Is There A Difference In The Values Of The Two Major Parties - 0 views
started by Matz Stender on 27 Jul 12
started by Matz Stender on 27 Jul 12
Start a New Topic » « Back to the kdmygnyvnybuqedoecxr group
started by Matz Stender on 27 Jul 12
Congressman Foley experienced no decision to resign. He knew that the extensive greater part of Republicans in congress would not support him. Much more significantly he realized that that there was no chance the Republicans of his state would assist him. The values of the people of his social gathering would not permit that.
In a related scenario when it came out that a homosexual prostitution ring was being operate from Democrat Congressman Barney Franks house there was no outcry. In fact all most all Democrats defended him and the Democrats of his state have re-nominated him ever before since.
From the day that Bill Clinton announced that he was running for president there ended up rumors of his obtaining affairs. When it came out in the media that the rumors had been correct the huge bulk of Democrats stood behind him. When a previous Miss The united states claimed to have been forced by Invoice Clinton to have intercourse with him (her words were rapped) the Democrats stood in devoted assistance. When information write-up appeared documenting that He employed the police gentlemen appointed to protect him to use their power to get females to be by yourself with him no a single in the party explained something. When he experienced sex with an intern they rallied powering him. When he lied about it underneath oath they defended him. So I believe that Democratic Social gathering values are that it is Okay to use your energy to seduce ladies and to lie prior to a Grand Jury. At minimum that is what the vast greater part of both elected and non-elected Democrats proved.
When Sandy Berger who was Democrat the Nationwide Security Advisor for the duration of the Clinton Administration. Sandy Berger became the concentrate of a criminal investigation after he was caught taking away highly categorised terrorism paperwork and handwritten notes from the Nationwide Archives during preparations for the Sept. eleven commission hearings. Once more there was no outcry from Democrats. How can it be that virtually no Democrats voiced out rage at stealing categorized files to go over the actions of the administration that you had belong to? I guess that Democrat values are that it is Alright to steel and take part in political cover up.
On Sunday, the June 18, 2000, the headline of the Washington Article study, "Political Dirty Tricks Alleged in Alabama Trial. Two Democrats are on trial in Alabama for bribing a prostitute to assert that Republican Gubernatorial applicant Steve Windom raped her. Steve Windom was elected Governor of Alabama when she confessed. Once more in 1998 when this happened there was no outcry from Alabama Democrats or Democrats everywhere else. Seams that the values of the Democrat Celebration uncover this suitable.
On May possibly sixteenth, 2000 delegates of the New York Democrat conference spat upon the Honor Guard and called them Nazis as the carried the Flag into the convention. No one particular in the group of delegates tried to stop them. Note that these have been not anarchists out side, these had been Democrat delegates on the flooring of the convention. This story was all in excess of the New York Media. Senator Clinton was nominated at this conference. Did she talk out in opposition to this? No! Neither did any distinguished Democrats. It seams that spitting on New York Policemen and contacting them Nazis whilst they hold the American Flag is an suitable value in the Democrat celebration.
There was not out cry amongst Democrats when the Clinton administration gathered above 1200 FBI documents of Republicans. They labored in unison to hinder the investigation and defended the Clinton administration vigorously. The Democrats are supposed to be the celebration that wants to guard privateness. I guess the acceptation is when members of their get together break the legislation and acquire non-public FBI files. The Democrat values need to be we value the privateness of our buddies and no one particular else.
The Democrat Governor of New Jersey, James McGreevey admitted to having a gay affair. Resigned after allegations of sexual harassment, rumors of getting blackmailed on leading of fundraising investigations and indictments. Although he did resign there was a lack of general public outrage expressed by fellow Democrats.
In the mid 1990s Democrat Congressman from Illinois, Melvin Reynolds was indited on 17 federal fees and plead responsible to two counts of misuse of general public cash. Democrat congressman from Michigan, Charles Diggs JR. was convicted of sexual misconduct and Obstruction of Justice. Yet again the whilst the Democrats did not endorse their steps they did not stand up and publicly condemn them either.
As you read this you may not remember several of these tales. The produced the news but they got really tiny coverage. The Media Research Heart researched two of these stories. In the 3 weeks immediately after the Foley story broke the three major networks (CBS, NBC and ABC) had broadcast 153 tales about the Foley Tale. Higher than I talked about the Melvin Reynolds tale. Among the 1994 indictment and 1995 conviction of Melvin Reynolds the tree key networks broadcast a total of 19. Could the variation of 192 stories in a few months and the 19 tales in a calendar year and fifty percent which incorporate equally indictments, the trial and the conviction have anything to do with the myriad of surveys that show that four of 5 folks in the media are registered Democrats.
Yet another example of the distinction among the values of the parties is how they react to domestic terror. There are two major locations of domestic terrorism. One particular is these functions committed by radical prolife members from abortion clinics and the other are these dedicated by radical environmentalists and animal rights groups.
Most prolife members belong to or vote for Republicans. Anytime there is an act of violence committed by a prolife extremist there is an instantaneous outcry from Republicans equally among the leadership and the rank in information members. The leaders of the prolife motion and all the conservative churches stand up and condemn the steps.
Most members of the environmentalist and bestial rights groups belong to or vote for Democrats. Yet when you hear of structures on higher education campuses getting burned or people assaulted by radical members of these groups you do not hear Democrats coming out and condemning the actions. Neither does the leaders of the environmentalist and animal legal rights actions.
Another factor to note in this place is the distinction in the amount of extremist between the two teams. More than the earlier 20 a long time there have only been a few dozen bombings and fires at abortion clinics and a number of physicians assaulted. On the other hand last year on your own there was more than 100 fires and vandalism on college campuses from properties exactly where bestial investigation is carried out and other sorts of study that these actions oppose. There were 1000's of SUVs vandalized and thousands of people assaulted for possibly driving an SUV or sporting genuine or faux fur. All of this in only 1 a 12 months time.
I am content that every person I know that considers them selves Republican and all most all Republican leaders condemn Congressman Foleys steps. I think it is ironic that the Democrats suddenly locate the values to condemn Congressman Foley. But as you can see from their historical past this is political maneuvering. Due to the fact background demonstrates that if Congressman Foley was a Democrat they would both stand guiding him or be silent.
So Sure I do see a main variation
REFERENCE:
http://www.ambravallo.com/Art/306374/36/Helping-Battered-Women.html
http://article2008.com/Art/1191090/257/Things-to-Know-About-Abortion.html
http://goarticles.com/article/All-About-Abortion/6656065/