Skip to main content

Diigo Home
Home/ Groups/ CYHSGovernment09
Tijay Hildebrand

Senate Approves Tight Regulation Over Cigarettes - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • raise prices to remain profitable
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      I find it ironic that this parallels America's dependence on oil. No one is willing to give it up and therefore the oil companies can raise prices without consequence. I think as a nation we are 'Addicted to oil".
  • smoking-related disease
  • smoking-related disease
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • smoking-related disease
  • die each
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      If anything the regulation of tabacco should be stifling upon that industry for the simple fact that they are knowingly poisening people. I understand the argument that it is their body and they should be able to do what they want, however it directly affects those around them.
  • pet food.
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      This is surprising, you would think health and economic issues would take precedent over pet food.
  • ostensibly safer tobacco
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      How safe can they get and still incorporate nicotine which keeps their profit out of the red. It seems like a ploy to bring a rose-colored image to a dark product.
  • protections for commercial speech
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      I will be looking forward to the outcome of such case. They have a point with the first amendment infringment, but congress has some powerful weapons namely the commerce clause and necessary and proper.
Tijay Hildebrand

Senate Approves Tight Regulation Over Cigarettes - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • regulate
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      how have we not acheived all means of regulating tobacco? We tax and control almost all aspects with respect to supply and demand. I am interested in what such hurdles we have yet to pass.
  • regulate
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      Which aspects have we not regulated yet? Im hoping this article goes beyond rhetoric and into detail.
  • reached his desk
  • ...16 more annotations...
  • reached his desk
  • reached his desk
  • reached his desk
  • reached his desk
  • reached his desk
  • reached his desk
  • reached his desk
  • reached his desk
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      One of my biggest complaints about politicians is empty campaign promises Every politician makes claims about issues they will resolve immediately after their election. If they were working at those issues I might be able to keep my peace but the truth is they dont.
  • reached his desk
  • a historic step
  • a historic step
  • historic step
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      Yes, and the first step was it's cultivation.
  • criminal black market
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      This is possibly true, many experts say that nicotine is more addicting than hardcore drugs such as cocaine and heroine.
  • 60 carcinogens and 4,000 toxins
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      The closest airborne pollutant source is green house gases, and even they do not cause a fraction of the deaths that smoking does.
  • 1,000 feet
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      One thing that gets under my skin more so than empty promises is when I see blatantly underage youth smoking. Not only do cigarettes degrade your health but the shear economic drain should be enough to deter someone.
  • cost of smoking
    • Tijay Hildebrand
       
      I do not know the exact numbers, but I heard a speaker say that if someone were to take the money they spend daily on cigarettes and put it into a money market account they could be a millionaire by retirement.
Hayley Ebersole

FOXNews.com - Democrats Weigh Expanding Eligibility for Medicare - 0 views

  • the idea is on the table as part of an emerging compromise under which liberals would back away from their demand for a new government health insurance plan to compete with private carriers.
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      This could possibly make more people happy, there would still be a lot of pushback for it, but it may appease some.
  • A Democratic official described the proposal on condition of anonymity because no decisions have been made. 
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      Anonymity? So even Democrats are unsure about this?
  • a government-run plan that states could opt out of
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      It's becoming a state issue?
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • suggested adding more people to Medicare could undermine the program's already shaky finances.
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      Agreed. I don't think that more people is what is required to help Medicaid, it would most likely only hinder it, not helping the financial situation at all.
  • "Americans would rather get it right than scurry around throwing together last-minute untested experiments to get 60 votes before Christmas,"
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      Generally most Americas don't like it when things are just rushed through Congress and such, it shows that it might not be entirely thorough.
  • Medicare now covers seniors 65 and older, as well as disabled people of any age. People in their mid-50s are among the most vulnerable to losing coverage, particularly in an economy where employers are still cutting jobs. But buying into Medicare would not be cheap. A current buy-in available to those 65 and older who don't qualify because of work history costs about $550 a month. 
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      If it's already expensive for people now, will expanding it to even more people make it less expensive? Is this entirely helpful? Doesn't appear so.
  • But instead of Medicare-for-the-masses, it would be Blue Cross Blue Shield or Kaiser Permanente, albeit with a government seal of approval from the department that handles the health plan for federal employees, including members of Congress. The Office of Personnel Management -- OPM -- would become an instantly recognizable federal acronym, like FDA and CDC. 
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      This confuses me a little. Why does the health care plan need a government seal of approval? Why does the government need to be involved with these health care plans...can't people just buy it on their own?
  • The latest public plan bears little resemblance to the original idea proposed by liberals, and embraced by Obama
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      Of course it's not going to look the exact same. The other side will have wanted some say, so it would've had to have been changed to appease a lot of people.
jordan stauffer

Same-sex marriage bill advances in New Jersey - CNN.com - 0 views

  • The bill cleared the Senate's Judiciary Committee on Monday evening by a vote of 7-6, state Democratic officials said. If the bill is approved by the full Senate, it would move next to the state Assembly.
    • jordan stauffer
       
      Im really surprised this hasn't become a national issue. I mean maybe the whole issue with the national government meddling in to many issues or since marriage is not defined in the constitution it's left to the states may draw an uprising if they were to get envolved but i believe the governemtn needs to step in with the controversy this has been brought about nationally. Its not right that you cold be legally married in one state and then may hae to uproot because of a job opportunity which lands you in a state where gy marriage is not legalized an that marriage becomes invalid. Its not right to determine ones happiness legal but not anothers. An amendment needs to be set in place defining marriage that contains no definition what so ever. It should not be up to the government to decide the validity of someones happiness.
  • epublican Gov.-elect Chris Christie, who takes office next month, has said he would veto it. Outgoing Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine has vowed to sign it.
    • jordan stauffer
       
      Wonderful. hopefully there isn't a republican majority otherwise this bill is long dead in the water. All they need to do is buy some time until Christie takes office and that's the end of that. This encompasses just how unfair this entire issue is. Damn politics.
  • or far too long, a large segment of our population has been denied the fundamental rights and protections of a civil liberty that is granted to all Americans.
    • jordan stauffer
       
      Exactly how i feel. Really I am indifferent. I can't believe there are actually people that wouldnt vote in favor of protecting civil liberties. Thing is most people don't have this thought in mind. Usuallly it involves a moral issue usually evident in regards to republican governments that tend to be christian and their moral values with their twisted interpretation of christianity is what leads to the downfall. As much as they may direct the attention to somewhere else there is the connecton. So much for seperation of church and state. this whole issue angers me so much. I DON'T SEE THE ISSUE WITH THIS "ISSUE." Liberty and justice for all my butt.
Hannah Coligan

Dems weigh temporary Medicare expansion - Capitol Hill- msnbc.com - 0 views

  • Medicare rolls to uninsured middle-aged people able to purchase the coverage.
    • Hannah Coligan
       
      If they make Medicare opitional for middle aged people will there be enough funding for Medicare? They will at least double the amount of users they have now. Will they be able to handle it?
  • available until government subsidies start flowing in 2014
    • Hannah Coligan
       
      I don't think it would be fair to keep it open only for a certain amount of time. Those who missed this opertunity by a "hair" will get very angry and feel like the government is mistreating them. If they are going to make this change it should be concrete.
  • Tuesday
    • Hannah Coligan
       
      Do they honestly think it wil be done in time? The government never meets thier deadlines.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • $550 a month
    • Hannah Coligan
       
      How do the elderly pay for this? They do not have a high income.
Tanner Sanderson

Watered-Down 'Public Plan' Emerges in Senate - 0 views

  • public plan
  • during the 2008 presidential campaign
    • Tanner Sanderson
       
      No surprise there. What politicians promise and what actually then transpires when in office in terms of legislation are typically drastically different.
  • 10-year
    • Tanner Sanderson
       
      What's the average amount of time it takes for a bill of this size and importance to be passed? I know the process is meant to take a while, and that government is slow in general, but ten years seems a little excessive...
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • A vote on an amendment to tightly restrict abortion coverage by health plans receiving federal subsidies could also happen Tuesday.
    • Tanner Sanderson
       
      Regardless of one's view on abortion, is it a strictly necessary procedure? I believe that a universal healthcare plan should only pay for necessary medical procedures, not anything frivolous such as plastic surgery for instance.
  • "It's probably the closest proposal thus far that could get the support of 60 senators.
  • "We need a public option that is a government entity, or established by government," said Richard Kirsch of Health Care for America Now.
  • "What the heck the advantage is, I don't see."
    • Tanner Sanderson
       
      Never, will everyone be happy.
  • with states allowed to opt out.
    • Tanner Sanderson
       
      This is a good addition, states should be allowed to choose, that way more individual freedom is perserved.
  • through new state insurance markets, called exchanges. New markets would create big purchasing pools
    • Tanner Sanderson
       
      Sounds like a lot of government expansion to me.
  • have to be nonprofit
  • hey run the risk of attracting sicker patients who might think the government's seal means less chance of insurance hassles. That would mean higher premiums for those who sign up.
  • away from a government-run plan,
    • Tanner Sanderson
       
      That's right, the plans need to be moved towards more independent/individually run plans.
Erik Bailey

FOXNews.com - Palin Praises Obama Administration for Approving Oil Drilling Off Alaska Coas... - 0 views

  • security for America
    • Erik Bailey
       
      It would provide security from relying on middle east countries for oil. If we drilled for our own oil there wouldnt be a reason to deal with those countries.
  • prosperity for Alaska
    • Erik Bailey
       
      How would destroying the land be prosperous? This doesnt make any sense. Was this decision voted upon or was it Obama saying go ahead and drill?
  • Erik Bailey
     
    Palin commended Obama's decision to start drilling for oil off the coast of Alaska.
Raphael Caloia

FOXNews.com - Reid Compares Opponents of Health Care Reform to Supporters of Slavery - 0 views

  • comparing Republicans who oppose health care reform to lawmakers who clung to the institution of slavery more than a century ago. 
    • Raphael Caloia
       
      How can he even make this compaison they are very differnt issues.
  • Sen. Strom Thurmond, then a Democrat, who unsuccessfully tried to filibuster the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and it was Republicans who led the charge against slavery. 
    • Raphael Caloia
       
      I really do not think he was making this about the partys but was saying people do not agree with me so they must be bad like the people who did not support civil rights.
  • stalling tactics
    • Raphael Caloia
       
      Pretty much every party has done this on pretty much every bill they do not agree with. Wouldnt it be the same thing when the Democrats do this to a bill they dont like so shouldnt he say the same thing about himself.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Instead of joining us on the right side of history
    • Raphael Caloia
       
      Health care reform even is not really a historical event. Maybe that is just my opinon but I do not think this is what our age will be remembered for.
  • Reid's office stood by the remarks
    • Raphael Caloia
       
      He should be forced to make an aplagy like Joe Wilson was forced to for just saying "You lie".
  • remarks were over the top. 



    • Raphael Caloia
       
      Not only that but very unprefesinal. He cannot be taken serucly when he is making comments like this.
Stephanie Grant

Senate Democrats eye alternatives to public option - CNN.com - 0 views

  • Liberal and moderate Senate Democrats
    • Stephanie Grant
       
      It's interesting that the Liberal and Moderate Senate Democrats are the ones that are creating this plan. Where are the Republicans? Do they really want no part in creating this? They need to be more realistic and both need to be more comprimising, as always.
  • The bill requires support from all 60 members of the Democratic caucus to pass.
    • Stephanie Grant
       
      I can see why they are taking their time for a few senators of each democratic group to come together and work something out. Clearly, they need to please everyone for this to work. It is also interesting that the Senate republicans, then, unanimously oppose the health care bill so far.
  • it would be a compromise likely to please no one but prove acceptable to all, he said.
    • Stephanie Grant
       
      That is an interesting way to say it. I guess all of the Democrats are passionate enough about getting ANY bill passed that they are willing to not be competely happy.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • There are no insurmountable obstacles," Pryor said. "We continue to resolve outstanding issues.
    • Stephanie Grant
       
      If there were 5 liberals and 5 moderates, I am a little surprised that they are having any difficulty coming up with a solutiuon. Lately it seems that the republicans are the ones that are branching out and becoming less united as a party. But I guess the same can be seen on the other side of the spectrum.
  • private insurers must get such approval to offer coverage in the federal health insurance program for government workers.
    • Stephanie Grant
       
      I have no idea what this change means? How does it affect anyone besides those working for the government or does it at all?
  • low-profit or nonprofit competition for private insurers
    • Stephanie Grant
       
      I agree with the public option supporters that creating low-profit or nonprofit competitions for private insurers is vital for REAL health insurance reform.
  • liberal Democrats the lower-priced competition they seek.
    • Stephanie Grant
       
      while I'm reading this, I can't help saying in my head WALMART WALMART. Ha oh those low-price competitions.
  • Americans to buy into Medicare starting at age 55. Currently, Medicare coverage begins at age 65, with some exceptions.
    • Stephanie Grant
       
      This would definitely make the liberal Democrats happy that are looking to expand health coverage to more people.
  • how to pay for it were still being worked out, according to sources close to the talks.
    • Stephanie Grant
       
      I didn'y think about that. But it would cost a lot more to add those 10 years to the plan and that is going to be right around the babyboom ages too.
  • bill that gives money to states to allow them to cover low-income people through existing programs instead of Medicai
    • Stephanie Grant
       
      I would be interested in hearing about the programs that they want to add. But just hearing the general idea, I don't like it.
  • would need some Republicans to back the bill in order for it to pass.
    • Stephanie Grant
       
      Haha good luck with that when they all unanimously opposed the idea before.
Jocelyn Hudson

Permanent 'death' tax passes House - 0 views

  • A bill that would make the 2009 estate tax level permanent — 45 percent and $3.5 million per person exemption — has been approved by the House of Representatives.
    • Jocelyn Hudson
       
      The House of Representatives passed a bill that allows the tax levels to stay permanent for year 2009. For some people this can be good but for some it can be brutal because people with high taxes will not be able to get them lowered. The flaw to this bill is the 45 percent and 3.5 million per person exemption.
  • The purpose of this bill is to establish clarity and certainty in the tax code for the estate tax while exempting 99.7 percent of the estates in this country from this estate tax altogether,”
    • Jocelyn Hudson
       
      Although this bill has a clear purpose, the estate tax that is leftover if a spouse dies will not be given to the other that is still alive. That rises the question of what happens to the rest of the taxes? What is the point of estate tax if only 99% of the whole entire country has to pay the tax. Honestly, I think that more people should have to pay the tax because .3% is very little and that is not enough to sustain the meaning of the bill.
  • “Farmers and ranchers are often forced to sell off land, equipment, or even the entire ranch just to pay off tax liabilities. This is money that could otherwise be re-invested to grow the family business and hand it down to future generations,”
    • Jocelyn Hudson
       
      Although I believe more people should have to pay the tax, It should be a variety of people not just the people who own farmers and ranchers. The taxes are so high on this group that the article mentions they have to sell land and farm equipment just to pay off taxes. That is absolutely ridiculous since farms are a necessity in order to produce crops. As stated by NCBA I also agree that the money being sent to taxes can be invested into the farm for the better of the environment and the business as a whole. Future generations will be able to use that money to keep the farming business going and then in turn more great crops will be grown.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • “This is not a tax on the ‘wealthy elite,’” Voogt says. “It is a huge burden — and in some cases, a death sentence
    • Jocelyn Hudson
       
      Vogut is explaining that this tax is not for the wealthy but it is alot of money. As a result many people refer to the tax as a death sentence because it forces people to sell their farms which are basically their small businesses in order to sustain themselves in this society. Their source of income is eliminated when there is a solution that should allow them to keep their estates and property.
  • Some Democrats said the legislation represents a compromise between Republicans’ preference for repeal and a bipartisan plan to extend the current estate tax through 2010 and, over the following 10 years, reduce the rate from 45 percent to 35 percent while raising the exemption from $3.5 million to $5 million for individuals.
    • Jocelyn Hudson
       
      This proposition described in this paragraph is suppose to be a compromise between the Democrats and the Republicans but, it adds more complications to the taxes for the public. The years for the taxes to stay the same are prolonged and the rate is reduced from 45 to 35 percent. However, the exemption is raised from 3.5 million to 5 million in a longer period of time. More money is being expected to be collected with more time to compile it.
Liz Mylin

UPDATE:US High Court Questions Constitutionality Of Accounting Board - WSJ.com - 0 views

  • Conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices appeared sympathetic Monday to concerns
    about the constitutionality of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act's handling of
    appointments to an independent board that oversees public company accounting
    firms.
    • Liz Mylin
       
      Many Justices don't view the SEC board as an unconstitutinal body, especially Justice Sonia Sotomayor who doesn't see much fault in the boards delegations of responsibilities and duties.
  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
    • Liz Mylin
       
      This was set up by Congress in order to oversee public company accountants
  • SEC, which is independent from the White House.
    • Liz Mylin
       
      The United States SEC program has been made to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation. Although has it been living up to these standards in more recent years?
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • Supreme Court case as a way to reopen the accounting statute writ large
    • Liz Mylin
       
      The true motives of Congress was to actually create an accounting facilitator that was independent from all other accounting firms.
  • The president has adequate control over the SEC only because he can dismiss the
    chairman of the SEC
    • Liz Mylin
       
      The control and central power of this board must reside in the members of the SEC, the chairman is just a "talking head".
  • collateral consequences" on companies that don't comply with its requests
    • Liz Mylin
       
      An important detail in the case, since they aren't required to attain imput from the SEC
  • Kagan said the president could call the SEC chairman or commissioners and
    say, "I have a problem with this."

    • Liz Mylin
       
      Many justices still don't assume that the accounting board is an unconstitutional body. Justice Sonia Sotomayor questioned how the accounting board's situation....it is similar in the regards that the SEC baord is behaving in a manor how an employer/boss delegates responsibilities and duties
  • "It's this thing out there running rampant that nobody can check,"
    • Liz Mylin
       
      CATO argues that independent institutions like this in fact violate the constitution because the boards are accountable to people elected to power
  • "the accounting profession would be torn in two diametrically opposite
    directions, and the SEC's policy objectives would be lost."
    • Liz Mylin
       
      The case will most likely end up with a majority in support of SEC, and a dissenting opinion written by Justices, Roberts and Alito. They seem to see it unfair how the president and board members have large salaries and how they determine thier own salaries.
  • I do think the market and investors benefit from having this oversight
    structure,"
    • Liz Mylin
       
      I agree.. the Center for Audit Quality also believes that the board is good for markets
Kati Decker

Lawmakers question 2011 Afghan exit plan - CNN.com - 0 views

  • Conservative and liberal lawmakers Wednesday sharply criticized President Obama's plan to start a U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in July 2011.
    • Kati Decker
       
      I agree, is this really a reasonable idea and date to withdrawl troops? Bush has attempted to do so before and it never really worked out.
  • Most Republicans backed the president's decision to send more troops.
    • Kati Decker
       
      That's because they think that having troops over in Afghanistan is the only way to win the war on terrorism.
  • when a U.S. departure from the war-torn country would begin.
    • Kati Decker
       
      I never would have even thought of that. But he did, now as soon as well pull out, there will be a massive coup on the Afghanistan government.
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • They questioned whether the war is winnable.
    • Kati Decker
       
      Depends on which war they are talking about. The war to free Afghanistan or the war on terrorism.
  • "I simply cannot understand and cannot agree with this approach,"

    • Kati Decker
       
      I don't think that really anyone backs Obama's idea to have a due date on troop withdrawls.But he is relativley new and this could just be a beginners mistake.
  • Gates noted the administration will conduct "a thorough review" of the Afghan strategy in December 2010.
    • Kati Decker
       
      Maybe they should have montly meetings about the situation, so that they can better monitor changes and make the needed adjustments.
  • The new strategy is designed to eliminate al Qaeda in Afghanistan and help the Afghan government defeat the Taliban insurgency, while bolstering Pakistan's anti-terrorism efforts.
    • Kati Decker
       
      Well that wont happen now that they know when we plan on leaving. They will just end up lying low until we get out, and the coup the place.
  • leaving, but what we have done ... is to signal very clearly to all audiences that the United States is not interested in occupying Afghanistan."
    • Kati Decker
       
      American's do not want this to end up being another Vietnam War, which it looks like it is going to end up being.
  • They also indicated the initial transfers of responsibility will take place in areas marked by less fighting.
    • Kati Decker
       
      Are the officals taking over going to be elected into office? Because if so, the ball needs to get moving
  • White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs dismissed GOP claims that the Taliban and al Qaeda could wait out the surge and return after the start of a U.S. withdrawal in 2011.

    • Kati Decker
       
      He may think it wont happen, but he also now has to convince the entire American public that it wont happen, not to mention the Afghanistans who have relied on us for years now.
  • "We've been there eight years now and we're still talking about turning it around," said Rep. Bill Delahunt, D-Massachusetts. "Is [another] 18 months going to be sufficient?
    • Kati Decker
       
      How do we know that these people haven't become so dependent on us that when we leave, they will fall apart?
  • "A stable security situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan, one that is sustainable over the long term by their governments, is vital to our national security," Gates said.
    • Kati Decker
       
      Vital? Yes. Achieveable? Not so much. We haven't done it in 8 years, how are we going to do it in 18 months
  • At the same time, Obama included an early date to begin withdrawing forces to signal that the U.S. commitment would not be endless.
    • Kati Decker
       
      Then why set a date?
  • We will continue to advise and assist Afghanistan's security forces to ensure that they can succeed over the long haul.
    • Kati Decker
       
      And create another bin laden arrangement? Don't think that is such a swell idea.
  • The additional 30,000 troops would begin deploying early next year at "the fastest pace possible," Obama said.
    • Kati Decker
       
      Then why didn't we deploy 30,000 troops before now so that we could get out of there sooner?
David Drosdick

FOXNews.com - Senators Push for Amendment to Restrict Funding for Abortion Coverage in Bill... - 0 views

    • David Drosdick
       
      To be honest, I don't see how this is problematic. While I do see a problem with banning those under the health care bill from receiving an abortion when they are willing to pay for it out of their own pocket, I don't see the problem with not using tax payer money for "birth control abortions". Its agreed across party lines to pay for abortions where the mother's life is in danger.
  • If Nelson's amendment fails to pass, the issue will likely fall on the shoulders of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who may face the daunting task of trying to strike a compromise on the issue.
    • David Drosdick
       
      This, however, is the part that gripes me. Both sides grudgingly acknowledge that compromise is something that is nesscary and required in today's world of politics, but neither are willing to be the side to compromise.
  • "This amendment violates the spirit of health care reform by effectively prohibiting women from using their own money to buy private health insurance that provides comprehensive reproductive health care benefits," Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement Monday. "Health care reform is meant to guarantee quality, affordable health care coverage for all, not take benefits away from American women."
    • David Drosdick
       
      After reading this, however, I know what side of the fence I'm on. If a woman is willing to pay her own abortion, and not receive federal aid for it, why shouldn't they be able to have an abortion? While I can see why an individual would be opposed to getting one, why force your own morals onto someone else?
Matt Varner

Senate health care debate to focus on abortion - CNN.com - 0 views

    • Matt Varner
       
      the way this is worded, it would seem that someone not covered by this plan is free to go... but if someone used their own money to get one, is that alright...?
  • an amendment to tighten restrictions on federal funding for abortion.
    • Matt Varner
       
      ahh yes, because this bill isn't already complicated and controversial enough. I can understand why they might want a section on it, but the way the government has handled it so far has been fine... why make this bill so much more complex?
  • prevents any health plan receiving federal subsidies from offering coverage for abortion.
  • ...6 more annotations...
    • Matt Varner
       
      uhhh....?

      define private market. Becuase if it's what I'm thinking it means, no Amerian would be able to buy, well, anything.
  • expand the current level of restriction because women receiving coverage under a federally subsidized health care plan would be barred from purchasing abortion coverage with their own money.
    • Matt Varner
       
      why would private money from only a person, not even an insurance company, have the slightest bearing on whether or not women under the plan should be allowed to get abortions with their own money? I would have to agree with the anti-abortion people on this one... if what I percieve from this article is true.
  • You can't use private money in the private market
  • The House adopted the restrictive language as part of a last-minute concession to anti-abortion legislators who threatened to defeat the health care bill without a vote on the provision.
    • Matt Varner
       
      This screams to me that they really don't care about abortion in this proposal, but rather, are using it to get votes.
  • "The question now is whether or not we're going to get it done,"
    • Matt Varner
       
      Whiiiiiich.... it won't. The way this is going.
  • "There was no interest in drafting a proposal that was in the political middle," McConnell said, adding that Democrats wrote a bill "that Republicans couldn't in good conscience support."
    • Matt Varner
       
      It has to be in the middle. I don't think it is right now, but it can't be swayed more towards the right because all the liberals won't vote on it and the right will be full of hypocrites. (Surprise, surprise...)
  • Matt Varner
     
    Today in the Senate, the prime focus was completely on the issue of abortion being provided under the proposed government option passed by the House of Representatives. According to the pro-life Senators, the level of government involvement in the proposed bill is equal to that of the level now: Federal money for abortions only in the case of rape, incest, and threat of life to the mother.

    However, pro-choice advocates claim that this language has a hidden glitch: because the public option is run by the government and receives federal funds, no woman in America will be able to have an abortion from their own funds.
Zach Heaton

Obama aides fine-tune meaning of Afghan withdrawal date - CNN.com - 0 views

  • (CNN) -- Top aides to President Obama on Sunday signaled that some U.S. troops could start coming home from Afghanistan as soon as July 2011, but most would likely remain there for several years.
    • Zach Heaton
       
      I don't necessarily agree with what president Obama did however, he is the one in charge of leading this country. Therefore i must respect his decision. Over the past couple weeks, Obama has been under heavy fire for his controversial decision. I think he had a good reason for this and therefore should not rushing troops home to please their families and the public. The soldiers knew that this was a possibility and i don't understand why they are putting up such a fight.
  • National Security Adviser Gen. James Jones told CNN's "State of the Union" that the July 2011 start of withdrawal was "not a cliff, it's a ramp" for beginning to turn over security responsibility to Afghan forces

    • Zach Heaton
       
      I don't think we should rush this. We must be 500% sure that they are ready for this new way of life. Though it will be amazing to have our soldiers home and our money going into the economy, we also cannot set ourselves up for another collapse, invasion, or disaster like 9/11.
    • Zach Heaton
       
      If this is the case then we need to put our focus their instead of Iraq. If we knew that this was as imprtant then why did we shift our focus from here to Iraq. How is Iraq related to Afghanistan.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • The challenge has been to meet the need cited by military leaders for more troops and resources to wipe out terrorist networks in Afghanistan and to help the Afghan government overcome the Taliban insurgency, while satisfying the Democratic Party's liberal base, which opposes the deployment of more troops.
    • Zach Heaton
       
      This is frustrating because everyone is worrying about making people happy with their decisions. Well first, the people and normal citizens here today in the united states, have no clue what is going on over seas. We don't know how it is over their to let us have the right to tell Obama it is time to get out. The only information that we get is what biased news channels want us to hear. Second, life is not beautiful, instead of worrying about pleasing the people and worrying about if youre going to get elected for a second term. Instead we need to focus on what really matters and that is the protection because if we all die due to insurgents, then we won't have to worry about that. So if we want to be here to see tomorrow then we need to focus on what matters most.
  • Video: No finite time in South Asia<script type="text/javascript">
    var mediaObj = new Object();
    mediaObj.type = 'video';
    mediaObj.contentId = '';
    mediaObj.source = '/video/politics/2009/12/06/jones.no.finite.time.south.asia.cnn';
    mediaObj.source = mediaObj.source.replace('/video/','');

    </script>








    <script type="text/javascript">


    mediaObj.lgImage = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('src');
    mediaObj.lgImageX = 640;
    mediaObj.lgImageY = currExpandableHeight;
    mediaObj.origImageX = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('width');
    mediaObj.origImageY = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('height');



    mediaObj.contentType = 'Video';







    CNN.expElements.expand2Store = mediaObj;
    </script>















    <script type="text/javascript">
    var currExpandable = "expand3";



    var currExpandableHeight = 360;



    </script>












    Video: Karzai on troop increase<script type="text/javascript">
    var mediaObj = new Object();
    mediaObj.type = 'video';
    mediaObj.contentId = '';
    mediaObj.source = '/video/world/2009/12/06/intv.amanpour.karzai.cnn';
    mediaObj.source = mediaObj.source.replace('/video/','');

    </script>








    <script type="text/javascript">


    mediaObj.lgImage = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('src');
    mediaObj.lgImageX = 640;
    mediaObj.lgImageY = currExpandableHeight;
    mediaObj.origImageX = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('width');
    mediaObj.origImageY = $(currExpandable).select('img.box-image')[0].readAttribute('height');



    mediaObj.contentType = 'Video';







    CNN.expElements.expand3Store = mediaObj;
    </script>


















    <script type="text/javascript">
    var cnnRelatedTopicKeys = [];
    </script>

    RELATED TOPICS

    • <script type="text/javascript">
      cnnRelatedTopicKeys.push('Afghanistan');
      </script>Afghanistan

    • <script type="text/javascript">
      cnnRelatedTopicKeys.push('Barack_Obama');
      </script>Barack Obama

    • <script type="text/javascript">
      cnnRelatedTopicKeys.push('James_Jones');
      </script>James Jones

    • <script type="text/javascript">
      cnnRelatedTopicKeys.push('Robert_Gates');
      </script>Robert Gates

















    <!--endclickprintexclude-->

    Gates explained the rationale for sending more forces on ABC's "This Week," saying the Afghan-Pakistani border is "the epicenter of extremist jihad."

    "And al Qaeda has close relationships with the Taliban in Afghanistan, and they have very close relationships with the Taliban in Pakistan," Gates continued. "The Taliban in Pakistan have been attacking Pakistani civilians, Pakistani government officials, military officials, trying to destabilize the government of Pakistan."

    Any success by the Taliban in either Afghanistan or Pakistan benefits al Qaeda, Gates said, adding that "any safe haven on either side of the border creates opportunities for them to recruit, get new funds and do operational planning."

  • In addition, Gates warned on NBC's "Meet the Press" that U.S. casualties "will probably continue to grow" as troops take on Taliban strongholds. However, Gates rejected a comparison to the Soviet Union's decision in 1985 to send more troops to bolster its occupation of Afghanistan, which ended in failure less than two years later.
    • Zach Heaton
       
      We should not be suprised by this. Death in war. They come as one. What do you expect to happen when you send people in another persons territory?. Of course people are going to die you can't prevent that. What war has there been without casualties? None. The soldiers knew this from the time they strapped those boots on ad buttoned up that shirt. So why are we making this a big deal. I know it is not what we want but instead of crying about it we could help out and try and end it.
  • Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the unsuccessful GOP presidential candidate last year, told NBC's "Meet the Press" that a strategy must be flexible to succeed, rather than limited by a set timetable.

    • Zach Heaton
       
      I agree because no one can tell the future. If we want to succeed then we must make room for error. If something goes wrong or an engineer misses a mountain in his drwing then we must know how to adapt to that and make changes to our plan of attack.
Katherine Grimaldi

6 suspects in high school gang rape enter not guilty pleas - CNN.com - 0 views

  • ntered not guilty pleas Tuesday
    • Katherine Grimaldi
       
      I don't know if they realize on how much trouble and judging that. They are making themselves look more mysterious by saying they aren't guilty of something that its obvious to the rest that its true. By what I understand they have a option of three things to say, if it would have been me in their position I would have answered with no contest.
  • ack of evidence,
    • Katherine Grimaldi
       
      I wonder if this "evidence" that is lacking, mysteriously was gained in a unlawful matter and they are letting him go just because they don't want to seem ignorant. I don't know that it is like this but its just makes me feel like that.
  • preliminary hearing
    • Katherine Grimaldi
       
      Would they be allowed to have a counsel with them? I'm just wondering because isn't that in certain occassions thay aren't permitted to have them present with them.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • 10 people were involved
    • Katherine Grimaldi
       
      Whatever happened to those three that aren't being even being questioned. This is serious matter, and it seems like nothing is being done about it lately. Some people are let off so easily, its embarrasing.
  • 10 people watched the attack, which lasted more than two hours, without calling 911,
    • Katherine Grimaldi
       
      First, I don't know how these people could have the heart not to do something about this. Second I wonder if they could be punished in any way. Its not like I enjoy seeing people being punished but if someone doesn't pay the consequences then who will?
  • such an attack never happens again.
    • Katherine Grimaldi
       
      I agree with this 100% like many colleges already go through this so often that we don't need that to pass unto the high schools.
  • Katherine Grimaldi
     
    In Contra Costa County a teenage girl was raped during a high school dance on October 24 and there were people watching while it happened. As of now there are six boys involved with the case because the seventh boy was released because of lack of evidence. They entered not guilty pleas and On January 21 a date will be set for a preliminary hearing.
Hayley Ebersole

Security Threats Inside and Out for 9/11 Trial - 0 views

  • Hot sauce and a comb were all an Al Qaeda suspect in New York needed to nearly kill one of his guards nine years ago. The bloody episode suggests that security worries in bringing Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and other 9/11 suspects to trial here could be just as big inside the courthouse as outside.
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      Things such as this should just not be available to them, anything that can be used as a weapon should be taken away. Only things like food, and soap. They can't be used as weapons.
  • Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to New York to face a civilian federal trial.
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      A civilian trial? They aren't civilians...
  • The prosecution is planned for a court complex just blocks from where the World Trade Center towers were destroyed in the attack blamed on these men.
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      This is going to upset a lot of people...
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • The courthouse is among the most secure in the nation, ringed by closed-off streets, 24-hour guard posts, anti-truck-bomb barricades and street video cameras so powerful that they can read the print off a passerby's newspaper.
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      That's a lot of security, as there should be.
  • Salim surprised Pepe by using a squeezable plastic honey bear container filled with hot sauce as a kind of homemade pepper spray that temporarily blinded the guard.
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      Why did he have this?
  • The prison is not very secure
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      It's a prison, why isn't it very secure? Especially if it houses terrorists.
  • It is likely, though, that the attorney general will approve extra security called "special administrative measures" -- reserved for the most dangerous prisoners. SAMs, as they are called, prohibit a defendant from communicating with other prisoners, the media, or anyone not connected to their legal defense.
    • Hayley Ebersole
       
      The 9/11 terrorists are SAMs, correct?
Matt Varner

Suspect in Custody in Oklahoma Murders of 4, Including Pregnant Reality Show Prostitute - L... - 0 views

  • ncluding a prostitute featured in the HBO reality series "Cathouse,"
    • Matt Varner
       
      I guess she's a real prostitute then...? not just an actress?
  • on six murder complaints, because authorities say two of the victims — 22-year olds Brooke Phillips and Milagrous Barrerra — both were pregnant.
    • Matt Varner
       
      So I guess in Oklahoma, a fetus is considered a human life? I'd love to know what their state's stance is on when a fetus is considered a person.
  • ...6 more annotations...
    • Matt Varner
       
      So he took all the bodies AND put them in a house... nobody noticed that until it was SET ON FIRE??
    • Matt Varner
       
      They don't have motive, maybe he's just really messed up.

      Does one fact lead to the other? Thinking he acted with a partner lead to motive or vice versa.
    • Matt Varner
       
      Enough evidence gone to maybe let this guy go?
  • Firefighters discovered the four bodies Nov. 9 in a burning home on the city's southwest side.
  • "We don't believe he acted alone," Knight said. "We've identified the one suspect, but that doesn't yet tell us what his motive is for doing this."
  • Efforts to identify the victims has been slow because all four bodies were badly burned, Knight said.
  • Matt Varner
     
    A prostitute featured in the HBO reality series "Cathouse", along with three others, were murdered, and someone has stepped forward and turned himself in. He will be charged (although not formally charged) with six murders, because two of the women murdered were pregnant. No motive for the killings has been established, and the police believe that he didn't act alone.

Kati Decker

Pentagon bars release of photos allegedly showing detainee abuse - CNN.com - 0 views

  • urging the Supreme Court to dismiss a lower court ruling ordering the photos to be publicly disclosed, according to court documents.
    • Kati Decker
       
      Why would someone want these images released to the public? I think that it would do more detriment than good.
  • efense Secretary Robert Gates notified the high court late Friday that he was issuing an order to block the release.
    • Kati Decker
       
      Why hadn't the case just been heard by the Supreme Court in the first place. I understand the different paths to get to the Supreme Court but this has to do with terrorism, so why not just jump the gun.
  • years-long lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union. Congress last month gave the Obama administration specific authority to prevent any release of the 44 photos. Afterward, Gates signed a certificate of authorization, or order, to prevent the photos' release, saying their disclosure would endanger U.S. troops serving abroad.
    • Kati Decker
       
      Then why does this have to be heard by the Supreme court, and why was it heard by any other court in the first place? These photos should just be burned once and for all.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • The Pentagon initially was set to release the images of Iraqi and Afghan prisoners in response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the ACLU.
    • Kati Decker
       
      Its just a terrible idea to do that! Why would you? It would only make the American people more upset.
  • The photos currently at issue are separate from those first publicly released in 2006 showing abuse of Muslim men held at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison.
    • Kati Decker
       
      I dont honestly know why someone would take pictures of such a terrible thing. I mean really? Why would you want to have not only have the memory but the photos of the horrific ordeals with you forever.
  • Newest Justice Sonia Sotomayor had served on that appeals court until August, but was not involved in that particular case.
    • Kati Decker
       
      I wonder how she will decide on these cases
  • The Senate in May voted for the Detainee Photographic Records Protection Act, which would limit the reach of the Freedom of Information Act request in this instance. The House adopted a similar provision in October.
    • Kati Decker
       
      People are stupid. THey shouldnt do these kinds of things and take pictures as evidence for what they don't want to be seen. That way they wouldnt have to protect themseleves
  • But in June 2008, the Supreme Court allowed Guantanamo prisoners to challenge their captivity in federal court, and the justices in December urged the lower court to reconsider its decision against the British detainees.
    • Kati Decker
       
      This is all so stupid. Just dont take pictures of things that you dont want to be seen or have to protect your butt for. Absolutley idiotic and immature.
Erik Bailey

Court Won't Hear Appeal From Group Who Says NFL's 'Redskins' Name Offensive - Local News | ... - 0 views

  • 17-year court battle
    • Erik Bailey
       
      17 years? Why would she keep wasting her time with this. Its obvious they won't overturn this and take away the trademark so they have to change their name. Nothing has changed in the name that will stop this.
  • change their name
    • Erik Bailey
       
      That wouldn't be fair for them to have to change their name. They've been called the Redskins for a long time and it would be stupid for them to now have to change it. There are plenty of other names that might be considered "offensive" also so this is just one in many.
  • declared invalid
    • Erik Bailey
       
      What would declaring them "invalid" do? Say someone else had a problem with another team name, could they go to court to try to have it declared invalid too? This case is pretty stupid in my opinion.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • legal action at the time
    • Erik Bailey
       
      Why is this just coming up now? The American Indians should have protested this as the team was being formed if they truly had a problem with the name. Maybe then they could have stopped it and we wouldn't have this issue today. You can't all of a sudden decide to try to change a team with so much history, deciding after the fact that it is offensive.
  • join the lawsuit
    • Erik Bailey
       
      This is fair that the people join the lawsuit because they now find it offensive. However there are so many people who aren't bothered by the name so they aren't overwhelmed with demand. I don't see how this is really relevant though.
  • 18 to 24
    • Erik Bailey
       
      These are just young people. They might not understand the true heritage of the Native Americans so im not so sure their claims can be taken seriously. They might be doing this just because.
  • offensive or racist
    • Erik Bailey
       
      It is maybe a little racist. There is no way someone could name their team the n*****s so this is basically the same level of disrespect to those people. The problem is that they have had the name for so long that with all of the legal issues there would be it is almost impossible to force them to change their name.
  • Erik Bailey
     
    Some people believe the name Redskins is too offensive and the football team should have to get rid of it and the courts won't hear it.
  • Erik Bailey
     
    Some people believe the name Redskins is too offensive and the football team should have to get rid of it and the courts won't hear it.
  • Erik Bailey
     
    Some people believe the name Redskins is too offensive and the football team should have to get rid of it and the courts won't hear it.
1 - 20 of 194 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page
Apply to join this group