"By extension, GCMs are not fit for the purpose of
justifying political policies to fundamentally alter world social, economic and energy
systems. It is this application of climate model results that fuels the vociferousness of the debate surrounding climate models."
from one of the reddit threads discussing this:
"bit fishy, crazy if real".
"Incredible claims:
- Train only using about 10% of imagenet-12, i.e. around 120k images (i.e. they use 6k images per arm)
- get to the same or better accuracy as the equivalent VGG net
- Training is not via backprop but more simpler PCA + Sparsity regime (see section 4.1), shouldn't take more than 10 hours just on CPU probably "
Hilarious critique to a quite important paper from Stanford trying to push the agenda of global warming ....
"You might therefore be surprised that, as I will discuss below, this paper is completely wrong. Nothing in it is correct. It fails in every imaginable respect."