"The Petitioners, Lawrence E. Kennon, Mary D. Powers, and Mary L. Johnson, all
three of whom are
citizens of Illinois and residents of Cook County, together with Citizens Alert,
the Coalition to End Police Torture and Brutality, First Defense Legal Aid, the
Justice Coalition of Greater Chicago, the Cook County Bar Association, the
Chicago Council of Lawyers, the Chicago Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under
Law, Inc., the Campaign to End the Death Penalty, the Illinois Coalition Against
the Death Penalty, the Illinois Death Penalty Moratorium Project, the National
Lawyers Guild, Amnesty International, and Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, by their
attorneys, Randolph N. Stone, of the Mandel Legal Aid Clinic of the University
of Chicago Law School, and Locke E. Bowman, of the MacArthur Justice Center,
respectfully request that this Court appoint a special
prosecutor
to investigate
allegations of
torture, perjury, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and
other offenses by police officers under the command of Jon Burge at Area 2 and
later Area 3 headquarters in the City of Chicago during the period from 1973 to
the present."
Brian Floyd the District Attorney Campaine managers brother showed up in court for Ty Reddish. He works for the group that represents the DA office. Right now they have a false statement of fact in Federal Court, maybe two. Exparte meetings with the judge already. This case can shine a light on some really bad things happening in Riverside County
We were told that Riverside County did not have a elder D crime victim assistant that was Federally Funded. Perhaps if Pacheco stopped using his ten member marketing team to puff up the news and use it for what it was meant for we could cut cost and serve the public. We had to file a Lemine to stop Supervisors, Sheriff and DA staff from making false statement of fact, The judge removed himself. http://nyefrank.typepad.com
This is Google's cache of http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance/id23.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 22, 2010 22:26:17 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more
Text-only versionThese terms only appear in links pointing to this page: http www vsb org profguides actions_jul06 dec06 html
Citizens' Demand For An Investigation of Criminal Conspiracy by Beltway Attorneys and Judges
Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy
Home | Letter to Congress on the Denial of the Right to Impartial Judicial Review of Misprision of a Felony | Our Purpose | Aug. 28, 2009 Letters to Preseident Obama and Gov. Kaine to Direct Response to Petition for Cert. | U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Cert. to DC Circuit to Oppose Disbarment based on VSBDB Void Order | I. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in the District of Columbia | Ia. D.C. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR CONSPIRACY BY JUDGES, GOVERNMENT AND BELTWAY LOBBYIST/ATTORNEYS | Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy | Ic. MEMO IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT TO INDICT JUDGES FOR CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY DEPRIVING FATHER OF RIGHTS | II. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint filed E.D. of Virgina | III. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint In Pennsylvania for Misprision of a Felony | IV. Transmittal Letter Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in Colorado for Obstruction of Justice. | V. TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR JUDGES CABRANES ET AL. VIOLATING VOID ORDER DOCTRINE | Becoming a Member | Contact Us | Calendar of Events | Members Page | Newsletter | Links
United States District Court District of Columbia ________________________________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
John G. Roberts, et al.,
________________________________________________)
AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
I. INTRODUCTION
1. I am a Citizen
Constitutional basis for legislation
Congress derived its power to pass the Sherman Act through its constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce. Therefore, Federal courts only have jurisdiction to apply the Act to conduct that restrains or substantially affects either interstate commerce or trade within the District of Columbia. This requires the plaintiff must show that the conduct occurred during the flow of interstate commerce or had an appreciable effect on some activity that occurs during interstate commerce.
[edit] Elements
A Section 1 violation has three elements:[16]
An agreement
which unreasonably restrains competition
and which affects interstate commerce.
Thanks to all the Racing industry who has supported our request to Riverside County for justice. So far completely denied and the killer still stalking Lee Frank with zero assistance from Riverside County. Nye was president of the Valley Hi Water Board in Twin Pines off 243 for 8 years. Turns out Brian Floyd the cover up guy is campaine manager for the Riverside county Water board, both judges who denied Constitutional rights and a protection order are water board people, The stuff I am finding out about the politics there is so shocking I hesitate to talk about it yet. Floyds brother fire department? Brian Floyd represents the Norco Fire Department to County, I think another brother or cousin a Forestry speacial fire fighter
Video
Link"
"The uncontested facts show that Evans cannot satisfy the
requirement of "affirmatively prov[ing] prejudice." It is inconceivable to us,
and not merely improbable as in Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 644 n. 12, 96
S.Ct. 2253, 2257 n. 12, 49 L.Ed.2d 108 (1976), that Evans would have gone to
trial on a defense of intoxication, or that if he had done so he either would
have been acquitted or, if convicted, would nevertheless have been given a
shorter sentence than he actually received. It just is not believable that Evans
did all the things he does not deny having done, involving elaborate
negotiations with the police over several hours, in some sort of alcohol-induced
trance. In this respect the present case resembles Morgan v. Israel, 735 F.2d
1033 (7th Cir.1984). In evaluating the voluntariness of Morgan's failure to
plead not guilty we said, "It is sufficiently clear that Morgan had no hope at
all of an acquittal to enable us to infer that he would not have changed his
plea to not guilty .... He admitted having shot Mallason; and when you shoot a
person several times, with fatal results, the inference of deliberate homicide
is irresistible .... The jury never would have believed that he lacked the ...
elementary mental capacity required to form a murderous intent...." Id. at 1036.
So here, no jury could have believed that Evans was not acting deliberately when
he did all the things he did in the police station. Therefore, being told that
if he had not been acting deliberately he would have been acquitted of some of
the offenses with which he was charged could not have led him to change his plea
and to win acquittal."
"whether Congress, in enacting § 1979, meant to give a remedy to parties deprived
of constitutional rights, privileges and immunities by an official's abuse of
his position. Cf. Williams v. United
States
, 341 U.S. 97; Screws v. United States
, 325 U.S. 91; United States v. Classic
, 313 U.S. 299. We
conclude that it did so intend."