Group items tagged

WND Exclusive OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL Eligibility battle rages on 3 fronts Court, Congress and college challenged on constitutionality Posted: January 18, 2009 12:05 am Eastern By Bob Unruh © 2009 WorldNetDaily Officials at Occidental College in Los Angeles, Calif., have been served with a demand to produce records concerning Barack Obama's attendance there during the 1980s because they could document whether he was attending as a foreign national - in one of three fronts now established by those contesting the president-elect's constitutional eligibility for the Oval Office. The Supreme Court and Congress also both are being challenged to address the worries that Obama doesn't meet the requirements of the U.S. Constitution that the president be a "natural born" citizen. WND has reported on a long list of legal cases raising questions over the issue, and several of those have reached the U.S. Supreme Court already. Justices have so far declined to give any of the cases full hearings on their merits, but another conference remains on the Supreme Court docket for Jan. 23 on the issue. "If Obama is sworn in as president, we will file a Petition for Writ of 'Quo Warranto,' a case that will challenge Obama as being ineligible to serve as president because he is 'not qualified,'" said Philip J. Berg, a lawyer who has brought several cases to court. Berg, whose information is on his ObamaCrimes.com website, indicated the issue isn't going away. Orly Taitz, a California lawyer whose dispute remains pending before the high court, agreed, noting that one of the hearings already is scheduled for the days following Obama's inaugural on Tuesday. Taitz said her arguments rest on precedents from both the California Supreme Court, which years ago removed a candidate for president from the ballot because he was only 34, and the U.S. Supreme Court's affirmation of that ruling. The Constitution requires a president to be 35. (Story continues below) In one of the latest

It is doubtful, however, that they are justiciable in lower federal courts. Standing requirements and the political question doctrine make it unlikely that a federal court will reach the merits in cases of the type filed to date. Justiciable means can the case be heard in a court or not? It is believed that this issue is more properly addressed by the political process and NOT the courts.

"For the first time in 17 years, 15 of those sitting on the Washington Supreme Court, I have agreed to represent a private citizen. And I am pleased to lend Linda Jordan a helping hand. In good faith Ms. Jordan commenced an action to question President Obama's name on the ballot. She did the best she could with limited resources and no legal training. The government's response was immediate and in some respects heavy handed. Having obtained a summary dismissal of her case, and then her appeal, the attorney general went further to demand the Secretary of State be reimbursed, claiming attorney fees amounting to almost $13,000. However what the attorney general did not tell the court is that the Secretary never actually paid this amount, nor was he billed this amount, nor probably anything close to it. The number is made up, pure fiction. The AG did not disclose the actual amount to the court probably because the objective is to get a punitive judgment for as much as he can without regard to actual expenditures which were much less."

This AG is probably working for the Seattle firm that represents the WH illegal alien

This event is a simulated adjudication of the hypothetical Supreme Court case, McCain v. Obama. The case was created by Edward B. Foley, director of The Ohio State University's Election Law@Moritz, as an experiment to demonstrate how such a dispute can be resolved in a non-partisan manner that produces confidence in both the courts and the election system.

A lawsuit in Honolulu in the First District Court is seeking a court-order to open Obama's secret birth records. Obama has thus far neglected a Freedom of Information request for the records at two hospitals in Hawaii. Obama has expended apx. 200,000 to NOT provide his citizenship becasue it is suspected that he used FORGED documents to become senator of statd and federal governments.\n\nArticle II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution reads: "No Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

The shipment includes 6,682 FedEx packages of nine letters each that will be delivered before the court reviews a case Friday challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, which stipulates the position can only be filled by "a natural born citizen."

The former deputy Pennsylvania attorney general who challenged Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama's qualifications to be president has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

"Because we have combined our resources into communities and states, we have also had to make certain rules for the orderly operation and use of these jointly owned facilities (roads, parks, utilities, courts, etc.) The rights to use these things are called vested rights because they do not come from the Creator and can be changed by the people. Vested rights are created to protect the three great unalienable rights of the people."

McCain v. Obama, a U.S. Supreme Court hypothetical (one hopes)

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's election.

Vice presidential Candidate Wiley S. Drake Sr. to file in court asking to de-certify Barack Obama because he has refused to release proof of being a Natural Born Citizen, thereby disqualifying Obama in his bid for the Office of President.

Perhaps this issue will go away after the Supreme Court of the United States discusses it in a scheduled conference on December 5. Author and journalist Joan Swirsky, writing for The New Media Journal November 24, says the media has failed to cover the allegations that President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he is not a natural born citizen of the United States.

As deserted malls and department stores struggle to court cash-short consumers with steep discounts this holiday season, a similar and even more ferocious price war is being waged online.

The audio presents a discussion of how the political body or the judicial body can aid in settlling issues concerning votes cast for candidates by the electorate.

The California secretary of state should refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until President-elect Barack Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office, alleges a California court petition filed on behalf of former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others.

USA citizens have "unalienable rights given by the creator". These rights cannot be taken away or given away by the right's possessor. Obama is violating our rights to know if he is a "natural born system" required to be the president of the USA. He is also by sworn oath supposed to uphold and defend the Constitution.as a senator of the USA and Illinoise and as an officer of the court. OBAMA is violating OUR (330 million of us) CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. WE DON'T NEED A LAW BREAKER FOR PRESIDENT

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania - 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of "qualifications" to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case

Unless proven otherwise Barack Obama "may" be an illegal immigrant according to reviews of existing facts concerning Obamas birth certificates. Obama has NOT satifactorily proved his birth as being a "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN" of America, nor has he responded to lawsuits filed in Federal courts to prove his NATURAL BORN citizenship. If he is a NATURALIZED citizen from Indonesia then he cannot be the president and is VIOLATING our social CONTRACT between all Americas citizens..,.it is called the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.\n\nFor Immediate Release: - 10/21/08 - Complete contact details and pdfs of this press release and motions filed by plaintiff Berg today are at the end of this article

The citizenship of those born in the Canal Zone in 1936 is a legal question, not a question about one's views of Senator McCain's candidacy. U.S. citizenship law is not simple or intuitive.

Comments on whether the Obama is an American natural born citizen