The problem, of course, is that those students represent the precise group MOOCs are meant to serve. “MOOCs were supposed to be the device that would bring higher education to the masses,” Jonathan Rees noted. “However, the masses at San Jose State don’t appear to be ready for the commodified, impersonal higher education that MOOCs offer.” Thrun’s cavalier disregard for the SJSU students reveals his true vision of the target audience for MOOCs: students from the posh suburbs, with 10 tablets apiece and no challenges whatsoever—that is, the exact people who already have access to expensive higher education.
It is more than galling that Thrun blames students for the failure of a medium that was invented to serve them, instead of blaming the medium that, in the storied history of the “correspondence” course (“TV/VCR repair”!), has never worked. For him, MOOCs don’t fail to educate the less privileged because the massive online model is itself a poor tool. No, apparently students fail MOOCs because those students have the gall to be poor, so let’s give up on them and move on to the corporate world, where we don’t have to be accountable to the hoi polloi anymore, or even have to look at them, because gross.
1More
Brainstorm in Progress: MOOCs and Connectivist Instructional Design - 1 views
1More
10 options for implementing a KM strategy | All of us are smarter than any of us... - 0 views
1More
Half an Hour: Evaluating a MOOC - 0 views
1More
OLDSMOOC Design « Jenny Connected - 0 views
1More
Enterprise Community Management: "joining up" learning and working « Learning... - 0 views
1More
10 Post Types That Gets Plenty of Shares - 0 views
1More
Disruption Ahead: What MOOCs Will Mean for MBA Programs » Knowledge@Wharton - 0 views
4More
Sebastian Thrun and Udacity: Distance learning is unsuccessful for most students. - 0 views
8More
The attack on higher ed - and why we should welcome it | ideas.ted.com - 0 views
1 - 12 of 12
Showing 20▼ items per page