Auto Racing

This formal approach to the meaning of due process could obviously have limited both Congress and the state legislatures in the development of procedures unknown to English law. But when California's abandonment of indictment by grand jury was challenged, the Court refused to be limited by the fact that such proceeding was the English practice and that Coke had indicated that it was a proceeding required as "the law of the land." The meaning of the Court in Murray's Lessee was "that a process of law, which is not otherwise forbidden, must be taken to be due process of law, if it can show the sanction of settled usage both in England and in this country; but it by no means follows that nothing else can be due process of law." To hold that only historical, traditional procedures can constitute due process, the Court said, "would be to deny every quality of the law but its age, and to render it incapable[p.1348]of progress or improvement."23 Therefore, in observing the due process guarantee, it was concluded, the Court must look "not [to] particular forms of procedures, but [to] the very substance of individual rights to life, liberty, and property." The due process clause prescribed "the limits of those fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions. . . . It follows that any legal proceeding enforced by public authority, whether sanctioned by age and custom, or newly devised in the discretion of the legislative power, in furtherance of the general public good, which regards and preserves these principles of liberty and justice, must be held to be due process of law."24 http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:zSDVmdAbFyMJ:www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/amdt5bfrag2_user.html+Extending+Due+Process+to+Undisclosed+Evidence&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Riverside County had Federal Funding for a DA Elder Victim Advocate and denied the services, along with Forensic elder autopsy evaluation. Death Certificate states natural cause of death with homicide. This does not meet statutory duty of coroner and I am requesting correction with Dr. Fajardo and Dr. Rice signature. Broken Bones on elder homicide duty to sign

"The uncontested facts show that Evans cannot satisfy the requirement of "affirmatively prov[ing] prejudice." It is inconceivable to us, and not merely improbable as in Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 644 n. 12, 96 S.Ct. 2253, 2257 n. 12, 49 L.Ed.2d 108 (1976), that Evans would have gone to trial on a defense of intoxication, or that if he had done so he either would have been acquitted or, if convicted, would nevertheless have been given a shorter sentence than he actually received. It just is not believable that Evans did all the things he does not deny having done, involving elaborate negotiations with the police over several hours, in some sort of alcohol-induced trance. In this respect the present case resembles Morgan v. Israel, 735 F.2d 1033 (7th Cir.1984). In evaluating the voluntariness of Morgan's failure to plead not guilty we said, "It is sufficiently clear that Morgan had no hope at all of an acquittal to enable us to infer that he would not have changed his plea to not guilty .... He admitted having shot Mallason; and when you shoot a person several times, with fatal results, the inference of deliberate homicide is irresistible .... The jury never would have believed that he lacked the ... elementary mental capacity required to form a murderous intent...." Id. at 1036. So here, no jury could have believed that Evans was not acting deliberately when he did all the things he did in the police station. Therefore, being told that if he had not been acting deliberately he would have been acquitted of some of the offenses with which he was charged could not have led him to change his plea and to win acquittal."

Riverside County Crime Victims of Legislative Arm with DA and Sheriff

Corruption

Victim Services

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Brian Floyd abuse of Legislative position to Elder. Riverside County Homcide Cover up

DA put in false statement of fact to help buddies son

Homicide of Nye Frank

"The Petitioners, Lawrence E. Kennon, Mary D. Powers, and Mary L. Johnson, all three of whom are citizens of Illinois and residents of Cook County, together with Citizens Alert, the Coalition to End Police Torture and Brutality, First Defense Legal Aid, the Justice Coalition of Greater Chicago, the Cook County Bar Association, the Chicago Council of Lawyers, the Chicago Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Inc., the Campaign to End the Death Penalty, the Illinois Coalition Against the Death Penalty, the Illinois Death Penalty Moratorium Project, the National Lawyers Guild, Amnesty International, and Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, by their attorneys, Randolph N. Stone, of the Mandel Legal Aid Clinic of the University of Chicago Law School, and Locke E. Bowman, of the MacArthur Justice Center, respectfully request that this Court appoint a special prosecutor to investigate allegations of torture, perjury, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and other offenses by police officers under the command of Jon Burge at Area 2 and later Area 3 headquarters in the City of Chicago during the period from 1973 to the present."

Aldinger v. Howard, supra, held "only that a city may not be joined as a pendent party to an action when there is no independent source of federal jurisdiction over" that party http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:wRo-kHPJjvMJ:ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/572/572.F2d.98.76-2593.html+federal+cause+of+action+constitutional+violation+court+cases&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

He arrived at the ICP just before 5:00 a.m. on October 26, 2006. [ FS Battalion Chief ] was the Forest Service Agency Representative at the ICP. He was briefed by [ FS Battalion Chief ] and [ FS Division Chief ] concerning the Congressional Organization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrganization Chart of Esperaza Fire StructureOrg