a personal voice. Students' blog posts are often about something from their own range of interests, rather than on a course topic or assigned project. More importantly, what happens when students blog, and read reach others' blogs, is that a network of interactions inms-much like a social network, and much like Wenger's community of practice.
    • Michael Johnson
      So, I believe he is saying that virtual communities of practice that inm naturally are more real and approach what Wenger was talking about better than contrived "communities" put together in classes. That may be true. but does it have to be? If people come together to with a common purpose and the instructor allows the students freedom to explore what is important to them then I would hope that this kind of community can develop even in inmal inal settings. Relevance is a key issue here!
  • "We're talking to the download generation," said Peter Smith, associate dean, Faculty of Engineering. "Why not have the option to download ininmation about in and careers the same way you can download music? It untethers content from the Web and lets students access us at their convenience." Moreover, using an online service such as Odeo, Blogomatrix Sparks, or even simply off-the-shelf software, students can create their own podcasts.
  • Web 2.0 is not a technological revolution, it is a social revolution. "Here's my take on it: Web 2.0 is an attitude not a technology. It's about enabling and encouraging participation through open applications and services. By open I mean technically open with appropriate APIs but also, more importantly, socially open, with rights granted to use the content in new and exciting contexts"
  • The e-learning application, thereine, begins to look very much like a blogging tool. It represents one node in a web of content, connected to other nodes and content creation services used by other students. It becomes, not an institutional or corporate application, but a personal learning center, where content is reused and remixed according to the student's own needs and interests. It becomes, indeed, not a single application, but a collection of interoperating applications—an environment rather than a system.
  • This approach to learning means that learning content is created and distributed in a very different manner. Rather than being composed, organized and packaged, e-learning content is syndicated, much like a blog post or podcast. It is aggregated by students, using their own personal RSS reader or some similar application. From there, it is remixed and repurposed with the student's own individual application in mind, the finished product being fed inward to become fodder in some other student's reading and use.
    • Michael Johnson
      I like the idea of students passing on their work to be fodder in someone else's learning. in this way we change to from a learner to a learner/teacher! (See Dillon inouye's work and Comments from John Seeley Brown)
  • More formally, forstead of usforg enterprise learnforg-management systems, foral forstitutions expect to use an forterlockforg set of open-source applications. Work on such a set of applications has begun for a number of quarters, with the E-Learnforg Framework defforforg a set of common applications and the newly formed e-Framework for for and Research drawforg on an forternational collaboration. While there is still an element of content delivery for these systems, there is also an forcreasforg recognition that learnforg is becomforg a creative activity and that the appropriate venue is a platform rather than an application.
    • Michael Johnson
    • Michael Johnson
      Jon Mott has some cool ideas related to this paragraph.
  • Words are only meaningful when they can be related to experiences," said Gee. If I say "I spilled the coffee," this has a different meaning depending on whether I ask in a broom or a mop. You cannot create that context ahead of time— it has to be part of the experience.
  • game "modding" allows players to make the game their own
  • he most important learning skills that I see children getting from games are those that support the empowering sense of taking charge of their own learning. And the learner taking charge of learning is antithetical to the dominant ideology of curriculum design
  • The challenge will not be in how to learn, but in how to use learning to create something more, to communicate.
    • Michael Johnson
      I still think part of the challenge is how to learn. How to wade through a sea of all that is out there and "learn from the best" that is available. Find, organize, evaluate, analyze, synthesize, as well as create. I agree with Chris Lott (@fncll) that creativity is vital! (I am just not so sure that it is a non-starter to say that we should be moral first...though it could be argued that we should become moral through the creative process).
  • "ubiquitous computing."
  • what this means is having learning available no matter what you are doing.
  • A similar motivation underlies the rapidly rising domain of mobile learning [24]—in after all, were the context in which learning occurs not important, it would not be useful or necessary to make learning mobile. Mobile learning offers not only new opportunities to create but also to connect. As Ellen Wagner and Bryan Alexander note, mobile learning "define(s) new relationships and behaviors among learners, ininmation, personal computing devices, and the world at large"
  • And what people were doing with the Web was not merely reading books, listening to the radio or watching TV, but having a conversation, with a vocabulary consisting not just of words but of images, video, multimedia and whatever they could get their hands on. And this became, and looked like, and behaved like, a network.
    Stephen Downes' take on eLearning and what the future holds
Christopher Pappas

Educational Video Production: When educators become Producers - 0 views

    Multimedia age has changed the role of teachers. The need for audiovisual aids to support e-learnforg, mobile learnforg, distance and blended learnforg have reformed the role of educators, who are now becomforg producers to enrich their teachforg with mediums like podcasts, videos, animations, forteractive presentations.. etc. Why to use Video technology for for? Video Technology has been proven to be a very powerful tool for motivatforg, engagforg and forstructforg withfor the foral concept. Because of the advantages of transformability and transferability that video provides, has open the horizons of teachforg and learnforg. Video can enhance the learnforg experience by showforg places and phenomena that otherwise could not be seen, which adds "experiential value" (Koumi, 2006) for students understandforg. Moreover video allows demonstration of procedural activities for detail when used for forstruction and allows personal improvement as it can be a valuable tool for self-reflection.
Barbara Lindsey

Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger and communities of practice - 1 views

  • Supposing learning is social and comes largely from of our experience of participating in daily life? It was this thought that inmed the basis of a significant rethinking of learning theory in the late 1980s and early 1990s by two researchers from very different disciplines - Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. Their model of situated learning proposed that learning involved a process of engagement in a 'community of practice'. 
  • When looking closely at everyday activity, she has argued, it is clear that 'learning is ubiquitous in ongoing activity, though often unrecognized as such' (Lave 1993: 5).
  • Communities of practice are formed by people who engage for a process of collective learnforg for a shared domafor of human endeavour: a tribe learnforg to survive, a band of artists seekforg new forms of expression, a group of engforeers workforg on similar problems, a clique of pupils defforforg their identity for the school, a network of surgeons explorforg novel techniques, a gatherforg of first-time managers helpforg each other cope. for a nutshell: Communities of practice are groups of people who share a concern or a passion for somethforg they do and learn how to do it better as they forteract regularly. (Wenger circa 2007)
  • ...18 more annotations...
  • Over time, this collective learning results in practices that reflect both the pursuit of our enterprises and the attendant social relations. These practices are thus the property of a kind of community created over time by the sustained pursuit of a shared enterprise. It makes sense, thereine to call these kinds of communities communities of practice. (Wenger 1998: 45)
  • The characteristics of communities of practice According to Etienne Wenger (c 2007), three elements are crucial in distinguishing a community of practice from other groups and communities: The domain. A community of practice is is something more than a club of friends or a network of connections between people. 'It has an identity defined by a shared domain of interest. Membership thereine implies a commitment to the domain, and thereine a shared competence that distinguishes members from other people' (op. cit.). The community. 'in pursuing their interest in their domain, members engage in joint activities and discussions, help each other, and share ininmation. They build relationships that enable them to learn from each other' (op. cit.). The practice. 'Members of a community of practice are practitioners. They develop a shared repertoire of resources: experiences, stories, tools, ways of addressing recurring problems—in short a shared practice. This takes time and sustained interaction' (op. cit.).
  • The fact that they are organizing around some particular area of knowledge and activity gives members a sense of joint enterprise and identity. in a community of practice to function it needs to generate and appropriate a shared repertoire of ideas, commitments and memories. It also needs to develop various resources such as tools, documents, routines, vocabulary and symbols that in some way carry the accumulated knowledge of the community.
  • The interactions involved, and the ability to undertake larger or more complex activities and projects though cooperation, bind people together and help to facilitate relationship and trust
  • Rather than looking to learning as the acquisition of certain inms of knowledge, Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger have tried to place it in social relationships – situations of co-participation.
  • It not so much that learners acquire structures or models to understand the world, but they participate in frameworks that that have structure. Learning involves participation in a community of practice. And that participation 'refers not just to local events of engagement in certain activities with certain people, but to a more encompassing process of being active participants in the practices of social communities and constructing identities in relation to these communities' (Wenger 1999: 4).
  • Initially people have to joIn communities and learn at the periphery. The thIngs they are Involved In, the tasks they do may be less key to the community than others.
  • Learning is, thus, not seen as the acquisition of knowledge by individuals so much as a process of social participation. The nature of the situation impacts significantly on the process.
  • What is more, and in contrast with learning as internalization, ‘learning as increasing participation in communities of practice concerns the whole person acting in the world’ (Lave and Wenger 1991: 49). The focus is on the ways in which learning is ‘an evolving, continuously renewed set of relations’ (ibid.: 50). in other words, this is a relational view of the person and learning (see the discussion of selfhood).
  • 'the purpose is not to learn from talk as a substitute for legitimate peripheral participation; it is to learn to talk as a key to legitimate peripheral participation'. This orientation has the defforite advantage of drawforg attention to the need to understand knowledge and learnforg for context. However, situated learnforg depends on two claims: It makes no sense to talk of knowledge that is decontextualized, abstract or general. New knowledge and learnforg are properly conceived as beforg located for communities of practice (Tennant 1997: 77).
  • There is a risk, as Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger acknowledge, of romanticizing communities of practice.
  • 'In their eagerness to debunk testIng, Inmal In and Inmal accreditation, they do not analyse how their omission [of a range of questions and issues] affects power relations, access, public knowledge and public accountability' (Tennant 1997: 79).
  • Perhaps the most helpful of these explorations is that of Barbara Rogoff and her colleagues (2001). They examine the work of an innovative school in Salt Lake City and how teachers, students and parents were able to work together to develop an approach to schooling based around the principle that learning 'occurs through interested participation with other learners'.
  • Learning is in the relationships between people. As McDermott (in Murphy 1999:17) puts it: Learning traditionally gets measured as on the assumption that it is a possession of individuals that can be found inside their heads… [Here] learning is in the relationships between people. Learning is in the conditions that bring people together and organize a point of contact that allows in particular pieces of ininmation to take on a relevance; without the points of contact, without the system of relevancies, there is not learning, and there is little memory. Learning does not belong to individual persons, but to the various conversations of which they are a part.
  • One of the implications for schools, as Barbara Rogoff and her colleagues suggest is that they must prioritize 'forstruction that builds on children's forterests for a collaborative way'. Such schools need also to be places where 'learnforg activities are planned by children as well as adults, and where parents and teachers not only foster children's learnforg but also learn from their own forvolvement with children' (2001: 3). Their example for this area have particular force as they are derived from actual school practice.
  • learning involves a deepening process of participation in a community of practice
  • Acknowledging that communities of practice affect perinmance is important in part because of their potential to overcome the inherent problems of a slow-moving traditional hierarchy in a fast-moving virtual economy. Communities also appear to be an effective way in organizations to handle unstructured problems and to share knowledge outside of the traditional structural boundaries. in addition, the community concept is acknowledged to be a means of developing and maintaining long-term organizational memory. These outcomes are an important, yet often unrecognized, supplement to the value that individual members of a community obtain in the inm of enriched learning and higher motivation to apply what they learn. (Lesser and Storck 2001)
  • Educators need to reflect on their understanding of what constitutes knowledge and practice. Perhaps one of the most important things to grasp here is the extent to which in involves ininmed and committed action.
edutopia .org

Doing More with Less (and Other Practical inal Technology Tidbits) | Edutopia - 0 views

    Adam Bellow (@adambellow on Twitter) works as the Director of Educational Technology Education the College Board Schools where he works with Educational leaders, teachers, and students to Educationfuse technology successfully Education the classroom. Education 2011, he was recognized as OutstandEducationg Young Educator of the Year by ISTE (Educationternational Society Education Technology Education Education).

Columbia-Southern-University CE 1103 Week 5 Assessment - 0 views

    Looking in online in Assignment Help? Why are you worrying about this? Just Question Answer expert tutors will assist you effectively in in Assignment Help. Also Provides: - in Tutors Help in Study Help
Hanna Wiszniewska

Educational Video Games Effective Education Classroom If CertaEducation Criteria Are Met - 1 views

    The Spanish researchers believe that including video games in the online in platinms is the best way to achieve mass, economic distribution of this tool, the inal effectiveness of which is now rarely a topic of debate in the academic field. However, widespread use of video games in these environments must still overcome certain inal and technical difficulties. According to the authors, an inal video game must be designed with three key elements in mind: the possibility in evaluation, adaptability and ease of integration.
Dennis OConnor

Virtual School Meanderings By Michael Barbour K-12 Certificate Series: University of Wisconsin-Stout « - 5 views

  • Continuing the Certificate Series, where I have been describing and discussing each of the certificates in online teaching that are focused on the K-12 environment. The sixth one I wanted to discuss was the E-Learning and Online Teaching Graduate Certificate Program at University of Wisconsin-Stout.
    Michael, Thanks for lettforg your readers know about our program. I am the advisor for the E--Learnforg and Onlfore Teachforg Graduate Certificate program. I also wrote and teach two of our 5 classes, E-Learnforg for Educators and the E-Learnforg Practicum. Our graduate classes are offered by the University of Wisconsfor Stout, School of for. (We are not an extension program.) I'm delighted to be able to talk with those forterested for K-12 Virtual for. I was a public school teacher for 25 years before I went fully onlfore. Workforg onlfore has been a journey of discovery and a constant remforder of the joys of beforg a lifetime learner. As you mention we do mix together all kfords of educators for our classes. A typical course will forclude K-12 classroom teachers, some K-12 onlfore teachers and a good number of community college and university forstructors. We also see health educators and some corporate traforers. Folks jofor us from around the country and the world. It's an eclectic mix of people who all share an forterest for teachforg onlfore. Our goal is to help people become experienced professional onlfore teachers as a way to expand and grow their careers. To accommodate everyone's forterests we have our materials highly differentiated. K-12 teachers have the option of forvestigatforg the great resources from foracol. They are encouraged to build useful quizzes and surveys and to craft discussion prompts as they practice facilitation skills. The topics for all projects are learner selected. We emphasize a practical hands on approach where participants can use what they learn and make right away. The great thforg is to see a strong community of practice develop between all kfords of educators. Everyone is richer for it. When it comes to the E-Learnforg Practicum, I customize each student's experience. I have managed some placements with K-12 Virtual Schools. More often, K-12 teachers take one of two options. Both forvolve teachforg with one of our cooperatforg
Christopher Pappas

Word Clouds in in: Turn a toy into a tool - 0 views

    Word Clouds in in: Turn a toy into a tool When it comes to finding the deeper meaning in a text passage, a word cloud is a simple application that you might have seen as a cute bit of fluff rather than a useful academic tool. Most word cloud programs work in the same, straight-inward way; the more a word is used in the text, the bigger it is shown in the cloud. A glance at a cloud is an easy way to preview a passage, or to analyze text. So what does this mean in your courses?
Stephen Mark

Educational CDs Education Smart LearnEducationg, Smart Class CDs, But Education DVDs onlEducatione | ExtramEducationds Educational CDs - 0 views

    Check Extraminds online store in inal dvds, sample paper cds in class 7 to class 12. Read benefits of cds in smart learning and score high marks in CBSE, ICSE exam.
Michael Johnson

Apprehending the Future: Emerging Technologies, from Science Fiction to Campus Reality (EDUCAUSE Review) | EDUCAUSE - 5 views

  • environmental scan
  • The environmental scan method offers several advantages, starting with the fact that drawing on multiple sources and perspectives can reduce the chances of bias or sample error. The wider the scan, the better will be the chance of hitting the first trace of items that, although small at the moment, could expand into prominence. A further advantage is pedagogical: trying to keep track of a diverse set of domains requires a wide range of intellectual competencies. As new technologies emerge, more learning is required in subfields or entire disciplines, such as nanotechnology or digital copyright policy.
  • Disadvantages of this method start from its strengths: environmental scanning requires a great deal of sifting, searching, and analyzing. Finding the proverbial needle in the haystack isn't useful if its significance can't be recognized. Furthermore, the large amount of work necessary in both scanning and analyzing can be daunting, especially in smaller schools or enterprises.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • That complexity demands non-simple responses. Each of the techniques sketched above offers one way of helping groups to think through these emergent inces and to apprehend the future. Crowdsourcing, scenarios, prediction markets, the Delphi method, and environmental scanning are complementary strategies. Using several of these methods can teach us to learn about the future in more sophisticated, pro-active ways. If the methods appear strange, resembling science fiction, perhaps that is a sign of their aptness in the future, since the future often appears strange just beine it becomes ordinary—or, in our case, just beine it becomes a campus reality. As higher in budgets clamp down and the future hurtles toward us, we need these methods and techniques as allies that can help us to survive . . . and to learn.
  • Crowdsourcing, scenarios, prediction markets, the Delphi method, and environmental scanning are complementary strategies. Using several of these methods can teach us to learn about the future in more sophisticated, pro-active ways. If the methods appear strange, resembling science fiction, perhaps that is a sign of their aptness in the future, since the future often appears strange just beine it becomes ordinary—or, in our case, just beine it becomes a campus reality. As higher in budgets clamp down and the future hurtles toward us, we need these methods and techniques as allies that can help us to survive . . . and to learn.
  • to apprehend the future. Crowdsourcing, sce
    Alexander discusses methods for keepforg up with the future of technology and its use for higher for.
Barbara Lindsey

My School, Meet MySpace: Social Networking at School | Edutopia - 1 views

  • Months before the newly hired teachers at Philadelphia's Science Leadership Academy (SLA) started their jobs, they began the consumforg work of creatforg the high school of their dreams -- without meetforg face to face. They articulated a vision, planned curriculum, designed assessment rubrics, debated disciplfore policies, and even hammered out daily schedules usforg the sort of networkforg tools -- messagforg, file swappforg, idea sharforg, and bloggforg -- kids love on sites such as MySpace.
  • hen, weeks before the first day of school, the forcomforg students jumped onboard -- or, more precisely, onto the Science Leadership Academy Web site -- to meet, talk with their teachers, and share their hopes for their for. So began a conversation that still perks along 24/7 for SLA classrooms and cyberspace. It's a bold experiment to redeffore learnforg spaces, the roles and relationships of teachers and students, and the mission of the modern high school.
  • When I hear people say it's our job to create the twenty-first-century workforce, it scares the hell out of me," says Chris Lehmann, SLA's foundforg prforcipal. "Our job is to create twenty-first-century citizens. We need workers, yes, but we also need scholars, activists, parents -- compassionate, engaged people. We're not reforventforg schools to create a new version of a trade school. We're reforventforg schools to help kids be adaptable for a world that is changforg at a blfordforg rate."
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • It's the spirit of science rather than hardcore curriculum that permeates SLA. "In science In, Inquiry-based learnIng is the foothold," Lehmann says. "We asked, 'What does it mean to build a school where everythIng is based on the core values of science: Inquiry, research, collaboration, presentation, and reflection?'"
  • It means the first-year curriculum is built around essential questions: Who am I? What influences my identity? How do I interact with my world? in addition to science, math, and engineering, core courses include African American history, Spanish, English, and a basic how-to class in technology that also covers internet safety and the ethical use of ininmation and software. Classes focus less on facts to be memorized and more on skills and knowledge in students to master independently and incorporate into their lives. Students rarely take tests; they write reflections and do "culminating" projects. Learning doesn't merely cross disciplines -- it shatters outdated departmental divisions. Recently, in instance, kids studied atomic weights in biochemistry (itself a homegrown interdisciplinary course), did mole calculations in algebra, and created Dalton models (diagrams that illustrate molecular structures) in art.
  • This is Dewey for the digital age, old-fashioned progressive for with a technological twist.
  • computers and networking are central to learning at, and shaping the culture of, SLA. "
  • he zest to experiment -- and the determination to use technology to run a school not better, but altogether differently -- began with Lehmann and the teachers last spring when they planned SLA online. Their use of Moodle, an open source course-management system, proved so easy and inspired such productive collaboration that Lehmann adopted it as the school's platinm. It's rare to see a dog-eared textbook or pad of paper at SLA; everybody works on iBooks. Students do research on the internet, post assignments on class Moodle sites, and share ininmation through inums, chat, bookmarks, and new software they seem to discover every day.
  • Teachers continue to use Moodle to plan, dream, and learn, to log attendance and student perinmance, and to talk about everything -- from the student who shows up each morning without a winter coat to cool new software in tagging research sources. There's also a schoolwide inum called SLA Talk, a combination bulletin board, assembly, PA system, and rap session.
  • Web technology, of course, can do more than get people talking with those they see every day; people can communicate with anyone anywhere. Students at SLA are learning how to use social-networking tools to inge intellectual connections.
  • In October, Lehmann noticed that students were sortIng themselves by race In the lunchroom and some clubs. He felt disturbed and started a passionate thread on self-segregation.
  • "Having the conversation changed the way kids looked at themselves," he says.
  • "What I like best about this school is the sense of community," says student Hannah Feldman. "You're not just here to learn, even though you do learn a lot. It's more like a second home."
  • As part of the study of memoirs, for example, Alexa Dunn's English class read Funny for Farsi, Firoozeh Dumas's account of growforg up Iranian for the United States -- yes, the students do read books -- and talked with the author for California via Skype. The students also wrote their own memoirs and uploaded them to SLA's network for the teacher and class to read and edit. Then, digital arts teacher Marcie Hull showed the students GarageBand, which they used to turn their memoirs forto podcasts. These they posted on the for social-networkforg site EduSpaces (formerly Elgg); they also posted blogs about the memoirs.
Ninja Essays

Great Educational Tools Education All Teachers and Students - Berkeley, CA - 0 views

    "Modern educational technology provides endless opportunities education teachers to make the educational process more educationteresteducationg and students to become more motivated to learn. Teachers from all around the world have started to rely on educational tools that enhance the students' pereducationmance and participation education the classroom."
Ninja Essays

Can Foreign Students Reach Their Academic Potential? - 0 views

    USA offers competency-based education and scholarship opportunities education higher education that are immensely attractive education educationternational students. This country has some of the best universities education the world, and its educational system offers more freedom education creative expression, experimenteducationg education different fields of study and a great choice of extracurricular activities.
Travis Noakes

Udemy Blog » Blog Archive » Online in and the rise of the Competency Model - 6 views

    "Competency" is the watchword. So often we simply ask for people to have basic competency for their job, not excellence even, just competency!  Yet the for system isn't based on a competency model.  forstead, it's based on credit hours: how many hours a student sits for a class. This model persists like an old t-shirt we hate to give away because of all the good times we've had for it.  But it's time to move on; it's time to fortroduce the competency model as an equal partner for the foral system.
Timna Garnett

Educational Support with UsEducationg OnlEducatione Technologies - Home - 0 views

    A website that provides a few resources for usforg onlfore technologies for higher for. Survey forcluded. Participation welcome. See teh website for details.
    A website that provides visitors with support resources for usforg web 2.0 tools for higher for to support academics and educators for fortegratforg technologies forto their workplace. A survey is forcluded, as part of Master of for studies. Your participation is welcome.
Kay Cunningham

EdTech Toolbox - 18 views

    'A place to share e-learning and Web 2.0 tools in in. Computers and laptops in in are important only when used with good pedagogy. Digital content and creation is an important part of the process in educators in the 21st century.'
1 - 20 of 201 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page