Group items tagged

Because A is the entity group parent of B, the key of an instance of B must contain information about its entity group parent instance of A. Instead of using b.key.getId() in   // We cannot retrieve this object. Why?   B newB = pm.getObjectById(B.class,b.key.getId()); you might care to use the KeyFactory.Builder class as detailed in "http://code.google.com/intl/en/appengine/docs/java/datastore/ creatinggettinganddeletingdata.html#Creating_and_Using_Keys" in order to build a key instance which contains information about both your B instance and its parental A instance.

Cron jobs / task queues Instead of using a framework like Quartz to schedule jobs, Google App Engine takes care of executing jobs for you. You simply enter a cron-like expression and a URL to call and your job is configured. You also have a task queue at your disposal. Your application code can add tasks to a task queue which will be executed later in the future, asynchronously. An example use case is that you don’t want clients to wait for an email to be sent before he sees the next page. Instead you can put the email task on the task queue and the email will be sent asynchronously.

When an email is received Google App Engine does a post on an URL in your application you configured. The HTTP body of the POST request contains the exact mime message as it was received by Google. To parse this mime message you can use the MimeMessage class provided by the JDK.

Well java.lang.System is whitelisted, so won't java.lang.System.out.println(...) work?

Google App Engine applications written in Java can write information to the log files using java.util.logging.Logger. Log data for an application can be viewed and analyzed using the Administration Console, or downloaded using appcfg.sh request_logs. More info in the Logging documentation.

The war/ directory uses the WAR standard layout for bundling web applications. (WAR archive files are not yet supported by the SDK.) The Eclipse plugin uses this directory for running the development server, and for deploying the app to App Engine. When Eclipse builds your project, it creates a directory named classes/ in war/WEB-INF/, and puts compiled class files here. Eclipse also copies non-source files found in src/ to war/WEB-INF/classes/, including META-INF/ and the log4j.properties and logging.properties files. The final contents of the war/ directory make up your application for testing and deployment. For details about the new project that the plugin creates, see the Getting Started Guide.

From what I understand, you are "manually" copying the properties from the Entity to the DTO. But this process is automated in GWT 2.1 So, I am not sending my entities directly, but the proxies as per the documentation : http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideRequestFactory.html "An entity proxy is a client-side representation of an entity, otherwise known as a DTO (Data Transfer Object). With RequestFactory, entity proxies are interfaces that extend the EntityProxy interface, which is the hook used to indicate that an object can be managed by RequestFactory. RequestFactory automatically populates bean-style properties between entities on the server and the corresponding EntityProxy on the client, which simplifies using the DTO pattern. Furthermore, the EntityProxy interface enables RequestFactory to compute and send only changes ("deltas") to the server." "Entity proxies simply extend the EntityProxy interface and use the @ProxyFor annotation to reference the server-side entity being represented. It is not necessary to represent every property and method from the server-side entity in the EntityProxy, only getters and setters for properties that should be exposed to the client." The entity proxies are merely interfaces that are being populated by the new GWT 2.1 RequestFactory framework. I have no control over this copying process. Per definition, getters/setters of the real entity are injected into the EntityProxy whenever they are present; So my problem still stands : what about complex values like com.google.appengine.api.datastore.Email that are not known by the client side code ? How to transfer these complex values to the client.

When I copy my entities onto my dtos, some entity fields don't even make it into the dto. Others only have getters in the dto because they are read-only to the client. Those that do get into the dto get converted to native Java types. For instance, Text gets converted to String. Key gets encoded to a url friendly string. If I have Set fields on the entities to manager my relations (property lists), I remap those to ArrayList... First, don't serialize interfaces to GWT client, you'll get Javascript bloat. Then, Hashmap is costly to serialize because String.hashCode() is not the same on in Java and in Javascript. Hence, all the items need to be re-inserted into a client side map. Of course, in Web mode, performance is good enough... but in development mode, your data transfers will become really slow for somewhat big transfers.

If you use the RemoteDatastore you have complete control in Java of   what you key is. http://code.google.com/p/remote-datastore/ e.g. this code puts an entity with the id set in your remote datastore   from your local machine:      RemoteDatastore.install();      RemoteDatastore.divert("http://myVersion.latest.myApp.appspot.com/remote-datastore ", "myApp", "myVersion");      DatastoreService service =   DatastoreServiceFactory.getDatastoreService();      Key key = KeyFactory.createKey("MyKindName, 35);      Entity entity1 = new Entity(key);      entity1.setProperty("property1", "hello");      datastore.put(Arrays.asList(entity1, entity2);

You can do this now using the RemoteDatastore Java utility http://code.google.com/p/remote-datastore/ For example, this code runs on your desktop and creates a single   entity in your live datastore:     // divert datastore operations to live application     RemoteDatastore.install();     RemoteDatastore.divert("http://myVersion.latest.myApp.appspot.com/remote-datastore ", "myApp", "myVersion");     // create an entity with a numeric key     Key key = KeyFactory.createKey("MyKindName, 35);     Entity entity1 = new Entity(key);     entity1.setProperty("property1", "hello");     // put entity to the remote datastore     DatastoreService service =   DatastoreServiceFactory.getDatastoreService();     datastore.put(entity1); This also works for bulk puts

My tag files worked very well in dev server without any problem. When uploading to gae/j, I encountered the problem describe in the above mentioned issue and I could fix it according to the workaround guidelines provided in that issue. My environment: WinXP SP2 Eclipse version 3.4 GAE/J SDK 1.3.1 JDK 5.0

disabling session id in code will not stop the cookie from saving session id. When you enable session in app engine xml file than you are telling the framework that you don't want to save sessions in cookies (client side), instead you want to save them on server i.e. using _ah_session. Cookies JSession id is default behavior of Java session mgmt. And it is nothing to do with APP engine framework.*

You don't have to add each class individually to the black list. They are all regex patterns, so just do this: <extend-configuration-property name="rpc.blacklist" value="com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.*Collection"/> In my case I wanted even finer grained control over which collections get included, so I did this: <extend-configuration-property name="rpc.blacklist" value="-.*List"/> <extend-configuration-property name="rpc.blacklist" value="-.*Map"/> <extend-configuration-property name="rpc.blacklist" value="-.*Collection"/> <extend-configuration-property name="rpc.blacklist" value="+java.util.HashMap"/> <extend-configuration-property name="rpc.blacklist" value="+java.util.LinkedHashMap"/> <extend-configuration-property name="rpc.blacklist" value="+java.util.ArrayList"/>

One thing you get used to on appengine is that any bulk data work requires the task queue.  You can use a little bit of framework and make all of these transforms (including deleting data) a question of just writing a simple task class and firing it off.  You'll want a copy of the Deferred servlet: http://code.google.com/p/gaevfs/source/browse/trunk/src/com/newatlant... Fair warning:  I found that I needed to change the code to make it perform base64 encoding all the time, not just on the dev instance.