Skip to main content

Home/ Big 12 Engineering Project-Policy Research/ Group items matching "assessment" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
abutler

Texas Tech University: Assessment Plan for Distance Learning & Off-Campus Instruction - 0 views

  •  
    APPENDIX 1-4A Section 1 Question 4 Institutional Issues Assessment Plan for Distance Learning and Off-Campus Instruction 1. Assessment of student learning outcomes Readiness Survey * Assessment of student readiness to complete course delivered in a specified modality * Administered prior to a student's first enrollment in a course delivered via a specific modality * Development of readiness surveys for each modality (e.g., broadcast TV, Internet, video conferencing, mixed modalities) Modality Assessment * Student self-report of how modality affected course delivery * Administered at end of term for each course * Instruments developed for each modality of delivery (e.g., broadcast TV, Internet, video conferencing, mixed modalities) Learning Objectives Assessment * Assessment of student mastery of learning objectives for a specific course * Faculty member for course establishes learning objectives and processes for Assessment, documents findings, and uses for improvement of teaching and student learning * Conducted by faculty or faculty team each term course is offered Degree program student learning outcomes Assessment * Discipline or degree program faculty identify specific learning outcomes that are expected of students * Methods of Assessment selected from best practices in discipline * Assessment plan designed and implemented by disciplinary faculty * Assessment conducted at several points of student's progress through degree program (sometimes, at entrance, mid-point, and at exit) * Degree program faculty document findings and use for improvement in teaching and student learning 2. Retention * Institutional Research to implement retention reporting for two groups: 1) distance learners and 2) off-campus educational site students. * Retention research will parallel existing retention research conducted for students studying at Lubbock. * Retention benchmarks for distance learners and off-camp
  •  
    APPENDIX 2-1C Section 2 Question 1 Educational Programs Texas Tech University Distance Learning and Off-Campus Site Program Proposal I. Title of program (e.g., English, Secondary Teaching Certificate, Business Administration) II. Degree offered (BA, BS, BBA, M.Ed., MBA, MA, MS, etc.) III. Timeline for offering the degree (Beginning date, courses per term, end date; continuous offering or cohort-based offering) IV. Brief description of degree and curriculum (brief narrative of academic program) V. Evidence of long-term need for each program in terms of student demand (marketing analysis of regional or state-wide student demand, THECB approved programs, state occupational data, institutional data, etc.) VI. Evidence of institutional capacity to assure the students can make continuous progress toward their degree (Institutional faculty staffing adequacy, regional part-time adequacy, facility and technology adequacy, institutional commitment, etc.) VII. Strategy for providing comparable on-campus support to distance and offcampus learners (standards for admission, enrollment, registration, financial aid, availability of faculty for on-site or Internet office-hours, institutional and regional library resources, administrative support personnel to provide on-site services, training for support staff who will work with distance or off-campus learners, quality control measures, etc.) VIII. Strategies for scheduling courses to meet degree requirements for distance and off-campus learners (sequencing of course delivery, method of delivery, etc.). IX. Degree plan (required curriculum for degree completion; under-division courses required but not currently offered by regional community college; recommended four-year program for undergraduates; recommended term-by-term program for graduate students). X. Degree courses (list each course number, title and description from current institutional catalog) XI. Learning outcomes and assessment processes for courses and
  •  
    Section 3 Faculty 1. The qualifications for distance education faculty are the same as faculty teaching the same courses in a traditional on-campus format. Please describe rationale applied for making exceptions. ELECTRONICALLY-BASED DISTANCE EDUCATION Faculty members are the core of distance education and off-campus instruction. Issues related to faculty qualifications and services are covered in a variety of University Operating Policies, which will be referenced in appropriate portions of this report. Faculty Qualifications Full and part-time faculty members must meet the qualifications stipulated by SACS. OP 32.02 http://www.depts.ttu.edu/opmanual/New.contents.links/32academic_policies_faculty.htm denotes the qualifications needed for all faculty levels. Departmental chairpersons must certify the qualifications of faculty members at the time of employment, including those faculty members contracted for course development and implementation through Outreach and Extended Studies and those teaching at off-campus educational sites. Exceptions to the stated requirements are not typical at Texas Tech, but may be permitted in cases of persons who have "demonstrated exceptional scholarly or creative activity or substantial professional experience." As noted by Institutional Research and by Outreach and Extended Studies, over 95% of those teaching distance courses are the same faculty members who teach the course on campus. OFF CAMPUS INSTRUCTION At Texas Tech University faculty members who teach in the various distance education programs and courses hold the same credentials as those teaching on-campus courses. Full and part-time faculty teaching distance courses or at off-campus sites are appointed by the respective academic departments at Lubbock. All policies and procedures that apply to on-campus faculty members apply to faculty members teaching distance education courses and at off-campus educational sites.
abutler

Texas A&M University: Program Assessment for Professional Accreditation and Internal Program Review - 0 views

  •  

abutler

Texas Tech University Strategic Plan : Goal 4. Technology - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      Goal 4: Benefit from the use of technology in the delivery of services. Create technology infrastructure that provides easy collaborative interaction in a learning environment. Offer 12 degree programs through distance learning and 8% of total course inventory through distance learning. 75% of appropriate recruiting tools will be Internet-based. Objective 4.2: Integrate the use of technology in teaching and learning processes. Strategies: Engage faculty in how instruction is impacted by technology. Provide an appropriate infrastructure for distance learning. Assessments: Number of distance courses. Amount of external support. Number and capabilities of technology classrooms. Number of courses using technology. Objective 4.6: Increase the number of electronically delivered degree programs and courses. Strategies: Develop and implement additional electronically delivered courses and programs. Support faculty training for electronically delivered instruction. Support faculty training in the design and implementation of electronically delivered curriculum. Provide appropriate technological resources for electronically delivered instruction. Market electronically delivered courses and degree programs. Assessments: Number of electronically delivered courses. Number of electronically delivered degrees. Student enrollment.
abutler

Texas A&M University Student Learning Outcomes - 0 views

  •  

abutler

KBOR - Policy and Procedure Manual Appendix G Approval of New Academic Programs - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      Registrar Information: page 36 Kansas Board of Regents Policy and Procedure Manual ACADEMIC CALENDAR a. The Academic Calendar of each institution under the jurisdiction of the Board shall provide for an academic year minimally consisting of two sixteen week semesters totaling 150 instructional days plus five final exam days each semester. b. Each Regents university shall file a three-year Academic Calendar adhering to holidays and breaks approved by the Board. Each institution shall follow the calendar as approved by the Board. Any deviation for reasons other than natural disasters or national emergencies must have prior approval of the Board. (6-19-70; 1-18-90; 5-20-93) 2. COURSE NUMBERING SYSTEM a. In order to maintain a common system of classification of academic information for all Regents institutions, course levels are to be identified by the first digit catalog course number as follows: 000-099 No credit courses. 100-299 Lower division, undergraduate. Designed as freshman-sophomore courses. 300-499 Upper division, undergraduate. Designed as junior and senior courses. 500-699 Upper division, undergraduate. Primarily for juniors and seniors, with enrollment of less than 50% Graduate I students. 700-799 Graduate and upper division. For Graduate I students primarily; with enrollment of less than 50% undergraduates. 800-899 Designed primarily for Graduate I students. 900-999 Designed primarily for Graduate II students. Grad. I = Courses and thesis for Masters students who will ordinarily have accumulated from 1 through 30 graduate hours and students enrolled in professional schools (Law, Veterinary Medicine, M.D., Architecture, etc.). Grad. II = Courses for Specialists and Doctoral students who will ordinarily have completed greater than 30 hours of graduate work. The dual listing of courses may be permitted on a limited basis with the written approval of the graduate dean of each institution. A current list of such dually listed cours
  •  
    Collaboration: page 118 Kansas Board of Regents Policy and Procedure Manual APPENDIX K COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM/DEGREE PROCEDURES Proposals for collaborative programs/degrees must include the following and should be limited to two pages: (a) A brief description of the nature of the collaboration and the benefits to Kansas (b) Lists of partners in the collaboration and degrees/certificates (if any) to be conferred by each partner (c) Description of faculty load and faculty compensation for each partner (d) Tuition/fees for each partner (e) Description of student support services provided by each partner (1) Academic Advising (2) Financial Aid (3) Access to facilities (4) Transcripting procedures (f) Plans for joint use of facilities (g) Plans for joint purchase and/or maintenance of facilities (1-19-05) ------------------------------------------------------------------ 25. COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM/DEGREE POLICY page 148 The Kansas Board of Regents encourages and supports system-wide cooperative and collaborative efforts among postsecondary institutions within the State of Kansas and between Kansas institutions and out-of-state institutions, including international institutions. a. Defion of collaborative programs/degrees Collaborative programs/degrees are defined as programs/degrees developed and/or approved jointly by more than one institution; students from each participating institution may study parts of the program/degree at the collaborating institutions. In this policy, "program" refers to a formal academic course of study. Although most programs result in a degree or a major within a degree, in some cases, such as teaching endorsements, a program does not result in a major or a degree. b. Requirements for collaborative programs/degrees (1) Effective August 2005, all new collaborative programs must be reported to SCOCAO and SCOP according to the procedures described in Appendix K. The purpose of the report is to
  •  
    APPENDIX D RESIDENCY RULES AND REGULATIONS Article 3--GUIDELINES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF RESIDENCY FOR FEE PURPOSES Page 88 88-3-1. Student Information. Whenever a question arises concerning a person's residence classification for fee purposes, that person shall be provided with a copy of information substantially as set forth in this regulation, together with K.A.R. 88-3-2 through 88-3-13. "Carefully read the information, statute, and regulations that follow. Then, if you believe you should be eligible for resident classification for fee purposes, complete the attached application for residence classification and submit it to the registrar within 30 days of your notification of classification as a nonresident for fee purposes. When an appeal is made by a student from a determination that the student is a nonresident, the student must pay nonresident fees at the time designated for payment of fees. If the student is found to be a resident, the difference between resident and nonresident fees will be refunded. Subject to the provisions of K.S.A. 77-601, et seq. decisions of the residence committee shall not be subject to further administrative review by any officer or committee of the university, or by the state board of regents." Responsibility "The responsibility of enrolling under proper residence classification for fee purposes is placed on the student. If there is any possible question of residence classification under the regulations of the state board of regents, it is the duty of the student when registering and paying fees to raise the question with the registrar. If a student enrolls incorrectly as a resident of Kansas and it is determined at a later date the student was a nonresident for fee purposes, the student shall be required to pay the nonresident fee for all terms during which the student was incorrectly registered." (Authorized by K.S.A. 76-730; implementing K.S.A. 76-729; effective, E-71-35, Aug. 20, 1971; effective Jan. 1, 1972; a
abutler

Texas Tech University Strategic Plan Goal 5. Partnerships - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      Excerpts of Texas Tech University Strategic Plan Goal 5 Partnerships: Objective 5.4: Develop partnerships with other educational institutions. Strategies: Identify partnerships with other educational institutions, both nationally and internationally, that provide opportunities for external funding. Expand the Gateway Program. Expand the partnerships with Early Childhood - 12 schools. Expand the partnerships with post-secondary institutions. Market the partnership programs. Assessments: Number of inter-university partnerships. Number of K-12 partnerships. Number of post secondary institution partnerships. Number of students in the Gateway Program.
abutler

Texas Tech University: College of Engineering Strategic Plan - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      The missions of the College of Engineering are to: Offer quality undergraduate programs that stress the fundamentals of engineering and its practice. Prepare graduates for an engineering career, advanced studies, or other professional paths. Provide quality graduate programs for students seeking strong research experiences in preparation for a professional, academic, or research career; as well as quality flexible graduate programs for students seeking professional enhancement. Pursue basic and applied research to generate new knowledge and create technical solutions to society's challenges. Serve the broader educational and professional engineering community. Vision: Excelling as a national leader in engineering education and research. Strategic Goals of the College of Engineering: 6. Pursue targeted areas of opportunity for the college. As an engineering college that is increasing its national visibility, we can have the greatest impact by focusing our limited faculty and funding resources in selected niche areas that exploit our current or potential strengths and have a significant impact on the nation. Benchmarks by 2012: Identify two or more areas of opportunity and obtain greater than $1M in research funds and/or establish academic offerings in those areas. Strategies include: Hold a series of summits at TTU over the next two years in areas of significant national importance. Invite speakers/panelists that include politicians, funding agency representatives, National Academy members, technical experts, and others to share their view of research and workforce needs in these areas. Identify topical areas for summits through a faculty proposal process coordinated by the Strategic Directions Committee. Start with a summit in the area of energy. Elucidate niche areas of opportunity by assessing the synergy that results between national needs and faculty interests. Invest in the resulting areas of opportunity t
abutler

Iowa State University College of Engineering Strategic Plan - 0 views

  •  
    Priorities Education: To prepare our graduates to become leaders in a profession dominated by globalization, our students will have increasing opportunities for international experiences. Academic opportunities involving biology will be provided in all majors and programs, undergraduate and graduate, in recognition of the vital role played by biological science and technology in, for example, health care, the food supply, industrial processing, energy development, and environmental management. Priorities: Infrastructure We will employ the most advanced collaborative information technologies and business practices to best position ourselves to take advantage of new opportunities and to increase our operational efficiency.
1 - 20 of 23 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page