Fred von Lohmann, EFF’s senior staff attorney, has been through the agreement and calls it “very one-sided contract, favoring Apple at every turn.” Some of the troubling aspects of the agreement that has come under von Lohmann’s scrutiny are:
Ban on Public Statements
App Store Only
Kill Your App Any Time
We Never Owe You More than Fifty Bucks
How can Apple get away with imposing such heavy-handed restrictions on developers?
Because it is the sole gateway to the more than 40 million iPhones that have been sold. In other words, it’s only because Apple still “owns” the customer, long after each iPhone (and soon, iPad) is sold, that it is able to push these contractual terms on the entire universe of software developers for the platform.
It’s all down to competition, or the lack of it:
In short, no competition among app stores means no competition for the license terms that apply to iPhone developers.
von Lohmann then goes on to accuse Apple of acting like a “feudal lord” rather than a “leader.”
If Apple wants to be a real leader, it should be fostering innovation and competition, rather than acting as a jealous and arbitrary feudal lord. Developers should demand better terms and customers who love their iPhones should back them.
prashantdeahmukh on 23 Mar 17Labor law (also known as labor law or employment law) mediates the relationship the middle of workers, utilizing entities, exchange unions and the administration. Aggregate Labor law identifies with those tripartite relationship between employee, manager What's more Uni. Single person Labor law worries employees' privileges at work Furthermore through the agreement for worth of effort. Employment measures would social standards (in A percentage instances likewise specialized foul standards) to those least socially satisfactory states under which representatives alternately contractors would permitted to worth of effort. Indian abour law alludes to laws managing work On india. Traditionally, indian administrations In national Furthermore state level need looked for to guarantee An secondary level from claiming security for workers, yet all the clinched alongside practice, authoritative privileges main blanket An privileges of the minority for laborers. India will be an elected manifestation of government Also in light work may be a subject in the simultaneous rundown of the indian Constitution, work matters are in the locale for both vital Furthermore state governments; both national What's more state legislatures need sanctioned laws for Labor relations and employment issues. History of Indian labour laws: Indian labour law is closely connected to the Indian independence movement, and the campaigns of passive resistance leading up to independence. While India was under colonial rule by the British Raj, labour rights, trade unions, and freedom of association were all suppressed. Workers who sought better conditions, and trade unions who campaigned through strike action were frequently, and violently suppressed. After independence was won in 1947, the Constitution of India of 1950 embedded a series of fundamental labour rights in the constitution, particularly the right to join and take action in a trade union, the principle of equality at work, and the aspi
