The Moral Argument For God - 0 views

• 
  #1 Will Steele on 02 May 12

   

  The early 21st century stands for a period of profound ethical confusion. On the one hand, mothers and doctors are generally permitted to crack when the skulls and pull out the brains of nearly-born babies with government sanction beneath the banner of partial birth abortion. Should these same people hike into the woods and crack open a bald eagle egg, they could face serious prison time.
  
  May well therefore seem that modern day society is marked by two seemingly contradictory extremes --- that of extreme license and that of excessive control. However, upon closer inspection it would be concluded that these conditions are certainly not as contradictory as the situation might originally appear. Alternatively, it would seem each is the consequence of the systematic removal of the ethical balance provided within the Judeo-Christian tradition with it's emphasis upon transcendent standards provided by an infinitely just and loving God.
  
  With your increasing complexity of know-how and technology, those trained in the acquisition and usage of this complex body of thought (those broadly called "intellectuals") have taken on increased amounts of influence and responsibility all through society. No longer does agriculture or manufacturing dominate society on the degree it once managed.
  
  Futurists from Alvin Toffler to Newt Gingrich have characterized the present sociological epoch as information-based, with those manipulating these details from government bureaucrats to help Hollywood producers exercising unfathomable power above the composition of the modern day mind. Therefore, it ought to be remembered, as Lord Acton is believed to have said, "Absolute power corrupts absolutely. "
  
  Via a historical process too complicated to detail to a significant degree in this brief analysis, the prevailing secular elite found see the world around them and their own assorted intellectual systems as satisfactory explanations in and of themselves for the reality in which these kind of thinkers found themselves. As per Phillip Johnson in "Reason Inside Balance", this way of experiencing the world prevalent among the most influential intellectuals is naturalism. Naturalism is the idea that the material reality makes up the totality of existence and thinking about God is merely some sort of mental construct promulgated in an attempt to cope with the stark realities in the universe in which boyfriend finds himself (7).
  
  The average person might naturally conclude that will naturalism by its nature would confine itself to your issues of blunt visible scientific fact. However, naturalism has left the tedium with the laboratory and now tries to influence fields since divergent from science since education, ethics, and federal. It is through this set of paradigms embracing the present material reality as being the highest criteria of judgment that twin siblings of chaos and tyranny have grown to be so prevalent throughout environment society.
  
  No matter what the secular elites call their own systems or what concerns these systems emphasize, it's the goal of the secular elite to remake man inside image of the current secular elite. According to Alister McGrath in "Intellectuals Don't Need God & Other Modern Myths", prominent ideologies competing for any minds of men comprise Enlightenment rationalism, Marxism, together with scientific materialism (one hundred sixty).
  
  Despite the shades of difference between these systems, at their core each shares the assumption that man is bound just by no eternal standard beyond this reality and may be remade into regardless of the powers that be see fit. It is out of this effort to remake the essential nature of man that this sorrow of anarchy together with tyranny flow.
  
  Bound as a result of certain God-ordained limits concerning behavioral standards and human relationships, man can expect only heartache should he attempt to ignore these warnings. Nevertheless, those seeking to create a cultural ethos standing in addition to the moral will of Goodness regularly ignore these ethical stoplights like newly-licensed teenagers barreling down the Sin city strip.
  
  Proponents of modernism at first hypothesized that man could retain increased degree of morality without reference to all that theological superstition. Yet with out a clear theological reference by which to measure, the actions of man degenerate into the depths of unfathomable nasty.
  
  According to Norman Geisler in "Introduction To Philosophy: Some sort of Christian Perspective", when man looks to himself as being the source of right and wrong, the result is existential subjectivism and relativism where everyone becomes a law on to themselves (404).
  
  And while modernism attemptedto maintain the illusion of objective standards in addition to the revelation of God, your logical conclusion of these kinds of atheistic thinking --- postmodernism --- holds to no such delusions. The truth is, political radical and literary critic Michel Foulcalt has stated there are no facts (though this assertion is itself stated for a fact) and his fellow travelers down your deconstructionist superhighway literally fancy themselves as "assassins of objectivity" according to Lynne Cheney in "Telling In reality: Why Our Culture & Nation Have Stopped Making Sensation & What We Can do About It" (91).
  
  Such sentiments possess ramifications beyond settling the issue of irrespective of whether hemlines will be low or high for the coming year. Such ideas determine the very shape and composition with human society and relationships.
  
  This is particularly obvious on college campuses where these kind of ideas enjoy free reign keeping the status of orthodoxy and where nobody bats an eye with anarchy and tyranny walking together in hand. For example, Dinesh D'Souza highlights in "Illiberal Education: This Politics Of Race & Sex On Campus" that many college campuses distribute condoms together with support the vilest profanity since art yet advocate a radical type of feminism just about branding traditional kinds of sex as rape together with enforce speech codes so broad concerning punish "misdirected laughter" and "exclusion from conversation" (238).
  
  Additionally, much of twentieth and twenty-first history has been a running commentary on the chaos and tyranny that derive from attempting to undermine your insoluble union between morality and divinity. The former Soviet Union perhaps stands for the reason that primary example of such a experiment where in an attempt to better himself man moves his back on God and reaps the outcomes in abundance. That particular society experienced bloodshed and misery rarely repeated in history except perhaps in its sister dictatorships of Nazi Germany and Maoist China.
  
  Without an objective standard as provided by the moral revelation associated with God, the state as embodied with the Communist Party was absolve to do as it pleased like changing the law in the drop of a hat and then violate the law when it suited with no degree of institutional recourse on the market to the Soviet people. In his monumental Understanding The periods, David Noebel quotes a Communist functionary who said, "There is no Goodness, no hereafter, no punishment for evil. We can do as we wish. As i thank God, in whom I don't believe, that I have lived to the current hour when I can express this evil in my heart (104). Few Evangelical thinkers have been completely able to express that moral dangers of atheism within a more succinct manner.
  
  Standing in marked opposition to atheism and it is law of the marketplace and inherent antinomianism is usually belief in God along with the corollaries of morality flowing from God's existence. From the heartaches and confusion mentioned previously in such a exposition, it is evident that mankind is unfit to be establishing a satisfactory moral system of his well-known accord.
  
  Instead, man must be provided one by an objective outside source yet one accustomed to the conditions under which man is capable of thriving. Furthermore, it is only through God as revealed in Scripture that you is even justified within speaking of morality in the first place.
  
  Try as he may well, C. S. Lewis highlights in "Mere Christianity", person cannot escape the encompassing embrace or rebuke of morality. For even in the attempt to flee from its more traditional products, one must invoke your structure of its dialogue to be able to appeal to a competing number of standards (3).
  
  For example, D. James Kennedy points out in "Character & Lives: A Nation In Search Of Its Soul" that tolerance is the last virtue of an immoral society since the following moral principle in invoked to cover over a plethora of popular abominations ranging from pornography to abortion to help sodomy (78). The catch is not so much that will man will live without some degree of morality, but rather by in whose standards will man live and the consequences resulting from like decisions.
  
  Westminster Seminary Professor John Frame elaborates in "Apologetics On the Glory Of God" that, in order to are in existence as objective standards beyond the level of subjective sentiments, morals must stem from an absolute source; and since these principles govern personable people, they must exude from an absolute ultimate personality (100). If morality exists within a transcendent source apart from man in God, morality is granted a qualification of liberation from this murky fog of subjectivism yet is obtainable to man and may be said to exist in all situations even if finite man refused to disentangle himself in the passion of the moment to look at these conundrums from your crisp peaks of objective detachment.
  
  Since these divinely legislated standards stem from God, they exist contained in the underlying fabric of this universe. Try as he might, man cannot escape that lure of morality, a really situation further attesting on the power of the Our god standing behind these basics. Romans 2: 14-15 says, "Indeed, when Gentiles, who should not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law, since they show that the requirements with the law are written on their hearts... (NIV). "
  
  Even those who actively choose to restrain and undermine this universal order appeal to it when it agrees with their interests. C. S. Lewis writes in "Mere Christianity", "Whenever you see a man who says he does not believe in a serious Right and Wrong, you can find the same man going back on this a moment later. He may break his promise back, but if you try breaking want you to him he will be complaining before he can say Jack Robinson (5). " Norman Geisler illustrates this aspect in "Christian Ethics" inside story of a scholar professing antinomianism who appealed to objective standards upon receiving a failing grade from this ethics instructor regarding some sort of trivial matter (384).
  
  Now, readers not normally enchanted by the banter of academic discussion may concede that morality will indeed flow from Goodness but may wonder what practical impact such a truth may have with everyday existence. Actually, considerably.
  
  Since God is both the legislator of traditional morality along with the loving creator of man, it follows that the standard moral system established by God and established in the revelation with the Holy Bible is the machine of morality best fitted to the nature of humankind, both protecting him on the greatest possible degree from the rampant evil plaguing a fallen world and allowing him to enjoy whatever goodness that remains inside through the grace associated with God.
  
  For example, God did not establish the rules surrounding marriage so as to toss a wet blanket over the fornication follies. Rather, confining the act of human intimacy inside context of marriage balances both the desire for physical pleasure along with the need for lasting enjoy, to say nothing of protecting the individual against the proto-apocalyptic pestilences now ravaging millions. Instead of withering away like a forgotten memory as expected by some, Tim LaHaye hypothesizes in "The Battle For any Family" that the family will really provide a foundation involving stability in times involving unprecedented social turmoil (237).
  
  The moral argument for God is far more than a dry academic proof obtained in seminary textbooks. Its the truth is being made more concrete on a daily basis throughout the culture as the nation continues to drift faraway from its Judeo-Christian foundations.
  
  With "Turning The Tide: Nov Liberalism & The Increase Of Common Sense", Pat Robertson describes the 2 main possible futures that await the country (293-296). Americans can either repent of their wickedness and return to help God and His principles, experiencing national renewal, person well-being, and eternal salvation along the way. Or, the American people can continue within their sin and deny God's really existence, risking national drop, personal suffering, and eternal damnation as a result. The choice is your choice, with your eternal destiny and also the welfare of your family hanging in the balance.
  
  by Frederick Meekins.
  
  REFERENCE:
  
  http://www.realestatearticles4u.com/Art/325848/317/Healthy-Habits-For-Expecting-Mothers.html
  
  http://www.realestatearticles4u.com/Art/325995/317/Healthy-Habits-For-Women-Who-Are-Pregnant.html
  
  http://www.steeparticles.com/41974/85/Healthy-Habits-For-Women-Who-Are-Pregnant.html

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">The early 21st century stands for a period of profound ethical confusion. On the one hand, mothers and doctors are generally permitted to crack when the skulls and pull out the brains of nearly-born babies with government sanction beneath the banner of partial birth abortion. Should these same people hike into the woods and crack open a bald eagle egg, they could face serious prison time.<br /><br />May well therefore seem that modern day society is marked by two seemingly contradictory extremes --- that of extreme license and that of excessive control. However, upon closer inspection it would be concluded that these conditions are certainly not as contradictory as the situation might originally appear. Alternatively, it would seem each is the consequence of the systematic removal of the ethical balance provided within the Judeo-Christian tradition with it's emphasis upon transcendent standards provided by an infinitely just and loving God.<br /><br />With your increasing complexity of know-how and technology, those trained in the acquisition and usage of this complex body of thought (those broadly called "intellectuals") have taken on increased amounts of influence and responsibility all through society. No longer does agriculture or manufacturing dominate society on the degree it once managed.<br /><br />Futurists from Alvin Toffler to Newt Gingrich have characterized the present sociological epoch as information-based, with those manipulating these details from government bureaucrats to help Hollywood producers exercising unfathomable power above the composition of the modern day mind. Therefore, it ought to be remembered, as Lord Acton is believed to have said, "Absolute power corrupts absolutely. "<br /><br />Via a historical process too complicated to detail to a significant degree in this brief analysis, the prevailing secular elite found see the world around them and their own assorted intellectual systems as satisfactory explanations in and of themselves for the reality in which these kind of thinkers found themselves. As per Phillip Johnson in "Reason Inside Balance", this way of experiencing the world prevalent among the most influential intellectuals is naturalism. Naturalism is the idea that the material reality makes up the totality of existence and thinking about God is merely some sort of mental construct promulgated in an attempt to cope with the stark realities in the universe in which boyfriend finds himself (7).<br /><br />The average person might naturally conclude that will naturalism by its nature would confine itself to your issues of blunt visible scientific fact. However, naturalism has left the tedium with the laboratory and now tries to influence fields since divergent from science since education, ethics, and federal. It is through this set of paradigms embracing the present material reality as being the highest criteria of judgment that twin siblings of chaos and tyranny have grown to be so prevalent throughout environment society.<br /><br />No matter what the secular elites call their own systems or what concerns these systems emphasize, it's the goal of the secular elite to remake man inside image of the current secular elite. According to Alister McGrath in "Intellectuals Don't Need God & Other Modern Myths", prominent ideologies competing for any minds of men comprise Enlightenment rationalism, Marxism, together with scientific materialism (one hundred sixty).<br /><br />Despite the shades of difference between these systems, at their core each shares the assumption that man is bound just by no eternal standard beyond this reality and may be remade into regardless of the powers that be see fit. It is out of this effort to remake the essential nature of man that this sorrow of anarchy together with tyranny flow.<br /><br />Bound as a result of certain God-ordained limits concerning behavioral standards and human relationships, man can expect only heartache should he attempt to ignore these warnings. Nevertheless, those seeking to create a cultural ethos standing in addition to the moral will of Goodness regularly ignore these ethical stoplights like newly-licensed teenagers barreling down the Sin city strip.<br /><br />Proponents of modernism at first hypothesized that man could retain increased degree of morality without reference to all that theological superstition. Yet with out a clear theological reference by which to measure, the actions of man degenerate into the depths of unfathomable nasty.<br /><br />According to Norman Geisler in "Introduction To Philosophy: Some sort of Christian Perspective", when man looks to himself as being the source of right and wrong, the result is existential subjectivism and relativism where everyone becomes a law on to themselves (404).<br /><br />And while modernism attemptedto maintain the illusion of objective standards in addition to the revelation of God, your logical conclusion of these kinds of atheistic thinking --- postmodernism --- holds to no such delusions. The truth is, political radical and literary critic Michel Foulcalt has stated there are no facts (though this assertion is itself stated for a fact) and his fellow travelers down your deconstructionist superhighway literally fancy themselves as "assassins of objectivity" according to Lynne Cheney in "Telling In reality: Why Our Culture & Nation Have Stopped Making Sensation & What We Can do About It" (91).<br /><br />Such sentiments possess ramifications beyond settling the issue of irrespective of whether hemlines will be low or high for the coming year. Such ideas determine the very shape and composition with human society and relationships.<br /><br />This is particularly obvious on college campuses where these kind of ideas enjoy free reign keeping the status of orthodoxy and where nobody bats an eye with anarchy and tyranny walking together in hand. For example, Dinesh D'Souza highlights in "Illiberal Education: This Politics Of Race & Sex On Campus" that many college campuses distribute condoms together with support the vilest profanity since art yet advocate a radical type of feminism just about branding traditional kinds of sex as rape together with enforce speech codes so broad concerning punish "misdirected laughter" and "exclusion from conversation" (238).<br /><br />Additionally, much of twentieth and twenty-first history has been a running commentary on the chaos and tyranny that derive from attempting to undermine your insoluble union between morality and divinity. The former Soviet Union perhaps stands for the reason that primary example of such a experiment where in an attempt to better himself man moves his back on God and reaps the outcomes in abundance. That particular society experienced bloodshed and misery rarely repeated in history except perhaps in its sister dictatorships of Nazi Germany and Maoist China.<br /><br />Without an objective standard as provided by the moral revelation associated with God, the state as embodied with the Communist Party was absolve to do as it pleased like changing the law in the drop of a hat and then violate the law when it suited with no degree of institutional recourse on the market to the Soviet people. In his monumental Understanding The periods, David Noebel quotes a Communist functionary who said, "There is no Goodness, no hereafter, no punishment for evil. We can do as we wish. As i thank God, in whom I don't believe, that I have lived to the current hour when I can express this evil in my heart (104). Few Evangelical thinkers have been completely able to express that moral dangers of atheism within a more succinct manner.<br /><br />Standing in marked opposition to atheism and it is law of the marketplace and inherent antinomianism is usually belief in God along with the corollaries of morality flowing from God's existence. From the heartaches and confusion mentioned previously in such a exposition, it is evident that mankind is unfit to be establishing a satisfactory moral system of his well-known accord.<br /><br />Instead, man must be provided one by an objective outside source yet one accustomed to the conditions under which man is capable of thriving. Furthermore, it is only through God as revealed in Scripture that you is even justified within speaking of morality in the first place.<br /><br />Try as he may well, C. S. Lewis highlights in "Mere Christianity", person cannot escape the encompassing embrace or rebuke of morality. For even in the attempt to flee from its more traditional products, one must invoke your structure of its dialogue to be able to appeal to a competing number of standards (3).<br /><br />For example, D. James Kennedy points out in "Character & Lives: A Nation In Search Of Its Soul" that tolerance is the last virtue of an immoral society since the following moral principle in invoked to cover over a plethora of popular abominations ranging from pornography to abortion to help sodomy (78). The catch is not so much that will man will live without some degree of morality, but rather by in whose standards will man live and the consequences resulting from like decisions.<br /><br />Westminster Seminary Professor John Frame elaborates in "Apologetics On the Glory Of God" that, in order to are in existence as objective standards beyond the level of subjective sentiments, morals must stem from an absolute source; and since these principles govern personable people, they must exude from an absolute ultimate personality (100). If morality exists within a transcendent source apart from man in God, morality is granted a qualification of liberation from this murky fog of subjectivism yet is obtainable to man and may be said to exist in all situations even if finite man refused to disentangle himself in the passion of the moment to look at these conundrums from your crisp peaks of objective detachment.<br /><br />Since these divinely legislated standards stem from God, they exist contained in the underlying fabric of this universe. Try as he might, man cannot escape that lure of morality, a really situation further attesting on the power of the Our god standing behind these basics. Romans 2: 14-15 says, "Indeed, when Gentiles, who should not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law, since they show that the requirements with the law are written on their hearts... (NIV). "<br /><br />Even those who actively choose to restrain and undermine this universal order appeal to it when it agrees with their interests. C. S. Lewis writes in "Mere Christianity", "Whenever you see a man who says he does not believe in a serious Right and Wrong, you can find the same man going back on this a moment later. He may break his promise back, but if you try breaking want you to him he will be complaining before he can say Jack Robinson (5). " Norman Geisler illustrates this aspect in "Christian Ethics" inside story of a scholar professing antinomianism who appealed to objective standards upon receiving a failing grade from this ethics instructor regarding some sort of trivial matter (384).<br /><br />Now, readers not normally enchanted by the banter of academic discussion may concede that morality will indeed flow from Goodness but may wonder what practical impact such a truth may have with everyday existence. Actually, considerably.<br /><br />Since God is both the legislator of traditional morality along with the loving creator of man, it follows that the standard moral system established by God and established in the revelation with the Holy Bible is the machine of morality best fitted to the nature of humankind, both protecting him on the greatest possible degree from the rampant evil plaguing a fallen world and allowing him to enjoy whatever goodness that remains inside through the grace associated with God.<br /><br />For example, God did not establish the rules surrounding marriage so as to toss a wet blanket over the fornication follies. Rather, confining the act of human intimacy inside context of marriage balances both the desire for physical pleasure along with the need for lasting enjoy, to say nothing of protecting the individual against the proto-apocalyptic pestilences now ravaging millions. Instead of withering away like a forgotten memory as expected by some, Tim LaHaye hypothesizes in "The Battle For any Family" that the family will really provide a foundation involving stability in times involving unprecedented social turmoil (237).<br /><br />The moral argument for God is far more than a dry academic proof obtained in seminary textbooks. Its the truth is being made more concrete on a daily basis throughout the culture as the nation continues to drift faraway from its Judeo-Christian foundations.<br /><br />With "Turning The Tide: Nov Liberalism & The Increase Of Common Sense", Pat Robertson describes the 2 main possible futures that await the country (293-296). Americans can either repent of their wickedness and return to help God and His principles, experiencing national renewal, person well-being, and eternal salvation along the way. Or, the American people can continue within their sin and deny God's really existence, risking national drop, personal suffering, and eternal damnation as a result. The choice is your choice, with your eternal destiny and also the welfare of your family hanging in the balance.<br /><br />by Frederick Meekins.<br /><br />REFERENCE:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.realestatearticles4u.com/Art/325848/317/Healthy-Habits-For-Expecting-Mothers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realestatearticles4u.com/Art/325848/317/Healthy-Habits-For-Expecting-Mothers.html</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.realestatearticles4u.com/Art/325995/317/Healthy-Habits-For-Women-Who-Are-Pregnant.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realestatearticles4u.com/Art/325995/317/Healthy-Habits-For-Women-Who-Are-Pregnant.html</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.steeparticles.com/41974/85/Healthy-Habits-For-Women-Who-Are-Pregnant.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.steeparticles.com/41974/85/Healthy-Habits-For-Women-Who-Are-Pregnant.html</a></div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top