IB Econ 12 (1)

1) This article talks about the EU that threatens anti-subisdy tariffs to the Argentinean and Indonesian biodiesel after approving five-year levies to counter below-cost, or "dumped," imports from both countries. 2)The article is arguing in favour of free trade as it tries to impose Argentina and Indonesia Anti-dumping 3) The effects on stake holders, will be that in this case Argentina and Indonesia will have to pay for five years as a consequence of them dumping the BIO-fuel on the EU. on the other hand the EU will benefit from this situation as from now one they will pay the normal price and therefore the consumers will pay less as the cost for the government and the country to get the fuel is less.

China is continuing to protect its rare earth minerals. It's important to note that China holds nearly 97% of all rare earth's in the world. These rare minerals are needed for many manufacturing ventures. China will increase its regulation on rare earth production to prevent any further externalities.  The article outlines a plan against free trade. Yet, stirs arguments about China's possible attempt to monopolize the industry. The United States, for instance, argues that China's export tariffs are too high, and that they inhibit America's domestic production of needed goods. China argues back that it's an environmental issue.  Countries who rely on technological progress will be hurt by this protection. The minerals are needed for cell phones, wind turbines, missiles, and many other high-tech products. If protection continues, prices will rise, thus lowering the advancement in that sector for many economies around the world. In China, however, less exports mean more jobs domestically. Also more supply domestically. And lastly, the environmental concern of China can further improve the standard of living for citizens whilst cutting down the pollution levels. 

1) Briefly summarize the article (3-4 sentences) Calgon Carbon Corporation announced that the Department of Commerce (DOC) has determined the amount of antidumping tariffs to be assessed on imports of steam activated carbon from China that entered the United States between April 2, 2011 to March 31, 2012. 2) Is your article arguing for or against free trade? Explain My article is arguing for free trade, as it is discussing the revision on anti-dumping tariffs in order to complete a more free trade between China and the United States. 3) Explain how different stakeholders might be affected (foreign/domestic producers, consumers, gov't) Foreign and domestic producers will have increased competition as the prices of steam activated carbon now will be decreasing. This will have a postive effect on consumers, since they now can buy the carbon at a cheaper price. The government will be generating less revenue, as the tariffs are now 0.40 usd per lb less than the initial tariff imposed.

This articled discusses about the EU imposing anti-dumping duties on biofuel from Argentina and Indonesia, which will last five years. Argentina and Indonesia have access to the raw materials necessary at a way lower price than the global market prices available for the EU. The EU has worked in collaboration with the WTO to enforce this punishment on Argentina and Indonesia, which will last five years.  This article is clearly for free trade because it shows how anti-dumping is important and must be enforced, since it isn't fair for the foreign countries to impose a higher price than the production one. Stakeholders can be affected by this issue, for example Argentina and Indonesia will now have to pay their duties for five years because of them dumping biofuel in the EU, while the EU will benefit from this situation since they will now pay the normal price for biofuel. consumers will also probably pay a bit less, since the country as a whole and the government will have to pay less to obtain biofuel. 

leave protectionism behind  It's better for the economy 

1) Distinguish whether or not the article is talking about absolute or relative poverty. The article is talking about absolute poverty. 2) According to the article what are some possible causes of poverty. - a lot of people are at low-wage jobs - More households are headed by single parents, which makes it  difficult to earn a living income from the jobs that are typically available. - disappearance of cash assistance for low-income mothers and children - race and gender mean higher poverty among minorities and families headed by single mothers. 3) According to the article what seem to be some of the consequences of poverty. - 6 million people have no income other than food stamps (provide an income at a third of the poverty line) - distrustful of encrusted power in all institutions - tending towards libertarianism, ripe for a new politics of honesty

The article mainly focuses on the canadian economy affected by inflation. Canada's annual inflation rate slowed to 1.1 percent in august. rent price went up 1.7 over one year, natural gas gained 9.5 %. Food price went up 1 %. the living standards went up, therefore living costs increased parallelly.

Professor Wakatabe says that if the tax were increased, it would slow down the process of recovery from the recession. now the deflation rate is going down, driven by the personal consumption, which is good, but if the tax were raised, this would slow down the recovery.

the currency of Japan is deacresing. this has a negative effect on the whole japanese economy. the rate of inflation has never been so high in 5 years. cost of fuel and electricity rises.

Ettore, please add some more thoughts. I would you like you to have at least 3-4 sentences summarizing the article and then a few more relating it to the cause/effect/impact of inflation.

This article is concerned about how Japan had been mired in a malaise brought on by falling prices and a strong yen for years, resulting in deflation in the economy. The economy's prospects have brightened significantly since Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced fresh spending by the government and encouraged the central bank to unleash a tidal wave of asset purchases, an approach to decrease deflation. In order to defeat deflation, Japan has submerged into increasing the country's tax consumption and are contemplating whether or not to increase the tax consumption to 10% by 2015.

This article stresses the continue increase of the prices of goods and services in Singapore, causing the inflation in the country to keep growing further. Moreover, this article talks about that the consumer price index (CPI) has risen in August of this year 2% more in comparison with the last year, they also had calculated the CPI in July of this year, which was 1.9% meaning that the inflation kept increasing constantly. This article also strains that one of the main causes for the increase in inflation in Singapore is because of the government measures to slow the inflow of the cheap foreign workers into the city-state. If the inflation in Singapore continues to increase, in the long run this will cause the country's currency to have a value of almost nothing. The consequence of this will be that the people living in this country won't have enough money to live a normal life. Therefore, they will have to have an aid from the government.

Singapore has been dealing with high inflation, which has risen significantly. This is especially in relation to core inflation, that excludes house and car costs, which is higher than had been predicted. Their CPI has increased as well. The Monetary Authority of Singapore has tightened the monetary policy in response to decrease the rate of inflation.  The inflation has partially been caused by restrictive government policies, which attempted to reduce the amount of low-wage foreign workers. These actions were taken due to locals' requests as there is a limited amount of jobs in this small state. The effect was that firms had to increase prices because of increased wages (cost of production) once the cheaper workers were no longer available. Consequently inflation increased more quickly, as did the CPI. To solve the issue, governments are encouraging firms to hire Singaporean employees.   

In August, China experienced their highest trade surplus of the year. With an increased interest in global nations, it is a teller of China's currently well-controlled inflation rate. If the rate of goods remains consistent, the greater interest of importers could dig China out of the domestic debt hole they're currently in. With a healthily increasing inflation rate, like anywhere, China is experiencing higher wages, and higher domestic consumer prices. All in all though, the positive direction the net exports are moving in gives us a sense of the ideal, well-managed, increasing inflation rate in China.

The article is talking about the situation in japan. The article talk about the deflation that japan has been suffering for the past years, but is saying how japan adapt to it and benefit from it. At the end of the article talks about a paradox that is happening in Japan called the Abe's Paradox that is when a country is both suffering and benefiting form deflation so they don't now to keep it and increase the countries debt or remove it.  The cause of the inflation in japan has been based on how japan has not make any polices to increase central bank polices and that the resulted in deflation. The effect has been both positive and negative, is that the nation debt has approach the 250 percent of gross domestic product. The positive effect is that how deflation helped the price levels to be stable and act like tax cut for households, and put some sobriety for cost. Also how the economic players of japan have adapted to deflationary environment and they now how to benefit from it.

The federal reserve has issued a statement where they intend not to raise the interest rates as long as the rate of inflation keeps itself low. It had originally lowered the interest rates in response to the 2008 financial crisis. The issue with this is that persistently low rates leads to a fear of a low value. The effect of this is a decreased aggregate demand as there is a lesser incentive for consumption.

This article mainly discusses about the government in India having a hike in DA by 10%, which allows the lakh employees and pensioners have a benefit. A hike in dearness allowance to 90% from existing 80%, this benefits around 50 lakh central employees and 30 lakh pensioners. The government caused this in order to give benefits to employees and pensioners. Which will show a effect of proportion of basic pay, and it will work out to be over 90% after factoring in the revised all India Consumer Price Index for the Industrial Workers. The impact of it will be that DA was hiked to 80% from 72%. The government uses Consumer Price Index for industrial workers to arrive at a number for the purpose of any DA hike. The retail inflation for the industrial workers (July 2012~ June 2013) needs to take a finial decision.

1) Distinguish whether or not the article is talking about absolute or relative poverty. This article is talking about absolute poverty 2) According to the article what are some possible causes of poverty. According to the article some possible causes of poverty are: a. Inflation increased b. Wages increased slower than the rate of inflation causing people to be earning less. 3) According to the article what seem to be some of the consequences of poverty. Some of the consequences of poverty are: Income fell as the earnings and benefit grew more slowly than the cost of living. Therefore there is also a decrease in the living standards.

1) Distinguish whether or not the article is talking about absolute or relative poverty. Absolute Poverty (people cannot afford basic necessities in India)  2) According to the article what are some possible causes of poverty. The lack of good education and work training do not allow workers to be very productive. In addition, the lack of capital such as modern energy resources contribute to poverty just as the extremely low income rates do.  3) According to the article what seem to be some of the consequences of poverty. Poverty appears to affect global sustainment, it does not offer future employment perspectives to the youth and impedes economic growth, given that the poor do not contribute to increase in national output due to lack of education and working skills.