the genetic and neuroscience revolutions would affect public debate. They would kick off another fundamental argument over whether God exists.

Tags: neuroscience religion science on 05-15-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.nytimes.com

The integral philosopher explains the difference between religion, New Age fads and the ultimate reality that traditional science can't touch.

Tags: mysticism religion science on 04-28-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.salon.com

Tags: creationism humor science on 04-27-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from baetzler.de

Interface of science, faith to be analyzed

Tags: faith science on 04-20-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.ndsmcobserver.com

Suspending Life

Tags: evolution science on 04-16-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.seedmagazine.com

A Globe, Clothing Itself with a Brain

Tags: faith god science teilhard on 04-14-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.wired.com

Tags: faith philosophy science teilhard on 04-14-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.kheper.net

Tags: faith noosphere science teilhard on 04-14-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.december.com

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was a visionary French Jesuit, paleontologist, biologist, and philosopher, who spent the bulk of his life trying to integrate religious experience with natural science, most specifically Christian theology with theories of evolution.

Tags: faith god science teilhard on 04-14-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.gaiamind.com

Tags: faith god imported powermarks science on 04-14-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.aril.org

Tags: faith god science on 04-14-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.godweb.org

His book, A New Science of Life, was published a week after the New Scientist article. In it, Sheldrake put forward the hypothesis of formative causation (the theory of morphic resonance)[9], which proposes that phenomena — particularly biological ones — become more probable the more often they occur, and therefore that biological growth and behaviour become guided into patterns laid down by previous similar events. He suggested that this underlies many aspects of science, from evolution to laws of nature. Indeed, he wrote that the laws of nature might be thought of as mutable habits that have evolved since the Big Bang.

Tags: metaphysics science on 04-13-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from en.wikipedia.org

Rupert Sheldrake, one of the world’s most innovative biologists, is best known for his theory of morphic fields and morphic resonance, which leads to a vision of a living, developing universe with its own inherent memory.

Tags: biology evolution metaphysics science on 04-13-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.sheldrake.org

COnventional Wisdom of the DUmiNant Group From my book: Science, Religion, Education and a lot of Bull

Tags: religion science wilber on 03-27-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.integralworld.net

Science and religion have often been at loggerheads. Now the former has decided to resolve the problem by trying to explain the existence of the latter

Tags: religion science on 03-25-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.economist.com

Nelson, a professor in the College of Biology and Agriculture, explained in his lecture titled "Evolution, Science, Religion: Overlaps and Boundaries," that neither faith, nor science alone can answer every inquiry.

Tags: religion science on 02-05-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from newsnet.byu.edu

"A New Voice Arising: A Pastoral Letter on Faith Engaging Science and Technology,"

Tags: dialogue religion science on 01-31-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from ucc.org

Faith is not a matter of “clinging to ancient misconceptions.” “Today one of God’s most provocative voices is science.”

Tags: dialogue religion science on 01-31-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.nytimes.com

The National Academy of Sciences, the nation’s most eminent scientific organization, produced a book on the evidence supporting the theory of evolution (and arguing against the introduction of creationism or other religious alternatives in public school science classes) in 1984. It published another in 1999. This month, they produced a third, but with a twist, for it is intended specifically for the lay public. Further, it devotes a great deal of space to an explanation of the differences between science and religion, maintaining that the acceptance of evolution does not require abandoning belief in God.

Tags: religion science on 01-31-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.crosswalk.com

Breaking down the firewall between science, religion

Tags: religion science on 01-29-2008 -Cached -About Shared by:ken meece

more from www.mitchellrepublic.com