Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ Big 12 Engineering Project-Policy Research
abutler

KBOR - Policy and Procedure Manual Appendix G Approval of New Academic Programs - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      Registrar Information: page 36 Kansas Board of Regents Policy and Procedure Manual ACADEMIC CALENDAR a. The Academic Calendar of each institution under the jurisdiction of the Board shall provide for an academic year minimally consisting of two sixteen week semesters totaling 150 instructional days plus five final exam days each semester. b. Each Regents university shall file a three-year Academic Calendar adhering to holidays and breaks approved by the Board. Each institution shall follow the calendar as approved by the Board. Any deviation for reasons other than natural disasters or national emergencies must have prior approval of the Board. (6-19-70; 1-18-90; 5-20-93) 2. COURSE NUMBERING SYSTEM a. In order to maintain a common system of classification of academic information for all Regents institutions, course levels are to be identified by the first digit catalog course number as follows: 000-099 No credit courses. 100-299 Lower division, undergraduate. Designed as freshman-sophomore courses. 300-499 Upper division, undergraduate. Designed as junior and senior courses. 500-699 Upper division, undergraduate. Primarily for juniors and seniors, with enrollment of less than 50% Graduate I students. 700-799 Graduate and upper division. For Graduate I students primarily; with enrollment of less than 50% undergraduates. 800-899 Designed primarily for Graduate I students. 900-999 Designed primarily for Graduate II students. Grad. I = Courses and thesis for Masters students who will ordinarily have accumulated from 1 through 30 graduate hours and students enrolled in professional schools (Law, Veterinary Medicine, M.D., Architecture, etc.). Grad. II = Courses for Specialists and Doctoral students who will ordinarily have completed greater than 30 hours of graduate work. The dual listing of courses may be permitted on a limited basis with the written approval of the graduate dean of each institution. A current list of such dually listed cours
  •  
    Collaboration: page 118 Kansas Board of Regents Policy and Procedure Manual APPENDIX K COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM/DEGREE PROCEDURES Proposals for collaborative programs/degrees must include the following and should be limited to two pages: (a) A brief description of the nature of the collaboration and the benefits to Kansas (b) Lists of partners in the collaboration and degrees/certificates (if any) to be conferred by each partner (c) Description of faculty load and faculty compensation for each partner (d) Tuition/fees for each partner (e) Description of student support services provided by each partner (1) Academic Advising (2) Financial Aid (3) Access to facilities (4) Transcripting procedures (f) Plans for joint use of facilities (g) Plans for joint purchase and/or maintenance of facilities (1-19-05) ------------------------------------------------------------------ 25. COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM/DEGREE POLICY page 148 The Kansas Board of Regents encourages and supports system-wide cooperative and collaborative efforts among postsecondary institutions within the State of Kansas and between Kansas institutions and out-of-state institutions, including international institutions. a. Defion of collaborative programs/degrees Collaborative programs/degrees are defined as programs/degrees developed and/or approved jointly by more than one institution; students from each participating institution may study parts of the program/degree at the collaborating institutions. In this policy, "program" refers to a formal academic course of study. Although most programs result in a degree or a major within a degree, in some cases, such as teaching endorsements, a program does not result in a major or a degree. b. Requirements for collaborative programs/degrees (1) Effective August 2005, all new collaborative programs must be reported to SCOCAO and SCOP according to the procedures described in Appendix K. The purpose of the report is to
  •  
    APPENDIX D RESIDENCY RULES AND REGULATIONS Article 3--GUIDELINES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF RESIDENCY FOR FEE PURPOSES Page 88 88-3-1. Student Information. Whenever a question arises concerning a person's residence classification for fee purposes, that person shall be provided with a copy of information substantially as set forth in this regulation, together with K.A.R. 88-3-2 through 88-3-13. "Carefully read the information, statute, and regulations that follow. Then, if you believe you should be eligible for resident classification for fee purposes, complete the attached application for residence classification and submit it to the registrar within 30 days of your notification of classification as a nonresident for fee purposes. When an appeal is made by a student from a determination that the student is a nonresident, the student must pay nonresident fees at the time designated for payment of fees. If the student is found to be a resident, the difference between resident and nonresident fees will be refunded. Subject to the provisions of K.S.A. 77-601, et seq. decisions of the residence committee shall not be subject to further administrative review by any officer or committee of the university, or by the state board of regents." Responsibility "The responsibility of enrolling under proper residence classification for fee purposes is placed on the student. If there is any possible question of residence classification under the regulations of the state board of regents, it is the duty of the student when registering and paying fees to raise the question with the registrar. If a student enrolls incorrectly as a resident of Kansas and it is determined at a later date the student was a nonresident for fee purposes, the student shall be required to pay the nonresident fee for all terms during which the student was incorrectly registered." (Authorized by K.S.A. 76-730; implementing K.S.A. 76-729; effective, E-71-35, Aug. 20, 1971; effective Jan. 1, 1972; a
abutler

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board: Approval of Distance Education Off-Campus an... - 0 views

  • (5) For courses not eligible to be submitted for formula funding, institutions shall charge fees that are equal to or greater than Texas resident tuition and applicable fees, and that are sufficient to cover the total cost of instruction and overhead, including administrative costs, benefits, computers and equipment, and other related costs.
  • §4.108 Non-Formula-Funded (Extension) Course and Program General Provisions (a) Institutions shall not submit non-state-funded lower-division credit courses to Regional Councils. (b) Institutions shall not submit distance education courses delivered outside the state to non-Texas residents for formula funding. (c) The Commissioner shall develop standards for institutions offering out-of-state/country courses and programs. (d) Institutions shall not jeopardize or diminish the status of formula-funded on-campus courses and programs in order to offer extension courses. Extension courses shall not be a substitute for offering a sufficient number of formula-funded on-campus courses. (e) Institutions shall report fees received for extension and out-of-state/country courses in accordance with general institutional accounting practices. (f) Institutions shall report enrollments, courses and graduates associated with extension offerings as required by the Commissioner. Source Note: The provisions of this §4.108 adopted to be effective August 21, 2005, 30 TexReg 4642
  • (15) Formula funding--The method used to allocate appropriated sources of funds among institutions of higher education. (16) Formula-funded course--An academic credit course delivered face-to-face or by distance education, including correspondence, whose semester credit hours are submitted for formula funding.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Out-of-state and out-of-country courses do not receive formula funding and are a type of academic credit extension offering. They may be offered through distance education or face-to-face instruction.
  • egular on-campus student--A student who is admitted to an institution, the majority of whose semester credit hours are reported for formula funding, and whose coursework is primarily taken at an institution's main campus.
  • (1) Academic credit courses, degree and certificate programs, and formula-funded workforce continuing education provided by a community college through distance education or outside of the boundaries of its taxing district through off-campus instruction;
  • 3) Academic credit courses, degree and certificate programs, and formula-funded workforce continuing education provided by a public technical college or Lamar state college through distance education or off-campus instruction;
  • (2) Institutions shall report distance education and off-campus courses submitted for formula funding in accordance with the Board's uniform reporting system and the reporting provisions of this subchapter.
  • (3) Institutions may submit for formula funding the following types of academic credit courses: distance education courses delivered to Texas and non-Texas residents located on-campus or at another location in Texas, distance education courses delivered to Texas residents located out of state or out of country; Study-Abroad courses, and Study-in-America courses. (4) Institutions shall not submit the following types of courses for formula funding: (A) distance education courses taken by non-resident students who are located out of state or out of country, (B) courses in out-of-state or out-of-country programs, as defined above, taken by any student, or (C) extension courses.
abutler

Oklahoma University Faculty Handbook 2006 Irregular Class Meetings and Classes during f... - 0 views

  •  
    Finance information: * 4.22 WAIVER OF FEES: page138 * 4.23 WAIVER OF TUITION: page 139 * 4.23.4 WAIVER FOR OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS ACADEMIC SCHOLARS PROGRAM: page 140 * 4.23.5 NONRESIDENT TUITION WAIVER: page 141
  •  
    4.20 IRREGULAR CLASS MEETINGS All class meetings should be held during the regular hours scheduled for the course. Unscheduled meetings at other hours should be held only for very unusual and clearly defensible reasons and never for the mere personal convenience of the instructor or the students or both. If it is desirable for sound educational reasons to schedule a departmental or joint quiz at an evening hour so that all sections of a course may write the quiz simultaneously (uniform exams), the date and hour of each such irregularly scheduled quiz should be made known to all the students concerned during the first week of classes. If a student then incurs a serious conflict at one of these hours, the responsibility is the students. If no such notice of irregularly scheduled hours for departmental or joint quizzes can be given, such a plan for giving tests is presumably not important enough to merit systematic planning and should not be used. The University discourages all unscheduled class meetings; individual faculty members and departments regulate their teaching schedules in accordance with this principle. The department that announces the hours at which a course will meet, the faculty member who agrees to teach it at those hours and the student who has agreed to take it at those hours have all assumed an unwritten contractual obligation from which no one of them should deviate without very substantial reasons for doing so. (Deans Council, 12-14-66; Senior Vice President and Provost, 9-20-68, 3-3-05)
  •  
    4.22 WAIVER OF FEES Norman Campus - Faculty Handbook Institutions may establish procedures for waiving of tuition and fees for students who are enrolled in courses offered on a non-standard schedule. (State Regents for Higher Education, 1-30-61, 5-31-97)
abutler

OSRHE Policy and Procedure Manual 3.4 Program Approval Page 69 - 0 views

  •  
    Finance Info: 3.17.18 Fiscal Provisions for Electronic and Traditional Off-campus Instruction. Page 157 3.17.20 Electronic Curriculum Development Fund. Page 159
  • ...3 more comments...
  •  
    Program Approval Info: 3.17.16 Program Approval and Review. Page 156
  •  
    3.7.4 Criteria for Evaluation Page 69: the above link takes you to this page.
  •  
    Course and Program Approval: 3.4 Program Approval. Page 49
  •  
    3.14.8 Certificates: Certificates and other forms of academic recognition other than degrees may be awarded by institutions only as authorized by the State Regents and in the form approved by them for this puspose. Institutions should submit reequests to award certificates only when the certificate is identified on the transcript, diploma, or degree (See the State Regents Aademic Program Review Policy). Awards or certificates give for completion of short courses, non-credit offerings, basic education courses, or other such experiences need not be submitted for State Regents' Approval. Page 127
  •  
    Academic Program Review. Page 68
abutler

Graduate Deans Agreement GPIDEA - 0 views

  •  
    Graduate Deans Agreement Great Plains Interactive Distance Education Alliance (Great Plains IDEA) Adopted October 30, 2001, Updated March 18, 2003 The Graduate Deans of the Universities that are members of the Great Plains IDEA and that are participating in the Master's and graduate certificate programs offered through the Great Plains IDEA, on behalf of their respective Graduate Faculties, have agreed to the following principles and procedures in order to facilitate the development and delivery of inter-institutional graduate programs through their institutions. Principle 1: The participating Graduate Schools mutually respect the academic standards and quality of the academic departments involved in this joint program, therefore: 1.1 Courses approved for delivery by this program will be considered inter-institutional courses and will be exempt from transfer credit policies. 1.2 Faculty members who provide instruction in this program must carry graduate faculty status at their home institution; however, further documentation or approval will not be required by the other members of the Alliance. 1.3 Students admitted as degree-seeking students in Great Plains IDEA programs will be accepted automatically by all other members of the Alliance for enrollment in courses that are a part of the curricula of Great Plains IDEA programs. Admission to a Great Plains IDEA program will be based on the criteria established at each participating institution and program pre-requisites established for the Alliance Program to which admission is sought. Institutions are encouraged not to require the GRE. 1.4 The number of students that may be admitted to the program by each participating institution will be determined by agreement of the participating institutions. 1.5 The content of the curriculum will be determined by agreement of the participating institutions. Principle 2: The participating Graduate Schools recognize that the implementatio
1 - 20 of 168 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page