<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>nuke.news's feed | Diigo Group</title>
    <link>http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/ucs</link>
    <description>Bookmarks from nuke.news tagged by ucs</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:25:13 -0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>FR: NRC denial of David' Lauchbaum (UCS) petition</title>
      <link>http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-22174.htm</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is denying a petition for rulemaking submitted by Mr. David Lochbaum on behalf of the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) and the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) on February 23, 2007. The petitioner requested that the NRC amend its regulations governing domestic licensing of production and utilization facilities to require periodic demonstrations by applicable local, State, and Federal entities to ensure that nuclear power plants can be adequately protected against radiological sabotage by adversaries with capabilities that exceed those posed by the design basis threat (DBT). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/nrc&quot;&gt;nrc&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/nuke.fr&quot;&gt;nuke.fr&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/ucs&quot;&gt;ucs&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/theenergynet&quot;&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:25:13 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FR Doc: NRC: David Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists; Consideration of Petition in the Rulemaking</title>
      <link>http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-17321.htm</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;David Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists; Consideration of Petition in the Rulemaking Process AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Resolution and closure of petition docket. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the issues raised in a petition for rulemaking submitted by David Lochbaum, on behalf of the Union of Concerned Scientists, in the ongoing ``Power Reactor Security Requirements'' rulemaking. The petitioner requested that the NRC amend its regulations to require that licensees implement procedures to ensure that when information becomes known to a licensee about an individual that would prevent that individual from gaining unescorted access to the protected area of a nuclear power plant, the licensee will implement measures to ensure the individual does not enter the protected area, whether escorted, or not; and, when sufficient information is not available to a licensee about an individual to determine whether the criteria for unescorted access are satisfied, the licensee will implement measures to allow that individual to enter the protected area only when escorted at all times by an armed member of the security force who remains in periodic communication with security supervision. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/energy&quot;&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/nrc&quot;&gt;nrc&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/nuclear&quot;&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/nuke.fr&quot;&gt;nuke.fr&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/petition&quot;&gt;petition&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/policy&quot;&gt;policy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/safety&quot;&gt;safety&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/ucs&quot;&gt;ucs&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/theenergynet&quot;&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:03:18 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>knoxnews.com | UCS wants to delay projects at Y-12, Los Alamos</title>
      <link>http://blogs.knoxnews.com/knx/munger/2008/05/union_of_concerned_scientists.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Union of Concerned Scientists wants to postpone construction of a new production facility at Y-12 (Uranium Processing Facility or UPF) until the nation has a new nuclear policy and a better handle on the future of the U.S. nuclear arsenal. UCS also says it's &amp;quot;premature&amp;quot; to build the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement (CMRR) Nuclear Facility at Los Alamos.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The new report, &amp;quot;The Cart Before the Horse: DOE's Plan for the Future of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex,&amp;quot; is available&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/doe&quot;&gt;doe&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/n-weapons&quot;&gt;n-weapons&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/nuclear&quot;&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/nuke.news&quot;&gt;nuke.news&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/ornl&quot;&gt;ornl&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/tag/ucs&quot;&gt;ucs&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.diigo.com/nukenews/bookmark/theenergynet&quot;&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 08:55:06 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>