- Last active: about 23 hours ago
- Members: 13
- Items: 146
- Visits: 133
- Owner: Gary Edwards
- Group type: Public, anyone can join
- Group category: Government & Politics
321energy :: The Greatest Transfer of Wealth in History :: Bob Moriarty - 0 views
-
Bob Moriarty from 321 Energy provides a brief explanation of the fundamentals - excerpt: I've made it clear for a year that I believe we have entered what will be the most serious depression in history. It also will involve the greatest transfer of wealth in history.
There are two basic classes of assets. There are paper assets and real assets. An ounce of gold is a real asset. A copper mine is a real asset. A house is a real asset. An oil field is a real asset.
Over the counter derivatives now total over $596 trillion dollars, (click here [pdf]) ten times the size of the world economy. Those are paper assets, their value is derived from some other asset. That derivative size is what is going to destroy the world's financial system, it's all fraud.
A mortgage is a paper asset. A T-Bill or T-Bond is a paper asset. A $100 bill is a paper asset. It's pretty easy to see that a $500,000 mortgage on a house now worth $250,000 isn't worth very much. Latest figures show 9.6 million homes in the US have negative equity. How many of those loans are going to be paid back?
According to an ex-Fed Director, both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are bankrupt. They were leveraged 65-1. For those comforted by the thought of the FDIC bailing you out should the banking system fail entirely, you need to realize the FDIC is leveraged at 130-1. We are told that the collapse of Washington Mutual alone could bankrupt the FDIC.
In a depression, no real assets appear or disappear. Paper assets, on the other hand, turn to vapor. But the ownership of real assets will change as the real assets move from weak hands into strong hands.
Fears of a New Bubble as Cash Pours In - WSJ.com - 0 views
-
Those bastard banks have taken over $2 Trillion from the taxpayers, and are using this cash to invest in emerging markets instead of the USA. The Feds are providing interest free money to central banks, which then are used to invest in emerging economies. The bankers get the profits and USA taxpayers get stuck with the cost.
There is no possible upside for USA taxpayers unless of course you agree with Obama that the USA standard of living and extraordinary economic prosperity must be lowered before global economic equality can be achieved. This isn't just about greedy bankers and self interested international corporations. Wealth redistribution is now the official policy of our government. And the Federal Reserve is carrying it out with unexpected zeal.
The numbers are coming in. The facts are on the table. The USA is being gutted.
excerpt: Asian stock prices are shooting up, in part due to low interest rates in the U.S. Investors looking for higher yields are borrowing in U.S. dollars and then pouring that money "into countries that are growing more rapidly," said Stephen Cecchetti, chief economist at the Bank for International Settlements, the central banks' central bank, which warned early of the last asset bubble and is beginning to do so again. "That runs the risk of creating property and equity booms in those countries."
About $53 billion has gone into emerging-market stock funds this year, according to data collector EPFR Global. Through Monday's trading, the broad MSCI Barra Emerging Markets Index this year was up 60.7%. Brazil was up 100%, and Indonesia had gains of 102.7%. Over the same period, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 11.5%.
GDP Is..... Better Than Expected? - Or Filled With Outright Lies? The Market Ticker - 0 views
-
Whoa! Incredible fact filled analysis of the pre election GDP numbers released by Obama.
excerpt: Disposable personal income decreased in nominal terms q/o/q by 5.9% while in real terms (inflation adjusted) it decreased q/o/q by 7.4%! That is an enormous swing in purchasing power and not in the right direction!
Personal outlays increased $148.2 billion (5.8 percent) in the third quarter, compared with an increase of $8.2 billion (0.3 percent) in the second. Personal saving -- disposable personal income less personal outlays -- was $364.6 billion in the third quarter, compared with $533.1 billion in the second.
The personal saving rate -- saving as a percentage of disposable personal income -- was 3.3 percent in the third quarter, compared with 4.9 percent in the second.
So into decreasing personal income and disposable personal income people tried to spend anyway. Best guess: most of this was "cash for clunkers", which is the worst sort of "spending" - it is the taking on of more debt by replacing a paid-off car with one that now comes with a shiny (and nasty) payment book. The Trade: Go long auto repo outfits (aside: as far as I know there are no publicly-traded repo companies.)
Nothing in here I like; to the contrary, this report sucks and on a drill-down appears to be full of outright lies.
If You Are Known by the Company You Keep, What do Obama's Associates Say About Him? | Perso... - 0 views
-
A compiled list briefly profiling Obama's most important associations. Most of whom are radical Marxists, racists and social revolutionaries hating Christians, Jews, and the ordered liberty guaranteed by our Constitution. The list includes William Ayers, Carol Browner, Frank Marshall Davis, Anita Dunn, Dr. Eziekiel Emanuel, Rahm Emanuel, Chai Feldblum, Patrick Gaspard, Eric Holder, John Holdren, Valerie Jarret, Kevin Jennings, Van Jones, Mark Lloyd, Cecelia Munoz, Cass Sunstein, and uber racist Jeremiah Wright. Good cheat sheet for future reference.
David Einhorn Speech to Value Investors - 0 views
Fed Held Back as Evidence Mounted on Subprime Loan Abuses - washingtonpost.com - 0 views
-
In depth story about the Federal Reserve failure to act as an unregulated subprime mortgage industry raced out of control, and major banking and financial institutions bought into the wild wild west of high interest rate - predatory lending.
excerpt: during the years of the housing boom, pleas from consumer advocate groups failed to move the Fed, the sole federal regulator with authority over subprime mortgage businesses. Under a policy quietly formalized in 1998, the Fed refused to police lenders' compliance with federal laws protecting borrowers, despite repeated urging by consumer advocates across the country and even by other government agencies.
The hands-off policy, which the Fed reversed earlier this month, created a double standard. Banks and their subprime affiliates made loans under the same laws, but only the banks faced regular federal scrutiny. Under the policy, the Fed did not even investigate consumer complaints against the affiliates.
Of Marijuana And Laws - 0 views
The Right Way To Reform Wall Street: Let Stupid Firms Fail! - 0 views
-
Let stupid firms fail.
We need to get back to that.
Yes, the fact that the "stupid firms" this time around included most of Wall Street shows that special rules of financial bankruptcy should apply so the whole system doesn't collapse. But the firms need to be allowed to fail.
What should the special rules of financial bankruptcy be?
managements should be tossed
compensation contracts and other liabilities should be torn up,
bonus pools should be zeroed until the firms return to annual profitability
equity and preferred holders should be wiped out, and
junior bondholders should get a major haircut through the immediate, forced conversion of debt to equity.
All of this should happen not over years in the courts, but overnight--in the manner in which the FDIC seizes failing banks.
In such proceedings, all of Wall Street's idiocy enablers will lose their shirts: The folks who work the at the firms, the folks who lend money to the firms, the folks who invest in the firms and trust the firms' managements to be something other than morons.
Losing your shirt generally has a sobering effect on decision-making. As long as managers, lenders, and shareholders know they will lose their shirts, the next generation of Wall Street enablers will likely be far more careful and demanding than their predecessors, at least for a little while (and don't hallucinate that the Fed's new policy is anything other than temporary).
The Most Corrupt Members Of Congress - 0 views
-
A slide set featuring the corruption bio of the top 16 most corrupt members of congress. Incredible. Seems like the longer these clowns serve, the more corrupt and innovative they become. Kudos to the
This top tier listing must have been very competitive. Missing are criminals like Chris Dodd, Kathleen Sebelius, and Barney Frank. Frank and Dodd are almost single handedly responsible for the Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac mortgage crisis that tripped the entire global economy.
Republican Party Clutching At Straws - 0 views
Not What They Had in Mind: A History of Policies that Produced the Financial Crisis of 2008... - 0 views
-
Not What They Had in Mind: A History of Policies that Produced the Financial Crisis of 2008.
GMU economist and popular blogger Arnold Kling has released a new paper titled: "NOT WHAT THEY HAD IN MIND: A History of Policies that Produced the Financial Crisis of 2008."
Kling is very much of the view that if you had to choose between blaming private sector greed and public policy, the fault lies in the latter:
As this paper will illustrate, the seeds for much of the current crisis were sown in the policy "solutions" to previous financial and economic crises. Any attempt to dissect and understand the current crisis that does not account for the complex history, evolution, and integrated nature of financial regulations will not yield meaningful lessons for today's policy makers.
Among the topics he addresses: housing policy, bank capital regulations, monetary policy, and bank capital regulations. Incredible
Death Penalty Needs to GO! - 0 views
Political Pundits Killing America? - 0 views
Americans Have Been Taken Hostage | Dylan Ratigan - 0 views
-
A system where bank lobbyists have been spending in record numbers to make sure it stays that way.
A system that corrupts the most basic principles of competition and fair play, principles upon which this country was built.
It is a system that so far has forced the taxpayer to provide the banks with the use of $14 trillion from the Federal Reserve, much of the $7 trillion outstanding at the US Treasury and $2.3 trillion at the FDIC.
A system partially built by the very people who currently advise our President, run our Treasury Department and are charged with its reform.
And most stunningly -- it is a system that no one in our government has yet made any effort to fundamentally change.
Should Joe Wilson Shut Up? - 0 views
War On Drugs Or Mexicans? - 0 views
American Thinker: Whose Mess? - 0 views
-
Economic comparison that describes the prosperity differences between a Republican led congress and a Democratic controlled congress.
Excerpt: If you want to give Bill Clinton credit for economic results during his terms, you have to link those results to his policies. If you want to give him credit for those policies, you must admit that they were virtually all in line with Republican rhetoric and antithetical to modern liberalism.
But here's what you can't do and remain intellectually honest: praise Clinton and damn Bush, and then encourage Obama to do the exact opposite of what Clinton did and to add multiple trillions of dollars to Bush's spending and deficit levels.
Conservatives like me have always encouraged tax rate cuts, spending cuts, free trade and eliminating government programs like welfare and the byzantine farm program. Reagan did what he could (with a Democrat-controlled House the entire time), and the economy grew 3.5% annually over his eight years. Clinton did these things as well (with Republicans controlling both houses of Congress his last six years), and the economy grew 3.8% annually over his eight years.
This is not hard: cut taxes, cut spending, cut programs. Oh, and elect Republicans to the Senate. At least that's what the facts say.
Join this group


excerpt: Now we know: Geithner and Friedman interceded on behalf of Goldman and Wall Street (Merrill received $6.2 billion, Societe General - a whopping $16.5 billion) to deliver a stealth bailout, one that wouldn't need Congressional approval, and even better wouldn't require the counterparties to pay any of it back NOR would it require that they issue shares, warrants or any other instrument to AIG (taxpayers) in return for more than $32 billion in free money.
In any other time, a sitting Treasury Secretary who interceded on behalf of Wall Street to screw taxpayers out of tens of billions, would not be sitting long. But Democrats control both the House and Senate, so there are no investiagtions (Issa's letter aside). Traditional media is content not to rock the boat for President Banks Obama lest they be shunned by their peers, and ultimately, 99% of TV and print journalists don't understand the issues well enough to complain with any conviciton, especially against the merry backdrop of the Dow rising and their deflated 401ks beginning to show life.
They fall prey to fear and weakly submit to duplicitous hyperbole (Paulson threatening martial law and blood in the streets), when they should instead be consulting with the objective, critical voices who foresaw the crisis and were prepared with alternative solutions when it finally came (Stiglitz said instead of TARP, create new banks).
A pox on Congress, President Banks Obama, Bush, Paulson, Friedman, Bernanke and Geithner (plus Greenspan and Rubin). You may have gotten away with it for now, but I would wager there are a few million of us, roughly, who do understand everything that went down last Fall, and we're not amused. We're not just going to let this one pass, and we will not stop filling the vast interweb with the truth (and our distaste and vitriol for your wretched souls) day after day, week after week, all over message boards and fin