Skip to main content

Diigo Home
Home/ XD3102 - Gender Studies/ Group items tagged Heterosexuality

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Weiye Loh

In The Company Of Men - Anna Arrowsmith's Myths About Porn « Guardian Watch - 0 views

graunwatch.wordpress.com/...a-arrowsmiths-myths-about-porn

Pornography Gender Stereotype Gender Equality Heterosexuality Heteronormativity

shared by Weiye Loh on 22 Mar 12 - No Cached
  • The fact porn films sometimes require performances from men that can perceived to be misogynistic does not necessarily mean that the films, or the actors, are misogynistic themselves. In fact, most of the individuals involved are usually aware that they are putting on a performance that must be understood within friendly parentheses.’
  • even leaving aside for one moment the huge markets that include M/m porn, F/m ‘dominatrix’ porn and mixed-sex ‘gang bangs’ (which you cannot categorise as ‘gay’ or ‘straight’), heterosexual porn is often ALL ABOUT THE MEN. And, even taking it on its own, with men in dominant positions, the male stars are still the objects of the camera’s gaze. And other men look at them!
  • guys watch­ing porn today expect to see male per­form­ers who reflect their own met­ro­sex­ual pre­oc­cu­pa­tions. More than that, I think many young men expect that male porn actor’s bod­ies should give them visual plea­sure. (Deen com­plains that he gets hate mail from men – who fre­quently tell him he ‘needs to work out’.)
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • all male porn actors are ‘objects of desire’ and not just objects of desire, but objects of MEN’s desire.
Weiye Loh

What Do Men Want? | marksimpson.com - 0 views

www.marksimpson.com/...what-do-men-want

Gender Stereotype Gender Equality Heterosexuality Sexism Objectification

shared by Weiye Loh on 27 Aug 11 - No Cached

  • I read with interest this YouGov survey published this week which provides some confirming data on the fashionability of face fuzz and its accessorization by males today: ‘stubble’ is reportedly the most popular form of facial hair today – especially with 18-24 year olds (51% say they have facial hair and 80% of those describe it as ‘stubble’). Stubble of course being the most easily adopted and discarded form of facial hair.

    But the survey – called ‘Let’s Face It’ — is much less interesting for what it reports than for what it doesn’t. What it’s not facing. At all. The assumptions behind it and the way that compulsory heterosexuality is used to deprive all men of a voice, even about their own bodies.

  • The first assumption of course is that the date a male is looking for is necessarily with a woman.
  • The second, and closely-related assumption, is that men’s affinity for facial hair is naturally to be measured entirely in terms of what women want:
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • The survey asks men whether they have facial  — and chest — hair, and what kind. (And a third assumption is that women don’t have facial hair….) But only asks women the questions: ‘Do you prefer the appearance of a man with or without a beard?’, and ‘Do you prefer the appearance of a man with or without chest hair?’
  • Men are objects here, and not in a good way. They are not allowed subjective feelings about facial or chest hair, their own or anyone else’s. They merely have it or they don’t. What they might want is of no interest. Women are the only ones allowed to want.
  • I don’t mention this to score gayist points and invoke ‘homophobia’. Or to diss the importance of women to most men. I mention it to illustrate how (hetero)sexist assumptions are used to shut men up. All of them. And maintain the reassuring pretense that even in a world where young men have become brazenly narcissistic and ‘passive’ – desiring to be desired – and where women are now allowed and indeed encouraged to have active preferences about men’s physical appearance, that it’s still all about good old heterosexuality.
Weiye Loh

Money for nothing and the dicks for free « Quiet Riot Girl - 0 views

quietgirlriot.wordpress.com/...nothing-and-the-dicks-for-free

Gaze Feminism Gender Stereotype Gender Equality Sexism Heterosexuality

shared by Weiye Loh on 21 Jun 11 - No Cached
  • “Here at Candy Rain, we have a simple policy” one of the party’s organizers yelled into the mic at one point. “Show us your dick or get the fuck out!!!”
  • How would I feel if some guy yelled “show us your tits or get the fuck out”? Not very good, I reckon. In objectifying men like this, one might argue Candy Rain apes the worst aspects of the patriarchy. Shouldn’t feminism be working towards a world in which nobody gets objectified?
  • despite the fact that they were showing their bodies off for our (adult) entertaiment that night, men still have all the power. So even if they were being objectified in an uncomfortable way for a few hours, it said nothing about the underlying system in place. It’s simply not the same. It’s like that medieval holiday where the masters served the servants; it was hilarious because it was so unusual, and everything went back to the way it had been shortly thereafter’
  • ...1 more annotation...

  • Men’s objectification of themselves and their metrosexual self-love seems too much for some women to bear. So they pretend it doesn’t exist. And make up a load of shit about men and women in the process.

  • Weiye Loh on 21 Jun 11
     
    Where men looking at women is seen as riddled with power relations, but women looking at men is liberating. As for men looking at each other or themselves? That is not mentioned.
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20▼ items per page
Move to top