Joel, we chose consul for a few reasons. First, I wanted a service discovery solution that could work with our legacy architectures as well as any new projects we run on mesos. In addition, I wanted a way to bootstrap the mesos cluster setup/configuration (masters and slaves) such that when they are provisioned, they will be auto-configured using data in consul. Think zk values, quorum, etc. I’ll be working on a solution for this very soon. Lastly, I really like how consul supports health-checks, which we will leverage heavily to ensure that only “healthy” services are actually registered. Like you mentioned, consul is very fast in updating the service info and that is very important as well.
Hope that helps,
-Phil
Contents contributed and discussions participated by munyeco
Core Blog - 1 views
haklop/terraform - 0 views
Red Hat sets Docker as nucleus of 'Project Atomic' | InfoWorld - 1 views
-
"Red Hat Linux Enterprise Atomic Host." Por fin redhat le da pelota a docker, al nivel de en unos meses poder calentar la polémica Coreos Vs. Redhat. Para correr docker, soluciones similares. Pero no vi que o quién reemplaza al manejo que pueda hacer fleet ni como se registran automágicamente los servicios. Habrá que leer y leer.
crosbymichael/skydock - 1 views
hashicorp/consul-haproxy - 1 views
WebServiceSpecifications ¡LISTA! - 3 views
-
¿Que debe hacer un webservice? Si la respuesta es que la lista de sus posibilidades - específicas, entiéndase bien - es ésta, entonces sostengo sin dudar que todos podemos arrogarnos la conclusión de que Los Especificadores manejan un concepto de la complejidad cercano a la Esquizofrenia múltiple, sin que nadie de nosotros incurra ni mínimamente en la soberbia.
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 51
Next ›
Showing 20▼ items per page