Sixty seconds elapsed between placement of the scent marks in the first and second donor. The slide was suspended by a clasp and wire hanger approximately 1 cm above your substrate and against the walls opposite the nest in the subject's home cage. After that, during the 3-min examination, the total amount of time that subjects investigated the marks from that pair of scent donors was registered. Subjects had to riff or sniff both fragrance marks on the slide for the details to be in the analyses. The observer was blind to your position of the scent donor's marks over the slide. Each slide was used only one time and then discarded. Necessarily mean time (s)±SEM which LP male voles not necessarily treated with melatonin, LP men treated with melatonin, LP female voles not treated using melatonin, LP female voles taken care of with melatonin, SP adult men, and SP females spent selfgrooming when they were exposed to bedding scented by LP adult men, LP females, SP adult men, and SP females. A two-way ANOVA was used to test for significant differences in the quality of time self-grooming across each odor condition (αâ¤0. 05). Histograms given with different letters point out significant difference between odor conditions (Holm-Sidak test, pb0. 05). Mean titers±SEM of circulating (some sort of) testosterone of LP men voles not treated using melatonin, LP male voles treated with melatonin, and SP men voles and (n) estradiol of LP female voles not treated using melatonin, LP female voles taken care of with melatonin, and SP female voles. (F8, 239=12. 13, pb0. 001) and for condition of the donor (F3, 239=5. 53, p=0. 001). However, there was also a significant 001) together with for condition of your donor (F3, 239=3. forty two, pb0. 018). Post hoc comparisons indicated that LP males spent more time selfgrooming in response to the bedding of LP females than to that of LP males, SP males, and SP females (Holm-Sidak, pb0. 05; Fig. 2). LP females spent longer self-grooming in response on the bedding of LP males than to that of LP females (pb0. 05; Fig. two). In addition, LP although spent more time self-grooming in response to the bedding of SP adult men than to that involving SP females (pb0. females, SP adult men, and SP females (each comparison, pN0. 05; Fig. 2). Short-photoperiod males spent longer 17, df=11, p=0. 86; Fig. 3a). Untreated LP females spent longer investigating the odors with LP males than people of LP females (t=5. 66, df=11, pb0. 001), and they also spent a similar amount of time 71; Fig. 3b). In contrast, LP males that received melatonin capsules spent a comparable amount of time looking into the odor of opposing and same-sex conspecifics irrespective of photoperiod (t=1. 29, df=11, p=0. 320, with regard to LP donors and t=0. 10, df=11, p=0. 91 with regard to SP donors; Fig. 3c). Long-photoperiod females that received melatonin capsules spent similar numbers of time investigating the odors of LP opposite together with same-sex conspecifics (t=1. 03, df=11, p = 0. 34), but they spent longer betamethasone dipropionate cream .05, immunosuppression kidney transplant, fish tank fish species
in the first and second donor. The slide was suspended by a
clasp and wire hanger approximately 1 cm above your substrate
and against the walls opposite the nest in the subject's home
cage. After that, during the 3-min examination, the total amount of time that
subjects investigated the marks from that pair of scent donors
was registered. Subjects had to riff or sniff both fragrance marks on
the slide for the details to be in the analyses. The observer
was blind to your position of the scent donor's marks over the slide.
Each slide was used only one time and then discarded.
Necessarily mean time (s)±SEM which LP male voles not necessarily treated with melatonin, LP
men treated with melatonin, LP female voles not treated using melatonin, LP
female voles taken care of with melatonin, SP adult men, and SP females spent selfgrooming
when they were exposed to bedding scented by LP adult men, LP females,
SP adult men, and SP females. A two-way ANOVA was used to test for significant
differences in the quality of time self-grooming across each odor condition
(αâ¤0. 05). Histograms given with different letters point out significant
difference between odor conditions (Holm-Sidak test, pb0. 05).
Mean titers±SEM of circulating (some sort of) testosterone of LP men voles not
treated using melatonin, LP male voles treated with melatonin, and SP men voles
and (n) estradiol of LP female voles not treated using melatonin, LP female voles
taken care of with melatonin, and SP female voles.
(F8, 239=12. 13, pb0. 001) and for condition of the donor
(F3, 239=5. 53, p=0. 001). However, there was also a significant
001) together with for
condition of your donor (F3, 239=3. forty two, pb0. 018). Post hoc
comparisons indicated that LP males spent more time selfgrooming
in response to the bedding of LP females than to
that of LP males, SP males, and SP females (Holm-Sidak,
pb0. 05; Fig. 2). LP females spent longer self-grooming
in response on the bedding of LP males than to that of LP
females (pb0. 05; Fig. two). In addition, LP although spent more
time self-grooming in response to the bedding of SP adult men
than to that involving SP females (pb0. females, SP adult men, and SP females (each comparison,
pN0. 05; Fig. 2). Short-photoperiod males spent longer
17, df=11, p=0. 86; Fig. 3a).
Untreated LP females spent longer investigating the odors
with LP males than people of LP females (t=5. 66, df=11,
pb0. 001), and they also spent a similar amount of time
71; Fig. 3b). In contrast, LP males
that received melatonin capsules spent a comparable amount of
time looking into the odor of opposing and same-sex
conspecifics irrespective of photoperiod (t=1. 29, df=11,
p=0. 320, with regard to LP donors and t=0. 10, df=11, p=0. 91 with regard to SP
donors; Fig. 3c). Long-photoperiod females that received
melatonin capsules spent similar numbers of time investigating
the odors of LP opposite together with same-sex conspecifics
(t=1. 03, df=11, p = 0. 34), but they spent longer
betamethasone dipropionate cream .05, immunosuppression kidney transplant, fish tank fish species
To Top