Bruce and Levin (1997), for
example, look at ways in which the tools, techniques, and applications of
technology can support integrated, inquiry-based learning to "engage
children in exploring, thinking, reading, writing, researching, inventing,
problem-solving, and experiencing the world." They developed the idea of technology
as media with four different focuses: media for inquiry (such as data
modeling, spreadsheets, access to online databases, access to online
observatories and microscopes, and hypertext), media for communication (such as word processing, e-mail,
synchronous conferencing, graphics software, simulations, and tutorials), media for construction (such as
robotics, computer-aided design, and control systems), and media for expression (such as interactive video, animation
software, and music composition).
In a review of
existing evidence of technology's impact on learning, Marshall (2002) found strong evidence that
educational technology "complements what a great teacher does naturally,"
extending their reach and broadening their students' experience beyond the
classroom. "With ever-expanding content
and technology choices, from video to multimedia to the Internet," Marshall suggests
"there's an unprecedented need to understand the recipe for success, which
involves the learner, the teacher, the content, and the environment in which
technology is used."
Tom Daccord on 03 Feb 09Dennis is a former English teacher and administrator in urban and suburban schools for many years. Dennis has always gravitated toward K12 leadership, learning and technology topics. He has graduate degrees from Middlebury College's Bread Loaf School of English and Harvard University's School of Education. In addition to blogging about K12 learning, leading and web 2.0 tools/pedagogies at innovation3.edublogs.org, he is president of the Massachusetts affiliate of ASCD, a member of the Leadership Council for ASCD; a member of the Massachusetts Working Group for Educator Quality; Co-Facilitator of the Massachusetts High School Redesign Task Force; and a member of Massachusetts STEM Summit V Planning Committee. The web 2.0 conversation is not about technology tools; it is about student learning. Dennis subscribes to the definition of Professional Learning Communities that Rick and Becky DuFour and many other leaders of education have espoused. In simple terms, * learning (for us and for students) is our purpose, * we can improve student learning if we learn together collaboratively, and * monitoring student learning is the only way to know: 1. what students are learning, 2. how we are teaching and 3. how we get better at it. A former English teacher and administrator in urban and suburban schools for many years, he has always gravitated toward K12 leadership, learning and technology topics. He has graduate degrees from Middlebury College's Bread Loaf School of English and Harvard University's School of Education. He is married with three children and four grandchildren. Among other things, he loves running, cycling, kayaking, contemporary poetry, photography and the outdoors. In the summer of 2007 his professional life changed when he attended the Building Learning Communities Conference 2007 and in three days experienced, for the first time, the power of Web 2.0 tools and their potential for transforming schools and learning. That experience
