Skip to main content

Diigo Home
Home/ XD3102 - Gender Studies/ Group items tagged Parenting

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Weiye Loh

How my mother's fanatical feminist views tore us apart, by the daughter of The Color Pu... - 0 views

  • Feminism has much to answer for denigrating men and encouraging women to seek independence whatever the cost to their families.
  • while she has taken care of daughters all over the world and is hugely revered for her public work and service, my childhood tells a very different story. I came very low down in her priorities  -  after work, political integrity, self-fulfilment, friendships, spiritual life, fame and travel.

    My mother would always do what she wanted  -  for example taking off to Greece for two months in the summer, leaving me with relatives when I was a teenager. Is that independent, or just plain selfish?

  • When I was beaten up at school  -  accused of being a snob because I had lighter skin than my black classmates  -  I always told my mother that everything was fine, that I had won the fight. I didn't want to worry her.

    But the truth was I was very lonely and, with my mother's knowledge, started having sex at 13. I guess it was a relief for my mother as it meant I was less demanding. And she felt that being sexually active was empowering for me because it meant I was in control of my body.

  • ...1 more annotation...
  • A good mother is attentive, sets boundaries and makes the world safe for her child. But my mother did none of those things.
    • Weiye Loh
       
      Ironically, her article proves her mother's point that "motherhood was about the worst thing that could happen to a woman [and] that children enslave women." Because that's exactly what she's doing now, attempting to enslave her mum into the myth that "having a child has been the most rewarding experience."
Weiye Loh

Parents of a Certain Age: Is there anything wrong with being 53 and pregnant? - 0 views

  • “If you look at it from an actuarial standpoint, I might not be around when she’s 30,” Fiona says. “If you sit down and look at the cold, hard facts, this is the truth.” But Fiona shrugs it off.
  • The age of first motherhood is rising all over the West. In Italy, Germany, and Great Britain, it’s 30. In the U.S., it’s gone up to 25 from 21 since 1970, and in New York State, it’s even higher, at 27. But among the extremely middle-aged, births aren’t just inching up. They are booming. In 2008, the most recent year for which detailed data are available, about 8,000 babies were born to women 45 or older, more than double the number in 1997, according to the Centers for Disease Control. Five hundred and forty-one of these were born to women age 50 or older—a 375 percent increase. In adoption, the story is the same. Nearly a quarter of adopted children in the U.S. have parents more than 45 years older than they are.
  • just as important as those medical advances is a baby-crazed, youth-crazed culture that encourages 50-year-olds to envision themselves changing diapers when a decade ago they might have been content to calculate the future returns on their 401(k)s. Nothing—not a sports car, not a genius dye job—says “I’m young” like a baby on your hip. “He’s given the house a renewed spirit and purpose,” John Travolta told People magazine earlier this year about his new son, Benjamin. Travolta is 57. His wife, Kelly Preston, is 48.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Reproductive technology accounts for the sharp rise in the numbers. Women over 45 who want to carry their own babies most often use donor eggs, though egg freezing, a more cutting-edge method, offers early adopters another option, a kind of reproductive DVR for circumventing the inflexible and often inconvenient schedules handed down by Mother Nature. (Save your shows, and watch them when you have time; put your own eggs on ice, and wait for Mr. Right.) Egg freezing now gets write-ups not just in medical journals but also in Vogue, where a long feature on the technology appeared this past May between articles on avant-garde gastronomy and the fashionable art of mismatching patterns.
Weiye Loh

Jonathan Kay: Take it from me - 'gender-free' parenting doesn't work | Full Comment | N... - 0 views

  • It is correct and admirable to grant a child unconditional love even if he or she has trouble fitting into the two clubs — straight boys and straight girls — that arithmetically dominate all societies. But it is a species of lie — and a damaging one, at that — to pretend that those clubs are illusory. They do exist, as surely as I threw two very different parties for my daughter’s classmates last week; and thanks to biology, they begin forming before children can even process full sentences — let alone understand indoctrination about “gender exploration.”
  • Indeed, the very fact that “gender” is a word that falls so easily from the lips of the Footloose parents tells us a lot about their worldview. Sex is a biological reality and every human being is born with one. “Gender” is a recent theory-based locution and always has to do with a person’s Sexuality. Children know their sex but cannot possibly consider their gender because they are too young to appreciate what their sexuality is. The only way to explain gender to a child is to explain sexual desire, which no child wishes to know about. So the fact that Jazz writes a little family newspaper called The Gender Report tells you that he hears that word a lot, and that he is being fed a daily dose of theory he is too young to appreciate and that is clearly confusing him.
  • David Sedaris’ Me Talk Pretty One Day, in which there appears a wonderful story about what it was like for Sedaris to be a gay fifth-grade student at a North Carolina school.

    Describing his efforts to hammer out his lisp in the speech therapy lab, Sedaris remembers life thusly: “None of the therapy students were girls. They were all boys like me who kept movie star scrapbooks and made their own curtains. ‘You don’t want to be doing that,’ the men in our families would say. ‘That’s a girl thing.’ Baking scones and cupcakes for the school janitors, watching Guiding Light with our mothers, collecting rose petals for use in a fragrant potpourri: anything worth doing turned out to be a girl thing. In order to enjoy ourselves, we learned to be duplicitous. Our stacks of Cosmopolitan were topped with an unread issue of Boy’s Life or Sports Illustrated, and our decoupage projects were concealed beneath the sporting equipment.”

    Sedaris has some painful memories of his childhood — alongside many funny ones. But his is not the usual cri de coeur from someone who considers himself to have been a victim of torment and discrimination. He is an extraordinarily self-aware writer who recognizes that there are very real and permanent differences between the school’s lispers (the “future homosexuals of America,” he calls them — a line no straight man would ever be allowed to write) and the majority of the school’s males, who worship fast cars and professional football; and that these differences cannot be erased or bridged merely with good intentions.

    In short, he recognizes that there is a boy’s club, and that he isn’t in it — not in its majority caucus anyway. Better to seize on that sobering realization than wallow in the myth that the world can be brought into one giant gender-free mélange if we all send our children out in feather boas.

  •  
    As any (normal) parent can attest, such vignettes are entirely typical of parties featuring young boys and girls - who generally are so different in their behavior as almost to compose different species. Stocker is entirely wrong: There is no other single datum of information about a young child that will tell you more about his or her temperament, interests, energy level and maturity level than his or her sex.

    Nor does it hold water to say that such differences are "socially constructed." In my own way, I was even more socially progressive than the Footloose Family - dragging my two daughters out on to tennis and squash courts when they were just three years old, and aggressively discouraging them from "princess parties" and the like. My motives were purely selfish: I wanted my daughters to become racquet addicts, like me, so I could combine my sporting and family loves in the same weekend activities. The project was a total failure: On court, Alexa and Daniela would discard their racquets, and squat down over the balls, pretending they were "mama chickens, laying eggs." Soccer was also a disaster: Alexa, in particular, just wandered around the field, picking clover and occasionally talking to other girls, most of whom looked equally bored. The prospect of actually touching the ball terrified her.
Weiye Loh

Why is feminism still so afraid to focus on its flaws? | Deborah Orr | Comment is free ... - 0 views

  • Feminists (and I'm generalising here) tend towards the conclusion that women who don't sign up are simply hostages to the tyranny of the patriarchy, whose feeble personal consciousnesses have refused to be raised.
  • The fundamental and rather serious problem is the blunt and somewhat stubborn emphasis on "equality", difficult enough in a society deeply divided by economic inequality generally, even without the added complication that it's the people with care of children, whatever their sex, whose economic freedom is most compromised the world over.
  • It has also embraced, then dumped the idea of women who "have it all". The archetypal feminist of the 80s and 90s had a fulfilling and dynamic career, wonderful children, a lovely home and fabulous grooming. Consensus on the impossibility of such a lifestyle for any but the wealthiest has been long-since reached.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • The mass entry of women into the workplace in the latter half of the last century was claimed too unequivocally as a purely feminist achievement. Yet the door opened so easily when pushed because the needs of capitalism had undone the bolt.
  • the fast-burgeoning demand for professionals did as much to usher women into flashy jobs as female liberation did.
  • equal opportunity in the workplace has not resulted in equal achievement, and not all of this is the fault of continuing chauvinism. Women bear the children and, far more often than not, they wish to be the primary carer for those children. At its most strident, feminism can be mistaken for an ideology designed to make women feel they are wrong to want that.
  • Worse, feminism has accidentally promoted the idea that it's pretty easy to work and have children, with the right support in place. On even an average income, it's never easy, even once children are at secondary school (though it's certainly easier then). Your priorities change. Work is no longer the most important thing, for a while anyway. Ambition can dissipate.
Weiye Loh

Claws and Flaws « Guardian Watch - 0 views

  • Deborah Orr looks at why some women still don’t adopt feminism or call themselves feminists. She starts by saying that there is a myth that women reject feminism simply because it has a bad image. A kind of 80s dyke image. I agree with her point in relation to that myth, that:

    ‘The very fact that some feminists are so willing to accept that women don’t want the label for such superficial reasons, rather than crediting women with more profound intellectual discomfort, is an indication that even feminist attitudes can sometimes be dismissive of women and their legitimate concerns.’

  • Orr writes:

    ‘The fundamental and rather serious problem is the blunt and somewhat stubborn emphasis on “equality“, difficult enough in a society deeply divided by economic inequality generally, even without the added complication that it’s the people with care of children, whatever their sex, whose economic freedom is most compromised the world over.’ (my emphasis)

  • ‘Feminists (and I’m generalising here) tend towards the conclusion that women who don’t sign up are simply hostages to the tyranny of the patriarchy, whose feeble personal consciousnesses have refused to be raised.’

    And, her belief that women reject feminism for more complex and thought-out reasons than mere ‘false consciousness’.

  • ...6 more annotations...
  • One of the problems I have with feminism is the way it seems to ignore the continued importance of the ‘couple’ in society. Sure, single parents, who are more likely to be women than men, suffer economic pressures. But people in couples, when they have children, do not operate as isolated entitities.
    • Weiye Loh
       
      But one might bear the brunt more than the other?
  • The real divisions are along class, location, cultural and age lines.
  • Orr goes on to do something I rarely see a feminist woman do, and that is she acknowledges that many of women’s advancements have been down to socio-economic change, not feminism.
  • ‘But equal opportunity in the workplace has not resulted in equal achievement, and not all of this is the fault of continuing chauvinism.’

    This statement goes along with recent research, for example by Catherine Hakim, reported in her book: Feminist Myths and Magic Medicine, which shows how the fast diminishing ‘gender pay gap’ is no longer the result of discrimination, but of actual different choices and behaviours made by men and women in their jobs and careers.

    http://www.cps.org.uk/cps_catalog/Feminist%20Myths%20and%20Magic%20Medicine.pdf

  • Orr acknowledges that when women have children often their ‘priorities change. Work is no longer the most important thing, for a while anyway. Ambition can dissipate’. She does not ask why the same does not occur for men, or if it does, why this is not an issue for feminists.
    • Weiye Loh
       
      Because the dominant narratives demands women to be contribute more towards the caring and well being of their children? 
  • I think feminists, deep in their subconscious, are worried that if they admit the truth that gender ‘inequality’ is not caused only and always by ‘patriarchy’ and ‘discrimination’ against women, then the whole house of cards will come tumbling down. If gender inequality is caused by a number of complex factors, and, in many instances men suffer from gender inequality (e.g. fathers, prisoners, mental health sufferers, men who don’t live as long as women or enjoy as good health as long as women), then what is this ‘feminism’ lark for exactly?
Weiye Loh

Powerless to protect our kids? Oh, do grow up | Barbara Ellen | Comment is free | The O... - 0 views

  •  
    This idea that we are powerless against a cultural tsunami - come on! Once late teenage hits, many parents learn the hard way about powerlessness, but not in the age range under discussion here. As the mother of an eight-year-old, I'm finding it easy to keep her away from padded bikinis, Nuts, internet porn, violent video games and sexy music videos. I did think The X Factor routines were too much for "little eyes", but it wasn't difficult to flick the channel over for a few minutes. It wasn't as if I was trapped, Dr Who-style, in a child-sexualised force field, unable to reach the TV remote.

    Indeed, as much as David Cameron seems to be enjoying waltzing around, looking all gung ho and "concerned father-ish", he must know that, without hands-on parental involvement, there is only so much the coalition can achieve. Popular culture does not exist to babysit our children. As always, parents have to step in where appropriate, too. So let's stop the sub-McCarthyist hysteria about child sexualisation and get some perspective - no one is going to steal your child's childhood, unless you let them. "Porn star" knickers for children are creepy, but they can't jump into underwear drawers all by themselves.
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page
Move to top