OOXML: The next step - Interop at the International Standards legal level | Marbux - Weir - Ian [odf-discuss]

Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:17:00 -0000

Highlights and Sticky Notes:

Both ODF and OOXML are only one WTO Dispute Resolution Process complaint away from losing their international standard, national technical regulation, and government procurement specification status. They do not meet the minimum requirements of international law. Both are unnecessary obstacles to international trade; neither specify a uniform and substitutable product. That does not sound like a sound business plan to me. So I return to my question posed in an earlier post: Will ODF v. 1.2 under your leadership attempt to "clearly and unambiguously specify that conformance requirements essential to achieve the interoperability" and will the standards-based interoperability between *different* IT systems be "demonstrable," as required by JTC 1 Directives? That is not a complicated question and it requires no deep dive into international law to answer. International law requires what the quoted JTC 1 Directives require in this regard, but for purposes of the point under discussion we need go no further than the Directives' plain language. One either adheres to the rules or one forfeits the moral high ground to complain when others ignore the rules. Where does Rob Weir stand on complying with the rules?

Tags: interop iso odf ooxml wto

Posted by: garyedwards

OpenDocument's feed | Diigo Group

OOXML: The next step - Interop at the International Standards legal level | Marbux - Weir - Ian [odf-discuss]