Fitzpatrick argues that journals should throw the door open to all comers, then deputize their readers to usher sound articles to a pedestal and banish bad ones to the margins. Scholarly journals would serve their constituencies better “by allowing everything through the gate, and by designing a post-publication peer review process that focuses on how a scholarly text should be received,” she writes, “rather than whether it should be out there in the first place.”
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url
News: Academic Publishing and Zombies - Inside Higher Ed - 1 views
How Online Innovators Are Disrupting Education - Jason Orgill and Douglas Hervey - Harvard Business Review - 4 views
-
In fact, Gates, Khan, and teachers at the academy argue that online education can liberate teachers, allowing them to engage in more creative and influential one-on-one mentoring.
-
teachers can serve as professional coaches and content architects to help students progress in ways that they never could under most current models
-
Targeting non-consumers creates less backlash from teachers' unions and administrators, and could even generate student referrals from incumbents themselves.
-
"teachers can serve as professional coaches and content architects to help students progress in ways that they never could under most current model"
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20▼ items per page