Group items tagged

Let me start by stating that “open” is a term that is now essentially meaningless. Apparently Twitter is open. So is Blackboard. And Facebook.

Richard Stallman has been somewhat replaced by, or even written out of, the open source movement. Stallman was (and still is) an uncompromising radical. Or at least that is how the well established proprietary software field sees him. The open source movement developed in response to what others perceived as Stallman’s unpalatable views for mainstreaming openness.

(If you’re interested, I explored this in a bit more detail in Free and Open Source Movements, part 1 and part 2 (somewhat related: Why we should share learning resources).)

But we first need a Stallman in open education before we can even begin to marginalize him. We need an idealist that sets the stage for thinking and debate around openness.

By not criticizing gradient views of openness, by failing to establish a solid foundation on which to discuss openness, we are providing an ideology for our generation, not one that serves as a future-focused movement. Openness is a hard topic to discuss ideologically because it’s important. Yes, pragmatics are easier. But pragmatics have a short life span.

Openness is an ideology along the lines of democracy. It is worthy of theoretical discussion. And various modes of implementation should be subject to debate and criticism.

Just like the “green movement”. I’m sick of commercials with new cars driving through lush forests, suggesting that if only I buy their vehicle the world will be greener. Green is treated as a utility to sell vehicles. For many companies in the educational field, open is the new green: use it to sell your product.

On kuitenkin virheellistä (IMHO) sanoa Twitteriä J&Qaikua huonommaksi palveluksi, koska siihen ei muodostu keskusteluita. Mielestäni Twitterin kehittäjät on ihan oikein pitäneet sen alkuperäisessä sillisalaattimuodossaan - sillä Twitterin pointti ei ole keskustelut (jotka ovat usein eräänlaisia draamankaaria, kokonaisuuksia joilla on ainakin alku ja mahdollisesti loppu) vaan jatkuva signaalivirta. Jokainen Tweetti on samanarvoinen (käyttöliittymän kannalta), riippumatta siitä, onko se “originaali” (tiedotus omenan putoamisesta) vai “reaktio” (sama viesti uudelleenlähetettynä).