<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Trends's feed | Diigo Group</title>
    <link>http://groups.diigo.com/trends/bookmark/tag/threats</link>
    <description>Bookmarks from Trends tagged by threats</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:58:58 -0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Carbon nanotubes outperform copper nanowires as interconnects</title>
      <link>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-03/rpi-cno031308.php</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;After crunching numbers for months with the help of Rensselaer’s Computational Center for Nanotechnology Innovations, the most powerful university-based supercomputer in the world, the research team concluded that the carbon nanotube bundles boasted a much smaller electrical resistance than the copper nanowires. This lower resistance suggests carbon nanotube bundles would therefore be better suited for interconnect applications.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/trends/bookmark/tag/carbon&quot;&gt;carbon&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/trends/bookmark/tag/copper&quot;&gt;copper&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/trends/bookmark/tag/nanotechnology&quot;&gt;nanotechnology&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/trends/bookmark/tag/nanowires&quot;&gt;nanowires&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/trends/bookmark/tag/substitution&quot;&gt;substitution&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/trends/bookmark/tag/threats&quot;&gt;threats&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/trends/bookmark/keulenae&quot;&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:58:58 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>