This speed may create lower levels of accuracy and reliability. I’ve seen first-hand how rapid publication practices, driven by competitive forces as well as the tempting capabilities of Internet publishing, can lead to an increase in corrections and errata at scientific journals. There is a price to pay to squeezing the time to publication down to its absolute minimum. The aggregate rise in corrections and retractions across the journals system may provide more evidence that haste makes waste. With questions of the quality and legitimacy of the reports published in journals arising in the mainstream media, the costs of speed to our brands and the overall reputation of the industry may be worth reconsidering.
Moreover, is rapid publication where the competitive advantage currently resides? Or has the strategic ground shifted?
Publishing in a Time of Information Warfare - A Wakeup Call - The Scholarly Kitchen - 0 views
UW professor: The information war is real, and we're losing it | The Seattle Times - 0 views
Digital Library Pedagogy Resources - 0 views
2More
The Tincture of Time - Should Journals Return to Slower Publishing Practices? - The Sch... - 0 views
ZOTAC | Push The Limit - VR Go Backpack - 0 views
1More
The Differences between Digital History and Digital Humanities | Dr Stephen Robertson - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
301 - 320 of 394
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page