Group items tagged

Nye Frank Message (11) Friends Tools Profile Settings Sign Out Research, Share, Collaborate Home My Library My Network My Groups Community 79 followings, 16 followers Change picture Common Stuff Send Message Invite to a Group Nye Frank's Profile Edit my profile Library Network Groups Profile Crime Victim 68 year old Riverside County Resident who was attacked in front of 73 year old wife by a 27 year old.http://cid-5c082f7eb08932e1.users.api.live.net/Users(6631602672477221601)/Main?$format=rss20 I am interested in Racing with a passion,Catching Big Big Fish,my apple trees with wife Lee Frank. Books: History. I use Diigo because http://cid-5c082f7eb08932e1.users.api.live.net/Users(6631602672477221601)/Main?$format=rss20 Member since Mar 06, 2009, follows 79 people, 18 public groups, 5592 public bookmarks (6964 total). More » TagsRecent Tags: county(0), homicide(0), Crime(0), riverside(0), federal(0), state(0), law(0), sentencing(0), casation(0), california(0), causation(0), Racing(0), elder(0), Frank(0), due(0), process(0), southern(0), Nye(0) Top Tags: elder(569), law(419), Nye(339), Frank(324), riverside(295), county(257), court(257), Crime(217), rights(184), prosecutor(179) More » Recent Bookmarks and AnnotationsFederal Judge in the Broadcom Case Cites Prosecutorial Misconduct as One of the Grounds for Dismissing Criminal Charges 8 minutes ago Grand Opening of New Riverside District Attorney Building Highlights the DA's Political Power :: Southern California Defense Blog 10 minutes ago Crime Victims Media Report 25 minutes ago LIABILITY OF INDIVIDUAL STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS: THE PRIMA FACIA CASE 30 minutes ago Southern California Defense Blog :: Published by Southern California Criminal Defense Law Corporation Wallin & Klarich about 1 hour ago Stalking Laws: How to Determine the Elements a District Attorney Has to Prove about 1 hour ago Caliber - Federal Sentencing Reporter - 21(5):299 - Citation about 2 hours ago C

Corruption- misconduct Sheriff and Prosecutor Daima Calhoun having father of a killer tell how to cover up homicide and that is just how it was done. Daima Calhoun closed the case behind closed doors. On top of it Calhoun was promoted and so was the cheif Da so they can commit more corruption. They proved they were willing to do the job.

Homicide cover up inland empire of Nye Frank 68 by friend of Da

Violation of Law

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Home > Criminal Appeals Law & Information > California's DNA Testing Procedures Questioned by the U.S. Supreme Court - Protect Your Sixth Amendment Rights Posted On: February 22, 2010 by Southern California Criminal Defense Attorney California's DNA Testing Procedures Questioned by the U.S. Supreme Court - Protect Your Sixth Amendment Rights In 2007, the California Supreme Court held that a DNA expert could testify about evidence from a test he or she did not perform. (People v. Geier (2007) 41 Cal.4th 555). This state has followed a long established practice where supervisors testify about lab tests, instead of technicians who actually tested forensic evidence. However, the validity of the California decision has been questioned by the 2008 United States Supreme Court's ruling, which held that a defendant had a right to demand live testimony at trial from crime lab technicians who actually performed their tests. (Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts (2008) 129 S. Ct. 2527). In particular, the Court has ruled that a trial court violated defendant's rights under the Sixth Amendment during his trial on a charge alleging that he distributed cocaine, when it admitted certificates signed by state laboratory analysts which stated that material police seized was cocaine because the certificates fell within core class of testimonial statements covered by Confrontation Clause. The Court's decision was the latest test of a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to be "confronted with the witnesses against him." The Confrontation clause was revived in 2004 when the justices rejected a prosecutor's use of an absent witness' tape-recorded statement to the police. Justice Scalia writing for the majority of the Court emphasized that when testimonial evidence is at issue, the Constitution gives the defendant a right to confront and to cross-examine the witness. (Crawfowd v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36). Since then, the Supreme Court has issued opinions clarifying what qu