Skip to main content

Diigo Home
Home/ OpenDocument/ Group items tagged alex-brown

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Jesper Lund Stocholm

Alex Brown on the ODF Zero Interop problem: The discussion to limit the use of Foreign elem... - 0 views

  • So I think users need to understand, very clearly, that an ODF
    document/app of *either* conformance class has an EXTREMELY WEAK CLAIM
    TO INTEROPERABILITY. The "pure ODF conformance" sticker would be at best
    valueless and at worst positively misleading.

    So what I'd like to see is some real effort from the TC going into
    resolving this problem ...
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      The sad thing is that with the agreement between JTC1 and OASIS regarding ODF, it seems that SC34 has been completely cut out of the loop in terms of "fixing ODF", as you put it.

      I cannot see how SC34 will be able to play any part in this - besides rubber-stamping ODF 1.2 when it comes our way.
  • Gary Edwards
     
    So I think users need to understand, very clearly, that an ODF
    document/app of *either* conformance class has an EXTREMELY WEAK CLAIM
    TO INTEROPERABILITY. The "pure ODF conformance" sticker would be at best
    valueless and at worst positively misleading.

    So what I'd like to see is some real effort from the TC going into
    resolving this problem ... Alex Brown

    What Alex fails to mention is that the "foreign elements and alien attributes" components in the ODF Section 1.5 "Compliance and Conformance" clause was originally put there in early 2003 to provide a compatibility layer for MSOffice binary documents. Without this clause, it would be impossible to convert the billions of legacy MSOffice binary documents to ODF without breaking the fidelity. Now th OASIS ODF TC wants to limit the use of the compatiblity clause. An action that would seriously cripple Microsoft's efforts to implement ODF in MSOffice 14.

    No surprises here. It was only a matter of time until IBM and Sun ganged up on the newest TC member, Microsoft.
  • Jesper Lund Stocholm
     
    So I think users need to understand, very clearly, that an ODF
    document/app of *either* conformance class has an EXTREMELY WEAK CLAIM
    TO INTEROPERABILITY. The "pure ODF conformance" sticker would be at best
    valueless and at worst positively misleading.

    So what I'd like to see is some real effort from the TC going into
    resolving this problem ... Alex Brown

    What Alex fails to mention is that the "foreign elements and alien attributes" components in the ODF Section 1.5 "Compliance and Conformance" clause was originally put there in early 2003 to provide a compatibility layer for MSOffice binary documents. Without this clause, it would be impossible to convert the billions of legacy MSOffice binary documents to ODF without breaking the fidelity. Now th OASIS ODF TC wants to limit the use of the compatiblity clause. An action that would seriously cripple Microsoft's efforts to implement ODF in MSOffice 14.

    No surprises here. It was only a matter of time until IBM and Sun ganged up on the newest TC member, Microsoft.
1 - 1 of 1
Showing 20 items per page