Group items tagged

"Close Reading and Argument Writing - Authentically Across the Curriculum 7/16/2015 0 Comments Close reading of informational texts and non-fiction articles is not - and should not be - reserved for language arts classes. Every content area would be immensely enhanced if science teachers, social studies teachers, physical education teachers, welding teachers, woodworking teachers (in other words, "all technical subjects," as Common Core states) would not push aside the textbook, but instead embrace it, along with content area and trade articles. Students would then simultaneously learn how to dissect the readings while gaining knowledge in these content areas. What often happens is that teachers feel that students can't handle the text books or can't read the articles independently - and often that is true. However, when teachers instead go into a survival mode, of sorts, and read aloud the whole chapter or article or summarize it with a slideshow, it ends up doing a disservice to students - students are not learning HOW to read these complex texts. They are not learning how to acquire the information on their own. They are not being given the skills to read the sometimes intricate information within a particular content area or even within their possible future trade. They are not being given the opportunity to read, understand, articulate, and discuss or even debate topics within their area of study. Teachers sometimes feel that they can't do these things with students because they are not language arts teachers, or because they don't have time, or simply because they don't know how. Alternatively, a simple solution is to let go of the control and let students do…..with the guidance called close reading. Close reading is a guided reading approach. It is guided because 1) the close reading strategy is reserved for complex texts that are often too high for students to be left with independently and 2) students don't use close reading strateg

"Open with a question or two. Another favorite education writer of mine, the cognitive psychologist Daniel Willingham, argues that teachers should focus more on the use of questions. "The material I want students to learn," he writes in his book Why Don't Students Like School?, "is actually the answer to a question. On its own, the answer is almost never interesting. But if you know the question, the answer may be quite interesting." My colleague Greg Weiner, an associate professor of political science, puts those ideas into practice. At the beginning of class, he shows four or five questions on a slide for students to consider. Class then proceeds in the usual fashion. At the end, he returns to the questions so that students can both see some potential answers and understand that they have learned something that day. What did we learn last time? A favorite activity of many instructors is to spend a few minutes at the opening of class reviewing what happened in the previous session. That makes perfect sense, and is supported by the idea that we don't learn from single exposure to material - we need to return frequently to whatever we are attempting to master.But instead of offering a capsule review to students, why not ask them to offer one back to you?Reactivate what they learned in previous courses. Plenty of excellent evidence suggests that whatever knowledge students bring into a course has a major influence on what they take away from it. So a sure-fire technique to improve student learning is to begin class by revisiting, not just what they learned in the previous session, but what they already knew about the subject matter.Write it down. All three of the previous activities would benefit from having students spend a few minutes writing down their responses. That way, every student has the opportunity to answer the question, practice memory retrieval from the previous session, or surface their prior knowledge - and not just the students most likely to

"Me pareció interesante indagar a qué edad escribieron sus obras clave algunos novelistas de renombre. Entre la curiosidad, el asombro y la autoflagelación comparativa, terminé haciendo un relevamiento de 130 obras. Mi selección es, por supuesto, arbitraria. Son novelas que me gustaron o me interesaron (en el caso de haberlas leído) o que -por distintos motivos y referencias, a veces algo inasibles- las considero importantes (aunque no las haya leído todavía)."

"Me pareció interesante indagar a qué edad escribieron sus obras clave algunos novelistas de renombre. Entre la curiosidad, el asombro y la autoflagelación comparativa, terminé haciendo un relevamiento de 130 obras. Mi selección es, por supuesto, arbitraria. Son novelas que me gustaron o me interesaron (en el caso de haberlas leído) o que -por distintos motivos y referencias, a veces algo inasibles- las considero importantes (aunque no las haya leído todavía)."

Lectura, escritura, comunicación, redes sociales, vínculos, compartir, dialogo, lectura colectiva, juegos, voluntad pedagógica, tutoriales, materiales de estudio, licencias

Lectura, escritura, comunicación, redes sociales, vínculos, compartir, dialogo, lectura colectiva, juegos, voluntad pedagógica, tutoriales, materiales de estudio, licencias